December 01, 2006
Okay, Here's My Concern.
I mean, why would I want a worm? When the early bird gets it, doesn't that actually enhance the quality of my life? That's one fewer worm I might encounter in an apple or whatever, and really a damned fine thing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:53 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The early bird may get the worm,
but it is the second rat that gets the cheese!
Posted by: Bob at December 01, 2006 06:40 AM (CP6tB)
2
I'm quite satisified if the bird leaves the worm at the bottom of the bottle...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at December 01, 2006 06:44 AM (1hM1d)
3
"The early bird gets the worm" only proves that the worm should have stayed in bed.
Posted by: Zendo Deb at December 01, 2006 10:33 AM (+gqOq)
4
The fact that the early bird gets the worm is evidence that whether or not you want the worm, the bird does.
Posted by: triticale at December 06, 2006 06:28 PM (o2qne)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 30, 2006
I'm Sorry.
But when a few drunks are trying to ruin your standup act—standup being one of the most difficult art forms there are—you are entitled to call them
anything you like.
If they can't take the heat, they oughtn't to have stepped into a kitchen infamous for its sauna-like atmosphere.
And how many times must I remind everyone that there is only one cure for the undue power people give the word "nigger"? Say it until it loses that power. Nigger, nigger, nigger. (And I am "trailer trash, BTW. And a "white mutt.")
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:12 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You assume people are being intellectually honest about word-power to begin with, not using it as an excuse to get in a free shot, or get that "money for nuthin' stuff" we all are looking for.
Words aren't magic. They never were. Words never hurt me. They were either true or they weren't. The betrayal behind some words sometimes hurt me. But that is a personal story, and a hurt that could never be inflicted by a stranger.
This said, Michael Richards is still an idiot. He proved it by trying to drag all white people into his argument(offense) and defense, and tried to draw parallels between what he did and the fight against terrorism. Every comic knows to say "I don't bother you when you're working! Did I ever try to slap the cocks out of your mouth when you're trying to pay the rent? Do I tell them that the health department is looking for you?" Stick with the classics.
Posted by: Darrell at November 30, 2006 02:50 PM (OETMZ)
2
But no comic wants to used any other guy's lines. They are a lonely, independent, and generally hostile breed. The trick is to use one's twisted anger to make others laugh.
There is an art to using that twistedness to good effect: to channel one's assholism without truly BEING an asshole. That's why I prefer Jay Leno to David Letterman: I sense that he's a nice guy. He doesn't take the gloves off too often.
But I'll bet he did when he was working clubs. He had to, or he wouldn't have survived in that environment.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 30, 2006 03:46 PM (LEEsJ)
3
Michael Richards now OWNS "Shut up! Fifty years ago we’d have you upside down with a f**king fork up your ass,” that's for sure...
I agree with you in general, by the way. I don't know about any comic being a nice guy, though. They all teeter pretty close to the edge of sanity, Leno included. Ask any stand-up Leno worked with about getting through to him now. Or about his rivalry with Letterman. Nicer-than-Letterman isn't hard to do, I've been told.
Posted by: Darrell at November 30, 2006 08:43 PM (snZPP)
4
I wouldn't know: Attila the Hub knew him in his own standup days, but it wouldn't occur to him to call Leno out of the blue. He generally lets other people call him--or if someone else needs to be called, he lets his agent handle it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 01, 2006 01:05 AM (LEEsJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 26, 2006
Little Old Lady Survives Police Raid!
Always nice when they manage to
live, huh?
And this one is in my very own Golden State.
Via Radley Balko.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
November 25, 2006
License to Kill
Desert Cat is
all over this one, of course. The elderly woman who was killed by the police might have been victim of "dynamic entry," rather than a "no knock" raid. I'm sure her loved ones are reassured by that fact.
Like most aspects of the "War on Drugs," this has to stop: innocent people are dying because a technique that should only be used on the most violent of criminals is turning into the "first resort," and there are virtually no safeguards in place. I'm furious. You should be, too.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Don't tell me that you are from the Peach State as well?
