June 24, 2007
Some Questions for the Democrats . . .
. . . over at
The Tygrr Express. Most of these queries are things I'd ask those people personally, and
all of them would put 'em through a head trip I'd like to watch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:21 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
June 14, 2007
Fred Thompson with Peter Robinson.
They
discuss taxes, Fred's political/philosophical development, the stakes involved in when/how we leave Iraq, military spending, abortion and the Supremes—and why a guy with a happy home life and a new family would want to run the horrific gauntlet of a Presidential primary/campaign.
Best quotes:
"Having one more good man in the primaries isn't going to hurt."
And: "I've told John [McCain] that we were friends before this, and we'll be friends after it's over—unless he beats me." (Note to my other proofreader friends: it was a joke.)
One of the most interesting moments in the video was when Robinson suggested, "so, you have a gut feeling that you're the most electable, but you'll let the voters decide that." Thompson agreed, remarking that he simply didn't think this was the moment for someone from "the other side of the aisle" to take the reins.
I was impressed by his assertion that it was time for average Americans to make some sacrifices in order to win the War on Terror—and to face our other upcoming security challenges. To me, this suggests that he may plan on actually communicating with the country—keeping the American people in the loop. I think the country is ready for that. Ready for some communicating, Great or otherwise. [/obligatory Reagan reference; how tiresome to make it—and yet, this issue of communication/PR has been a non-trivial deficiency in the Bush '43 administration]
So an announcement will be formality at this point. Fred's in. And, yes, James: as a matter of fact, I am excited about it.
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:24 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Attila, when will you get it, the guy who is appealing to the masses, equates to the village idiot. You have made poor choices in the past, can you please correct yourself and find someone with half a brain on the right. Maybe someone who is brave enough admit to adultary or has the courage to speak their mind on abortion. And you know that someone will also play well with the "war on terrur" croud;.
Posted by: azmat Hussain at June 14, 2007 08:22 PM (mdszq)
2
So Barack Obama is a village idiot? Or do you hate having competition, Azmat?
Posted by: Darrell at June 15, 2007 09:40 AM (o/8QX)
3
Rudy's a possibility. I like Rudy. My main issue is the War on Terror, and Rudy "gets" that.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 15, 2007 11:21 AM (VgDLl)
4
But no Democrat gets it. They even made it official policy, striking the words "War on Terror" from the approved lexicon in April 2007. http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2007/04/military_gwot_democrats_070403w/
They did miss April 1st by a few days, though.
Posted by: Darrell at June 15, 2007 11:51 AM (8JkAl)
5
I'm afraid they weren't joking. The only one who has a chance of acquitting herself okay in the WoT is Hillary, and her only partly to "make her bones" as the first woman prez. But none of them really get it, deep down.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 15, 2007 12:45 PM (VgDLl)
6
What competion? Fred? And no I don't care much for BO. I don't like any of the Dems this time around, bunch of spineless creatures, not standing for any particular issue.
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at June 17, 2007 07:44 PM (mdszq)
7
And I like Rudy, he is a smart man who knows what is the right thing to say to get power and then do whatever it takes once you get power. And he is not all polished and full of it like the rest.
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at June 17, 2007 07:47 PM (mdszq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2007
Ace on the Republican Debate.
Apparently, CNN is in
rare form:
CNN supposedly picked "likely Republican voters" -- both actual Republicans and right-leaning indepedents -- to ask the candidates questions.
Let's see how scorchingly liberal the questions are.
Off to a good start -- a woman who lost her husband brother to the war wants to know how to get us out of Iraq.
I'm so surprised CNN found this questioner!
Why, you'd think liberals had some sort of premeditated strategy to put forward victims to push their policies or something!
More! Environmentalism, prescription drug subsidies, and now, from the affiliate's handpicked (liberal) blogger, a question as to whether or not to install a Canadian style single-payer national health care system!
Wow! These "likely Republican voters" sure are reflecting my concerns and interests!
I'm glad I skipped the debate. Maybe someone will bait Fred! into another mini video tomorrow, which would at least liven things up a bit.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:20 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I caught part of it. I agree with you on the baited liberal pablum questions. CNN sucks.
Posted by: Rich at June 06, 2007 01:02 PM (4j8Ry)
2
Since when is it liberal to ask when a war that's killing off our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters?
I think it's a rather important question to ask, since war typically involves sacrifices, and people who are asked to sacrifice might like, you know, what to know how long they have to bleed.
Is anyone in your family actually, like, fighting in this war?
Posted by: dejah at June 09, 2007 04:24 PM (pD1u6)
3
dejah, you are so full of it!
I watched the debate, I watch all of them for BOTH parties, just as I watch BOTH the DNC and GOP Conventions.
