March 22, 2008
Dudes!
Will someone out there who isn't television-impaired tell me whether the hundreds of FBI files that the Clinton Administration collected "by accident" —which contained raw data, interviews, unsupported allegations, and plenty of true/untrue
dirt on people—got nearly as much
news coverage as someone peeking at the current candidates' passport fies, and thereby potentially getting hold of their social security numbers (which is not a small thing, but certinly orders of magnitude away from what we saw wholesale in the 1990s under Bill Clinton)?
h/t: Memeorandum.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:11 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Because Hillary creating a "database of the cast iron fist" (over 1500 files of raw FBI data, last I heard)was a malicious and overtly unlawful act. (Witness Nixon era Chuck Colson admitting to having one file and going to jail) But this seems to be for curiosity or possible financial gain selling tidbits to tabloids by nonpolitical employees. But Dems think they can smear Bush and the Republicans with it, so their douche rag MSM will make this a Plame game of the episode.
Posted by: Darrell at March 22, 2008 06:51 PM (/zh8q)
2
There's was plenty of coverage. They even covered the Congressional investigation hearings. The passport flap is already old news.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 22, 2008 07:32 PM (IpB84)
3
Maybe it's time to rethink the haste--
"The third employee, who has not been fired, worked for The Analysis Corporation (TAC), which is headed by John O. Brennan, a former CIA agent who is an adviser to Mr. ObamaÂ’s presidential campaign on intelligence and foreign policy.
The TAC employee is the only individual to have accessed both Mr. ObamaÂ’s and Mr. McCainÂ’s passport information without proper authorization, a State Department spokesman said. That employee, who was not named, triggered an electronic alarm system, officials familiar with the probe said."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/NATION/243762495/1001
Posted by: Darrell at March 22, 2008 11:20 PM (/zh8q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2008
It Turns Out . . .
that sometimes journalists only skim the summaries in the reports they are supposed to be reading.
Shockingly, that means they get it wrong sometimes.
Even more shockingly, those with axes to grind often write the summaries, to spin the reports in one direction or another. And the media generally buy what the bureaucrats are selling.
"First, we kill all the reporters . . ."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"First we kill all the reporters..."
Where do I sign up? Can I be the one to open the canisters? Pretty please?
Posted by: BillyHW at March 14, 2008 09:03 PM (FhMJq)
2
William, you
do indeed get that honor. Just because.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 15, 2008 12:50 AM (hr1i5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2008
It's 3:00; Do You Know Where Your Newsgatherers Are?
Sean's
got both of the "3:00 a.m." ads—Senator Clinton's, and the response ad from Senator Obama. The timeframe is impressive, in terms of the Obama ad. But if I had video-editing software on this computer (and knew how to use it), I'd do the parody of both:
"It's 3:00 a.m., and your children are in bed and safe. There's a phone ringing in the newsroom.
Who do you want to answer it?—the mainstream-media reporters, who keep normal hours and sleep at night, or the crazy night-owl bloggers, who never drop off until the rosy-fingered dawn is poking at their bedcovers?
Your web traffic will determine who answers that call, and how soon you read about this supposedly important-fucking news item—and how quickly it gets disseminated over the internet.
I'm Little Miss Attila, and I approved this ad."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
But can you spin it to the Left like Reuters and the AP?
Posted by: Darrell at March 01, 2008 10:27 AM (ud8rY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
26kb generated in CPU 0.0247, elapsed 0.137 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.124 seconds, 443 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.