August 07, 2007
Emerging Technologies
Unfortunately, today will be my last day at
Siggraph; I'll have to make it count.
My very favorite exhibit in Emerging Technologies was "Globe 4D," put together by some whip-smart Netherlanders at the Universitat Leiden. In the middle of the display is a an ordinary globe atlas; surrounding it is a lazy Susan sort of device that allows one to track changes the occur, or occurred, or might occur, over a matter of time. (That is, one can historically track what has happened with continental drift, and which tectonic plates will be crashing against each other in the future—and therefore what continents will be merging in the next few million years. Or one can simply look at the effects of light on Earth, by tracking the days and seasons. Or one can look at what could happen if water levels rise. [Hint: Florida and Holland could be in trouble.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
July 21, 2007
Thanks, Darrell!
You're the best stalker a girl could ever have.
The last component of my birthday gift arrived a few days ago: a small martini shaker, a light-up pen, a few bottle openers that didn't sport the names of gins on them (vodka and rum respectively), and could well have been thrown in by the packager.
And when I misplaced my shades the other day I wore the Tanqueray Arnold-style wraparounds.
I looked beyond cool.
For both of you who still read this blog, I'd just like to announce that Hell Week is over on the volunteer front, and I can go back to the more normal insanity of juggling clients.
That means that I might blog again someday soon.
Especially if I am able to make it out to Siggraph. I hope I can: I missed it last year. Wrong coast, and all that.
Of course, this year may require that I be in two places at once: Los Angeles, working at a magazine client's digs, and San Diego, celebrating pop culture and the fusing of art with technology.
It can't be that hard. Lesser people do shit like that all the time. Or so I hear.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:58 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No coupon? For Tanqueray, of course.
Non-gin related items? How uncouth!
Posted by: Darrell at July 23, 2007 06:53 PM (MgcVC)
2
About that San Diego event...
Disney will have a replica of The Black Pearl at their exhibit. This info I got from the local news.
Keep your eyes open for a lady by the name of Carrie Vaughn. She's got a series of books out about the adventures of one Katherine "Kitty" Norville, a werewolf DJ. Carrie has a talent for messing with genre conventions and tropes. (Ever wondered what happened after the psycho monster got killed?) She's on a panel on Thursday should you make the event.
BTW, I won't be making it this year (no money, dang), but I am available for chatting and spilling the dirt. 333 G St Apt 607 is my place of habitation, just 2 blocks east of the Ralph's downtown.
Posted by: Alan Kellogg at July 24, 2007 01:29 AM (uW7ra)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2007
My Cell Phone Finally Died Today.
So I got something cool, but not quite the heart's desire: it's
light and pretty, but it doesn't have a qwerty keyboard, so I'm not sure how I'm supposed to send people text messages (not that I do it that often, anyway--but I feel like I ought to be able to).
Before I had to worry about the Impending Car Replacement Project I think I was leaning toward the Sidekick (or maybe even a Treo), but I can always get one of those later. The one feature this phone has that my old one doesn't, is that there is supposedly a calandar in it somewhere. (So I might not need a smart phone or even a PDA before I can ditch my paper agenda. We'll see. BTW, did you know that my pocket calendar is gay? It came out to me right after I brought it home from Office Depot. No one else knows, though, so please don't talk about it.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
March 30, 2007
Is Google Taking Over?
I never used AOL, but I had friends who told me that it was awful—that people kept bugging them, wanting to chat.
Google might be turning into something similar. I mean, as a Mac user, everything seems fine. But when I log into my gmail account from work, using Internet Explorer, Gmail wants to tell me what everyone is doing—based on nothing other than the fact that I've sent them e-mail in the past. People like my colleague at the nonprofit, who is a fellow night owl. And bloggers whom I would never presume to send notes to for any frivolous reason: Gmail wants Windows users to know whether they are at their machines at any given hour of the day or night.
It's kind of creepy. I understand that it's supposed to facilitate chat, but do I really want to chat with everyone I know? Do I want them to be able to chat with me?
And is chatting efficient anyway?—isn't there a certain amount of sitting around while the other person types? And having them wait while I type, producing lines that contain [cough, cough] typographical errors?
Hm. I don't know if I like this Brave New World. I think I want the old one back.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If I'm a good example I don't usually IM my friends on Google Talk unless I have something to say. No bland "How's the weather out there?" questions.
