November 20, 2008
Vote!
I
did!
UPDATE: Of course, I voted "present." Hope that counts.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:25 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wrong Darrell (or an imposter).
I'm from the "don't plan out loud" school of thought.
How about running a true Conservative with a genuine Conservative agenda and see how that works out?
Posted by: Darrell at November 20, 2008 11:45 PM (z3JME)
2
Oh, and we can take back academia, the Media, and the Legislative and Judicial Branches in the meantime...
Beats manufacturing rope or selling it.
Posted by: Darrell at November 21, 2008 12:09 AM (z3JME)
3
Oh, let's not get into the hemp debate just now . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 21, 2008 09:02 AM (TpmQk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 17, 2008
Understanding the Left
A paper explains why some of them may be misguided, but—as they see it—
we are evil.
And D91 of AoS adds his own insights on how to appeal to those with liberal leanings.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:27 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
November 14, 2008
The Anchoress
Reposted something she wrote several months ago that seems quite appropriate.
It just seems to me that within those little ideological spheres which are full of ideas, a president must be permitted to listen to ideas and debate them and perhaps even to choose portions of ideas from each position, left, right and center, in order to formulate policies which are best FOR AMERICA, and which address the concerns of all the country, not just “the party,” and which serve the whole citizenry, not just “the base.” The best recipes call for more than one ingredient. The best policies do, too.
If we are determined to shut out whole blocks of people because their thoughts are not ours, their ideas are not ours, their beliefs are not ours, then we’re doing democracy wrong - we’re turning it into something else. And I don’t think the “something else” is necessarily a good thing.
Thomas More, the patron saint of politicians, was a good and trusted adviser to King Henry VIII, but his faith and conscience took precedence over that fealty. When Rome refused Henry a divorce, Henry broke away and formed the Church of England. More could not go where Henry went, saying at his arrest, “I am the King’s good servant, but God’s first.”
I am by no means comparing President Bush to St. Thomas More, but it does seem to me that part of his problems within his own party stem from a similar attitude: Love him or hate him, he is the partyÂ’s good servant, but AmericaÂ’s first. And AmericaÂ’s good servant, but GodÂ’s even before that. Or, as I have written elsewhere,
It does not surprise me that he is a Christian man living a creed before he is a President, that he is a President before he is a Conservative. It seems to me precisely the right order of things.
Those priorities seem like good ones to me, and perhaps in a healthy society, they would be appreciated. But we’re not healthy right now - I doubt anyone would truly suggest we are - and in this society, sadly, the precedence of “the parties” and “the movements” over everything else is disconcerting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How can an undesirable candidate suddenly become an acceptable, good-faith alternative? I know there is a school of thought that says, “well, that will teach others and they’ll be more loyal to the party, next time.”
But thatÂ’s being too clever by half, isnÂ’t it? One of President BushÂ’s errors was in thinking he could sign a campaign finance reform into law and count on the Supreme Court to find it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court did not meet his expectations.
Signing off on this election while counting on people to “do the right thing” in the next one seems to me equally hazardous and just as likely to disappoint. And it feels a little bit like putting one’s ideology before all else, and trusting in it, alone.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 520 words, total size 3 kb.
November 07, 2008
November 06, 2008
Oh, Brother.
I'm getting a
lot more search traffic than usual for "Sarah Palin gaffes."
Who are you? Democratic operatives who still see her as a threat, or maverick loyalists who want to pin this debacle on the bitch who breathed new life into your, um, rather low-key campaign?
Let it go, boys and girls. You're just making yourselves look a lot worse.
But here you go. It's one of her worst misstatements ever.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
Infiltrating the Democratic Party.
Purple Avenger's got it all
scienced out.
Me? I plan on infiltrating the Republicans, and keeping them away from religious extremism and strange, paranoid theories about Obama.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:53 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
September 10, 2008
I Hate to Admit This.
But sometimes I split my infinitives.
I've also been known to end my sentences with prepositions.
English is, after all, a Germanic language. We mustn't get too hung up on word order.
Naturally, this has led to ostracism from other English majors, who have started referring to me as an "EMINO."
Once again, I'm just not part of the club.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:22 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, there's always Churchill's remark when someone complained about his dangling prepositions:
That is a rule up with which I shall not put.
