February 16, 2006
Warhol Had It Almost Right.
Turns out, everyone's famous whenever Glenn gets around to it. He's got the
CPAC podcast up now, including impromptu interviews with bloggers and participants, including me (no, I haven't listened quite yet: like most people, I dislike the sound of my own voice when it's been recorded).
Two interesting exchanges as we spoke right before the "tape" started rolling:
Glenn: I should link your site more. I've been thinking of doing an entire entry on "people I don't link to enough."
Joy: Don't get into the mindset that you bear the weight of the blogosphere on your shoulders.
Glenn: I'm glad you said that. Some people take it personally when I don't link them.
Why was this hilarious to me? Because most of us do feel twinges of irrational guilt from time to time, and it's interesting that Glenn isn't immune. Clearly, he tries to use his powers for good as much as possible—which I find admirable. After all, I'm not sure I do any such thing.
• • •
And there's this one, which occurred just as he moved to turn the mic on—
Joy: I've been really good about not getting starstruck, but it's starting to hit me now.
Glenn: Oh, don't do that. Blogging stars are like bowling stars: no one in the outside world cares about them.
It was a sweet thing to say. Though I doubt many bowling stars can raise millions of dollars from venture capitalists to start bowling-related businesses. Even when several of them get together.
Call me an ass-kisser, but if someone drew a nasty cartoon about Glenn, I'd really be upset.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
February 15, 2006
Shattered!
During the CPAC bloggers'
main bacchanale at the Marquee Bar and Lounge—hosted by the wonderful
Mike Krempasky—the subject of Stephen Glass' old work of fiction on young partying conservatives kept coming up. Several people wondered if the story itself was available online, and whether Glass had really alleged that young conservatives were cokeheads.
Oddly enough, former Wonkette Ana Marie Cox discussed that shaggy dog story in Mother Jones several years ago, debunking it and other Glass-related fact-checking fiascos.
In the snippet she quotes, the "young conservative" event was at the Omni Shoreham Hotel, but it takes place in the spring (so theoretically it wouldn't have been CPAC), and the cons in question were smoking grass rather than snorting coke. And Glass didn't appear to be making the point that a lot of conservatives are really libertarians—but rather that his imaginary right-wing friends were hypocrites.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:04 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
At least I got the hotel right. As for the cocaine I was "fake but accurate." It was good enough for Dan Rather.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at February 16, 2006 01:14 AM (JAozc)
2
Well, there's still a chance that cocaine was in the oroginal article, but didn't show up in Cox's expose.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 16, 2006 02:03 AM (XbEp3)
3
I recall that the Glass article was about CPAC. I was a college student at the time and I remember thinking to myself that I had gone to all the parties and didn't see either Glass or anything he described in is essay. Rather then engage in a drug orgy, most of my circle debated political philosophy over a couple cold ones (it was there that I figured out I wasnÂ’t a conservative, but an Objectivist, so the moment sticks out in my head as important).
Later, it sure was amusing when I learned that Glass had made it all up . . . very satisfying to see his lies utterly discredited.
Posted by: Nicholas Provenzo at February 16, 2006 06:49 AM (nISc5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2006
I Don't Want to Leave.
This is such a pretty town anyway, and right now its skeletal trees are accented with white.
The thing I dreaded most about coming out here has been the most fun: I was spooked at the idea of having to walk 15 minutes every day to the Shoreham hotel&mdash&or 20 minutes to the Metro stop—but after I got used to the fact that it's nippy here, I remembered that I love towns I can walk around in, whether it's sedate Santa Monica, the bohemian end of Chicago, or glass-and-steel-laced Manhattan.
It's been a great experience. Today, I go back to the Mall to photograph a few of the monuments in different light, and check out the war memorials (Vietnam, WWII, and the Korean War). Then it's off to Be More for a couple of days with Professor Purkinje and his family.
BTW: why do they call it a "mall"? I went down there looking for a Baby Gap or a Victoria's Secret, but they had neither. Nor even a Crate and Barrel. If you want to know the truth, I feel a bit led on.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
Harrell's
. . . having a little
fun with the "defend Ann Coulter no matter what" crowd.
Apparently, those of us who don't like ethnic slurs are on a slippery slope: first you're objecting to the term "ragheads," and—next thing you know—you're applauding a new, worldwide Caliphate and/or submitting to the installation of Sharia law.
It's true: two days ago I got pissed off at Coulter's bigotry. Now I stop men on the street—guys with dark coloring and strong noses—and ask them if they'd consider stoning me to death.
I keep getting misunderstood, though: Most of these guys are Jewish, and nearly all of them assume I'm trying to score some weed. I keep getting pointed in the direction of Georgetown University. Sigh.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
February 12, 2006
Well, One Data Point Should Do Me, Here.
Mexican food in the nation's capital sucks. Not to the same degree that Mexican food in Europe sucks, but it's pretty lackluster stuff. My tamales last night were bland, and the salsa that accompanied our chips didn't have nearly enough cilantro in it—but
did have black pepper, of all things.
