February 20, 2008
How Funny; The Anchoress Loves Semicolons.
And
so do I. We're both in
Neocon's club.
My affection for semicolons has led to complaints in the past, from other bloggers who felt that I truly abused these handy little punctuation marks.
They are wrong, though—my real vice is the em-dash, which can be used in much more flexible ways than the semicolon.
Via Althouse, blogging over at The Court of Insty.
Note: You think I'm joking? What do you imagine copyeditors talk about over lunch and dinner? Substance? Or style?
Note II: At the risk of being accused of too much free association before I even take my nightly Ambien, does anyone want to place this quote?
You could say she has an individual style;
She's part of a colorful time.
Q: What sort of person actually inserts quotation marks into the song lyrics he or she quotes?
A: A copyeditor, of course.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The older I've gotten the more I like semicolons. They beat starting sentences with conjunctions.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at February 21, 2008 08:53 PM (IpB84)
2
But what about special circumstances, wherein one might want to lend special emphasis to a particular clause?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 21, 2008 09:19 PM (larLB)
3
I'm of the simpler school of using the semicolon as a replacement for the comma when the latter creates confusion.
But I'm also of the school where punctuation is an art. I'm sure a craftsman could employ it well in any number of ways.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at February 22, 2008 01:54 AM (IpB84)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 16, 2007
Fred Thompson and the Wind Tunnel of Christian Conservatives
ABC News has
the scoop:
[Wesleyan Center for Strategic Studies Co-Founder Phillip] Knight, who says he has prayed with Thompson and his wife, Jeri, believes Thompson has been "mischaracterized" by Christian conservative leader, Dr. James Dobson, who questioned Thompson's faith and candidacy in an email a couple months ago.
Unfortunately, ABC News can't afford a proofreader for its website, so it ran the story with an extra comma before "Dr. James Dobson," and omitted the "of" in "a couple of months ago." But it's okay: the folks at ABC are just being colloquial. Illiterate, but colloquial.
There is also the issue of whether Mr. Knight (or Dr. Knight; I'm not sure) spells his first name with one L, or two. It appears both ways on the World Wide Web. But ABC may have that detail right. I would still, however, like to see some attention to grammar and punctuation from my news providers.
I'd also like to meet the Easter Bunny this coming spring, and shake his little paw. Anyone want to give me odds on that?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 188 words, total size 1 kb.
November 05, 2007
Grammar Wear
Richard Manitoba points to
this T-shirt as appropriate attire for those of us who are . . . well, a bit unyielding on issues of punctuation and language structure. (Except for the split infinitive thing, on which I'm extremely liberal: I figure English is a Germanic language, and the rhythm of a sentence is often superior when we T-bone that infinitive. Also, some infinitives really want to be split, deep down.)
But the "sic" pun leaves me cold. I like this hoodie, however. And this issue has been a linguistic pet peeve for decades.
But this one here says it all.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:04 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
$20+ for a t-shirt? Who can afford grammar these days?
Posted by: Darrell at November 05, 2007 10:27 PM (GnmHB)
2
I'm a former high school English teacher. Grammar mistakes are definitely peevish. I shudder when reading my stepkids' rough drafts of assignments for various classes, and realize they have had no formal grammar training probably since 5th grade. I love these shirts, and have put them on my Christmas list!
Posted by: Anne at November 06, 2007 07:53 AM (R/ik3)
3
As a joke, my sister uses the word "irregardful."
Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at November 06, 2007 02:32 PM (ztNrs)
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 06, 2007 04:40 PM (aywD+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 10, 2007
And Yet More on the Proposed Code of Conduct:
Frank J
rolls his own.
Via Cal Tech Girl
(That was a Google-bomb, BTW: I don't like "CalTech Girl." I want it to be "Cal Tech Girl." Who cares how she actually wants it to appear?—she's a scientist, and she should leave these delicate issues to a competent editor. Like, um . . . me.
From now on, please link her as Cal Tech Girl. Cal Tech should be two words.)