Posted by: Mike at September 11, 2008 05:03 AM (PQZGd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 29, 2008
Just When I Think that Maybe Peggy Noonan May Have Lost Her Edge,
she reminds me that even when we disagree—as we do so often these days—she's still
The Original Goddess of Political Opinion. Watch the clip: she
must be Irish; it was just too funny for her not to be.
(Okay, okay—Noonan's Goddessness would have to come after Susan B. Anthony's and Elizabeth Cady Stanton's respective Goddessossitude; for some reason those two are on my mind this week: the fighter and the intellectual. Kirk and Spock. I hate to break it to everyone, but they were both pro-life.)
Noonan footage via AllahP.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:08 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
August 18, 2008
August 09, 2008
Miniter, John Edwards' Defense
. . . and
what it says about modern-day feminism. ("The Clinton wound was mortal.")
Well, I don't think I know what feminism is—as with Art, I just know what I like. If men can be gentlemenly (perhaps even, on special occasions, gallant) without patronizing me, thas cool. and without it being this desperate endless striving to get to the door first, so he can be the one to open it for me: how about seeing which one of us gets there first, and he/she will hold it for the other?
If lesbians can stop pretending that I'm an idiot because I (as they say about polling data) "trend straight," that's a good thing, too. [After all--can we admit that some of the worst sexists out there are dykes, and a few tall women of miscellaneous orientations?]
But instead of that blunt "I didn't love her," Silky would have been better off with "I had tremendous respect for her"—instinctively moving his hands forward, as most of 'em do, like heat-seeking missiles—"frontal lobes. I mean, she had a first-rate intellect. That's why we don't need a paternity test: the child just doesn't seem vain enough. No sitting in front of the mirror, trying on various hairstyles. What a waste of money that would be."
Actually, I liked Breck boy, because he just wasn't ever afraid to kind of brainstorm about ideas for what we could do to improve the country. I didn't agree with most of 'em, but I liked the fact that the wheels kept turning.
Likewise, I have a soft spot in my heart for a politician who's been caught out in an affair that's tawdrier-than-average (when one's wife is diagnosed with cancer isn't a great time to go clitting around), and yet he admitted that Universal Truth in a way I hadn't ever heard Clinton articulate, and doubt even Ted Kennedy has ever put into words. "I thought I was special."
Does everyone have moments of sociopathy? More, perhaps, than might want to publicize that fact. Edwards scores lower on the sociapath scale because he admitted it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:17 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 336 words, total size 2 kb.
1
According to multiple sources, Edwards was apoplectic that ABC News broke the story on its website and began promoting it early on Friday, giving the rest of the media a chance to play catch-up and site [sic] ABC NewsÂ’ report. (Representatives for Edwards did not return a call or e-mail for comment.)
Edwards subsequently made solicitous calls to multiple reporters including CBS NewsÂ’ Bob Schieffer, who also talked to a distraught Elizabeth Edwards.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/1380000138/post/360031436.html
Slimeball. Yes, he's always thinking. He can improve the country by never being heard from again.
Posted by: Darrell at August 10, 2008 06:37 AM (vdTSe)
2
Yeah, well: maybe the liberal part of my nature got the better part of me for a time.
Or perhaps I forgot that Edwards made his killing as a P.I. lawyer, 99% of whom are scumbuckets--and, taken as a totality, a group that has led to huge increases in health care costs in this country.
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 11, 2008 07:42 AM (TpmQk)
3
BTW, the only thing worse than clitting around is
not clitting around, if-you-know-what-I-mean-and-I-think-you-do.
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 11, 2008 09:27 AM (TpmQk)
4
Darrell: I don't recall obeying any clitoris as part of marriage vows. I
do recall women having to obey cocks, though...
/being pussy-whipped is plenty bad enough, one should think...
Posted by: Gregory at August 12, 2008 01:40 AM (cjwF0)
5
And being cock-whipped would be, I should imagine, just as bad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 12, 2008 09:31 AM (TpmQk)
6
For years, only one had to say it. Then no one had to. Nothing says that both can't cede power to form an even stronger union than the sum of the individual parts.
Posted by: Darrell at August 12, 2008 10:54 AM (4FXMl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
American Political Life
. . . has turned into that Monty Python skit, "Blackmail." At least, according to
Iowahawk.