And the margaritas were terrible. I mean, they used good booze, but they make them too sweet. Even ordering a Cadillac-style margarita didn't get them to dial down on the sugar. It almost tasted like they were using some kind of a goddamned mix, though that's such an outrageous thought that it could simply be that they're using a sucky recipe.
Once I realized my partners in crime were sold on the oversweet Margies, I powered a few of them down very quickly, figuring I'd need a bit of a buzz to survive the next few.
And I woke up feeling fine. Once more. What does a girl need to do to acquire a hangover in this town?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:07 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LMA:
Stick to the basics... gin and tonnix, scotch & eh water and the like.
Ya can't get decent Maggies outside of the Southwest.
Posted by: lelu at February 12, 2006 08:26 PM (wE6A2)
2
Black pepper in salsa....
black pepper???
Phillistines.
Posted by: Darleen at February 12, 2006 08:49 PM (FgfaV)
3
Try Mixtec(Adams Morgan, Columbia Rd NW) or Alero(on Connecticut Ave.) If you want to travel to Alexandria there are a couple of places-- Taqueria Poblano being one. For your corrupted taste, you'll have to embellish with the pepper sauces.
Posted by: Darrell at February 12, 2006 08:50 PM (jM8RY)
4
We were at Alero. The people were very nice, but it was a pale culinary echo of what I can get at home. Even the pricier places back home that focus on drinks and let the food slip a bit do better than this.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 12, 2006 10:26 PM (F7zrJ)
5
What does a girl need to do to acquire a hangover in this town?
Drink bottom-of-the-barrel rot-gut. Anything at $5/gallon. PBR in mass quantity.
Oh, yeah, it's DC. They probably don't have anything for less than $15/gallon...
(as a side point, I can make a vicious margarita)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 13, 2006 05:29 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2006 05:45 AM (F7zrJ)
7
AG
When you come home I should take you to
El Cholo's in La Habra.
Absolutely the best, authentic Mexican food to be had in So. Cal plus margaritas by the pitcher.
MMMMmmmmm!
Posted by: Darleen at February 13, 2006 08:10 AM (FgfaV)
8
Them's fighting words; you're on!
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2006 08:25 AM (F7zrJ)
9
Funny, I thought they were a bit sweet too. And I knew it was the sugar that caused my hangover the next day. I wasn't sick... I was just "fragile". Had a blast - thanks again.
RG
Posted by: RightGirl at February 13, 2006 09:16 AM (AyL3W)
10
You're right, there is very little good Mexican food here, but there IS excellent Salvadorean throughout Northern Virginia, and a few places in DC that make passable tamales (there's one on D St. downtown whose name is currently escaping me) and actually decent margaritas.
Posted by: Tom Bridge at February 13, 2006 09:18 AM (U75YS)
11
I'll take Alero off my list. The place always had a problem with it being a crap shoot depending on who was working the kitchen. They never seemed to be able to standardize the recipes as much as other restaurants. Regulars sometimes didn't recognize the food when another chef came in.
Bartenders can accomodate requests, by the way...And follow your directions. Be nice and watch them, though. You don't want any "surprises"...Hands and glassses must be visible at all times.
Posted by: Darrell at February 13, 2006 12:12 PM (cMW6Q)
12
There would have been a lot of us to take advantage of, all at once--a mini-GOP army.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2006 08:15 PM (Is4ds)
13
If you want good Mexican food go to New Mexico. The absolute best. And Margaritas are sooo California. Have a Dos XX or Corona.
Posted by: Gene at February 14, 2006 04:02 PM (aklAt)
14
New Mexico is a completely different style, though also good. Chipotle is the best.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 14, 2006 04:08 PM (Is4ds)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Short Write-Up of Gingrich's Speech Yesterday Evening.
1) He's definitely seeking the nomination in '08.
2) He can be a very charismatic speaker. Not bland like George Allen, nor bordering on insanity, like Tom Tancredo. He creates a lot of excitement, without resorting to "wingnut code," such as talking about the New World Order.
3) Newt and his handlers have a flair for drama, and clever ideas for creating excitment and momentum.
4) A lot of his most passionate support seems to come from college-age kids who have lots of energy and clearly would be willing to put in lots of volunteer hours for a campaign.
Our best candidates are clearly Rice, Guiliani, and Gingrich. (I do not count the guy who's attacking the Bill of Rights: if it came down to him or Hillary, I might vote for Hillary. Or just stay home. I will not vote for that man.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:22 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ditto on McCain -- I'd rather just vote for Hillary and watch her drop the Democratic party further into the ash heap of history. Any Senator who thinks that political speech should be restricted just prior to a federal election will never
ever get my vote for any office.
That being said, while I like Gingrich, I wonder about his negatives. These are twofold. First, the rather ugly way he left his first wife. Second, the disasterous way he dealt with Bill Clinton in 1995-1997. Gingrich bears a portion of the responsibility for the Republican party becoming addicted to growing the budget, because Gingrich couldn't lead the Republicans into standing firm in the face of Clinton in the budget showdowns. If he cannot do that, what makes us believe he will be any more effective in the White House?