I am currently here, and because of certain future factors, I need to know as much as I can, about the political climate, and other aspects of life, about the GA county I'm in (about 2 hours or so from Atlanta), and about this state as a whole.
I remember seeing an item on the local news, a few days ago, about that 90+ old woman, so I am thinking that you may be from this area... I just sent an e-mail to Michael J. Canup, who I just learned, from going back to '
Save the GOP' today, that he is from here as well
. I sent Mr. Canup an e-mail, and cc'ed it to other conservative Georgia bloggers, such as Erick Erickson, Basil, Mr. Shamalama, and Gennie, about these issues. I didn't see your site, when I quickly looked through Gennie's GA blogring for sites I recognized, otherwise I would've cc'ed it to you as well.
If you are from Georgia, or know about it's political climate (as well as academic and job-related issues, and other aspects of life), I may need some information and advice, in the near future.
I hope your Thanksgiving weekend is going well! Keep up the good work here.
Posted by: Aakash at November 25, 2006 11:11 PM (1z/TV)
2
Actually, I'm in Southern California, but I think the problem is nationwide.
You might go visit Kelly at Suburban Blight.
Also: let me know what your academic specialty is; I do know some people from there (albeit not conservatives). I might be able to offer some limited insight. But I'm ultimately not going to be a lot of help . . . sorry!
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 26, 2006 09:44 AM (LEEsJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"No-Knock" Raids
If we don't
restrict them further and make law enforcement fully responsible for the inevitable tragedies that result, the Constitution means nothing. Nothing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:19 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
October 05, 2006
Freaking Rethuglican Bigots.
They make me
sick.
Oh. Wait . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
September 30, 2006
Overheard
"I've signed up with
Match.com."
"Why not J-Date?"
"Have you met either one of my sisters?"
"You know I have—oh, wait. Okay."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:52 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
September 07, 2006
"I'm Ready for It;
Come on—bring it."
Hey! What kind of snakes were they? But don't tell me too much. Not yet.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:41 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
July 04, 2006
Gay Marriage! Oh, no!
The sky is
falling!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:00 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm going to have to disagree with you here Ms. the Honey. Gay marriage is in it self nothing to be concerned about. Calling them 'married' is. It will change the meaning of the word, and not in a good way.
Don't believe me? Try wearing a rainbow pin the next time you go out, and see what people think of it. Or, how 'bout we go out and have a gay old time?
They should be able to join together in a union just like us, but it's not the same thing, so they should call it something else (don't care what).
Posted by: Kevin at July 05, 2006 03:14 PM (++0ve)
2
But should the difference between a "marriage" and a "civil union" be codified by the state?
The state should treat us all equally--therefore, the only thing it is really qualified to proclaim is a civil union.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 05, 2006 06:09 PM (4IuF2)
3
The state is treating us all equally right now. A gay man has just as much right to marry a woman as I do. What we are talking about is adding a right for men to marry other men. When creating this new right, there is no reason we have to give it a name that is already taken (like marriage). Unless you consider it identical, which I don't.
On the other hand, changing the legal term for all marriages to civil unions seems fair enough if it is important to try to gloss over the differences between heterosexual and homosexual coupling.
But living in California, you know that most homosexuals try very hard to
not be the same as straight people. I would have thought that giving their unions a special name would be desirable by them, if the legal implications were the same.
(This would all be the same if you switched out 'men' and 'women' and lesbian for gay man, but I was trying to save typing

)
Posted by: Kevin at July 05, 2006 07:30 PM (++0ve)
4
The state already codifies us, and does NOT treat us all equally (see: affirmative action, set-asides, illegal immigrants paying few if any taxes vs legal citizens forced to pay taxes, money buying the best justice possible, tenure granted-not granted due to political stance at state-and-federal funded colleges and universities, etc). There are more instances if you really think about it. Equality is in the eye of the beholder, more than in actuality.
Posted by: clyde at July 06, 2006 06:24 AM (6m+7s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 14, 2006
In Response to My Post
. . . . about real estate management—and what it means, philosophically, to be a landlord—K put together an extensive
meditation on the subject, with plenty of practical tips.
