March 28, 2006
Imagine How Thrilled I Am.
People whom I supposedly have a few points of agreement with can be just as
childish, shallow and stupid as the silliest people in Hollywood.
I'm just about to burst with pride.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
March 26, 2006
Sopranos!
I really thought they were going to leave you-know-who entirely indisposed all season. Did someone lose their nerve? I thought this latest season would be about AJ, but we're stuck with his dad's point of view. Along for the ride, as usual.
And I still like the dream sequences, so there.
Kev-Infinity. It took me a while. Sheesh: I'm getting slow in middle age.
And: To what degree does the desire to watch The Sopranos betray not just our wistfulness about not being able to act on our animal desires, but genuine fear that we've lost track of those desires, and don't even really know what they are any more?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:00 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Good episode. That was like ol'-skool
Sopranos.
Tony goes into cardiac arrest, almost flatlines and now is on the fast-track to recovery. Typical Hollywood. I guess they have to move the story along....
Alright, alright, I'll admit it - the dream sequence was actually pretty good. Although you could say that the last part of his "dream" wasn't a dream. He was getting ready to go to The Great Beyond.
Speaking of which - where was he going? Tony met his cousin that he whacked; he saw his mother. The event was billed as a "family reunion". Has anyone in his family ever made it into Heaven? If Tony decided to accept his cousin's invite into the party, he would have been Goin' South, ifyouknowwhatImean. For some reason, that angle interested me.
Damn. Gotta cut this short. I'll continue tomorrow.
Posted by: Daniel at March 28, 2006 07:29 PM (GIhW0)
2
Did you see Barton Fink?
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 28, 2006 08:29 PM (s96U4)
3
No. Once again, I'm sorry. I live an empty, sheltered existence.
However, I have seen
Ilsa:She-Wolf Of The SS and some Jenna Jamison movies. Great flicks.
AJ tried to buy a gun to whack Uncle Junior. Obviously, he can't get him while Junior is in jail (they could try that plotline but it's a bit far-fetched).
What happens if Uncle Junior (for whatever reason) gets released? This is the last season. You'd think that at least one major character is gonna buy it. Uncle Jr isn't seen as much anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if he goes. Whether or not AJ does him in is another story.
Paulie Walnuts was great as usual.
I loved that they brought back Tim Daly's character. He's gotta write that stupid script. Can't wait to see how that turns out.
Posted by: Daniel at March 29, 2006 06:42 PM (GIhW0)
4
A quick follow-up to last week's Tony Sirico story -
March 27, 2006 -- It looks as if he was acting back then, too.
The cop who busted "Sopranos" co-star Tony Sirico more than 30 years ago said the future Hollywood henchman talked a good game - but was only pretending to be a tough guy.
When NYPD Detective Joe Coffey collared Sirico in 1971 for trying to shake down a nightclub owner, Sirico tried to resist arrest - and had his nose broken.
According to Coffey, an organized-crime task-force member, Sirico, a mobster wannabe, had a gun in his waist band.
When the thug pushed back, Coffey took Sirico's gun and whacked him in the face with it, sending blood gushing all over Sirico's lily white suit.
He was also hit with a felony weapons-possession charge after allegedly threatening the lives of city cops and the nightclub owner. Later, when a judge asked the suspect what happened to his suit, Sirico said, "I fell down and broke my nose."
Many years later the cop and the former crook crossed paths at a Breeders' Cup event featuring members of "The Sopranos" cast including Sirico, who plays capo Paulie Walnuts.
Although the one-time thug had since achieved some TV and movie fame, it was Sirico, 63, who recognized Coffey, now in his early 70s.
Sirico threw his hands up to protect his face.
"Madon! Don't hit me again!" the TV star joked, and the two laughed.
"You have to admire the guy," said Coffey, whose own career exploits will be the basis for an upcoming A&E TV series.
"He turned his act around. He used to be a moron like the rest of them."
Coffey, who is retired, also shed some light on an unsolved murder for which Sirico had once taken credit.
In 1969, a man named Bobby Woods was found dead in Queens with five bullets in his head. Sirico made reference to the homicide when trying to intimidate a club owner, according to a transcript of a sentencing hearing on the weapons charge.
Coffey said Sirico was just delivering another line.
