September 11, 2007
James Taranto on "Osama bin La la la la la"
In
Best of the Web:
It seems both fair and accurate to note that there is a confluence of interests between bin Laden and those Americans who seek defeat in Iraq. It is little wonder that this is an embarrassment to the latter. But it would be unfair and inaccurate to suggest that this is anything more than a de facto tactical alliance. The Angry Left wants America to lose in Iraq for its own ideological and partisan purposes, which have little to do with the establishment of a global caliphate.
So what are we to make of bin Laden's striking a pose as a global warmist who hates capitalism? Here's a theory: Slate reports that by one estimate 10% of al Qaeda's "soldiers in the global jihad" are converts to radical Islamism, a religion/ideology that, as Slate puts it, "has become a magnet for some of the world's angriest people."
Blogger Roger L. Simon speculates that "the true author (or scriptwriter) of the tape" is Adam Gadahn, né Pearlman, an American-born "spokesman" for al Qaeda who, as The New Yorker reported earlier this year, had a decidedly countercultural upbringingmdash;raised by hippie parents who converted to Christianity and lived on an isolated farm raising goats. A "shy, bookish" boy who rebelled against his parents' faith, Gadahn immersed himself in the world of satanic "death metal" before converting to Islam.
The bin Laden tape evinces a familiarity with, but a lack of sophistication about, America's political cultur—just what you'd expect from the sort of alienated and immature weirdo Gadahn seems to have been. In particular, it seems not to have occurred to the makers of the tape that hardly any Americans, including bitter foes of the president, would actually want to be associated with al Qaeda. Bin Laden has succeeded here only in embarrassing his putative allies, and perhaps in somewhat diminishing their effectiveness at a crucial political moment for the future of Iraq.
But wait!—Taranto also has some interesting comments on the sticky wicket some of the anti-war crowd is in. If their major commentary on bin Laden's video appears to be that we shouldn't pay any attention to what it says, the question becomes, "why?" Well, it's like reading Mein Kampf in the original, Taranto implies. Or (it occurs to me) actually getting impartial translators to divulge the contents of Palestinian schoolkids' textbooks.
You know: because it's there.
So read the whole thing.
Via Insty, but all he has is a dumb link. I provided "added value." So there.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 440 words, total size 3 kb.
1
It is a sticky widget. We shouldn't worry about OBL, but then they have their meme "why didn't we get him?"
Just proof that they will say anything at any time, no matter how silly, to defame America and try and get political power for powers sake.
Posted by: William Teach at September 11, 2007 05:42 AM (NaHh8)
2
The Left never were sticklers about consistency.
On another subject---
"On the evening of the 24th I spoke with a local Iraqi official, Colonel Faik, who said the Muftis would order the severance of the two fingers used to hold a cigarette for any Iraqis caught smoking. Other reports, from here in Diyala and also in Anbar, allege that smokers are murdered by AQI. Most Iraqis smoke and this particular prohibition appeared to have earned the ire of many locals. After an American unit cleared an apartment complex on the 23rd, LTC Smiley, the battalion commander, reported that residents didn't ask for food and water, but cigarettes. In other parts of Baqubah, people have been celebrating the routing of AQI by lighting up and smoking cigarettes."
Michael Yon. http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/drilling-for-justice.htm
Posted by: Darrell at September 11, 2007 12:38 PM (qoyYS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 13, 2007
August 10, 2007
Sometimes, a Little Brainstorming Is in Order.
On the dangers of "thinking like a terrorist," Hackbarth
muses: "Experts are fine, but the experts let us down Sep. 11, 2001."
Yup.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:19 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Terrorize the United States? Looks to me the demonrats (democrats, john murtha, john kerry, teddy kennedy, shillary and the pretenders) are terrorizing the Country in spades. Enemies in our own borders. I don't even want to get started on the traitors at the state department....then there is the thing where the "republicans" are welling out our future to illegal immigrants, refusing to secure the borders..... The left is full of #%^&^@# about impeaching Bush. If they were serious, they would have something on the borders issue. Yep, there is another thing terrorizing the United States, compassionate conservatism. I long for the day this oxymoron is thrown in to the trash heap of history.
Posted by: RWB at August 12, 2007 10:22 AM (4j8Ry)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2007
Oh, Those Brits.
Iowahawk:
Initially police had specifically asked the public for information relating to doctors driving automobiles, but that initial warning brought angry denunciations from the British Medical Association and the UK Automobile Association.
"This directive unfairly singles out and targets British medical professionals, a great many of whom are loyal and patriotic citizens," complained Dr. Hamish Meldrum, chairman of the BMA. "The fact that some of the people involved in the recent unfortunate events may have been doctors is totally coincidental, just as if they had been accountants, plumbers, or random members of a deranged apocalyptic religious cult."