Unfortunately, my personal favorite, Haley Barbour, just announced that he will not be running in '08. A pity. I would have supported him (or Jeb Bush) in a heartbeat.
Posted by: MrSpkr at February 12, 2006 08:48 PM (sBWc2)
2
Count me, too, as one who would rather see Hillary win then to support McQueeg. His smack down of Obama doesn't even scratch the surface of redemption.
Posted by: Darleen at February 12, 2006 08:52 PM (FgfaV)
3
Flap handicaps the 2008 race:
Rudy Guiliani as GOP Presidential nominee
George Allen will be GOP VP
vs.
Hillary and Richardson
Posted by: Flap at February 12, 2006 08:53 PM (A8i+J)
4
Newt seems to be the best chance of spreading a new strain of Bush Derangement Syndrome to a new generation of electoral politics....
Posted by: Leo at February 12, 2006 10:21 PM (5bY/U)
5
I suspect a big part of Newt's work in the primary campaign will have to do with answering questions about his role in the way the revolution of '94 faltered--and what he learned from that experience.
I've heard that awful story about his first wife, but I'm not sure it's true--at least, the way we got it told to us. And even so, I'm really more interested in a guy's policies vs. his personal life. (Up to a point, of course. Bill Clinton was beyond the pale regarding that.)
And keep in mind that as wary as we are about Gingrich's luggage, Hillary's is far, far worse.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 12, 2006 10:34 PM (F7zrJ)
6
McCain might as well just announce that he is a democrat. He has been so chummy with Hillary and supported so many democratic agendas I can't see a difference between him and Hillary.
With Rice out of contention I don't see any leaders in the race for '08 but like all elections it usually comes down to the primaries before we have a true leader in the polls.
Posted by: Jack at February 13, 2006 09:32 AM (16sHb)
7
If he runs for president in 2008, I will support Cong. Tom Tancredo.
He has a lifetime rating of ninety-eight (9
from the American Conservative Union. Cong. Tancredo is pro-life and pro-second amendment. I fully support his opposition to any legislation that legalizes illegal aliens. The security of this nation's borders are a disgrace. If Cong. Tancredo were elected president, this country's borders would be secured.
Posted by: Tennessee Conservative at February 13, 2006 11:25 AM (OZgSU)
8
Problem with that, TNC, is that Tancredo hasn't got a chance in hell of winning a single state. He is unknown, nationally, and largely a single issue candidate. Those are HUGE obstacles to overcome.
Frankly, I'd rather see him take over at Homeland Security than become President. There are too many unknowns.
Posted by: MrSpkr at February 13, 2006 01:43 PM (CEsbr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 11, 2006
Lunch Today
with David Foster of
Photon Courier and
Chicago Boyz. What a nice man. And smart. He's semi-retired, but I've decided to label him a Maryland beach bum, because I like the sound of that. We stopped in at a Chinese restaurant and worried together over green tea about the future of Google, privacy in this country, the concept of free speech, and some other issues I'll cover later so I can pretend that his penetrating insights were really my own.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you all still in D.C.?
Some bloggers chose to sneak out early, but most of our group, from the UIS College Republicans, chose to delay our flights till tomorrow (Monday).
It was a pleasure to meet you, and others who I had previously known only through the web.
Posted by: Aakash at February 12, 2006 01:21 PM (D6Lvg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Will Someone Vid-Blog This?
Apparently, Reynolds will really be
beating up on CNN tonight, but I may still be listening to Gingrich's CPAC speech around then. I'd truly hate to miss it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:22 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was just added [kinda] to Bloggers Row a few hours ago; I am here now. There are a bunch of bloggers to the left of me... But I don't know who they are! Are these the same people [in real life] who I've been communicating with for some time, but only in cyberspace?
This is a new [but interesting...] experience.
Posted by: Aakash at February 11, 2006 10:41 AM (XRSeS)
2
Joy,
Get out of D.C. now before the blizzard hits!!!!
A half-inch of snow paralyzes the city...
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 10:44 AM (AyROc)
3
But my spouse tells me the Korean War memorial looks great with a little weather around it . . . and tomorrow's sightseeing day.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 11, 2006 12:31 PM (XRSeS)
4
Well, you can just hunker down until the all-clear sounds...We'll take up a collection to keep you and your flip-flops indoors.
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 01:06 PM (UW1Q8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2006
Sparkle
. . . wants to know what
Ace of Spades is like. I can't say much, except that he was gallant enough to walk
Wendy and me across the bridge to the block where we're staying. And that there are two types of comics: the immature, hostile type, and the mature, sweet type. Ace is the latter, but I don't think I'm supposed to say that. So: while in our presence, he did hoist one black flag, but he only slitted a single throat. Or maybe two. (Possibly a third, while I sneaked off to the ladies' room in my bare feet, looking for all the world like a Californian out of water in a fancy East Coast hotel. But I can't vouch for that third casualty.) The bartender cleaned up the mess, and that was really the end of the whole matter.