"Sirico had nothing to do with it," Coffey said.
Coffey's judgment was confirmed by a man on the other side of the law, who said he ran with Sirico during the actor's dark days.
Louis Pegno went legit years ago, but he reminisced about the days when he had to fight Sirico's battles because he couldn't back up his tough talk.
"I saved his ass so many times," Pegno said.
murray.weiss@nypost.com
Posted by: Daniel at March 29, 2006 06:52 PM (GIhW0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Memo:
To: Spike Lee
From: Joy Whittemore
Re: Inside Man
NYPD detectives aren't going to be assigned to bank robberies. That's a Federal thing, my man.
I know where you can get yourself a superb fact-checker. She works cheap, and she has experience looking at scripts. FYI.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:51 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I never want to watch a movie with you. We'd either get kicked out of the theater for talking, or we'd never finish the movie because we'd be pausing, rewinding, and arguing about all the plot holes.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 27, 2006 01:25 AM (JAozc)
2
The upside of that proposition is that you'd be working. The downside is that you'd be working for Spike Lee.
Posted by: utron at March 27, 2006 11:09 AM (CgIkY)
3
Well, in Chicago, city detectives also work bank cases. Of course, they cooperate fully with the Feds.
Why did Spike Lee choose to do a film like "Inside Man"? Maybe because “She Hate Me” took in $366,000. Filmmakers with grosses like that can wind up directing Nike commercials fulltime. Or rolling "joints".
Posted by: Darrell at March 27, 2006 01:45 PM (o/8QX)
4
Yep, normally you have a primary FBI person who works with local detectives.
Posted by: Leo at March 27, 2006 03:15 PM (WRSYV)
5
FBI presence in the film: zero. Zilch. Nada.
NYPD responsibility for an ongoing bank robbery, and subsequent investigation: 100%.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 27, 2006 03:20 PM (s96U4)
6
You mean I have to see the film to comment? You are a tough taskmistress... I am sure it would have been a better film with you onboard.
Posted by: Darrell at March 27, 2006 08:33 PM (OpyYk)
7
Well, I would have advised against the hamfisted racial references, but you know how Spike is.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 27, 2006 08:59 PM (s96U4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 19, 2006
So. The Sopranos.
The writers thereof are making some wild calls. Taking chances.
I can't get the movie Apt Pupil off my mind. Tell me why.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:42 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As the opening credits were rolling and I saw that David Chase wrote last night's episode I said to myself "Uh-oh. This could be a doozy."
And indeed it was.
The Sopranos and "dream sequence" should not be in the same sentence. Remember the last one they had? That was Chase too, if I'm not mistaken.
I know they want character development and all (nothing wrong with that) but let it happen with Dr. Melfi and not in stupid-ass dream sequences.
Next week looks promising.
Sorry, haven't seen
Apt Pupil yet.
Posted by: Daniel at March 20, 2006 12:43 PM (GIhW0)
2
Paulie Walnuts, played by Tony Sirico, is my favorite character. I knew that Sirico did a stint in the joint but I never knew the details. Since the link requires registration here's the article from the
NY Post -
March 20, 2006 -- 'WALNUTS' WAS NUTS IN 1970S
Before he became knee-breaking "Sopranos" henchman Paulie Walnuts, TV tough guy Tony Sirico was a low-level, gun-toting shakedown artist who threatened to kill cops and hinted that he once whacked a guy with five bullets in the head, an explosive new report reveals.
Although Sirico, 63, has made no secret that his art imitates his life, the thug-turned-thespian has kept the details of his checkered past as closely guarded as a "Sopranos" script.
But a newly published document sheds a harsh light on Sirico's criminal past - showcasing the life of an armed, arrogant hoodlum.
According to court documents obtained by TheSmokingGun.com, Sirico was shaking down a Manhattan nightclub in 1970 when he got pinched for threatening the lives of city cops and a nightclub owner.
Sirico was sentenced to prison for seven years, of which he served three. At his sentencing, according to a transcript of the proceeding, a prosecutor outlined the bullying style that Sirico would later bring to HBO.
Sirico was working his mob magic on a discotheque called "Together" on 59th Street, telling club owner John Addison how he dealt with guys who didn't obey.
"You hit them over the head with a baseball bat and they come around," Sirico said.