UPDATE: I've been vetoed! Apparently, Pasadena houses the California Institute of technology. Who knew?
But someone ought to tell the CS Department, nicht?
I have been given special dispensation to use "Dudette from the Land of the Nerds," but it's small consolation, really.
Apparently, things are almost as bad at the website for the Massachusetts Institute of technology, since in display type they use "mit," and in plain text it's MIT. Of course, at no point is it styled "MIt," which would be the equivalent of "Caltech."
Not that I'm an embittered English major who never gets her way, and has never truly accepted that it's The New York Times, but Los Angeles Times (no article required). Or why I once worked (I kid you not) at Hunting Magazine. (Why the capital "M," if the word Magazine isn't part of the name?)
Goodnight; I'm off to consume huge quantities of gin.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:42 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Actually, NO. It's actually Caltechgirl.
Caltech is ONE WORD. Really. And the T is NEVER capitalized.
Check my blog. I NEVER capitalize the T.
If it was multiple words it would be Cal Inst Tech, since the full name is California Institute of Technology.
Just one of my pet peeves.
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 10, 2007 05:13 PM (r0kgl)
2
Hm. Okay. Let's think this through.
Normally, the way a phrase evolves goes like this: two words, hyphenated compound, and then run together. For instance, 15 years ago I was a copy editor, and now in publishing circles I call myself a copyeditor.
And I used to e-mail people, but now I generally email them.
So perhaps after years of Cal Tech, it became Caltech (though I could see an argument for CalTech; I'm hoping Cal-Tech was skipped, due to its being egregiously ugly--though it probably was used adjectivally). However, there's no rule that dictates that the nickname would have to be Cal Inst Tech. For one thing, there are many ways of abbreviating California. For another, nicknames are weird: how did Robert beome Bob? How did William become Bill? The idea that all shortening of names follows the same pattern is incorrect.
Of course, if you feel that strongly, I can certainly call you Caltechgirl. Except on those occasions when you decide to take the wrong side of an issue, when I would find myself "accidentally" breaking the name.
Are you sure about this, though? After all, Caltech (yeech) modifies "girl." I still think there should be at least one break in there: it's a bit of a mouthful this way. Also, it's a proper noun. You want more capital letters. They make a name look more namelike.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 10, 2007 08:16 PM (uSWaZ)
3
Well, Caltech is the preferred name that everyone on campus uses.... CalTech is right out. It is however, Tech if used with out the "Cal" Modifier.... Also previously referred to as the "Big T"....
I'll go for Caltech Girl. That's acceptable. Just not CalTech Girl. Or Cal Tech Girl Or Caltech Gal.
Interesting, the Firefox dictionary recognizes Caltech, but not CalTech...
Posted by: caltechgirl at April 10, 2007 08:22 PM (r0kgl)
4
CITeGirl
No thanks necessary. . .
Posted by: Darrell at April 10, 2007 08:26 PM (QEkk2)
5
How about "Tech Chick from Oldmoneyville"?
or "Biology Maven from Gambletown"?
or "The Microscope Mistress from The Land of the Roses"?
Whaaaaaat? Too wordy?
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 10, 2007 08:51 PM (uSWaZ)
6
...btw, it's "California Institute of (capital T) Technology."
8-O
Posted by: leelu at April 11, 2007 08:45 PM (KFuCy)
7
Leelu! You missed the joke. I'm surprised at you.
Let's not fall asleep at the switch again.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 11, 2007 10:59 PM (6C0F9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2007
I Dunno.
I sort of like my verbiage in little bite-sized chunks. And they have to be separated
somehow. But too many commas are, indeed, an aesthetic evil.
So I usually prefer—under most circumstance, mind you—to set some of the phrases off with em-dashes.
And the one rule in the Joy Style Guide is that series commas are our friends; the eye generally skips by that extra comma before the "and" or the "or," but when it needs it—well, it needs it badly.
So many things are that way.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
March 30, 2007
On Forbidden Words.