Can't say much about Gmail since I don't use it enough. There must be a default setting in it to keep yourself offline when using it. If not complain to Google because I'm sure others would like that feature.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 30, 2007 10:57 PM (QJ5cf)
2
You can sign off of chat by clicking the "Set status here" button.
We all knew they would invent a method of communication that didn't involve the brain. Someone should write a program for a random answer generator so that anyone over 18 doesn't have to really participate. Nobody will ever know.
Posted by: Darrell at March 31, 2007 09:23 AM (VNWWq)
3
But it isn't that I mind other people knowing when I'm online. It's that I find it strange that gmail wants me to know what people like James Joyner and the Ace of Spades are doing.
I guess, strictly speaking, it's no weirder than the fact that my neighbors used to know how late I was staying up reading because of when the lamp went out in the living room, though. So perhaps it's a matter of geographical proximity--or lack thereof.
I feel like I can see into other people's living rooms, and I have no way of knowing whether they want me to.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 31, 2007 01:49 PM (1tv3E)
4
People close the blinds when they desire privacy. Besides, computer can do things when their "human companions" are not around. For example, I'm taking a shower now before going to bed. 7AM Mass comes so fast you know, and tomorrow's is a long one.
Posted by: Darrell at March 31, 2007 08:48 PM (yXCxb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2007
February 13, 2007
And Speaking of Appliances . . .
our toaster is dying. Sometime in the next month, I'll have to go out and buy one. Basically I want a Williams-Sonoma model for Wal-Mart money. As usual.
Thoughts?
My mother found a cool Oster with the features I like, so I might try to get a four-slot version of hers.
And don't be saying, "you killed it with those nonstop toaster waffles." We already know that. We're contrite, and stuff. Well, we aren't really contrite, but we're willing to play it on TV.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:59 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I got a nice toaster at Tuesday Morning last year.
Posted by: maggie katzen at February 13, 2007 10:10 PM (movWU)
2
Look at this first and give us some ideas of what you like. http://products.howstuffworks.com/toaster-reviews.htm
May I suggest http://shopproducts.howstuffworks.com/toasters/SF-1/PID-21376641 Check out that SmartBargains price. Don't fear factory refurbished items, especially small appliances: Many have never been used. People get multiples in some cases and they return the highest priced items.
If you wanted something that none of your friend have, try http://shopproducts.howstuffworks.com/toasters/SF-1/PID-27900641
Look at that price from the Amazon Marketplace vendor. I can't resist getting something for $35 that someone else is selling for $300.
Fluffy made me redo this by coming back empty after a spam alert. It was more comprehensive the first time. Sigh. A minute or two my ass. . .I've been trying to post this since 1PM Central Time on February 14th.. What we do for LMA!
Posted by: Darrell at February 15, 2007 09:36 AM (Z1w99)
3
The good news is, Fluffy may go into semi-retirement after Munuviana gets its new system.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 15, 2007 01:57 PM (0CbUL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2007
Dear Diary,
It feels so good to write this all out. It's clarified my thoughts tremendously, and made me see that my problems aren't insurmountable.
Now—how do I post this?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:07 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was almost afraid to click (thanks Beth C) when I saw "urban dictionary" and the prefix "ana..."
There are too many sick things in this world :-)
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 17, 2007 10:06 PM (r0kgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 12, 2007
Bob (The Good One, Not the Bad One) Points Us To This Bitchin' Video.
I think no matter where we stand on the political spectrum, or how we feel about the war, we can all agree that
zombies are cool.
"I'm not a monster,
Well—technically I am.
I guess I am."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
January 10, 2007
January 08, 2007
Live From Las Vegas!
The Popular Mechanics
CES blog.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
January 04, 2007
For Pete's Sake.
Excuse me. I meant, Pete's
sake.
H/t: Darrell. As he points out, this is a perfectly legitimate use for RFID.
I'm a bit staggered by all the negative comments: turns out there's a huge anti-sake lobby out there! My feeling is, almost any wine that is served hot is good. And red wine is better than white not just because of all the interesting tannins and whatnot, but because it's served closer to room temperature.
Those of us with a high surface-area-per-volume have an interest in such things . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:06 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Those of us with a high surface-area-per-volume have an interest in such things . . ."
Sure. Start with the graphic sex talk, then just leave us hanging. Er, maybe hanging's not the best word. . . What's French for a 72-degree angle?