The woman that stood up and asked the question that night and started her question by saying a her brother had been killed in the war then went on to ask her question was either a plant by the DNC or Yesssss a liberal.
Liberals do not realize that war is about killing on both sides and there is nothing that can be done about that. But Conservatives know that there is only Peace through war. We only pray that the peace will last as long as possible.
I know where I stand and that is along side our awesome military. Liberals seem to have forfotten the first attack on the World Trade Center, the USS Cole, 9-11 and many, many other attacks to many to mention here and all done by the followers of Islam. ......terrorists.
Liberals USE the death of the troops to push their agenda to cut and run. Conservatives never use the death of one single soldier to push any agenda. We mourn their deaths but we also celebrate their lives and honor them as true American Heroes.
When a liberal has to use the deaths of soldiers they dishonor his/her service to our country and that is a fast. Learn it, own it and shame on you dejah for not getting it.
Do I have a member of our family serving now in the military? Or a friend in the military? Yes I do, several and I am proud of each one of them and I would never dishonor their service like a liberal would. Liberals are the enemy within, they aid the enemy with their spew of saying things like kill your officers signs they hold up at anti-war rallies.
LIberals should get down on their knees and thank God for our military and for all of America's finest for all they do each day.
dejah your comment......"you know, what to know how long they have to bleed. "....is absolutely disgusting!!!!
Posted by: Wild Thing at June 10, 2007 12:15 AM (t259v)
4
When's the last time CNN had a military family member who actually SUPPORTED the war on the air?
*crickets chirping*
Statistically, they are far more numerous that those who don't support the war, yet miraculously every time they air an "in-depth look at how military families feel" we see some non-representative "military family member" who... Oooo! surprise surprise! AGREES WITH CNN!
Hey, I know some military family members don't support the war, and I'm perfectly happy to let them say their piece. But don't you find it just a
little suspicious that CNN can never seem to find any of the vast MAJORITY of us who do when camera time rolls around?
Got bias? CNN does.
Posted by: Cassandra at June 10, 2007 04:09 AM (G/Ncc)
5
"Dejah"--as in, "deja vu"? Sorry, Doll: Iraq isn't Vietnam. (Nor was El Salvador, for that matter, though I suspect a lot of your friends have a hard-on for another "defeat.")
Since the e-mail address you gave me was fake, I'll ask you publicly what I tried to ask you in private: do YOU have any family members or friends serving in Iraq (or even Afghanistan)?
I want to know. But I think I already do.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 10, 2007 09:48 PM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 05, 2007
And So
. . . it
begins.
The "I'm With Fred" slogan/identifier is very clever, reminiscent of "Join Arnold," or "I Like Ike." And using it as the site's URL is another way of separating F. Thompson from the rest of the pack.
Hackbarth is concerned about how the Fred! strategy will affect the primaries:
If Thompson goes the “travel little but make up for it with big gulps of the internet” he won’t win the nomination. Iowa and New Hampshire voters are spoiled. They expect and demand candidates suck up to them in person in private homes and at town hall meetings. How can a candidate have a good ground game when the he doesn’t bother covering much ground?
The question becomes: how addicted are voters in Iowa and New Hampshire to having their asses kissed? Or, to put it less bluntly, will they get enough hard data on where Fred stands to feel comfortable voting for him without a lot of hand-holding? And if they are accustomed to acting as the presidential gatekeepers, can they set their egos aside and vote for a man on his merits, rather than based on how much time he spends in their states?
Fred!'s advantage here is the fact that he doesn't necessarily want the job of President: he's being drafted. So an unorthodox campaign might just work. The danger, as I see it, lies in the fact that most people still get their news from the mainstream media rather than the web. And the producers of segments for television like soundbites. They like to send reporters to cover the news on the ground. So people like my mother won't have much of a sense that Fred! is really running, unless he makes a splash despite being physically absent.
The whole thing is a huge gamble, but if Thompson wins, he wins big. A strong showing in the first few primaries despite the "travel little" strategy will be big, big news.
And then the MSM will come to Fred!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:35 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 339 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Remember this is also the first primary season where so many states have moved up near Iowa and New Hampshire, so I am wondering if Fred! ends up getting the nomination (or comes awfully close to it) political strategists will have to redo their strategies of spending so much time in these two states...
Posted by: Mark at June 05, 2007 05:55 PM (Xl6MK)
2
To me it's looking like Kerry in '04. Dean had momentum but biffed Iowa. Kerry wins, wins New Hampshire, and the rest is history. With so much compression between races it will be hard for losers to let the media, webloggers, and voters catch their breath. POOF! Before we know it the race will be over.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at June 05, 2007 09:13 PM (8lL1c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
36kb generated in CPU 0.0173, elapsed 0.1226 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1129 seconds, 444 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.