January 30, 2008
Yeah, Concealed Carry Doesn't Mix with Alcohol.
Everyone knows that you ditch all your guns if you're going to a bar for more than, say, a single drink. Yes: even your
church gun. All of 'em.
But going out to party is different than going out to dinner, no?
Actually, I love those cafes in Arizona that ask that "no weapons" be brought inside. What the hell do they expect me to do?—leave it in my fucking glove box? Now that's safe. Why don't I just leave 'em in the lost and found by the hostess' post, so they can be claimed by the local criminals?
I've got to get out shooting, soon. And remember: women need twice as much target practice as men do. It isn't an eye-hand coordination thing. It's the fact that we have to do the same drills wearing both flats and heels. More of a challenge. (I love shooting in heels; everyone asks if I'm a cop, and I get to act all excited, like, "oh, they've waived the height requirements, have they?" Men are so transparent; they might as well say, "I've seen you at this range before . . .")
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:57 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you have a CCW and keep it concealed except in the event of armed robbery, then no one's the wiser and you're safer. It's not like there's a metal detector at the door.
For myself I'm seriously thinking about a small handgun safe for my vehicle for just such circumstances.
There is a bill before the AZ legislature to legalize carry in restaurants as long as you're not drinking. Predictably the GFW's are all up in panty-bunching mode.
Speaking of shooting practice, time at the range is good, if that's all you have access to. But for a more realistic form of practice, you might want to look into whether there is a local IDPA* chapter near you. (*International Defensive Pistol Association). Typically a chapter will hold a once a month shooting match, where you get to practice your skills in a more dynamic environment than plugging a cardboard target while standing still (heels or no).
Now if you were to get involved in this, I would love to be there to video you running the course in heels. Heels and pearls and a cocktail dress.
*Whew*...getting hot thinking about it...
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 30, 2008 09:44 AM (B2X7i)
2
I did take one defensive shooting course; we had to run to create some stress before our final shooting stint. Run, shoot, run, shoot, run, shoot . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 30, 2008 02:31 PM (vuv+H)
3
I L-O-V-E this post! I'm linking it on my Headlines of Note section.
Posted by: Conservative Belle at January 30, 2008 03:44 PM (vPC7m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 19, 2008
Sure, Sean.
He'd
fire it. If there were a home invader present and the closest gun at hand were the wife's Hello Kitty rifle, he'd use it to defend his family. (Though I recommend the Hello Kitty 20-gauge for that application.)
And I'm usually hesitant to get into the arena of "what do real men do?" I'm a chick, and I hate to issue directives to the complicated sex.
But in a heteranormative context, the real question is, Would a real man own a pink gun? No. Maybe one with cherry stocks. Hot pink, however, with a Hello Kitty logo on it? No.
Hell—I don't think I'd own one, despite the fun you all have regarding my hot-pink iPod and my flower-tattooed Motorola phone. A girl has to draw the line somewhere.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:54 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd own one but I'm afraid this will lead to MORE anti-gun legislation.
1. It appeals to children. . .therefore it will lead to more accidental deaths and shootings.(A replay of the Joe Camel argument also)
2. It is MORE dangerous to police because it may look like a toy(as opposes to "assault weapon" lookalikes that look cooler and more deadly than the sport versions, but are really no more so. Critical seconds may be lost.
3. It's cool, so it has to go!
4. Blah, blah, blah.
Note: I don't agree with these reasons, I just know what will come. I respond the same way to any weapon that is produced.
Posted by: Darrell at January 20, 2008 09:58 PM (sN0PB)
2
I was still reading old-fashioned "feminist" literature when Smith & Wesson brought out the "Ladysmith." A lot of gun-grabbers were
not amused. Which might be a good enough reason to get one, of course.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 21, 2008 04:51 AM (vuv+H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 02, 2008
Mrs. Du Toit
. . . is getting emotional again, and Desert Cat is there to
explain why we don't do things that way in this country. Why we shouldn't. Why we can't.
In the past I've often gotten it into my mind that all Western countries have similar intellectual frameworks, but the older I get the more I realize our particular system is unique: we have a system of government that includes a Bill of Rights, and our Constitution has a "by the way" clause in it that points out whatever ain't spelled out in here is not something the government can do. Of course it doesn't work out that way completely in real life, but that language does keep the state from overreaching to the degree that it does in Western Europe, and in some other English-speaking countries.
As for anyone who thinks we can marginalize and "shoot on sight" members of any group that is well-armed represents a minority point of view . . . I've got one word for you: Waco.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:44 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Whatever laws the EU crafts to deal with religious "extremism" will probably be selectively enforced. Nonviolent Christians will be rounded up, because that's the actual intent of the law, and it's safe. Violent Muslims will be ignored, because they're not the real target of the law, it's dangerous going after them, and if they really were gone the fig leaf would go with them.
Posted by: John at January 03, 2008 01:48 PM (hIbmr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
29kb generated in CPU 0.0195, elapsed 0.1233 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1148 seconds, 439 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.