For some reason, tonight I was able to procure a few drinks that were weak enough for me to stay out a bit and act like a human being. So I spent time at the Marquee Bar with bloggers too numerous to list—though including our host, Mike Krempasky, Cam Edwards,Tom Bridge, and a few legitimate people with real jobs. Then we adjourned across the street to Murphy's, where I had potato skins and another gin and tonic, listening to Ace's jokes, Wendy's stories, Sean's anecdotes, and the vignettes of the witty guy who started Football Fans for Truth during the '04 campaign.
At one point in the Marquee, I was introduced to Jeff Harrell, who hadn't been sure he'd be here for CPAC at all. So I put down my G&T and embraced him. Somehow the person I'd been talking to got the idea that if only so-and-so introduced him, he'd get a hug as well.
Of course, that's not how it works. Sorry.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.
Had I Mentioned Lately That My Sister is Half-Syrian?
No?
Well, it's true. And Ann Coulter can get fucked.
Wasn't it James Joyner who coined the moniker "our Michael Moore"?
I'll never buy one of her books.
UPDATE: Nice little roundup of right-wing outrage here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:46 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The use of the "F" word in your blog worries me if you are indeed a GOP conservative. If you try to to access Ann Coulter's website you encounter an adjacent website that says "I fucked Ann Coulter in the ass hard". I do not like this stuff. I believe that Ann Coulter brings alot to the fight and I appreciate her sarcastic approach to the idiocy of the left. "Rag Heads" vs. "Fucked"!! So what is your response?
Posted by: Jim Gardiner at February 10, 2006 10:18 PM (3mIFp)
2
Are social conservatives maybe a little bit like Catholics--they both think they're the only true believers?
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 10, 2006 11:01 PM (xdX36)
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 11:47 PM (F7zrJ)
4
Miss A:
Not exactly the way I would put it, but you express the proper sentiment.
If we're going to go after people like Moore, Carter, et. al. we should prove be consistent and take Coulter to task for some of the more outrageous things that come out of her mouth.
Would that the left had a similar attitude about their diarreaha mouths...
Posted by: Rick Moran at February 11, 2006 02:37 AM (wZLWV)
5
I did promise to love, honor, and obey her in good times and bad...
Perhaps that's her point. Conservatives do show outrage at what she is now saying. On the other hand, the Left is saying the exact same things about Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rove with nary a rebuke. Visit the DU or that crazy Kos Kid...Visit college campuses around the country. I recall a play opening in Chicago a couple of years ago with "assassinate" and Bush in the title, and the glowing reviews. Ever read the Guardian?
Recall that she started to receive 10,000 pieces of hate mail per day the first time she used "liberal" in a non-reverential tone. Lovely stuff about rape with a chain saw. Abused Child Syndrome, I say.
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 10:06 AM (AyROc)
6
Since getting f***ed is often pleasurable, it can be interpreted to mean that you wish her well.
Posted by: John at February 11, 2006 12:10 PM (QiBpQ)
7
Any chance I can get more of my male readers to take their eyes off her legs long enough to figure out that how bad she makes us look?
I don't think the answer to left-wing lunacy is to lower our own standards of behavior.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 11, 2006 12:35 PM (XRSeS)
8
Your outrage proves we are the "good guys." She is the only Conservative positioned to make the point. And her mail box can't hold any more hate mail, besides.
OK...I'll use super-human strength to look away from those endless legs for a nanosecond....OK, Ann... Point made...Knock it off!
Are you happy now, LMA?
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 01:04 PM (UW1Q8)
9
Um, hon, her legs creep me out.
Each to their own, but I try to avoid looking too hard. She's always struck me as something like The Incredible Stretchy Rubber Woman.
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 11, 2006 09:38 PM (xdX36)
Posted by: Darrell at February 12, 2006 06:39 AM (f/jKP)
11
Desert Cat, we Leg Length Challenged Women the world over thank you from the bottoms of our height-challenged hearts.
Posted by: k at February 13, 2006 03:02 PM (y6n8O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lunch Yesterday
. . . with my cousin
Pillage Idiot, who lives and works nearby. It's always nice to meet someone whose blog I love to read: after the first few minutes, the strangeness of it all melts away, and you're cracking jokes.
Look Ma—no keyboard!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:38 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
So. Glenn Reynolds.
Sat down next to me; before he got mobbed, we had a few words. He ended up interviewing me for one of his next podcasts. What a sweet guy. It's interesting that when I've heard his voice in the past—on his podcasts and on
Bill and
Jeff's experimental web radio show—his Tennessee dialect appeared more muted than it does in person. (Tracking accents is among those things that I like doing, but do not do particularly well. Singing is another.)
I'm terribly tempted to buy his book while I'm at the convention, though as it is I'll have to discard most of my clothing in order to fit all of the tomes I acquired here into my suitcase.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:24 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 124 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Perhaps if you discard more of your clothing you'll make his blogroll, if you know what I mean & I think you do
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at February 10, 2006 12:13 PM (bCCgf)
2
One word: Fedex
The clothes back home, I mean. (Heck, don't most of us blog in PJ's or naked anyway?)
