November 26, 2004
Hooray for Hollywood
Andrea Harris at
Twisted Spinster:
Bridget Johnson wonders why there has been no outcry from the Hollywood crowd against the murder of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh by Islamic terrorists. Just off the top of my head I’d say that unlike disgruntled Christians, Republicans, and law-abiding gun owners, Islamic terrorists will actually kill you if you piss them off, and for all their spouting about “free speech” and the “chilling effect” on Tinseltown of four more years of Bushitler, actors and screenwriters and so on are simply afraid of dying. Of course since their mere existence has already pegged them in fanatical Muslim eyes for the Big Sleep they are in a sense living on borrowed time, so the only solution to Hollywood’s buttheaded insular assurance that Appeasement Is the Only Way is to sit back and wait for the killings to begin. After a few big name celebrities are sent to kingdom come by exploding limosines and the like maybe we’ll see some changes in perspective.
Nah. TheyÂ’ll just screech that itÂ’s all Hitler McChimpyÂ’s fault for not protecting them better. TheyÂ’re hopeless.
So there's two depressing thoughts in a row.
Posted by: Attila at
09:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 197 words, total size 1 kb.
November 21, 2004
Or Rudy. I'd Take Rudy, too.
Via
Michael J. Totten comes this picture of Rudy G in drag:
Micheal would love to see him as the GOP nominee in '08—enough to register GOP and vote in the primaries.
I still like Condi, because I think she'd energize the Republican base a little bit better. OTOH, Giuliani comes with automatic crossover (and crossdressing) appeal.
That would be a tough choice for me, really, if they both ran in the primary. Very tough. Michael:
James Dobson, Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson, and Jerry Fallwell would finally, at long last, get the political nightmare they've deserved for a long time - a cosmopolitan socially liberal Republican president. IÂ’d love to see them form their own party where they can talk to themselves about how godless, decadent, and depraved everyone else is.
Yes. Ditto.
Giuliani is neither red nor blue. HeÂ’s purple, like most of America. I canÂ’t think of anyone (except perhaps for Barack Obama or John McCain) who would be better able to rally the country. Unlike George W. Bush he really is a uniter.
I'm not sure whether Bush's failure to "unite" the country has everything to do with his policies or actions; some of it is just the fact that he's continually demonized.
And John McCain? He never met a civil liberty he didn't want to abridge. If he were running I'd break my arm to make sure I didn't vote for him by accident. Between his temperament and his troubled relationship with the Bill of Rights, he's got to be the worst possible choice. I'd rather vote for a roast beef sandwich.
Posted by: Attila at
10:28 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Attila,
Geeze, I have always enjoyed your comments over at Jeff's, didn't realize you had a blog. I thought we would agree more, but...I'm thinking..not so much.
But thats ok!!!
Debate is what is is all about, right?
Anyway, I will keep checking in.
Us obviously hot 40 somethings need to stick together!..;-)
Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at November 21, 2004 01:28 PM (nxyup)
2
Thanks for stopping by. You just came on that rare day that I happen to run a cross-dressing photo--just the luck of the draw.
I'm probably more socially "liberal" than 75% of my readers, for what that's worth.
"Hot 40-somethings"--well, I'm holding up okay. But not quite as well as you!
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 21, 2004 01:48 PM (SuJa4)
3
"I'm not sure whether Bush's failure to "unite" the country has everything to do with his policies or actions; some of it is just the fact that he's continually demonized."
It has everything to do with his policies *AND* his actions, which is why he's continually demonized (and rightly so).
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at November 22, 2004 10:20 AM (BZ0tI)
4
I think you've pretty much nailed McCain. I have a ton of personal respect for the guy, but no way do I want to see him as President.
The others? Too soon to tell, IMHO. I'd be fine with Rudy, but I suspect he's the Republican version of Lieberman--too far from the party mainstream to get through the primaries. Condi's my emotional favorite, but I want to hear more about her domestic policies, and see how she does administering State. Obama gave a great speech, and he has a truckload of charisma, but no track record whatsoever.
In any case, it's all a few years down the road. In 2008, I suspect we'll look back at our predictions and realize that we might as well have been pulling names out of the phone book.
Posted by: utron at November 22, 2004 12:10 PM (CgIkY)
5
No, it's the demonization. Intellectual disagreement, vigorously proposing and defending your own policies, etc. is one thing. Demonizing the opposition with hate-filled rhetoric is what divides.
"I'd rather vote for a roast beef sandwich."
Me too!