Posted by: Darrell at January 05, 2007 12:37 PM (3lHEJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 03, 2007
December 28, 2006
Bad Idea: RFIDs on American Passports
Good idea: "inadvertantly"
destroying the chip.
Thank you, Wired.
And thank you, Sean Hackbarth.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:10 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't know enough about it to be scared. What information is on the chip that isn't on the pages of the passport itself? Birthday? Check. Height? Weight? Check. (Even fairly accurate.)
But my passport won't expire until 2011, and I like watching privacy nuts get all nutty.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at December 28, 2006 10:23 PM (QJ5cf)
2
well considering that anyone with a reader could get enough info to steal your identity (name, address, SSN, Birthday) as they pass you in the airport, yeah, not so good.
Hammer time.
Of course, I don't even have one right now.
Posted by: caltechgirl at December 28, 2006 10:53 PM (hQNjm)
3
It's one thing that the person who checks your passport knows you're American: it's worse when anyone you pass on the street might know that too, if they are carrying the right equipment.
After all, we aren't that popular in some quarters.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 28, 2006 11:55 PM (zxOEV)
4
You can just keep your passport in a (conductive) metal sleeve--a Faraday Cage(Gauss Cage). I bet there would be a market for a LMA passport 'wallet', featuring the avatar of our fearless leader. Store that in a LMA metal cigarette-type case, and you will be all set for any eventuality. Supplies limited by demand, of course. Forget the hammer. No profit in that.
Posted by: Darrell at December 29, 2006 10:58 AM (ZYQoU)
5
Ah, to have been rich enough when I was young, or to have enough time now that I'm no longer poor, to ever have required a passport....
Posted by: TheManTheMyth at December 29, 2006 11:55 AM (Gvo/q)
6
Attila. Miss. Attila. Shaken, not stirred.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 29, 2006 01:42 PM (zxOEV)
7
I might be in the market for a LMA 'everyday' wallet, too, now that credit card companies are using RFID chips. http://www.difrwear.com/products.shtml
It's great that thief can steal my credit info at 50 paces now. Thanks AE, Visa and MasterCard!!!
Something like in that link. Only in the LMA brand-- with a higher price, of course. If AG has a talk with Q, maybe she can come up with a line of products that can protect against EMPs, too. I suggest using MuShield-- http://www.mushield.com/sample_kits.html
technology for that. I wouldn't want my electronic crap damaged in the case of a nuclear attack. Where would I get my tunes or my porn?
MI6 girl, really? I would have pictured you a Bond villain or Bond Girl with that first name and all. Lots of possibilities there.
Posted by: Darrell at December 29, 2006 08:49 PM (Grscj)
8
My SS number on the chip: not cool. The rest could probably be found about me with a few Google searches.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at December 29, 2006 10:35 PM (QJ5cf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 19, 2006
Rubber Sidewalks.
You've seen the pictures, right? Here's the
backstory: it sounds like one of those "why didn't someone think of this before?" moments. Walkers and runners will be especially happy about it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:45 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
September 11, 2006
Advice from My Computer Lady, 2
"Twenty thousand is kind of a lot of mail to have in your 'in' box. You might want to throw some of it away."
But if I throw it away, that'll guarantee I'll need it soon—no?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:09 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes. guaranteed. One of the few things you can be sure of....
Posted by: Lifecruiser at September 12, 2006 09:16 AM (9fTBB)
2
Thats what always happens to me. I just get a bigger hard drive. 8^)
Posted by: Jack at September 12, 2006 10:03 AM (8I6Wb)
3
for me too. That's like a corollary to Murphy's law.
Posted by: caltechgirl at September 12, 2006 10:10 AM (/vgMZ)
4
You can count on it!
Just do what I do, get a Gmail account and fill it up! Once it's close to filled forward new mail to a new Gmail account (without saving a copy in the old account). In theory this could go on forever but odds are Google will catch on soon. Someday I'll plan to take a two week vacation on a beach, drink some margaritas and tidy up the original account. That makes the vacation tax deductible-no?
Posted by: Janette at September 14, 2006 09:55 PM (OcgcA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 10, 2006
Advice from My Computer Lady, 1
"Empty out your trash bin every once in a while. You have 200 items in there, including pictures, videos, and applications."
I was very hurt by that. But then, I'm sure the tough love did me good.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
August 08, 2006
Holy Biofuel, Batman.