Verity Kindle objects over on
this thread to the use of the word "papist" by someone who referred to themselves as a "recovering papist."
The problem being, as he/she sees it, that the word suggests we worship the Pope. Hey—I thought we worshipped the Virgin Mary. And the Saints. And golden calves. Guess I've been doing it all wrong.
You know how I am about language, though: making any word verboten goes against my grain, because it empowers that word and makes it more hurtful simply by being forbidden. So, once more: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, tits, nigger, kike, spic, faggot, skirt, heeb, whore, mick, lezzie, redneck, gook, chink, slut, wetback. Wingnut. Leftard. Papist.
(Now the Ann Coulter defenders are going to get on my case, on the basis that she only used a transgressive noun. That is not, of course, how I see it: I feel that she applied a perjorative term for homosexual—listed above—to a heterosexual, married man. In public. With cameras rolling. At an event I'd like to take itself more seriously than it sometimes does. So, yes: that was different.)
If anyone is entitled to use the term "papist," it would be a cradle Catholic, whether or not that person is still in the Church.
It's people of faith—Muslims, ironically, being sometimes an exception—who are marginalized the most in society today. I think we can take it as a given that any rocks being thrown around by the devout of any mainstream faith are either (1) done in a spirit of jest, or (2) the mark of idiots.
I can't define true religious slurs. But I know them when I see them.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:57 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I AM a cradle catholic. It was a scandal in 1918 when the daughter of a fronteer Hugonout married the son of a German catholic farmer.
Growing up, we attended mass on a regular basis, went to catacasm, was comformed and attend Fatama festavals.
In adulthood, I became a neo-pagan environmntalist. Then became "born again" and went through my own reformation. Sola Scriptura vs transtubastation of the eurocurist (sp?)
Now I am a proud fronteer cavlvanist. Who has studied history especally the Counter-Reformation. I thought Papist, Popery, Romish, and Mackeral snapper meant the same thing: catholic. I only used Papist because I couldn't spell Mackeral snapper.
Posted by: Bloggermouth at March 30, 2007 03:36 PM (gBOGv)
2
1) Do you think all Catholics aren't saved?
2) Are you a five-point Calvanist? TULIP, with no reservations whatsoever?
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 30, 2007 06:23 PM (1tv3E)
3
Those are good questions.
First, Jesus told us not to speculae on such issues. He said it was his job, not ours. I do belive that the catholic faith is full of herecy. But there are sincere belivers who lead good Christian lives.
My father was such a man. He was a good catholic. He led a good life, was a good provider, worked hard and had few vices.
I rest comfortably in knowing where he is now.
We also buried my aunt a couple weeks ago. She was a very sweet lady, (my favorite aunt), caring, and up on all the issues. She was involved in what appeares to be a very liberal wing of the catholic church. Up in Seattle. My cousins flew her down here to lay her to rest with about 4 generations of my family.
Are Catholics saved? Well I don't know. Compare people like Nancy Pelosi to Alan Keyes. Both are catholic and as diffrent as night an day.
2, I'll have to google the 5 points to give you an answer on that. I know my paster has issues with them. I am more of a historian than a theologian.
A banner above the pulpet says: "Remember the old ways, where there is the good way and walk therein." We go through the King James Bible from cover to cover, trying to press the Crown Rights of Jesus into all areas of life. We study the lives of our Pilgrim and Puriton fathers and the Founding Fathers, the constitution other founding documents. We homeschool, stay out of debt and avoid taking out licenses.
Posted by: Bloggermouth at April 01, 2007 06:54 AM (gBOGv)
4
This is Bob Zone in the Bob Zone Sports Zone. We have the results of the "Sweet 14" round of the 2007 Forbidden Words National Championships brought to by 'Asslicker' who just missed making the Sex Acts/Sex Actors team when, in the final seconds of qualifying, one of his patented flick shots bounced off her rim.........uh,
the rim:
And speaking of Sex Acts/Sex Actors, they eliminated Waste Matter by a score of 3 to 2. In an earlier match, Number Two defeated Number One by the obvious score.