Sir Trevor Chinn, Chairman of the UKAA, warned that the earlier directive would "spark a backlash against the British motoring community and promote a climate of fear and carophobia."
On Tuesday, new British Prime Minister Gordon Brown met with representatives of the medical and car communities and announced that the government would henceforth prohibit occupational and transportational profiling by public officials. Brown said further government communications would prohibit the use of certain prejudicial words like "doctor," "Vauxhall," "podiatrist," "propane," "Asia," "drive," "ticking noises," "panic," and "the."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:44 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Britian relased a list of approved words today;
A
And
How
The
To
What
When
Why
France approved this list and added two words;
Surrender
Retreat
Posted by: Darkman at July 12, 2007 08:00 PM (RLqlB)
2
And back here in the land of freedom, only some words have power.
Victory in Iraq. Win at whatever the cost. Even though we do not know what winning means.
Posted by: azmat hussain at July 13, 2007 04:36 PM (mdszq)
3
Winning means a serious reduction in the number of people at risk, should those ticking noises get, um, consummated.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 13, 2007 11:24 PM (VgDLl)
4
azmat;
I did notice that you admitted that this is the land of "freedom". There must be a reason that this is a land of freedom, maybe you should find out why.
I suppose you would change it to "Retreat in Iraq", "Quit if it starts to cost" and then argue at what winning is.
Posted by: Darkman at July 14, 2007 06:47 AM (RLqlB)
5
I should? I thought I had the freedom to be ignorant in a democracy?
I didn't say retreat ever, from the very beginning of mission accomplished I said declare victory and leave.
And attila do you mean the risk to 150K soldiers?
Cause the rest really don't count do they or do you have a count for them?
It is interesting to note that none of your readers have a clue as to what victory would look like.
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at July 24, 2007 11:02 PM (mdszq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 07, 2007
So You Think You're Having
. . . a bad day? Think
again.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
June 04, 2007
Popular Mechanics Editors vs. the Loose Screws at Loose Change.
Start
here.
UPDATE: Okay, it looks like I've got a few readers who like them a Kool-Aid cocktail every now and then. So, one question: if the damage at the Pentagon and the crash site/"crash site" in Pennsylvania weren't caused by planes, then what happened to the two missing planes that day that didn't hit the WTC?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:02 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Zendo Deb at June 04, 2007 04:58 AM (+gqOq)
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) at June 04, 2007 08:35 AM (6pAmW)
3
Check out the new book by Dr. David Ray Griffin “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory”
www.amazon.com/Debunking 9-11 Debunking
Posted by: terry at June 04, 2007 09:05 AM (6AiQg)
4
About Dr. Griffin:
From Publishers Weekly, Starred Review. An emeritus professor of theology with no previous interest in conspiracy theories, Griffin has dedicated himself since 2003 to the "9/11 truth" movement, a group committed to "exposing the falsity of the official theory about 9/11," and this book is a thorough, highly detailed attempt to do just that.
Emeritus professor of theology? Deer Lord.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 04, 2007 10:32 AM (1hM1d)
5
"Emeritus professor of theology? Deer Lord."
Also, check out the Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, Government Officials, Professors, 9-11 Survivors and Family Members who have expressed significant criticism of the 9-11 Commission Report and/or allege government complicity in 9-11 found here:
www.patriotsquestion911.com
Posted by: terry at June 04, 2007 11:37 AM (6AiQg)
6
Yes, that's nice, Terry. Now, if they can offer a plausible, coherent explaination of the events that began on 11 Sep 2001 that doesn't involve pre-placed demolition charges, I'm willing to take a look.
What? I have to accept pre-placed demolition charges? do you realized how freakin' hard that would be to pull off *without* someone, anyone, noticing?
And in case you haven't been paying attetion, let me point one more thing out to you. This administration hasn't been able to keep any state secrets...well, secret. From NSA intercept program, the SWIFT program, to the most recent leak of plans to undermine the Iranian government, this administration has leaked like a leaky sieve.
And now you would like me to believe that they also have pulled off the conspiracy of a lifetime??
To coin a phrase,
oh, puuuuuuullllllleeeeeeeeeeezzzzzeeeeeeeeee.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 04, 2007 01:54 PM (1hM1d)
7
Seriously, is it even worth the time to debate what happened on 9/11 with Truthers, who, a couple decades ago, would have, at the least, been dismissed as complete cranks, if not stuck in mental institutions?
As for the planes, one of them was Lost.
I had a convo with the husband of a family friend who was working at the Pentagon that day, other side of the building, E Ring, regarding the camera footage. Security cameras there, like most places, are not set up with to capture that kind of speed. They are designed to capture vehicles through the gates, so the frame speed is not real high. To store that high a frame rate would require enormous storage.
