May 06, 2008
April 27, 2008
On Feminism and White Privilege
. . . Jeff G. decided to
show up for work today.
(Oh, for Pete's sake, people. No, rape isn't funny, but white guilt can be hilarious. And these days those who think black men are more sexual than white men—or better in bed, or whatnot—don't know very many men of any race.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
January 21, 2008
Our Friend, the Saudis
. . . may begin
"allowing" women to do something I've been doing since the age of 17. (No, not that. We're talking about that skill that takes decades to get really good at, and is generally thought of in the West as "the right to travel," and A Good Thing for commerce.)
There's even talk of letting adult females register in hotels without male "guardians."
There are moments in the middle of the night that I just want to, um, ventilate the entire Muslim male population of the entire Middle East.
Then I take a valium, and I'm good for another 24 hours.
Please send more tranquilizers—or more Winchester Silver Tips. Either way.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
December 03, 2007
My Question for the MultiCultis:
As long as we're being so
"tolerant" of other cultures and their various approaches to radical genital mutilation, why not bring back the
castrati?
Not removing the testicles of young boys so they will have greater vocal range later in life strikes me as intolerance of traditional Italian culture, and a terrible blow to opera-lovers everywhere.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:25 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Allessandro Moreschi's shade will not be happy with your suggestion.
Posted by: Bohemian at December 04, 2007 01:42 PM (NLmWQ)
2
The multicultis have wanted to castrate all straight while males for just about the duration of the movement.
Posted by: John at December 04, 2007 03:23 PM (r7NfG)
3
The muzlims of the Ottoman empire were big on eunuchs for tending their harems, so once they take over (which the Left is helping to set in place) we are likely to see this practice begun again. Muzlims are not big on music, however, so I don't think this is going to do much for opera.
Posted by: Dr.D at December 04, 2007 08:28 PM (KG5do)
4
Just came back from the future, and I'm happy to report that the UN One-World Emergency Gov't separated sex from procreation in the year 2056 to stem Global Warming. Your friendly World Health Service will perform a vasectomy on every male at age 7, and you will have to receive a permit for procreation via sperm collection by filing the appropriate forms at your regional office. Proof of lifetime carbon offsets required, of course.
Female circumcision doesn't require the removal of the clitoris and sexual sensation and pleasure. It just achieves it most every time, absent complications. Funny thing, that, given the use of the finest shards of broken glass and tin can lids finely crafted for the task, and the precise skills of the untrained practitioners wielding same. Without anesthetics.
Posted by: Darrell at December 04, 2007 08:49 PM (umZdf)
5
Time travelers from the distant future visiting here to prevent the hell dimension you grew up in-- welcome! Remember Wednesday's "historic" global warming Senate vote and Brian Williams choosing "Mother Earth" as person of the year. You know what you have to do! Good Luck!
Posted by: Darrell at December 04, 2007 08:58 PM (umZdf)
6
If any of your operatives are caught or killed, the secretary is fucked . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 05, 2007 02:32 AM (aywD+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 05, 2007
Not Content to Simply Oppress His Own Wife,
Dennis is
oppressing Amanda Marcotte on the side.
"Knock-knock jokes." What a strange, fascinating creature Dennis is.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Technically, don't you need a "Knock-knock" and a "Who's there?" for it to be a knock-knock joke?
Example: Knock-knock.
Who's there?
Amanda.
Amanda who?
Exactly.
Posted by: Darrell at June 05, 2007 07:44 PM (Vcv+O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 25, 2006
Here You Go, Yolanda.
I adapted the expression about a servile womb not breeding free men from the closing stanza of this poem:
Advice to Young Ladies
A.U.C. 334: about this date
For a sexual misdemeanor, which she denied,
The vestal virgin Postumia was tried.
Livy records it among affairs of state.
They let her off: it seems she was perfectly pure;
The charge arose because some thought her talk
Too witty for a young girl, her eyes, her walk
Too lively, her clothes too smart to be demure.
The Pontifex Maximus, summing up the case,
Warned her in future to abstain from jokes,
To wear less modish and more pious frocks.
She left the court reprieved, but in disgrace.