Body Parts sweated out a win over African-Americans, 2 to 1.
Jews and Latinos/Hispanics dueled to a 2-2 tie. Then they went out to eat and drink respectively.
Homosexuals edged out Women 2 to 1, still felt oppressed and staged a post-game protest.
The Sexually Free defeated the Irish 2 to 1 in a match that featured acts with beer, a keg-tap and baked potatoes that defy description.
Asians out-strategized Southern-Americans by finding the venue for their match.
Political Activists bested the Religious 2 to 1. In this reporters opinion, until these two teams are disbanded, we all lose.
That's it from Bob Zone in the Bob Zone Sports Zone. This is me, Bob Zone, zoning out.
Posted by: Hog Beatty at April 02, 2007 01:18 AM (2H6Aq)
5
Please explain this one to me Little Miss Attila: you and I were both able to freely use all the words anyone that logs onto this blog can see and, yet, your "Spam Filter" forced me to change the written out (alpha version) word to the numeric '14' because of the last four letters?! What kind of arbitrary, inconsistent, hypocritical bullshit is that? Who are you protecting and from what?
Posted by: Hog Beatty at April 02, 2007 01:27 AM (2H6Aq)
6
Sorry. Fluffy the spam filter gets a bit overzealous at times.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 02, 2007 01:47 AM (1tv3E)
7
So it's okay with Fluffy if I write about sex with a 19 year old girl and not a nine**** year old girl?
Posted by: Hog Beatty at April 02, 2007 02:01 AM (2H6Aq)
8
Fluffy is only looking for phrases that have come up from comment spam in the past. That would indicate that the word that isn't-quite-tween is awfully popular among those who purvey tasteful artistic representations of the sex act.
My favorite thing is that on some people's comment boards the word "socialist" can't be used because of the drug name embedded in the middle. (Let's see if it flies this time.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 02, 2007 02:23 AM (1tv3E)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 23, 2007
Do You Ever Feel
. . . that reading of any kind—whether online, or via dead tree—is like walking through that apple orchard in
The Wizard of Oz? Typographical errors and incorrect word selections grab at one, tearing at one's clothing and sending one screaming away into the night.
Unless, of course, it's just me. Sigh.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:41 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I feel the same way when I hear Al Gore saying that the Earth has a fever--or anything else he says for that matter. Or when the MSM goes on about Val Plame and Bush, Cheney, and Rove. Or most other MSM truthiness. Or when I visit Kos. Or.... You get the picture. That's why they don't sell nuclear weapons at Walmart, you know, and why other stores carry gin.
Posted by: Darrell at March 23, 2007 09:24 AM (jcUK2)
2
I can forgive it to a degree amongst non-professionals online. But dead tree publications and commercial/professional websites, there's no excuse. You shoot your credibility with misspellings, grammatical errors, etc. What's an editor for, if not to catch junk like that.
One of my pet PEEVES? A "Forward" at the beginning of a book, where a "Foreword" ought to be.
GAAhh!
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 23, 2007 03:05 PM (B2X7i)
3
I hate tpos, especially in coment sectons!
Posted by: Mark at March 23, 2007 07:19 PM (ROzRH)
4
Mark, Mark, Mark--chivalry really
is dead, isn't it?
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 23, 2007 09:20 PM (0CbUL)
5
Never felt that way. I wish the Tin Woodsman had a chainsaw instead of his ax. There's something to be said for some good clear cutting.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 23, 2007 11:15 PM (QJ5cf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 09, 2006
"I Got Wasted; She Got Mad.
She called me names, and she called her dad."
—"Anything, Anything" (Dramarama)
This isn't a zeugma, but it is a syllepsis. I adore it. Here's another one, a true zeugma. Do you recognize it?
"Here thou, great Anna! whom three realms obey,
Dost sometimes counsel take—and sometimes tea."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:33 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"She threw pots, pans, and a fit."