Posted by: William Teach at June 04, 2007 06:14 PM (doAuV)
8
Two questions:
1. How does the theory explain Flight 93?
2. How come the US Government can keep this secret and NOTHING ELSE?
Posted by: Chuck at June 04, 2007 07:27 PM (H4W1a)
9
Note the '666" in the youtube link. . .
At least we know who is behind this crap. Besides the Left, that is.
Oh, and those nutters have an explanation for the missing planes and passengers--the people have been given new identities and are still alive. Remember the Tom Flocco story of Barbara Olson(Ann Coulter's best friend, wife of Bush lawyer, Ted, who helped him "steal" Florida, killed on Flight 77) being arrested on the Polish/Austrian border in 2005? Shocking because Poland and Austria share no border? And he misspelled her name. And said she was carrying millions in counterfeit Italian "lyra". She was carrying a Vatican passport, of course--never miss a chance to bash Catholics. I guess the Bush pals were given new IDs. The others? Not so lucky. The planes? Still on the NTSB tail number list. Probably in one of those junkyards in Arizona. Desert Cat should go take a look. Or start scratching paint off tail numbers to look for a re-paint. Why should the loony Left break all the "good" stories? Like who's gay.
Posted by: Darrell at June 04, 2007 08:48 PM (H8+in)
10
So is Ted Olson in on the conspiracy? Does he get to have secret liaisons with his wife, or is he expected simply to cope for the good of the cause?
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 04, 2007 09:27 PM (VgDLl)
11
I work for the government and have been in the military for the last 20 years.
I can debunk the 9/11 conspiracy with one concept.
We're not that good. Seriously, I wish we were. But we are simply not that good. No one is.
Posted by: redleg at June 05, 2007 07:38 AM (PaV2r)
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 05, 2007 09:17 AM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 31, 2007
This Is the Best Idea
. . . I've heard in quite a while: get science fiction writers to
think like terrorists.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
May 30, 2007
The Queen of Flight 327,
Annie Jacobsen, has a
blog now.
Bookmark it.
And, for a good summary of that now-infamous test run, see Malkin's digest on the OIG report. The conclusion: Jacobsen was just being hysterical.. Because—you know how chicks get.
Okay. Just kidding. They concede that the whole thing might have presented a little bit of a problem, in terms of how Air Marshalls, the FBI, and the OHS have dealt with it. A small problem, mind you.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
April 24, 2007
London Calling.
Rusty has the
scoop on six radical Islamists arrested for charges of incitement.
I know that sometimes law enforcement/intel on both sides of the Atlantic prefers to monitor those it could arrest for "incitement," so they can get to bigger fish, but I hope they cooperate with each other, and remember that combatting terrorism is not like fighting organized crime: the "broken window" principle requires that at some point these people be brought in. Threats against people and property are crimes here, and they should most certainly be crimes in a country that has essentially decided there is no universal right to self-defense.
(As usual, I skimmed the comments section for a moment. Alas, Rusty's comments are still as chock-full of the "all Muslims are terrorists" sentiment as the generally are with the "homosexuals are out to destroy the family" nonsense. And, as usual, I fear that he comes awfully close to endorsing both positions in his posts. But he is a good source of information on Islamic terrorism, and despite his myopia in those arenas, a genuinely nice guy.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
April 04, 2007
Steyn on Passover/Easter, and the Palestinian "People of the Book"
It's a re-run from 2002, but no less
chilling for that.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Who Sank the Titanic?
Well, the
chosen conspirators, of course. Though I think the Masons might have been involved.
Which reminds me: it's almost time to re-read some of my favorite books.
But not this year. Not if I'm going to crank out a book manuscript in 90 days. And, no: not even I can rationalize it by claiming that one of my characters is a Titanic buff, and I need to do this for "character development."
Via Ace.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:06 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The demand for steel and dwindling resources of low-sulfur coal sunk the Titanic. Steel makers in the UK had to substitute high-sulfur coal for their usual purchases as demand went through the roof as the Industrial Age blossomed. High sulfur embrittles steel. Popular Science had the definitive analysis in the late 80s or early 90s. They found the son of one of the builders that had a large number of coupons--punched-out steel from the actual hull that the shipbuilder had engraved and was going to pass out as promotional items. They were put into a drawer after the sinking. PS's analysis showed that the sulfur content was many times today's standards and that the steel was as brittle as glass. A sufficient impact could have caused a large section of the hull to shatter--many times the size of the impact contact area-- spanning multiple decks and defeating the compartmentalization safety design. It was a floating accident waiting to happen.