What then? With her the annalist is less
Concerned than what the men achieved that year:
Plots, quarrels, crimes, with oratory to spare!
I see Postumia with her dowdy dress,
Stiff mouth and listless step; I see her strive
To give dull answers. She had to knuckle down.
A vestal virgin who scandalized that town
Had fair trial, then they buried her alive.
Alive, bricked up in suffocating dark,
A ration of bread, a pitcher if she was dry,
Preserved the body they did not wish to die
Until her mind was quenched to the last spark.
How many the black maw has swallowed in its time!
Spirited girls who would not know their place;
Talented girls who found that the disgrace
Of being a woman made genius a crime;
How many others, who would not kiss the rod
Domestic bullying broke or public shame?
Pagan or Christian, it was much the same:
Husbands, St. Paul declared, rank next to God.
Livy and Paul, it may be, never knew
That Rome was doomed; each spoke of her with pride.
Tacitus, writing after both had died,
Showed that whole fabric rotten through and through.
Historians spend their lives and lavish ink
Explaining how great commonwealths collapse
From great defects of policy—perhaps
The cause is sometimes simpler than they think.
It may not seem so grave an act to break
Postumia's spirit as Galileo's, to gag
Hypatia as crush Socrates, or drag
Joan as Giordano Bruno to the stake.
Can we be sure? Have more states perished, then,
For having shackled the inquiring mind,
Than those who, in their folly not less blind,
Trusted the servile womb to breed free men?
—A.D. Hope
More thoughts on the current pertinence of the poem here, and another site reproduces it with footnotes to explain the historical references.
When I was young I always assumed the poem was written by a woman, because men were too busy thinking of new ways to oppress us. Wrong.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:00 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 3 kb.
1
WOW!!!
What a blast to the brain on a lazy Saturday morning before the end of spring break.
Thank you!
IÂ’ve never paid much attention to poetry before, but this one will make me a fan.
It should be translated into Arabic. So that the next time I read on a blog how Israel is at fault for the depressed state if the Muslim world, I have material for a reply.
Posted by: Yolanda at March 25, 2006 10:45 AM (1sZay)
2
I know i spend most of my waking days thinking of ways to better oppress women.
Posted by: Averroes at March 25, 2006 08:16 PM (jlOCy)
3
I don't mind being oppressed, as long as it's done with a little class and verve.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 25, 2006 11:13 PM (s96U4)
4
Somehow this reminds me of the old
mpot:
"Hurt me," says the masochist, and the sadist says, "No!"
Posted by: Averroes at March 27, 2006 03:52 PM (jlOCy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 20, 2006
The Vagina Dialogue
Darleen has some great
thoughts that started as a riff on my last rape post, and took on a life of their own.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:45 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
First monologues, now dialogues. Who wants them to be so chatty?
Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at February 22, 2006 01:33 PM (ZaM5Y)
2
I'm only afraid that mine says bad things about me while I'm asleep.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 22, 2006 02:35 PM (s96U4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 16, 2006
Rapeseed Oil.
Cathy Young and Jeff Goldstein are trying to have a
serious discussion of rape, and how to address the current inequities in law/custom without going back to the old inequities in law/custom.
Oddly, they are each experiencing a high noise-to-signal ratio. Hm.
Next week Jeff will take another crack at abortion, and Cathy will respond. Doctrinaire gender feminists will be just as helpful in that exchange.
I can't stop thinking of the time I read aloud in my writer's group from an autobiographical piece that discussed my first experience of sexual intercourse, which happened to be by force—but by a boy I was dating, and knew would not kill or seriously injure me.
One of the women in the group was profoundly shocked at all this, and simply could not believe that the people who knew about it didn't do more to help me.
"You know," I responded, "that was pretty small potatoes compared to all the other things that were going on when I was a teenager."
This woman had heard enough from my autobiographical pieces to know that I was homeless multiple times during that era, not to mention getting attacked with a club by a close family member. Etc.
And yet, in the tradition of extreme feminists everywhere, she regarded me as simply a walking vagina with arms and legs attached to it.