Via Dan Collins at the Protein Pub.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
July 16, 2008
I Think It's Probably More Difficult To Do a Great Job
. . . . when you're
at war with the White House; that takes a lot of energy, you know.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:44 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
June 25, 2008
The Power Puff Girl
It'll be interesting to watch
Clinton's Senate career for the next 12-24 months.
If she stays in the Senate—and I think she should—it might be Obama who has to come to her, hat in hand, to get anything done over the next few years.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
June 23, 2008
Who Knew that "the Next Ronald Reagan"
. . . would be from
Florida, of all places?
(Yeah: I know there was only one Ronald Reagan. But for the next set of economic and national security challenges, we can do even better. Lt. Col. West is a true-blue conservative with crossover appeal—someone who can be popular without having to resort to populism or pandering. Whether he wins or loses this immediate, upcoming contest, watch that man.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
June 16, 2008
Nope. We Haven't Seen the Last of Any of Our Political Dynasties.
Not the Kennedys. Not the Clintons (Hillary will still be active for years, and Chelsea my become a Tsunami when she gets older—particularly if she combines her mother's talents with her father's).
I'm not sure Jeb Bush has the interest (or the strong stomach) to seek Federal office. But his son, George P. Bush, may well be unstoppable in the future.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
April 29, 2008
March 17, 2008
Great Start, Buddy.
You've got
six more deadly sins to go; please get back to us in a timely fashion.
—The MSM and The Blogosphere
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:43 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So does this mean that New York Democrats will get 80% of the vote next time around?
Posted by: BillyHW at March 18, 2008 04:05 AM (FhMJq)
2
Not a partisan issue; I just think it's hilarious that politicians are now expected (by some) to publicly disclose their sins to that degree.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 18, 2008 09:02 AM (Hgnbj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yeah. What Is It With These Freakin' Northeastern States?
I mean,
really.
It isn't like my governor . . . . Oh, shit. Never mind.
Carry on.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
Of Course, If We're Not Careful,
people are going to start
mixing up the McGreevy and Spitzer scandals. Which would lead to some who are only sort-of paying attention to believe that Spitzer is gay.
And that McGreevy was the worst hypocrite on planet Earth.
And that Mrs. Spitzer had three-way sex with her husband and "Kristen."
And that Mrs. McGreevy really didn't know her husband was seeing prostitutes.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
March 16, 2008
The Right Kind of Three-Way . . .
How much time did I spend, in my twenties, trying to get it out of my boyfriend why it wasn't gay for us both to hop into bed with another woman, but it would be if we got into bed with another guy?
"If there are two men in the same bed, it's gay," he told me. "End of story."
Thank goodness Governor McGreevy didn't see it that way. Oh, wait . . .
Via Insty, who's downright tabloid-ey lately. Oh, wait . . .
P.S. Did you see the pix? Bunk.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:55 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And New Jersey still voted Democrat.
Posted by: BillyHW at March 16, 2008 09:23 PM (FhMJq)
2
- Your b/f's contentions were manifestly silly. Manage can run the table in preferences, depending on how many cards of the same suit, and which doors swing in how many directions.
- I, of course, am only repeating what I've read, and have not a shred of first hand knowledge on the subject..........?........really.......well its true!
- Good day to you Miss!
Posted by: Big Bang Hunter at March 17, 2008 04:33 AM (k9TnY)
3
Little Miss Attila:
Your rather self-absorbed boyfriend meant it wouldn't be gay FOR HIM to be in bed with two women.
Best regards;
Posted by: Ruy Diaz at March 17, 2008 04:37 AM (ffrsX)
4
I don't know about other guys' problem with MFM three-ways, but my problem with them is the fact that our reproductive organs are both protruberant and delicate. The rest of the man is markedly less so, and real life sex (as with real life violence) is far more confusing and complicated than any carefully choreographed scene you ever see on TV or in the movies.
What you end up with is either a very careful but boring sexual tryst, or at least one set of mashed nads. You milage may, of course, vary.
Posted by: Tatterdemalian at March 17, 2008 04:55 AM (j8zCH)
5
Because we don't like to share our women, but we want as many of them as possible.
Gay is just an excuse for the above.
Posted by: seguin at March 17, 2008 07:44 AM (NXtju)
6
Oh, please.
Everyone knows that women aren't "gay", they're "lesbian". That's why it's "gay and lesbian association."