Ford Motor Company just bought an ad from me. And it's started . . . well, it started a
blog. With word entries
and video updates about its efforts to go green and turn the company around. It makes me want to buy a Mustang—one that runs on ethanol, of course.
Hat tip: the folks at blogads, who let me know what a brave new world of corporate communications I entered earlier today when I approved that ad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:05 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, holy smokes. Congratulations!
Posted by: k at August 08, 2006 07:31 PM (y6n8O)
2
I'm sure all your readers will click that link to the "Bold Moves" website.
LMA is the new force in today's business world. Wonder when other forward-thinking companies will get the message...
Posted by: Darrell at August 09, 2006 07:45 AM (isnKJ)
3
You're right in thinking since Ford now supports your site you should reciprocate. All's fair in love and ads, as the saying goes. Get the Mustang in RED, of course, maybe the convertible version. Oh yeah, that's it. Red convertible. Be sure to include the designer sunglasses in the package.
Red. Convertible. Hmmmm. Think about it.
Posted by: clyde at August 10, 2006 06:12 AM (6m+7s)
4
Another thought: work a deal where you get a HUGE discount on the red convertible in exchange for free ad space. Red. Convertible. Sounds better every time I type it, doesn't it? Oh, yeah!
Posted by: clyde at August 10, 2006 06:13 AM (6m+7s)
5
While you're cutting your deal for the red Mustang convertible, don't hold back. I'd like one in dark green. With butter-colored leather interior, thank you very much.
Posted by: clyde at August 12, 2006 03:15 AM (6m+7s)
6
I don't see why not, though I think I might go for black rather than the red. But they've already sent me $35, so I figure I have 'em whipped . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 12, 2006 08:05 AM (10HYf)
7
Let's see...$35 a hour for 24 hrs = $840 per day. $840 a day in ad income from Ford means you'll be able to buy that new RED convertible Mustang in a little over 41 days. Very cool. Red is a LOT easier to keep clean than black, is the reason for the color recommendaion. Your burgeoning ad income also means that I will be able to pick up MY new Mustang convertible (in dark green) in 82 days! Wow. I can hardly wait. Sell more ads quick! More commentary to follow at inflated rates, now that you're rich.
Posted by: clyde at August 12, 2006 08:22 AM (6m+7s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2006
I Need to Trace an IP Number.
Can someone give me the step-by-step? Can I do it from within Movable Type?
My readers are the awesomest.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:00 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Check out http://www.samspade.org/ .
The whois function will tell you who owns the netblock. Lots of dialup/cable/dsl connections don't necessarily have any publically available use data about them, as they're dynamically assigned. Whois tells you at least who owns the IP address.
What is it that you're trying to do? drop me a line, if you like.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at August 08, 2006 05:05 AM (1hM1d)
2
If you just want to know what town it's coming from, go
here and type the address in the first box. That will give you city and state.
To find the controller of the ip, open up a dox box (start->run->type in 'cmd' ). When the window opens, type 'nslookup ' except replace with the real ip address.
That'll give you the hostname with the true owner of the domain. do a
whois on that to find out who to contact.
If you do a whois on the ip address, you will get misleading information because of different subnet ownership.
Posted by: Kevin at August 08, 2006 09:21 AM (++0ve)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 07, 2006
Art for Art's Sake
What constitutes art? How central is craft in true art?
And, whose work do you dig the most: 1) the old masters, 2) the impressionists, 3) Picasso/Kandinsky et al.?
Should art support linear thought or complement it?
Should it be representational, or abstract?
Should it delight the eye, or get one to think?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:47 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I never understood what made something art. I think it's just anything made with the purpose of pleasing the eye. If it makes you think or feel, that just makes it 'good' art.
I am a painter, though admittedly somewhat ameteur. Here's my latest,
"Vineyard Mornings". It's reminiscent of Renoir, but as you can see I'm still not very good at paining clouds
Posted by: Kevin at July 07, 2006 12:33 PM (++0ve)
2
Oops! I linked to a funny Greg Gutfield post on Global Warming by mistake. Here's
my painting.
(jokes are less funny if you blow the timing, huh)
Posted by: Kevin at July 07, 2006 12:36 PM (++0ve)
3
Well, why cannot a painting delight the eye and set one to thinking?
Personally, I've always felt that artists who were able to draw a horse before going in for abstraction had much better provisioned careers.
Having said that, Attila Girl, please do go over and submit your "rapity-rape" poem to the post at Ace's place regarding another PW troll. Jeff's site has been down due to DoS, probably incited by the strange creature who threatened Satchel in the comments.