Posted by: Darrell at April 04, 2007 10:03 AM (9iZ9f)
2
Well, there's also the fact that the Titanic was speeding through ice-infested water, ignoring multiple warnings wired ahead from other ships about the icebergs that lay ahead.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 04, 2007 02:21 PM (6C0F9)
3
Yes, there is that. :-)
Men would say--
1) How could I be speeding when there are no posted speed limits?
2) How could I set a new world record without "speeding"?
3) Isn't that why we have Smithy in the crow's nest?
At the time of the collision it is thought that the Titanic was at her normal cruising speed of about 22 knots (1), which was less than her top speed of around 24 knots. At the time it was common (but not universal) practice to maintain normal speed in areas where icebergs were expected (2). It was thought that any iceberg large enough to damage the ship would be seen in sufficient time to be avoided.
(1) British Inquiry - Testimony of JG Boxhall -Fourth Officer - ss "Titanic.", Q15645
(2)British Inquiry – Testimony of G Affeld, Marine Superintendent Red Star Line Q22583 & Q25615/16
Posted by: Darrell at April 04, 2007 08:26 PM (9nwuO)
4
But what underlay this custom about cruising speed was the fact that there was tremendous competition to get across the Atlantic as quickly as possible. It was a status symbol for a captain to get ahead of schedule.
The belief that this was safe emerged from the DESIRE to believe that it was safe.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 04, 2007 09:42 PM (6C0F9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2007
The Argument Isn't Whether the War on Terror Should Be Micromanaged.
It's simply that thinking people disagree on
how to
micromanage it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
Might We Gain the World
. . . and yet
lose our souls?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:12 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's an entirely believable scenario. And the merger of CPS with DHS analogy was chilling.
Unfortunately I see that trend even now.
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 10, 2007 09:07 AM (xdX36)
2
So do I, Desert Cat. I'm very much afraid he's right.
Posted by: Kathy K at March 10, 2007 06:42 PM (+2EU8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 20, 2007
What Options Can We Consider?
Glenn Reynolds on discussion of political assassination among Democrats:
Now, apparently, it's shifted to "beyond the pale" category. It's not only important to have the right opinions -- it's important to have them at the right time.
That's always been the case. After all, hyper-religiousity was okay when Jimmy Carter occupied the White House. And when Reagan was there, fluency in English was just another sign of stupidity; now it's essential to proving any intelligence.
It's all about timing.
UPDATE: Link fixed. I think.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:37 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LMA--always testing us. . .
How about this link--
http://instapundit.com/archives2/2007/02/post_2708.php
Posted by: Darrell at February 21, 2007 09:44 AM (wzGE3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 31, 2007
Whoa.
Now he's
messin' with the crew at Johns Hopkins.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:35 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
January 25, 2007
Greg Gutfield
. . . on how to recognize
patriotic terrorists.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:30 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My wife's parents fled the horrors of Communist China.
Her US citizenship is her treasure.
She thinks those patriotic terrorists should be lined up
in public and shot.
They have no idea how good America is.
-Bob
Posted by: Bob at January 25, 2007 06:46 PM (2tBSJ)
2
He's certainly turned the comments section into a frenzy of snapping piranhas.
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 25, 2007 09:07 PM (xdX36)
3
What do you expect at the Huffington Post? Reasoned thought is chum in the water there.
Posted by: Darrell at January 25, 2007 09:42 PM (Ddvv8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2006
Steven Taylor
. . . on AQ propoganda regarding the Democratic victory, over at
Outside the Beltway.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:19 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
November 02, 2006
Cassandra
. . . on what's
wrong with the way the MSM tells stories in wartime. (Hint: we ought to bear in mind that parents and spouses will read stories that name their family members. Names and gory details don't necessarily go together.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
October 03, 2006
It's No Secret
. . . that Condi didn't move with enough
alacrity in the summer of '01. But it's a bit rich for the Democrats to claim that the Bush Administration should have done, in eight months, what the Clinton Administration failed to accomplish in eight years.
Via Glenn.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
October 01, 2006
The "Blue Dress" of Terrorism
Don Surber
points out that we know when Clinton is lying, because that's when he wags his finger at whomever he's talking to.
I'm not sure it'll ever be clear which individual gave the order to spare Bin Laden's life during the Clinton Administration. But it's clear that no one thought he/she had the political cover to do it, because no one felt that Clinton would fully back them up if it went awry.
Via Glenn.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:11 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm thinking Clinton was deliberate in his being 'unavailable' so that others would do what he was to afraid to do. That way if it turned out right he could take credit and if it turned out wrong he could deny he gave the order.
He didn't get the nickname 'Slick Willie' for his sexual escapades alone.
Posted by: Jack at October 02, 2006 03:57 PM (DBn56)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
65kb generated in CPU 0.0254, elapsed 0.1359 seconds.
214 queries taking 0.1221 seconds, 511 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.