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 10, 2006 12:30 PM (B2X7i)
3
Little Miss Attila talks! Can't wait to hear YOUR dialect.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at February 10, 2006 12:32 PM (FU1id)
4
Oh, how fun! I *so* envy you, but CPAC simply wasn't in the budget this year, even assuming I'd figured out how to get invited/but a ticket/crash the party.
*sigh*
Perhaps next year. But, it sounds like you all are having a fun and informative time! Good for you!
-- R'cat
CatHouse Chat
Posted by: Romeocat at February 10, 2006 01:04 PM (/gCto)
5
How did cat bloggers hijack this thread?
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at February 10, 2006 02:16 PM (bCCgf)
6
Hey now! I rarely cat-blog (unless you count my moniker--then it's all I do).
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 10, 2006 04:07 PM (B2X7i)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2006
"O Oysters, come and walk with us,"
the Walrus did beseech.
"A pleasant talk, a pleasant walk, Along the briny beach.
We cannot do with more than four
To give a hand to each."
The eldest oyster looked at him and never said a word.
The eldest oyster winked his eye, and shook his heavy head—
Meaning to say, he did not wish
To leave the oyster bed.
—Lewis Carroll
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:50 PM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Let's see...You're either obsessed with your bed. (Not surprisng now that you can breath and sleep) Or having a few too many oysters. Tasty? Is it true what they say?
Posted by: Darrell at February 10, 2006 10:05 AM (2zCMq)
2
I would answer that if I knew what you were talking about
Actually, it has to do with leaving the bar early last night right after a bunch of tequila shots mysteriously showed up in front of all the females. it was good tequila, but I'd already had a drink. I sipped it for a moment and then took off.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 11:53 AM (SipPa)
3
They say:
There's only one thing better than an oyster, and you don't put it on a cracker to eat.
This is the same sweet New Orleans-type teeshirt that a guy will wear, who also has such t-shirts as:
-Mustache Rides-
25c
They also say oysters will ramp up one's sex drive, reportedly because of the zinc.
Posted by: k at February 10, 2006 02:06 PM (y6n8O)
4
Or because the experience of eating them is so sensuous.
Of course, mangoes aren't too bad in that category, either.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 02:24 PM (SipPa)
5
Oh yeeeeeeeeeesssssss.
Specially those extra juicy velvetly no-fiber slippery sweet smooth velvety kind that likes to grow over my back fence...
Posted by: k at February 10, 2006 05:19 PM (y6n8O)
6
Imagine. I said all that without saying a thing!
Posted by: Darrell at February 10, 2006 08:33 PM (f/jKP)
Posted by: k at February 10, 2006 09:49 PM (y6n8O)
8
No walks on the wild side, here. I'm just too, um, settled in my ways. And married. And so forth.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 11:52 PM (F7zrJ)
9
Likewise. But I sure enjoy thinking about my mangoes.
Posted by: k at February 11, 2006 07:12 AM (wZLWV)
10
Recall, I said nothing. That's why I said nothing. I like mangoes. I don't own any t-shirts with slogans. I find myself thinking about k's fence...
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 09:38 AM (AyROc)
11
I'll tell you a blog family secret, Darrell: Every summer, k sends Little Miss Attila a nice big box of those exquisite mangoes.
Posted by: k at February 11, 2006 11:23 AM (wZLWV)
12
I'll ponder the million images that brings to mind. I'll get back to you next Tuesday...
Posted by: Darrell at February 11, 2006 02:58 PM (UW1Q8)
13
I like eating a mango standing over a sink, since the juice gets everywhere: it runs down my arms to the elbows. It gets all over my face, and runs down my chin.
It can't be helped, I don't think.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 12, 2006 05:37 PM (F7zrJ)
14
I'm enjoying a cigarette now...
After four hours or so, I end up with a chapped face. Doctors in France need to work on a cure.
Posted by: Darrell at February 12, 2006 08:28 PM (jM8RY)
15
Um...chapped from eating too many mangoes? Or indulging in t-shirt supported activities?
Posted by: k at February 12, 2006 11:18 PM (y6n8O)
16
Let's say mangoes, for everyone's safety.
It's better if I don't shave, but the "mangoes" don't think so, so it is quite the quandry. The curse of being born with sensitive skin...
Posted by: Darrell at February 13, 2006 09:42 AM (++mZq)
17
Miss Attila! Perhaps we should let the poor man have some rest, so he can apply some soothing lotion?
Posted by: k at February 13, 2006 11:38 AM (y6n8O)
18
There is no rest, k..So many mangoes! So little time. Maybe when they get that face transplant thing perfected, they will turn their attentions to mango chapping.
I would love to get you the descriptions you want concerning my mango techniques but I am not clever enough to describe all the details without someone getting the wrong idea. It all starts with the lips, though, and a gentle suckling action...