So two women together can't be "gay". :-)
Posted by: Greg at March 17, 2008 10:23 AM (tyA9D)
7
......let alone the fact that a dude seeing another dude's ballsack from astern would surely require years of therapy, or a well-lit twig thrust into the cornea just so. Unless of course, the seer was, well, you know, gay.
Posted by: alppuccino at March 17, 2008 11:00 AM (YknXf)
8
Well yeah, your boyfriend was right, that's just the way it is. Just as there's really no such thing as a male bisexual (he's gay); or a man who's bi-curious (he's gay), or a guy who "experiments" in college (totally gay).
And whereas randy girls these days will often snog with each other at a party or on the dance floor to impress the guys, you'll note that MEN most certainly don't do this (unless they're gay).
Posted by: Mike at March 17, 2008 11:42 AM (nM6k1)
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 17, 2008 11:47 AM (Hgnbj)
10
Latest research - men are hardwired AC or DC, women aren't (it's social conditioning). Therefore men are either straight or gay, but women are inately bisexual.
That explains it all.
Posted by: bud at March 17, 2008 12:20 PM (nv1SZ)
11
Am I the only hetersexual male in the world who is turned off by the concept of trying to satisfy two women at once?
And girl-on-girl action doesn't do anything for me either.
Posted by: Lev at March 17, 2008 12:24 PM (0suEp)
12
"And girl-on-girl action doesn't do anything for me either."
Definite sign you may be gay.
Posted by: JD at March 17, 2008 12:38 PM (SJqd2)
13
Lev: There's one other guy like that. My high school sweetheart was bothered by lesbianism. He sort of had this fear that it would affect the . . . supply line.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 17, 2008 01:03 PM (Hgnbj)
14
I bet I've done two men and a woman 3-ways 40 to 50 times in my life, and I never, never, never touched or kissed a man, let alone had sex with one. Never wanted to, never talked about it, never considered it. In fact, the idea makes me want to puke.
But, there were instances wherein a woman wouldn't "do" me or a buddy alone, but was delighted to have us both, and that was fine by me. And I've found that the fantasy was common and intense in a significant number of women. I was happy to be a part of that fantasy. I don't give a damn about seeing some guy naked (hell, I've spent half my life in gyms), but sending some babe up a wall has always had a powerful appeal for me.
Posted by: Kevin at March 17, 2008 02:24 PM (ihRHS)
15
Well, Kev--according to some men, if you care about the woman's pleasure, that's gay, too.
I assume that this apparent paradox is hashed out somewhere in the world's locker rooms . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 17, 2008 02:43 PM (Hgnbj)
16
A man's boner should be between him and his woman/women. Another dude seeing your boner is gay.
Posted by: alppuccino at March 17, 2008 05:04 PM (BYezr)
17
Well, Kev--according to some men, if you care about the woman's pleasure, that's gay, too.
Uh oh...
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 17, 2008 05:13 PM (B2X7i)
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 17, 2008 07:14 PM (Hgnbj)
19
What do you call a man and two women? Menage a trois.
What do you call two men and a woman? Gang bang.
Gay gang bang. It's gay for a naked man to be in bed with another naked man, no matter who else is present, UNLESS:
the bed is very, very large (large enough so that the men rarely even glimpse each other), located in the Playboy Mansion, and has many, many women on it.
Posted by: jb at March 17, 2008 09:30 PM (HrVHr)
20
P.S. It's gay for two women too.
Good gay.
Posted by: jb at March 17, 2008 09:30 PM (HrVHr)
21
Have you noticed how much your traffic (at least as measured by comments) has increased since you stirred the pot last week?
There's a lesson in here somewhere...
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 17, 2008 09:47 PM (DIr0W)
22
Yeah. It seems to be something like "get in the gutter and stay there; you'll end up there anyway."
Actually, I think my little mini-blogwar on gender and bodybuilding is incidental to today's traffic, which is of course due to the Instalanche--and subsequent links at Protein Wisdom, Ann Althouse, and Ace of Spades.
A cynical person remark that "there's no such thing as bad publicity." I myself, however, am not a cynic--only a skeptic.
So I'll reserve judgement
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 17, 2008 10:17 PM (Hgnbj)
23
Swordfighting bad. Donut-bumping good.
Posted by: John at March 18, 2008 06:13 AM (UBPMC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
64kb generated in CPU 0.026, elapsed 0.1407 seconds.
212 queries taking 0.1246 seconds, 516 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.