Then, according to prosecutor Gerald Hinckley, Sirico explained to Addison the penalty for non-compliance. A previous owner's bouncer was thrown out a window, another club was shut down, and another man named Bobby Woods suffered the ultimate punishment.
"You saw what happened to him," Sirico said to Addison, according to the transcript.
Addison knew.
"Mr. Bobby Woods was found dead with five bullets in his head in Queens with a .32 automatic," Hinckley told the judge.
Addison went to the cops anyway, and seven detectives were assigned to the Sirico case.
But one day when detectives assigned to follow him botched a surveillance, Sirico and an associate turned the tables on the cops and followed the unmarked car, running it into a traffic divider at Broadway and West 72nd Street.
According to the transcript, an angry Sirico went back to the nightclub and confronted Addison.
"I'm going to come back here and I'm going to carve my initials in your forehead," Sirico screamed. "You put those guys on me. I'm going to take care of them. You want to play with guns? We got guns. We're going to shoot them.
"I have an arsenal of weapons and an army of men, and I'm going to use them, and after I take care of those guys I'm going to come back here and carve my initials in your forehead. You better learn a lesson. You better show me the respect I deserve."
A frightened Addison ran outside, where cops were still staking out his club. They went in and dragged the mobster out, and found a .32-caliber automatic handgun in his waistband. Sirico was indicted for extortion, coercion and felony gun possession, and pleaded guilty to the gun charge.
leonard.greene@nypost.com
For more check out
The Smoking Gun.
Posted by: Daniel at March 20, 2006 01:04 PM (GIhW0)
3
Wow.
I kind of dig the dream sequences. Sorry.
"My life was in that briefcase." And the briefcase was taken from him.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 20, 2006 04:03 PM (s96U4)
4
David Chase tries to get a little too artsy-fartsy sometimes.
I just found out a couple of days ago that this season is gonna be divided into two parts. They're showing the first 12 episodes now and then the remaining 8 will be shown starting next January. They haven't even started to film those 8 episodes yet.
That blows.
Posted by: Daniel at March 20, 2006 07:02 PM (GIhW0)
5
Mostly, it blows. However, it does mean that I'll have another seven months to watch movies with my husband on Sunday nights.
Of course, when we're going to watch a movie I have to allow more time after dinner. So I have to get dinner ready on time.
That blows.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 20, 2006 07:28 PM (s96U4)
6
Unless you make Sunday night pizza night.
Posted by: Darrell at March 20, 2006 08:29 PM (BIfQT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 13, 2006
Big Love
I did like the
Big Love premiere, and not just because I think Bill Paxton's cute and Tom Hanks is a sharp producer. I'm not
the only one.
It's essentially a nonviolent (so far, though that could easily change) version of The Sopranos: a guy lives half in the shadows, and half in Suburbia, and gets bounced like a pinball between his nuclear family and his extended family and his secrets and the modern world and the forces of darkness. Except that Bill is a good deal more likeable as a character vs. Tony Soprano.
It's all good.
I'm sorry some Mormons are upset, but the show does make the sharp division clear between mainstream Mormonism and the various polygamous cults that are tied to that church's roots. In fact, most people who study counter-cultures agree that the majority of the polygamous sects live elsewhere in the West, rather than in Utah. The show only needs to be set in Salt Lake City in order to create tension between cultists and mainstream Mormons.
In real life, of course, they'd live in New Mexico or Arizona, but we need to see Respectable Mormons recoiling from polygamy, and I imagine that we will. (At least, the first episode sets such a situation up.)
The show also captures the real moral problem in these sects: the "marriages" of young girls who haven't yet reached the age of consent to grown men.
I would love to see prosecutions for polygamy strictly confined to sects that prey on young women. That would, as I see it, be a much better use of law-enforcement dollars.
My husband's line on polygamous quasi-Mormon sects: "three wives, but no coffee? No thanks." Of course, I get the impression that he thinks one wife is an awful lot sometimes. Of course, he is, um, taking the graduate course in marriage.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Interesting thoughts. As a Mormon I plan to avoid the show for two reasons: 1. It has nothing to do with the Church, and 2. I don't have HBO.