How did sexual politics come to this? When did we get this far off-course?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:52 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"The notion of a universality of human experience is a confidence trick and the notion of a universality of female experience is a clever confidence trick." - Angela Carter
"Mother goddesses are just as silly a notion as father gods. If a revival of the myths of these cults gives woman emotional satisfaction, it does so at the price of obscuring the real conditions of life. This is why they were invented in the first place." - also Angela Carter
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at February 16, 2006 06:55 PM (walOq)
2
I didn't think it was possible, but Patterico has been having a very civil and extended discussion of abortion.
it gives me hope, even though people don't see eye to eye, the 'noise' is minimal!
PS Let me know when you're ready to enjoy a pitcher of margaritas! Take that DC taste of what passes for east coast "mexican" food outta your mouth.
Posted by: Darleen at February 16, 2006 10:37 PM (FgfaV)
3
1) Wow. I'll have to head over there to P's Pontifications.
2) Couple of weeks would be great. Just have to catch up with a few things around the house, and take care of a few clients. Something like first weekend in March . . .?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 16, 2006 11:08 PM (XbEp3)
4
AG
COOL! Couple of weeks will be very nice.
Now, please beat me about the head and shoulders for trying to have a civil discussion with 'extreme' feminists about The Vagina Monologues.
I just got told (because I don't fall down and worship the play as ART) that I'm anti-female-sexuality and I let men own my vagina.
I keep thinking that sweet reason can be a place even those will disagree can meet.
Argh.
Posted by: Darleen at February 17, 2006 03:18 PM (FgfaV)
5
Actually, I've never seen it, but I've heard a few quotes. I've always figured it was an excuse to get the word "vagina" into the media, because if that happens we will have officially Achieved Freedom. I'm afraid is sounds like pap, though I guess I ought to see it once.
But, really: what an unsexy word, "vagina." And to pretend that a mere canal is the "ringleader" in female sexuality isn't very smart. The vagina more or less goes with what the frontline decision-makers want . . . the brain, clit and vulva are really in charge, IMHO>
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 17, 2006 08:07 PM (XbEp3)
6
Very nice post, AtillaGirl.
"A walking vagina with arms and legs attached to it" -- isn't that what we, as women, were supposed to want to get away from?
Argh.
Posted by: Cathy Young at February 18, 2006 02:40 AM (wZLWV)
7
AG
I haven't see VM, but I've read the play. I can't bring myself to suffer 90 minutes of really bad, trite writing know matter how "empowering" it's supposed to be.
The author, Eve Ensler, has written a new play based on conversations with her stomach.
Cathy
If you see yourself as a "whole" woman, and you don't
embrace and become your vagina..you are letting men own it. You are stifling your sexuality.
It's really weird. Extreme feminists have now offered themselves up as the answer to a 15 y/o boy's wetdream.
Posted by: Darleen at February 18, 2006 01:00 PM (FgfaV)
8
Somehow, I've never been tempted to over-identify with my genitals. My fetching cerebral cortex might be a different matter, of course.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 18, 2006 03:15 PM (9c7FW)
9
I have had some discussions with radical feminists, and during one discussion, I mentioned that having sex with someone you're not married to, and as a matter of fact might not even love, allows her to be used by the man. She replied: "Well, I'm using him too".
So the new breed of radical feminists has institutionalized what I had always thought feminism was opposed to... the objectivation of women.
Posted by: Tony at February 21, 2006 08:40 PM (cNut9)
10
It's okay as long as
bothsexes are brought down to the lowest common denominator.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 21, 2006 09:49 PM (XbEp3)
11
Every time I try to talk to a "real" feminist about the Vagina Monologues, I'm told that I'm just repressed. Or a spouter of right-wing propaganda. I can't stand the fact that on my campus, and on campuses around the country, this play is the pinnacle of liberated womanhood. Strange, I always thought that feminists took issue with the objectification and oversexualization of women. Silly me.
Posted by: The Quartermaster at February 25, 2006 06:34 PM (U/H7b)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 05, 2006
Goodbye, Betty.
James Joyner pays his
respects.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:57 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/columnists/zito/s_420327.html
Posted by: Salena Zito at February 05, 2006 08:18 AM (kxhLo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 12, 2005
Feminism Kerfuffle
No, I haven't read all the posts and cross-posts; I'm on vacation. But I do like
Darleen's summary of the current blogstorm.
