March 13, 2006

Big Love

I did like the Big Love premiere, and not just because I think Bill Paxton's cute and Tom Hanks is a sharp producer. I'm not the only one.

It's essentially a nonviolent (so far, though that could easily change) version of The Sopranos: a guy lives half in the shadows, and half in Suburbia, and gets bounced like a pinball between his nuclear family and his extended family and his secrets and the modern world and the forces of darkness. Except that Bill is a good deal more likeable as a character vs. Tony Soprano.

It's all good.

I'm sorry some Mormons are upset, but the show does make the sharp division clear between mainstream Mormonism and the various polygamous cults that are tied to that church's roots. In fact, most people who study counter-cultures agree that the majority of the polygamous sects live elsewhere in the West, rather than in Utah. The show only needs to be set in Salt Lake City in order to create tension between cultists and mainstream Mormons.

In real life, of course, they'd live in New Mexico or Arizona, but we need to see Respectable Mormons recoiling from polygamy, and I imagine that we will. (At least, the first episode sets such a situation up.)

The show also captures the real moral problem in these sects: the "marriages" of young girls who haven't yet reached the age of consent to grown men.

I would love to see prosecutions for polygamy strictly confined to sects that prey on young women. That would, as I see it, be a much better use of law-enforcement dollars.

My husband's line on polygamous quasi-Mormon sects: "three wives, but no coffee? No thanks." Of course, I get the impression that he thinks one wife is an awful lot sometimes. Of course, he is, um, taking the graduate course in marriage.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 01:19 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 314 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Interesting thoughts. As a Mormon I plan to avoid the show for two reasons: 1. It has nothing to do with the Church, and 2. I don't have HBO. Oddly enough, for all the hype the show has gotten, there's been surprisingly little reaction around the Mormon equivalent of the Blogosphere. Those who bothered to watch the show were unimpressed, both from a socio-political angle as well as from an entertainment value perspective. I don't see this one surviving more than a season or two. I certainly don't see any reason to get any huffier about this show than, say, Sex and the City. Or The Sopranos. Talk about moral degradation! (Interesting aside: Paxton seems to be channeling latent Mormon tendencies already! Check out IMDB's highlights today.)

Posted by: Woody at March 13, 2006 09:16 AM (9kYWY)

2 It is an interesting premise for a show. And, as I said, it's not like watching the Sopranos wherein you are virtually forced to identify with a guy who's a monster: they make the Paxton character very sympathetic. I think this show might be interesting, and I'm glad the Mormon blogosphere (Saintsosphere?) isn't overreacting.

Posted by: Attila Girl at March 13, 2006 02:02 PM (s96U4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.108, elapsed 0.215 seconds.
208 queries taking 0.1986 seconds, 433 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.