June 16, 2005
So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish
Little Miss Attila should be home any time now from her vacation.
I sure hope she gets a good night's sleep before she discovers the hairball that I accidentally hacked up in her Persian sweater drawer. I'm sorry. I don't know what came over me...
The houseplants aren't my fault though. They fell over by themselves. I swear! I was just sitting there. Well, ok. There WAS a bird at the window momentarily...
Thanks anyway! I appreciated the opportunity. For the rest of you, don't forget that my usual drivel can be found here at Desert Cat's Paradise.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
Posted by: Desert Cat at
09:37 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My cashmere! Noooooooooooooo!
Thank, DC. It was great to have you filling in here. I'll be sending a case of Fancy Feast along.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 17, 2005 01:09 PM (8e5bN)
2
And mousies! Nice juicy mousies!
Just because. DC's a fun guest blogger. Hairballs and all.
Posted by: k at June 18, 2005 04:37 AM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 15, 2005
AutoBlogger
Got an active blog? Need to be away from it for a while?
AutoBlogger is the perfect solution:
As anyone who has ever had one can tell you, the
experience of running a popular blog/online
journal is a double-edged sword.
While it may be gratifying to know your words are
viewed by hundreds or even thousands of readers
per day, the challenge of developing fresh content
on a regular basis remains a constant struggle for
even the most creative of souls.
In the cutthroat world of online writing, every
blogger is only as good as his last update.
You have a life.
AutoBlogger helps you live it.™
What a way to bust through writer's block! Software to do it for you.
I just need this.
It's fascinating to see who some of the BIG NAMES IN BLOGGING are who utilize this software.
dead mousie to SondraK
Posted by: Desert Cat at
08:29 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wait! Wait! Before you tell me, yes I know.
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 15, 2005 08:44 PM (xdX36)
Posted by: k at June 15, 2005 11:53 PM (6krEN)
3
DC's just fending off a few of the obvious insults, I suspect
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 16, 2005 08:45 PM (8e5bN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Preach It!
Bush:
"If leaders of the other party have innovative ideas, let's hear them. But if they have no ideas or policies except obstruction, they should step aside and let others lead,"
The truth is, they have ideas and policies. Their reluctance to push for them openly in the "arena of ideas", stems from their knowledge that those policies tend to be rather unpopular except amongst a hard core of supporters (think HillaryCare).
Nice move, goading the other side to expose its positions. They won't of course, (unless they don't mind losing again). But that too sends a message. The majority isn't so dumb that they can't tell the difference between real policy proposals and obfuscation and rhetoric.
More at DRUDGE REPORT
Update: More HERE
Posted by: Desert Cat at
08:11 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't really have anything to say. I just felt sorry for you because you have so few comments on your blog.
Posted by: nicky at June 15, 2005 02:48 PM (lRgA6)
2
Exactly.
OT: This should be forwarded to Attila Girl and anyone else you know. Re. The "Reverend" Fred Phelps protesting a military funeral. And for what?
commonsenserunswild
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at June 15, 2005 03:14 PM (U2Wim)
3
Nicky, don't worry about me. I'm just thrilled to have ten times the readers this week than I usually have on my own blog.
Now if I could just get over this "writer's block" (feels kinda like a cramp in my side actually...) and post something truly entertaining and controversial. Aaugh! The pressure!
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 15, 2005 05:01 PM (n/TmV)
4
Hey-- I won't be home until tomorrow night, and then I'll be recovering from my vacation: I have stories to tell, but I'm exhausted, and five hours on a teensy plane seat won't help much, I imagine.
Nicky, at least we have blogs. Mostly, my readers wait until they have something to say before they open their virtual mouths . . . don't cry for me, Argentina.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 15, 2005 05:30 PM (g9iJH)
5
Per Senator, Democrats have introduced more bills than Republicans. Most Democratic bills are generally locked up in Committees, which is why they aren't mentioned. (Okay, I'm guessing on the last part, but I know it to be true in certain instances.
)
Hope you enjoyed your trip, Atilla.
Posted by: Steven at June 15, 2005 06:07 PM (xTI2S)
6
I'm pretty sure you know it's not raw numbers of introduced bills that matter. When you're in the minority, it's easy to introduce bills you know will go nowhere, just so you can show your base how committed you are to their ideals.
The larger issue is the reluctance of many (if not most) Democrats in leadership to engage publically on the level of ideas. The reason is simple.