Does that count as both?
Posted by: Asher Abrams at September 09, 2006 08:25 AM (Mu7y2)
2
Alexander Pope from "The Rape of the Lock." Although, as a non-English major, I shouldn't be commenting on this at all. Or reading it. I think I'll wash my head out with gin before synapses form. Must we name every figure of speech? With Greek-derived names no less? It's very anticlimactic!
Posted by: Darrell at September 09, 2006 09:09 AM (/gRHd)
3
Isn't it ironic?--don't you think?
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 09, 2006 11:04 AM (lXru8)
4
What brought this on? Are you using Strunk and White for little light reading?
Posted by: Zendo Deb at September 09, 2006 11:40 AM (+gqOq)
5
I'm on a writing binge, so I'm thinking almost nonstop about how words fit together. It's making me more myself than usual.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 09, 2006 01:27 PM (kFfrz)
6
No, I don't think-- before, during or after writing. It saves me quite a bit of time. Time I put to good use. Like waiting.
Posted by: Darrell at September 09, 2006 07:30 PM (0qTMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2006
Authentification, 1
What am I reading now?
Glad you asked.
It's a book about punctuation. However, because the decision was made not to Americanize the Stateside edition, the punctuation is all "wrong" in the eyes of the average Yankee copyeditor.
"Two people, divided by a common language."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:28 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No. No proof there.
Because ANY alien would be at least as confused by our punctuation habits as we are.
Posted by: k at May 05, 2006 06:12 AM (wZLWV)
2
What do the British know about our language! If it weren't for a lot of brave men and women, we'd all be speaking English!
"The Kiwi, it is said, is the most anti-social bird in the bush, and no-one likes to invite it to parties, because, if it turns up at all, it just eats roots and leaves." Guys all over New Zealand are snickering now: Women are blushing.
Posted by: Darrell at May 05, 2006 08:29 AM (KEBp7)
3
Think we're divided by a common language? Check out Germany sometime. The northern dialects and the southern dialects do not exhibit a great deal of mutual intelligibility.
Posted by: John at May 05, 2006 06:14 PM (KTxHe)
4
Well, in that regard Americans and the English have far more in common than either have with some inhabitants of Scotland.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 05, 2006 07:37 PM (34TBU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 05, 2005
Gerard
. . . discusses,
once more, the crazy world of American book publishing. Very illuminating.
And depressing.
Posted by: Attila at
08:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
January 05, 2005
Cranky Copy Editor Stuff
Please bear in mind that
up is not a verb; I don't care what worthless rag you're composing headlines or captions for.
Posted by: Attila at
01:26 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Copy editor? You are a stinking *copy editor*?!?
We may have to re-access our relationship.
;-)
Posted by: The Peoria Pundit at January 05, 2005 05:50 PM (QykcX)
2
Or "re-assess" it?
xoxo,
Attila Girl
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 05, 2005 08:05 PM (8TapF)
3
I have learned that any post in which I carp about copy editors always contains a huge error. Par for the course. Thpt!
Xacto-wielding pig dogs.
Posted by: Bill Dennis at January 05, 2005 10:15 PM (QykcX)
4
I try to walk softly; after all, my own posts aren't perfect.
Though, if I do say so myself, they are damn clean considering the conditions under which I proofread them (right on the spot, on screen, in a hurry).
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 05, 2005 11:05 PM (8TapF)
5
Dear LMA,
You need to up your meds or something. Ending a sentence with a conjunction...indeed!
Happy New Year!
LMM
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at January 06, 2005 07:45 AM (BZ0tI)
6
Dear LMM:
Actually, "for" is primarily a preposition, especially when describing a function, say, "composing headlines."
You're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition, either.
I only know this because I dearly love to end my sentences with prepositions. But ending with a conjunction just doesn't float my boat.
I also love to really split my infinitives. And start sentences with And or But.