Posted by: Darrell at February 13, 2006 12:25 PM (cMW6Q)
19
Did you know this one?: the two fleshy parts of the fruit that lay along the sides of the mango's large flat seed are called *cheeks.*
Posted by: k at February 13, 2006 03:08 PM (y6n8O)
20
I'm not surprised, k. But you got me looking for other fun facts. The name 'mango' is derived from the Tamil word 'mangkay' or 'man-gay'. Seems a bit harsh, but OK. The "mango tree" plays a sacred role in India; it is a symbol of love and some believe that it can grant wishes. I've always found that to be the case. Or rather, my profound wish...When choosing a "mango", roundness and plumpness are said to be best. The self-heating/spontaneous combustion risk is rated at "no risk", but I seriously doubt that.
Posted by: Darrell at February 13, 2006 09:06 PM (ME0W0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More on Illegal Immigration from CPAC
Tom Tancredo is, of course, a pistol. He's a strong speaker, and one of the important voices right now advocating for immigration reform. His stance is uncomprimising: the border must be sealed as soon as possible, he insists, using both a physical barrier and more efficient deployment of our manpower.
He talks about his experiences as a freshman congressman, bringing this problem to the attention of the country: “I wasn’t a committee chairman. By the way, I’ll never be a committee chairman. I’ve burned too many bridges around this issue.”
He voted against Katrina slush fund, he reminds us. He voted against the PresidentÂ’s Medicare prescription drug policy program.
And he voted against CAFTA. Why is it, he asks, that we no longer have treaties to control trade policies? All our new laws are called "agreements." Why? To pass a treaty, two-thirds of the Senate must vote for it. With a simple change in nomenclature agreements, all they need is 50% plus one vote.
President Bush, he proclaims, is in favor of open borders, and his proposed temporary worker program is sub rosa amnesty. The audience applauds. People filter into the back of the room, and stand there, listening to him speak. It is, of course, an impressive bit of speech-making.
Cheap labor, he tells us, is only cheap for the employer—not for the taxpayer. [I do hear that a lot, but I remain unconvinced, since the figures I hear are contradictory.—ed]
Tancredo has more red meat for us: “God bless Denmark," he proclaims, and the audience goes wild. "No new world order," he thunders. [Does that mean, I wonder, "no coalition-building?" Or does it mean "the Trilateral Commission is going to get my momma?" Unfortunately, NWO is another term with a somewhat flexible definition.]
"You young people are the hope of America," he proclaims. "America is something unique, an ideal worth fighting for.
I commend you to that task."
What I cannot argue with is his exquisite delivery, much as I can't bring myself to condemn every piece of wall that gets covered by his paintbrush.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:01 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 312 words, total size 2 kb.
1
AG, did Tancredo use the NWO expression in connection with the Denmark remarks? If yes, I would venture he's speaking against the Kofi Annan proposal for a worldwide "rules of conduct for journalists" telling them what they can/cannot publish
for our "own good" of course.
Posted by: Darleen at February 10, 2006 06:16 AM (FgfaV)
2
It didn't follow immediately, of course. But the phrase is popular among the black helicopter crowd, and since it was coined by George H.W. Bush in connection with the first Gulf War, I found it troubling.
But you know how I get.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 08:21 AM (F7zrJ)
3
I like this man and his commitment to stop illegal immigration. I with President George W. Bush would listen to the people. Most of us do not want the 'guest worker program'.
Great site by the way.
Posted by: Debbie at February 10, 2006 11:44 AM (xxTff)
4
No, it was not coined by GHWB. I recall my own startlement when he used it though, as it was already in wide circulation and had sinister meanings even then.
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 10, 2006 12:33 PM (B2X7i)
5
Re: Cheap Labor.
Please enlighten us with the figures you hear. Big business is so enamoured of cheap labor, what makes you think the existing crop of illegal aliens will remain employed if they are legalized and employers are required to adhere to the same rules and regulations as for current legal residents. It would be cheaper just to import another crop of illegals. Also what ever happened to respect for law and order? These people are breaking the law you know, along with the employers who hire them. I would also like to hear your objective evidence for the claim that the economy would collapse if all the illegals were forced to leave.
Posted by: Gene at February 10, 2006 02:00 PM (yTuVc)
6
Okey-doke. But I have a question for you: if you were born dirt poor in a Latin American country and had no way of getting work there, but someone offered you a way to go to the States where you knew you'd find work--what would you do?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 03:31 PM (XRSeS)
7
I'd go where ever I had to go to get honest work. I have no argument with the people comming here, my argument is with the people, perhaps like you, who think that any way they come is OK and we can ignore any law we find inconvenient. I feel very lucky to have been born in the United States of America but, if you read my comment on your other post, you will remember my statement about the equal sharing of misery. If I was born in a third world country I would do everything I could to get out, but being an American, I will do anything I can legally to see that it doesn't become another third world country and that is where we are headed with unchecked immigration.
Posted by: Gene at February 10, 2006 04:27 PM (yTuVc)
8
Hm. Not sure about that. Though we should be kissing the asses of good teachers a bit more, and getting rid of the bad ones.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 11:59 PM (F7zrJ)
9
You lost me on that one!! I could feel the wind in my hair.