Oddly enough, for all the hype the show has gotten, there's been surprisingly little reaction around the Mormon equivalent of the Blogosphere. Those who bothered to watch the show were unimpressed, both from a socio-political angle as well as from an entertainment value perspective.
I don't see this one surviving more than a season or two. I certainly don't see any reason to get any huffier about this show than, say, Sex and the City. Or The Sopranos. Talk about moral degradation!
(Interesting aside: Paxton seems to be channeling latent Mormon tendencies already! Check out IMDB's highlights today.)
Posted by: Woody at March 13, 2006 09:16 AM (9kYWY)
2
It is an interesting premise for a show. And, as I said, it's not like watching the Sopranos wherein you are virtually forced to identify with a guy who's a monster: they make the Paxton character very sympathetic.
I think this show might be interesting, and I'm glad the Mormon blogosphere (Saintsosphere?) isn't overreacting.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 13, 2006 02:02 PM (s96U4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 12, 2006
Just a Few Hours.
That's the real reason I don't watch "enough television." When I get hooked, I really get hooked. And when my husband and I get hooked together, it's ugly.
I love this picture: there's so much in it. The symbolism is so layered. And nearly everyone is looking over his/her shoulder. Wonder why.
The video of the trailer is at the official site, here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:53 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I thought it was a pretty good episode. The ending was a surprise.
Of course Tony isn't gonna pack in it. Unless the rest of the season is a dream sequence as he lays dying on the kitchen floor. The Sopranos Nation wouldn't like that too much.
Notice that they didn't have a preview for next week's episode. Smart move. Most conventional network shows would, thus giving away half the plot. Then they wonder why HBO racks up all the awards. "They can curse, they have nudity", whine the networks. STFU.
Posted by: Daniel at March 12, 2006 10:22 PM (GIhW0)
2
It was nicely done. They made us wait long enough . . . That one scene was just brutal--the one with the death that we get to see for seemingly five minutes as they just hold the shot.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 13, 2006 12:09 AM (s96U4)
3
It's going to be really, really tough to avoid any spoilers. I'm hoping and praying the season premier is safely tucked away on my TiVo at home.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 13, 2006 12:35 AM (2myVv)
4
They did
hang in there with that scene. I guess they were going for realism. That's what happens when people hang themselves - death doesn't occur instantaneously (sp?). It takes awhile and involves a lot of pain.
An after-show
Sopranos thread - is this going to be a regular feature?
Posted by: Daniel at March 13, 2006 05:58 PM (GIhW0)
5
I certainly knew he was going to kill himself when he was looking through the photo album, but I expected him to eat his gun. The editing was brilliant, there: they make you think you're in the house, when suddenly you're in the garage, and it's happening.
We can make this a regular feature if you like: no one ever wanted to talk this much about Boston Legal.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 13, 2006 07:05 PM (s96U4)
6
You just knew that he was never going to make it to Florida.
Please do make it a regular feature. I think it's the best show on TV although the last few seasons have been up and down.
Posted by: Daniel at March 13, 2006 07:46 PM (GIhW0)
7
Well, what happened is that they extended it by a season, and this screwed up the narrative arc: last season was clearly originally meant to be a last hurrah, and there were all these moments of raw familial emotion (what my husband calls "big moments").
The they had to substitute one climax for another, making the arrrest of Johnny Sacks the finale instead of whatever the first one was.
But it seems like it'll only be this one extra season, and we know it will end. We're not talking about that painful goodbye we had with the X Files: that was embarrassing and horrible.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 14, 2006 09:52 PM (s96U4)
8
I never saw the last season-and-a-half of the
X-Files. Loved the show but by then it had gotten so off-track that I couldn't take it anymore.
They should have ended
The Sopranos last season. You want a good show to go on and on but sooner or later (more like sooner) the quality suffers. I'd rather remember a few seasons of glory than endless seasons of junk.
Posted by: Daniel at March 15, 2006 06:19 PM (GIhW0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2006
I Was Naughty and Ditched the Oscars.
Because I have work to do tomorrow, and because—let's face it—there's too much of them these days.
However, PJ Media covered it. So I was able to read their entries over and kind of glean the highlights: which dresses showed off the most cleavage, how offensive the political commentary was. You know.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
48kb generated in CPU 0.0275, elapsed 0.1443 seconds.
211 queries taking 0.1346 seconds, 468 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.