I continued to call myself a feminist right up to the point that some self-proclaimed leaders of the women's movement publicly justified William Jefferson Clinton's exploitation of Monica Lewinsky. Then I backed off for a few years.
Since I've started blogging I've used the label on occasion—to distinguish myself from conservatives of the LaShawn stripe—but I generally like to remind people that the word feminist has about as many interpretations as there are people hearing the word.
What do I mean when I say it? I mean sexists are icky. That's all.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:29 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well there went three hours of my life...
Actually it was rather educational. And Jeff's endless patience and rhetorical skill is nothing to sneeze at. I'm more than pleased that someone of his caliber, steeped in the terminology and techniques of academia, is willing to duke it out for the conservative/libertarian corner.
If that's the essence of your feminism though, beware--you are probably an "anti-feminst" by the terms of the non-establishment establishment feminists (just don't you dare call them "gender feminists"!).
I guess by their terms I am an "anti-feminist" too, though I was comforted to realize that this is not necessarily the same as "sexist trogolodyte", depending upon how you define your terms.
Geez Louise!! Now that my brain is all in a pretzel, I have an urge to grab a crowbar and beat the hell out of some unfortunate hobo, just to clear out my testosterone channels and reassert myself as an Alpha Male member of the Patriarchy.
Posted by: Desert Cat at December 12, 2005 10:59 PM (xdX36)
2
I have the advantage of having the flu, and knowing I can't follow anything too intricate at the moment.
Bottom line: I am what I am. I probably strike a lot of people as a gender traitor, but that's fine.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 13, 2005 08:37 AM (Japql)
3
I'm not sure anyone can say Clinton exploited Monica. She was of age and decided to make out with a big powerful daddy figure.
There was of course the "stalking" charge. Of more relevance was Paula Jones. Her charges were serious if unverified. But the "you never know what you'll find if you wave a hundred dollar bill in a trailer park" remark was certainly unjustified.
But monica as feeble exploited victim, I guess you see yourself in this, nice middle class girl, not working class trash like Paula. Clinton was sleezy, but so was she.
Posted by: cathy at December 13, 2005 11:43 AM (PYzke)
4
No one denies that Monica was the initiator in those encounters. Or that she was technically an adult. But I believe a lot of people would prefer that the commander in chief of the U.S. be made of stronger stuff, and be able to resist such temptations.
And I found it rather ironic that a lot of women who had previously asserted that extreme power differences made consent less meaningful suddenly reversed their thinking when it came to Clinton. This applies to Jones even more than Lewinsky, of course.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 14, 2005 09:29 AM (Japql)
5
"No one denies that Monica was the initiator in those encounters. Or that she was technically an adult. But I believe a lot of people would prefer that the commander in chief of the U.S. be made of stronger stuff, and be able to resist such temptations."
Technically an adult? Do you want to raise the age of consent? Do you think she could consent to an abortion?
The counter argument is that if the Commander in chief can't get a BJ, who can?
Actua;lly, rather than prim puritans, people have always admired charismatic lusty leaders in politics. The Europeans were quite berfuddled about why we were making a fuss over monica.
Can anyone say J-F-K?
The difference is that in those days, there was a bit of restraint in the press. Polirtical correspindents knew enough to report on just those things that were vital to the country.
Having said that, it would be interesting to think about how or if a woman president would be treated differently.
Maybe Hillary will both get back at Bill and proivide us a real world opportunity to see about it!
Posted by: Averroes at December 14, 2005 02:29 PM (jlOCy)
6
The point is, it was almost whiplash-inducing to watch feminists change their stance regarding power differences and consent in sexual situations--or at least carve out a hefty exception for sexist members of the Patriarchy who happened to favor abortion rights.
I can't remember where it was I read--maybe one of JeffG's long articles--about how Clinton may have singlehandedly undone a whole lot of what Anita Hill did. I don't know about that, but he certainly managed to expose a huge vein of hypocrisy.
Posted by: Desert Cat at December 14, 2005 05:54 PM (xdX36)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
49kb generated in CPU 0.0366, elapsed 0.1794 seconds.
212 queries taking 0.1613 seconds, 455 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.