Posted by: Gene at February 11, 2006 03:24 PM (a8YpW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CPAC: Focus on Immigration
There are a lot of ideas out there on how to deal with the problem of our porous borders, and it seems that people are finally approaching the issue in a serious way, recognizing that the present situation is untenable.
The main two debates seem to be (1) between those who believe that some sort of guest worker program must be a component in whatever we set up, vs. those who feel that this would be tantamount to amnesty. And: (2) those who feel that enforcement of our existing laws should come first, before we address the issue of how to deal with those who already live in the "shadow world" of illegal immigrants.
James S. Gilmore talked today about the necessity to design a system to deal with immigration in a way that is humane. He maintains that we cannot take punitive action, because other miniorities might then think that "they could be next." Also, in the Hispanic areas of American cities, illegal immigrants are intermixed with legitimate immigrants, so it's more complicated to identify the illegals than one might suppose.
He insists, however, that we must control our borders, and cannot have any kind of anmesty program.
["Amnesty," of course, is becoming one of those squishy words that has at least two separate definitions, like "affirmative action"—which either does involve quotas or does not, depending upon how you feel about the issue. Everyone is against quotas, just as everyone is against amnesty. It's a question of getting more precise than that and figuring out, for example, whether we can have a guest worker program—or enhanced rates of legal immigration—without creating the kind of amnesty that only encourages a sudden, overwhelming flood during a perceived "window of opportunity."—ed.]
Some kind of guest worker program might help us to get our arms around this, Gilmore suggests, and it might be better to do that rather than simply letting the situation “drift.”
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:10 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
1
....why can't we have a program like the Bracero program of the fifties? BUT FIRST CLOSE THE BORDER!!!!!! Illegal immigants here in Colorado enjoy FREE medical care!??? Let a regular citizen try to get free medical care and he/she will be tossed out of the the med center.
W. Roy
Posted by: W. Roy at February 09, 2006 10:52 AM (6e/Ts)
2
Any "guest worker" program that doesn't require people who are here illegally to go back where they came from to apply for the program is de facto amnesty. So when people talk about a "guest worker" program they should define more clearly what they mean. By the way - we already have a "guest worker" program. It's called an H2-A visa. It is used extensively in the Pacific Northwest to bring workers from Asia to pick apples.
Posted by: Gene at February 09, 2006 12:56 PM (yTuVc)
3
To legalize an illegal is to give that illegal an amnesty.
Any guest worker program that legalizes illegals is an amnesty. President Bush has consistently called for the legalization of some number of illegals through a guest worker program while simultaneously claiming he opposes amnesty. He is not being honest with himself.
Nor is it honest to claim that legalizing illegals is "humane." For every illegal that is legalized as a reward for having taken illegal employment, a law-abiding potential guest worker would excluded from competing for that guest-worker slot. That's the gross unfairness of the Bush Amnesty, the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty, the Hagel Amnesty and any other scam that pro-illegal politicians might try to flim-flam into law. There is nothing humane about rewarding cheaters at the expense of potential workers and immigrants who've respected out laws.
Posted by: Sabertooth at February 09, 2006 03:19 PM (Sr4qe)
4
The public is against any form of amnesty for illegals. So, let's see if we can make a guest worker plan workable.
Here's my incentive laden approach.
1. Foreigners can apply for guest worker permits in their country of residence. They must provide evidence that an employer wants them and the employer must provide evidence that they cannot fill the position with American citizens or legal residents. Fee for application $50.
2. Illegals already in America can apply for guest worker permits in America. Fee for application $500. Persons making such application will be ineligible for citizenship for at least ten years after their departure from America.
3. Children born to guest workers are citizens of their parent's country.
4. Illegals are allowed six months to acquire guest worker status. After that period, employers must require that all employees show proof of residency or a guest worker permit or proof of citizenship. Any employer employing an illegal resident to be fined $5,000 per violation.
5. All government agencies at all levels are authorized to question immigration status. Failure to comply and report illegals to DOHS will result in loss of federal funding.
Chosen figures are arbitrary. The higher charge for illegals is a penalty for their being here illegally. The low charge for foreigners wishing to go through legal channels to get here rewards their respect for US law. It must be a lot cheaper than the fees paid to smugglers. Just my ideas on the subject.
Posted by: pat at February 09, 2006 06:34 PM (A/D51)
5
"Illegals are allowed six months to acquire guest worker status."
That's an amnesty.
Posted by: Sabertooth at February 09, 2006 11:06 PM (Sr4qe)
6
Q: is or need for unskilled labor being met by the 5000 or so people we legally admit into this country every year?
Could we therefore "simply enforce existing laws" without economic chaos?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 12:36 AM (F7zrJ)
7
Do your homework. The number of aliens admitted to the U.S. as legal residents per year is closer to 500,000. If you add H1-B visas, family members of H1-B visa recipients and people applying for asylum it exceeds that number by a considerable amount. You are naive if you think allowing workers from third world countries unrestrained access to our labor markets won't affect the lifestyle of Americans. An anecdote: My son's best friend's father owns a construction business in California. My son tried to get a job in construction with him. The guy ONLY hires illegals because he can't afford the workers' compensation for legal workers. Grow up and smell the coffee (if I might mix my metaphors). Someone once said that the inherent virtue of Communism is the equal sharing of misery. The same can be said for open borders.