For example, Walter Mondale ran as an unabashed liberal and was solidly trounced for it. Clinton ran as a centrist and won. But the lessons of 1984 were lost by 1994. When HillaryCare was unveiled, the repercussions involved the loss of the House of Representatives, and from then onward, Clinton limited himself to "microinitiatives", and taking credit for some of what the Republican Congress accomplished. Gore ran to the left of Clinton and lost, despite the overwhelming odds in his favor, considering the economy and his incumbency.
So what you end up seeing is a lot of extreme rhetoric--mostly devoid of alternative ideas and substantive visions--emanating from the left, while the right has it's ideas front and center, up for debate. Privatization of Social Security, medical malpractice reform, tax cuts, the war on terror, etc, etc.
"Yaay for Howard Dean!" At least the next couple of years will be entertaining.
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 15, 2005 07:00 PM (xdX36)
7
Hi, Just chiming in because I pitied your pathetic blog and lack of comments.
But don't worry; I'm not attacking you, the person -- just your hapless lack of ideas.
Love and hugs, shits and giggles.
Posted by: Baltic at June 22, 2005 06:20 AM (pSoT7)
8
Thank you, Troll. You comment at my pleasure, so do keep that in mind for the future.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 22, 2005 07:31 AM (8e5bN)
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 22, 2005 09:05 PM (xdX36)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 13, 2005
Iran Ripe For Counterrevolution?
If Lebanon is any indication of how it happens, revolution may be imminent in Iran.
Why?
PROTEST BABES!:
"Hundreds of women staged an unauthorized demonstration in Tehran today, protesting sex discrimination under Iran's Islamic leadership just days before the June 17 presidential elections.
The protest was the first public display of dissent by women since the 1979 revolution, when the new regime enforced obligatory veiling.
"We are women, we are the children of this land, but we have no rights," they chanted. More than 250 marched outside Tehran University, and about 200 others demonstrated two blocks away after hundreds of riot police swarmed in and barred them from joining the main protest."
Click the link above for the rest of the story, AND photos.
More HERE from Ace.
Posted by: Desert Cat at
07:07 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Iran's got some hotties, I must say.
All that needs to happen for them to get some equal rights and equal time and whatever else they want, is nothing ...in the bedroom!
Posted by: Ciggy at June 14, 2005 07:46 AM (0B3lJ)
2
Iranians think they can bring about a revolution without a fight. What fools !
They will learn that without killing the enemy, they only kill themselves. And waste precious time and oportunity in the process. The enemy is Islam, do something about it.
Posted by: wxjames at June 14, 2005 03:30 PM (yfsWy)
3
This is really encouraging. The collapse of the mullacracy in Iran would be about the best thing I could imagine. Iran is one very large domino.
Posted by: Van Helsing at June 14, 2005 04:57 PM (SGA6A)
Posted by: aj at June 14, 2005 06:38 PM (icVdZ)
5
Thanks; I know
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 14, 2005 06:57 PM (g9iJH)
6
Wow, Attila. I am SO glad you answered that before I had to...
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 14, 2005 08:57 PM (xdX36)
7
I just saw a sand cat at the Brookfield Zoo--Felix Marguerita, as I recall. Thought of you.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 15, 2005 07:37 AM (g9iJH)
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 15, 2005 12:33 PM (n/TmV)
9
So -- in the Middle East they're freedom fighters and pioneers; in the US they're "femininazis"? I betcha they're hairy-legged and angry and all the other ugly stuff over there, too.
Posted by: nicky at June 15, 2005 02:52 PM (lRgA6)
10
Ah...well the photos rather speak otherwise.
But I have a question for you Nicky: Why aren't the "Feminazis" supporting their sisters in the Middle East in their quest for freedom and equal rights? Where are the NOW rallies in support of the President's liberation of Iraq, the recent 'Cedar Revolution' in Lebanon, and the incipient revolution in Iran?
I'd like to see some consistency too.
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 15, 2005 05:12 PM (n/TmV)
11
Thanks for the correction, DC. It was, indeed, a pretty cat.
Feminism is in the eye of the beholder. Judge the ideas, not the labels.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 15, 2005 05:27 PM (g9iJH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
'Not Guilty' On All Counts
So Jacko the Wacko walks. Hmh.
It's not what I expected, because so much about Michael Jackson is just...creepy. But then I wasn't sitting on the jury and did not hear all of the testimony.
My gut tells me that money and fame just purchased another acquittal though.
Posted by: Desert Cat at
07:05 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't think the ruling means he's not a pedophile and not a wierdo, or that anyone in their right mind should ever allow their child within grabbing distance of his pasty white skin. It just means that in the particular incidents in which he was accused, the prosecution did not line up enough evidence to overcome a reasonable doubt that he did what he was accused of at those times and places.