Drives 'm nuts.
heh heh.
k
Posted by: k at January 06, 2005 09:33 AM (ywZa8)
7
Winston Churchill: "The rule about not ending sentences with prepositions is one up with which I shall not put."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2005 10:59 AM (8TapF)
8
snort!!!
You made me spit my chocolate milk all over my monitor.
If this is how you write and think when depressed, please don't take up Prozac or anything, ok?
go Winnie!
k
Posted by: k at January 06, 2005 01:30 PM (ywZa8)
9
Anyone here ever hear of the concept of the "idiom." It's a collection of words that has a singular meaning, such as "That is a situation I will not put up with."
"Put up with" is an idiom that means, roughly, "tolerate."
In this context, "with" is not a true preposition.
Therefore, it is perfectly grammatical to use at the end of a sentence.
But try to tell that to the grey-haired retired school teachers who write letters to your editor complaining about the bad grammar in your articles.
Screw 'em, I say.
Newspapers have two options: Write to the specifications of a handful of Language Nazis, who as often as not are not the experts they claim to be -- or write bright, entertaining copy.
Why would anyone want their newspaper to read like a 9th grade term paper?
Posted by: The Peoria Pundit at January 09, 2005 06:12 AM (QykcX)
10
Basically, I feel that if all the elements are in a sentence, and it sounds okay, full steam ahead--I can't get upset by wayward prepositions or this "split infinitive" stuff. Who cares?
But certain things still bother me, often because they require two readings for one to understand what's being said--or because they just come off as silly ("irregardless").
I mean, when an unfortunate situation occurs, and someone tells me he feels "badly," I'm often tempted to reply, "that's too bad. Especially for your wife."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 09, 2005 08:24 AM (uixsD)
Posted by: k at January 10, 2005 10:22 AM (6krEN)
12
He feels badly. He's bad at feeling. He lacks skill in feeling. He's a little clumsy with respect to . . . feeling.
(Obviously, the joke rests on the double meaning of the word "feel," and I'm alluding to its tactile sense.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 10, 2005 02:22 PM (RjyQ5)
13
OH! Well, now that you've pointed it out, it seems perfectly obvious.
The only way I ever learn anything about grammar is by my own mistakes, and then only when pounded into my head with a rock. Since I say "bad" not "badly" I had no idea what was going on.
Posted by: k at January 10, 2005 06:20 PM (ywZa8)
14
You're fine. And you're talking to someone whose relationship with arithmetic and money are
very troubled. Not my field at all.
Actually, very few things are my field: I do well in two or three areas, and fake the rest.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 10, 2005 11:54 PM (RjyQ5)
15
Actually, my arithmatic's lousy. It startled the hell out of the teachers when they realized I had the thing for math. It's different.
And I wouldn't be in the pickle I'm in if my control of my money were better that it is. When it's other people's money I always make it come out so true.
But I do know what my fields are, so I won't worry about the grammar any more. Now I can safely confess: the only preposition I know is "for." Only conjunction, too, come to think. I only know them because I looked em' up. I like looking stuff up. Makes it look like you know so much stuff you don't.
Did you say something about "I do well in two or three areas, and fake the rest"?
k
Posted by: k at January 11, 2005 03:25 PM (ywZa8)
16
An English teacher I knew used to talk about prepositions using a small stuffed animal and a box.
"Jack is IN the box."
"Jack in ON the box."
"Jack is zooming AROUND the box."
"Jack is jumping OVER the box."
You get the idea.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 04:47 PM (RjyQ5)
17
Ok. Jumping Jack Flashed FOR the box. I think I get it now.
See? The problem with looking stuff up is, sometimes it leads to actually learning something. Sheesh.
Posted by: k at January 11, 2005 10:11 PM (ywZa8)
18
Yeah. Once you have the little creature and the small cardboard box, it's easy to make the leap to the non-physical sorts of prepositions. God bless Mr. Scherrer.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 11:24 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
63kb generated in CPU 0.0248, elapsed 0.1243 seconds.
213 queries taking 0.11 seconds, 482 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.