Best,
Dan
Posted by: Dan Collins at July 07, 2006 03:36 PM (SDhNB)
4
I think art should convey feelings. We look at something for an impression and a feeling.
Too often I see art being used as commentary or political retoric. Sometimes I see what is aluded to as art which I am sure is artistic humor as they run to the bank. (Urinals as art)
One thing we will not know for sure is what is really art today. Because true art withstands the detriment of time. It will still be art 100 years from now. So when you look at art think, in a 100 years which do you think will be in a museum.
Posted by: Jack at July 07, 2006 07:58 PM (XUJmE)
5
I like classical architecture, sculpture, frescos, mosaics and decorative arts. I like medieval gothic painting and sculpture and the same in Renaissance art. I appreciate neoclassical and romantic paintings from the 19th and early 20th Centuries and think mid-20th Century American painters like Grant Wood and Edward Hopper are great.
Obviously I like physically recognizable subjects in art -- people, places, and things -- with allegorical or pensive themes. Art that pleases me most is that which opens my mind to reflections on the significance of human activity, self-perception of one's place in society, and difficult emotions such as loss, loneliness, alienation, and the occasional human triumph.
Surrealist painters like Dali and Rene Magritte, who distort and manipulate conventional images to stimulate reflection and emotion, are also high on my list.
On the other hand, I just don't get artists like Jackson Pollock and Alexander Calder. I'm more the balding old guy in Norman Rockwell's "Abstract & Concrete," who is looking at an abstract painting with an unknowable reaction, than I am what the old man is looking at. Hey, the colors are nice and aesthetically pleasing (sometimes) but WTF is the artist "trying to say?" So color me confused and unappreciative of most modern art, and if that makes me a Philistine or troglodyte, so be it.
Posted by: Redhand at July 07, 2006 10:41 PM (7G9b2)
6
There really are no "shoulds" in art. I believe this to be true no matter the form. We who are artists at heart leave the "shoulds" to the critics, then ignore them from a distance while we continue to pursue whatever definition of "art" strikes our fancies.
The only "should" I would even consider would be that no one "should" be forced to endure municipal art that costs taxpayers tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for the express purpose of making your municipality a laughing stock. Those responsible "should" spend the rest of their natural lives locked in the hoosegow.
Posted by: Woody at July 08, 2006 01:15 AM (e9FIN)
7
It should delight the mind and the eye.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at July 08, 2006 02:57 PM (FU1id)
8
Well, said, Sissy.
Dan, I can't remember the "rapity rape" poem, except that I was making fun of people who assumed Darleen and I (and all Jeff's commenters) were self-hating women.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 08, 2006 03:53 PM (4IuF2)
9
"Art. Isn't that a man's name?"
A. Warhol
Posted by: Gregor Samsa Mendel at July 08, 2006 05:39 PM (Vw1om)
10
Sissy's post reminds me of another quote on art...just can't place it
Paraphrase
Art should be uplifting (enlightening?) otherwise, what's it for?
Interestingly,
Puffington Host just had an article about how it is so NATURAL that only liberals are creative and produce "art."
sheesh
Posted by: Darleen at July 09, 2006 11:18 AM (rvX7J)
11
Also, they are the only intelligent people. At least, that's what they've been telling me.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 09, 2006 02:24 PM (4IuF2)
12
Here. This is art.
REAL art.
http://myunclepepeksjournal.blogspot.com/
Posted by: k at July 09, 2006 04:40 PM (wZLWV)
13
I thought this would make a great meme- so I'm going to use your questions ( with linkback) and answer them.
Great post!
Posted by: ilona at July 12, 2006 03:46 PM (nWCog)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 22, 2006
Boston.
End of July/beginning of August.
I'll be travelling alone, so I'll consider any money-saving tips that don't involve either sharing a room or giving up internet access.
Why? Well, you know: it's hard to drop by if you aren't in the neighborhood. And how else would I see my friends?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:47 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Did I ever tell you I have a bunch of old *Videography* magazines from the mid-to-late 1970's? The very first inklings of computer art and computer animation are in there.
See? You're not the only one with a collection of old magazines.
Posted by: k at May 22, 2006 03:48 PM (wZLWV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
70kb generated in CPU 0.0341, elapsed 0.1391 seconds.
219 queries taking 0.1239 seconds, 520 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.