Posted by: Gene at February 10, 2006 09:38 AM (yTuVc)
8
With a booming economy and very low unemployment, I'm glad the president seems to agree with me that the status quo is our best policy. He's throwing bones to people who want to close the border, but nothing is going to happen.
This reminds me of the medical "crisis" of the early 1990s when everybody said, "We have to do something." Turns out the status quo was working ok despite the screeching that this country would go under if we just kept drifting.
the status quo is great for the economy, good for the emploers, good for the Mexicans, and good for America -- letting enough workers without being overwhelmed if the border was completely open. Bush has been tremendous on this issue, glad he's keeping it up.
Posted by: Lincolnman at February 10, 2006 10:01 AM (nWvOW)
9
I don't worry so much about the economic impact, since I feel that the labor has been extremely good for the economies of border states. But I am concerned about some of the social ills that show up in border towns where a a lot of the traffic is truly criminal in nature (vs. merely "illegal").
And the security issues are extremely troubling.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 10, 2006 02:33 PM (SipPa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 08, 2006
Between the Sheets
. . . is where I spent most of the afternoon. Last night I flew out of LAX to Chicago, where I arrived at 5-something a.m. today local time. I had just enough time to grab breakfast, which consisted of my standard Starbucks order (a grande chai latte) with a big, fat, disgusting, decadent cheese Danish. (Women who pull all-nighters for a good cause deserve cheese Danishes. That's just the way it is.)
As I got to the gate, my flight from O'Hare to Reagan National was already boarding. At the time this struck me as rather lucky; what I didn't realize is that the tight time frame between flights made it possible that my suitcase didn't make the same connection I did.
Now may be the time to tell you that I planned very cleverly for this trip, realizing that in both Chicago and D.C. I'd be indoors all of the time, so there was no reason to lug a big, heavy coat around with me on two planes. After all, before I'd actually emerge into the ambient temperature of D.C., I'd be able to retrieve my coat.
This plan was much more clever in theory than in practice, a point that was driven home to me every time the wind kicked up as I stood on the elevated Metro station waiting for the train so I could get to the hotel—wearing a long-sleeve T-shirt with a cashmere sweater over it, a hat and gloves, a scarf, and the flannel shirt that serves as my jacket when I'm in Los Angeles. I found the ensemble a bit inadequate, if you want to know the truth.
Back at the hotel, I couldn't decide if I was more hungry, or more exhausted. This dilemma was solved when I was invited out to brunch by Girl on the Right and Wonder Woman. I sort of walked briskly along with them to stay warm until we found a nice bistro, where I had pasta and Merlot, figuring that this would help me take a nap when I got back to the hotel. It worked so well that I started to get sleepy right then and there, and as I recall started babbling inchoerently, asking them how the plans for Canadian World Domination were coming along. We walked to a nearby drugstore after our "early" lunch (it was late as far as my inner clock was concerned), and stopped at a local drugstore, where they could pick up some stationary supplies they needed for their next meeting—and I looked at cheap gloves in the children's sizes that fit me. They went off to their appointment from there, and as soon as I was over my acid flashback ("oh, hey—like, look at the weave of the yarn, man") I picked up some snacks and came "home."
And then I crashed out for what was supposed to be a 2- or 3-hour nap. I woke up eight hours later at 7:00 p.m. local.
My bag arrived at the front desk about an hour ago, and I went down to get it because I'm too cheap to tip people for bringing things up to my room. (Other than that, I'm a nice person.)
And now I need to sleep enough tonight that I can get up early for the first day of Conservative Political Action Conference, which includes the ill-named "Presidential Banquet." (It's actually a Vice-Presidential Banquet, since Cheney will be there and G.W. will not, but I'm off-duty as an editor, here, so I'll let that one go.)
Please note that CPAC will pool all our blogging, and we'll also be posting to our own sites. Make sure that, in addition to the wall-to-wall Cotillion coverage, you check out Scott Schmidt's posts at Spot On.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:43 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 635 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I was gonna ask you out for a drink this evening, but I was afraid of waking you. Poor jetlagged thing!
RG
Posted by: RightGirl at February 08, 2006 08:22 PM (F7zrJ)
2
Thanks, but I've been trying to catch up on e-mail, the commenters on my blog, etc. Are you two going to be there for the continental breakfast tomorrow morning?
(And, BTW, how the heck are things going at that end of the hallway?)
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 08, 2006 09:00 PM (F7zrJ)
3
If you ever want to learn how to deal with jet lag let me know. Call it an occupational hazard I guess.
The power of the breakfast beer is not to be underestimated.
Posted by: tommy at February 08, 2006 09:00 PM (Qmfgc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
92kb generated in CPU 0.0461, elapsed 0.1868 seconds.
218 queries taking 0.1608 seconds, 523 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.