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 25, 2004 07:21 AM (c8BHE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This . . .
is the kind of thing that makes us like George W. Bush:
The President intervening in an altercation between his own security detail and that of the Chileans. He pulled his primary agent away from the fracas and into the dinner being held for world leaders.
Normally, the President must have two Secret Service agents near him at all times, but in this instance the second agent had been whisked away and was being manhandled (to which he did not, apparently, react). But the primary agent, whom the President likes a great deal, was fished out of the crowd and pulled along.
(Trying hard to imagine a President Kerry rescuing one of his Secret Service agents.)
Posted by: Attila at
02:38 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I cannot imagine Kerry doing anything but whining about it. Fortunatley for him, the USSS is very professional, and would have taken care of him no matter how big a jackazz Kerry is. Fortunatley II, we'll never have to find out.
Posted by: William Teach at November 22, 2004 01:58 PM (cuTsc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 20, 2004
Protein Wisdom
has
the goods on Democratic racism. You follow the links, and are just shocked that anyone would dare portray Dr. Rice in these awful ways—based on the color of her skin.
Of course, I've never been much of an Aunt Jemima woman myself. Plain old Bisquick does it—with lashings of Mrs. Butterworth syrup, the libertarian choice.
So perhaps that's one less thing to worry about. I guess.
Posted by: Attila at
04:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
November 15, 2004
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you
. . . the next
President of the United States.
(What? You don't want Condi to be CiC? Then don't nominate another Northeastern liberal—male or female. Give yourselves a fighting chance.)
It would be interesting to have two women jockeying for the White House. And Condi is simply an astonishing woman: switchblade-smart, and (the straightened hair notwithstanding) amazingly beautiful. She turned 50 the other day, and it just doesn't show.
Posted by: Attila at
06:56 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is the woman who got her bachelor's degree at 19.
What I find funny is that
everybody had this thought at exactly the same time. Every blog of note has a post on it about Condi and the 2008 race.
I think this is just the kind of situation that the term "presumptive nominee" was created for.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at November 15, 2004 09:19 PM (UAuME)
2
Sure she has done a great job at National Security and will probably do a great job as Sec. of State, as for running for president, I would think she would have to run for a Governor's (maybe in California) or Senate (how sweet would Condi taking out Boxer be?) Seat first to show she can win a election race and manage those politics associated with it. The way I see it is (in relation to my politcal experience or lack there of) that is she runs straight for President there will be the stigma that every office she has held she has been appointed to and never really 'earning' through votes her position. Which I see as a weakness that can be exploited.
Then again I could be wrong.
Posted by: the Pirate at November 15, 2004 09:34 PM (1ox/A)
3
I believe having held a governorship is a strength in a Presidential candidate. I'm not so sure that having been a Senator is.
I have heard discussions of her potentially wanting to run for Governor of CA, which would be a nice idea, but would probably put off her White House ambitions for another decade.
Assuming she has them, of course.
In this day and age--and particularly for a woman--60 is not that old.
So it could certainly happen that way. And, despite all the media hand-wringing about Bush leaving office without an "heir apparent," we may get a stronger Pres. candidate without having to cope with a Veep selected for all the twisted reasons people pick Veep candidates.
I could actually see Giuliani making a strong GOP candidate in '08. And I think he'd also be a match for Hillary.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 09:56 PM (SuJa4)
4
I can't think of off-hand how many Senators have gone on to become President, but the only two sitting Senators who did it were JFK and Rutherford B. Hayes (I believe). Like you I do see a inherent strength in a Governor running over a Senator the whole 1 of 100 vs. 1 of 1 theory, plus the nature of the Senate isn't quite as conducive as illustrated by the 'flip-flop' label (personally I prefer double talk to discribe Kerry).
Putting off ambitions for a decade to be a governor somewhere would make her a stronger canditate (provided she was a effective governor and doesn't flop like Davis did). I hope she does run for President at some point, she'd be good at it.
No comment on the age, I'm still waiting for lower insurance rates and car rental fees.
I agree on the Veep thing.
As for Giuliani, he would make a strong Candidate, but if eh did he would just barely win it out in the primaries, probabyl coming down to GOP primary wins in non-GOP states like NY, CA, & NJ.
Posted by: the Pirate at November 15, 2004 10:14 PM (1ox/A)
5
That might be good, though. We need someone who qualifies in some sense as a centrist.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 11:37 PM (SuJa4)
6
More of a centrist, so a moderate like Franco or Pinochet?
