November 22, 2005
Battle Gossip and Gun Porn
Rusty has the
scuttlebutt on tactics and tools in Iraq, some interesting tactical observations and reviews on firearms. (Teaser: the 9mm sidearm is not as popular as the .45. Can you
believe it?)
Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's just say they know better now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
HA! Many of them, however, don't marvel because they're DEAD
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at November 22, 2005 09:38 AM (g8yUp)
2
I loved how they keep taking refuge in nearby buildings, thinking they'll make a glorious last stand . . . and forgetting about our air support. Such buildings are dubbed "Allah's Waiting Room." Nice.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 22, 2005 12:18 PM (JZqY7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 15, 2005
November 10, 2005
Michael Yon's Work
. . . is being used on the floor of the senate (link
here at the magazine), and he'll be posting the text of Bruce Willis' speech soon. (I hope he got a picture, too!)
Posted by: Attila at
06:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
November 09, 2005
Froggy Says
. . . don't even
bother with
Jarhead. The people who put it together are so ignorant of military matters that none of them even
own clothing in shades of green (or blue).
Posted by: Attila at
01:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
November 07, 2005
Remember
The Soldiers' Angels fundraising effort to provide injured men and women with laptops continues; please
give generously.
[Oh, gee. I guess that was the button for the Marine team. Well, there are Army, Navy, and Air Force teams. So there you go. We'll let the free market sort it out.]
Posted by: Attila at
12:19 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Can Anyone Recommend
. . . a good book on tanks? I'd prefer an overview, but a WWII focus is fine.
Actually, same question on planes. I'd like to explore what gave us air superiority in the invasion on D-Day, but context/history is important.
Thanks! (I'm sorry: tanks!)
Posted by: Attila at
12:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll tackle the air superiority question on D-Day in two very simplified answers.
(Big Picture Answer)
1. We out-produced the Luftwaffe in both planes and pilots. But primarily the Germans were unable to replace their losses of trained and competent pilots. Over time, that seriously degraded their ability to mount effective defensive air operations.
(Immediate D-Day Answer)
2. We basically had everything that could fly and shoot in the air for the first several days and pretty much brute-forced the Germans out of the sky.
We did that by both keeping a large amount of air cover above our forces and by also attacking the Luftwaffe while they were still on the ground preventing many of them from getting airborne in the first place.
If you need more detail or have any follow up questions, send me an E-Mail and I'll post more here.
Posted by: Apache at November 07, 2005 06:49 AM (GbuCd)
2
Ditto what Apache said (I'd add that the Allied bombing campaign in Germany, which began in 1943, tied up a significant portion of the Luftwaffe and contributed to their general inability to control the skies over Western Europe from mid-1944 to the end of the war).
As to the tanks, I've done a lot of studies (collegiate and otherwise) on the development of the tank and specifically on the deveopment of armored warfare doctrine. If you'd drop me an email, I'd be happy to point you towards the appropriate research materials.
Posted by: MrSpkr at November 07, 2005 12:00 PM (CEsbr)
3
Re: Tanks
Panzer Battles by F.W. Von Mellenthin
Attacks! by Erwin Rommel
I am trying to remember a book by an American tank commander, but not having any luck.
Nothing significant in tank combat happened after WWII except in the Arab-Israeli wars. I don't have any books on those wars.
I studied this stuff for quite awhile, but have concentrated mostly on first-person accounts and "real soldier" stories of combat. If I can find any better references, I'll post them.
Posted by: olddawg at November 10, 2005 08:14 PM (R2Tc7)
4
follow-up on tanks. The best book I've read by an American is Brazen Chariots by Robert Crisp. Another WWII account. If you are interested in the technical stuff, email me and I'll see what I can answer.
Posted by: olddawg at November 11, 2005 01:22 PM (R2Tc7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 05, 2005
Joyner on the Military in Movies
Apparently,
Jarhead is nearly as bad as a lot of us feared it would be. Very little verissimilitude for anyone who's ever served in the armed forces—much less a veteran of the first Gulf War such as Joyner. In the comments section, James is challenged to come up with military movies that are true to real-life experience in uniform. Naturally,
Band of Brothers gets raves—but of course one of the reasons it's so successful is that it takes eight hours (or was it ten?) to tell its story. There's a lot of time to capture some of the varied experiences of the men in the 101st Airborne.
We need more people who have actually served writing stories about the military; as it is, what we're given is too far off the mark.
Posted by: Attila at
09:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There's no way Hollywood is going to make a movie about heroic US soldiers in the Mideast. And since no producer or writer or director has ever met a US servicemember, how could they? The MSM's only interest in soldiers is dead ones
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at November 05, 2005 12:23 PM (yOYjQ)
2
That's not true! They are also intersted in ones that treat prisoners badly, or kill innocents by mistake, or kill bystanders on purpose. Or people who were somehow duped into serving under false pretenses.
All members of the armed forces are either brutal killers, or innocent victims. Don't you know
anything?
P.S. None of them--the violent, evil ones, or the misguided, good ones--are very smart. There's a "maximum I.Q." of 100 to get into the military. And no one in entertainment or media is dim enough to qualify!
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 05, 2005 01:32 PM (x3SIT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
33kb generated in CPU 0.0301, elapsed 0.1288 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1146 seconds, 455 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.