The system worked, and the tragedy is not that it did work for Jacko, but that it's possible that it hasn't been working for others without the money he was able to spend on a proper defense.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 14, 2005 07:40 AM (0B3lJ)
2
Well, we do need to be mindful of the McMartin case. But . . . "Jesus juice."
I defended him in the 90s when he was just wierd and misunderstood. But some of the details I've heard this time around truly make me ill.
As with OJ, I feel a bit better knowing that at least he's broke now. Best I can do.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 14, 2005 06:55 PM (g9iJH)
3
The MSM steps in where the law cannot.
John Ramsey.
O.J. Simpson.
Michael Jackson.
They lost everything, and rightfully so. This is why, even though the MSM gets very stupid and shrill in political areas, in legal areas they fulfill a viable social need, a sort of more civilized vigilanteism.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 15, 2005 07:24 AM (Ru8KL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 11, 2005
Time For Action
Peter Guither is the host of a blog called
Drug War Rant wherein he chronicles the onging travesty that is the "war on (some) drugs".
As I expected, he is on top of the current efforts to push for passage of an amendment to a spending bill that would prevent the federal government from interfering with medical marijuana patients in states where medical marijuana has been legalized.
I have quoted his post on the topic below. Please click over to his site and take a look at some of the online petition letters he links to. If you support the right of the individual states to make their own decisions regarding the medical use of marijuana, I'd appreciate if you would take a few moments and sign one or more of the petition letters. They will be automatically sent to your congresscritter. Or better yet, print the letter out, sign it, and send it via snail mail. Apparently the congresscritters take snail mail more seriously than e-mail.
Drug WarRant: "Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment coming to the floor on Tuesday!
The latest news is that the Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment is likely to actually hit the House this coming Tuesday (this is an amendment that prevents the federal government from spending money to interfere with medical marijuana patients who are following state law in those states that have medical marijuana laws).
This is great, because it takes advantage of all the recent press and reaction to the Supreme Court decision.
It also means that we must act now!
* DRCNet instant letter to Congress
* Drug Policy Alliance instant letter to Congress
* Marijuana Policy Project instant letter to Congress
* NORML instant letter to Congress
The links above are the bare minimum. If you really care, call your Congressional office on Monday morning and tell them to support the Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment when it comes to the floor.
Get all your friends to act, too. All of them. Seriously...
Are you afraid to tell them you support medical marijuana? Are you afraid to tell them that you believe it's wrong for federal law enforcement agents to harrass sick people who are following their doctor's advice and state law? Are you afraid to say that tax money would be better spent going after terrorists than breaking open the heads of cancer patients in wheelchairs?
If you were disappointed with the Supreme Court decision, then you must act."
So says Cat too. Go! Do!
UPDATE 6/15/05: This amendment was referred to the Health subcomittee yesterday. So if you have not already contacted your representative, it would not be too late to do so.
Posted by: Desert Cat at
11:01 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 442 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Barry Campbell of enrevanche has a new ad hoc blog on the subject:
"Announcing Compassionate Use, a blog which tracks the effort to make medical marijuana safe, legal and available to every sick person in the United States who might need it."
http://compassionateuse.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Sissy Willis at June 12, 2005 05:20 AM (7WFgX)
2
Trackback didn't seem to work. Here's my post:
http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/2005/06/quotif_you_were.html
Posted by: Sissy Willis at June 12, 2005 07:32 AM (7WFgX)
Posted by: Ciggy at June 13, 2005 08:05 AM (q9YxC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
When Attila's Away, The Cat Will Play
...this mike right here?
*tap-tap-tap*
*#IS*THIS+THING*.ON?.*.#*.. .
Oops. Heh. I guess it is...
*ahem* Hello. This is Attila the Cat. I'll be keeping the throne warm while Little Miss Attila is away this week. Although from the look of things, she's not so much "away" as "here, from elsewhere".
Rats. I was really looking forward to declaring this party underway, just as soon as I found the keys to the liquor cabinet.
So-o. Plan B is to see what I can do to keep you entertained and informed (and maybe irritated) as long as I've got the run of the palace this week.
Enjoy!
Oh, and before I forget, I want to thank our hostess, Little Miss Attila for the opportunity. Guest blogging here really is like trading in my paper cone megaphone for a 500 watt PA system.
Posted by: Desert Cat at
10:46 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
44kb generated in CPU 0.0087, elapsed 0.0167 seconds.
25 queries taking 0.0103 seconds, 73 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.