Posted by: the Pirate at November 16, 2004 03:15 PM (FvqEB)
7
Condi or Rudy? Rudy or Condi? Condi. She is going to mop the floor with Hillary "Cankles" Clinton. Thought the moonbats and their continued insanity will make it relatively easy, after another 4 years of their attitudes.
Posted by: William Teach at November 16, 2004 04:35 PM (KCG7N)
8
Maybe. The election was awfully close. We need to be careful.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 16, 2004 05:16 PM (SuJa4)
9
Even before this, there was already a site promoting her for President in 2008:
http://www.rice2008.com/
Posted by: Ranten.N.Raven at November 17, 2004 09:22 AM (CgkPo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Smash
has a lovely story about
an anti-war protest in San Diego, inspired by our Fallujah offensive.
Initially, he, da Goddess, and others were counter-protesting as usual with the other Protest Warriors.
Then a few Marines from Camp Pendleton wandered by. Seeing the point-counterpoint on the sidewalks of San Diego, they called their friends. Soon they had a righteous counter-demonstration of their own going on.
Go read the whole thing; Smash has pictures!
Posted by: Attila at
06:23 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
any time you find yourself down in San Diego, you're welcome to join us!
Posted by: Da Goddess at November 16, 2004 11:49 PM (59LyI)
2
Is it every weekend, or should I just monitor the BFL e-mails? I'd really like to do that sometime, though the next six weeks are starting to look ugly.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 17, 2004 01:04 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 14, 2004
A Time for Healing
And here's her blog.
Via the King of Felines, Desert Cat.
(Oh, come on, my liberal friends. Even you like to see pictures of pretty young women with large guns. You must—deep down.)
Posted by: Attila at
10:56 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah but she's wearing khaki instead of a bikini top...
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at November 15, 2004 07:52 AM (BZ0tI)
2
Uh oh...serious competition for beauty and brains award.
Posted by: Don at November 15, 2004 10:56 AM (FsGoB)
3
She also flopped the photo; you can tell from the American flag, which needs to be photoshopped back to health. Actually, Mahatma, she's wearing camo.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 06:26 PM (SuJa4)
4
Isn't that the way the US flag patch is supposed to be on her right shoulder? I thought that the flag on the left shoulder was worn the regular way and the one on the right shoulder was flipped backwards. It's supposed to represent the US soldier working, moving, making progress so fast the flag gets blown backwards.
However, I could be wrong......
Posted by: Daniel at November 15, 2004 06:57 PM (kn2HE)
5
No. You're
right. I'm the one who's got it wrong. I'll have to ask the husband if he ever wore the reverse-field flag on his right sleeve.
Apparently, there's even a reverse-field flag on Air Force One.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 07:09 PM (SuJa4)
6
Some Marines from Pendleton explained it the same way Daniel did to us once at a social gathering after a rugby game against them (now its not my fault if its wrong, the memory wan't the best at the time). Mostly from back when they had the guys carrying the flags into battle like the epic Civil War movies with the Stars leading the way.
Posted by: the Pirate at November 15, 2004 09:40 PM (1ox/A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 12, 2004
The Brilliant James Joyner
Has a small, public exchange with one of my favorite writers, Jonathan Rauch, right
here. Subjects: the degree to which the U.S. has turned to the right, and the level of danger that the conservatives within the GOP will overreach (I'll take the middle ground on that one: moderate to high).
Posted by: Attila at
11:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
November 03, 2004
What America Looks Like
Sean Hannity is running
a map created by
USA Today on his web site: it shows which counties voted for Bush, nationwide.
It's time for Manhattan, Hollywood and SF to wake up and realize that they and their chosen party will have to cooperate with the rest of the country if they aspire ever to be in power again.
Posted by: Attila at
07:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Miss Attila? I'm confused! ...The red part is "Middle America," right?
Posted by: Zoot at November 05, 2004 05:59 PM (yvtyP)
2
aka "Flyover Country"
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 05, 2004 07:11 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How Not to Rebuild the Democratic Party
Sondra K offers us
one good reason not to be "good sports": a portrait of George W. Bush composed of pictures of dead American soldiers. According to one
Freeper, it's tucked away on an obscure part of the Michael Moore web site, so presumably it's "yet to be released" as an official part of Lord Pork Pork's electronic presence.
It's disgusting, and inexcusable. If I had lost a family member in the War on Terror, I'd be livid. As it is, I'm pretty furious.
Posted by: Attila at
06:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
49kb generated in CPU 0.0209, elapsed 0.1292 seconds.
212 queries taking 0.1182 seconds, 484 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.