Head on over there.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:06 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I take it you are still fighting with the "short post" problem....
I do miss the longer posts.
Posted by: Zendo Deb at May 15, 2006 03:11 AM (S417T)
2
They'll be back.
As soon as MT forgets what it's mad at me about, and forgets to keep punishing me for my real/imaginary transgressions.
I forgot people actually read my blog. How cool . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 15, 2006 09:21 PM (34TBU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2006
How to Protest the 55 mph Speed Limit
Via
Reynolds, An Extraordinary Act of Civil Obedience.
My first reaction: what assholes.
My second reaction: a system that depends upon rule-breaking is fundamentally broken. If we are relied upon to break the rules, the rules should be changed. (See "immigration, illegal," and "drugs, war on.") So, yeah: it had to be done.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:13 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Dallas Police Department periodically does that on the freeways here with both marked and unmarked cars.
I do think following the traffic laws should be mandatory, and an unwillingness to do so should result in a suspension of privileges.
Posted by: tommy at March 01, 2006 01:04 PM (dTj9I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 24, 2006
This Is an Idea . . .
whose
time has come.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
January 28, 2006
Tunnel of Love
Paging Michael Connelly.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:37 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hello,
I thought you might like to know that a new Beckett weblog has just been created in an effort not to celebrate his centennial :-)
Best,
Posted by: Guillaume at January 28, 2006 01:05 PM (2rCFp)
2
Yesirree, we got that border locked down tighter than a nun's twat.....
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at January 28, 2006 01:11 PM (j6hXo)
3
Last line of the article:
“People are always going to find a way around us,” he said.
There's the bottom line.
No matter how much money is spent, no matter how many busts are successful, no matter how many drug cartels are broken up, the demand will always be met with a supply one way or another.
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 28, 2006 05:40 PM (xdX36)
4
I'm the oddball on that issue, in that I think the Canadian border may be the greater threat, simply because Canada can be so quasi-European in its hospitable attitude toward terrorists.
Still, we have to get a handle on this.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 28, 2006 05:45 PM (XbEp3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2006
Gin-Blogging.
Wow. I've been away from Bombay Sapphire for a while now, just drinking plain Tanqueray. But Sapphire was on sale, so I bought a little. I was probably still drinking mini-dirty martinis last time I had Sapphire around, but its strong gin taste is a bit much for a gin and tonic. I deliberately make them pretty weak, with no more than an ounce of gin in each, and the Bombay has a rather uneasy truce going with the tonic and lime: it's as if it wants to be in a martini. I see why I was fond of it at one time: the juniper taste can knock you over if you let your guard down.
I need a lot of hydration these days, so I'm not too interested in martinis. Still, I should have one more while the Bombay is still in the house. The stuff just begs to be mixed up with a little vermouth and olive brine. Who am I to argue?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
December 21, 2005
One Day I'll Just Scream
I meet a friend at a mutual friend's house. I've never been there before. I'm thrilled by his collection of Buddha statues, because they come from several vastly different Eastern traditions: one is Indian, another is southeast Asian. Yet a third is Chinese. He has a laughing Buddha; I love laughing Buddhas.
We stop there for tea, and I hit it off with my host, he of the many Buddhas. The topic of taxes comes up, and he remarks, "you have to pay taxes, unless you're Halliburton." He winks at me; his meaning is clear.
He's a nice guy, but like everyone else in artistic L.A. he takes it for granted that we all hate the Bush administration and the war and the nasty capitalists and the dirty republicans, and the rich. (Oh, wait: what about the rich in the entertainment industry? Do they get a special dispensation?)
We—creative Republicans—are the Last Minority. In the 1970s one used to be able to get buttons at the Sisterhood Bookstore in Westwood that asked "how dare you presume I'm heterosexual?" Others queried, "how dare you presume I celebrate Christmas?"
If neither my husband nor I ever needed to work again, I'd get us buttons that read "how dare you presume I hate the President?"
It would blow a lot of people's minds to know up front that we don't.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:23 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He also takes it for granted that you nothing about the tax system, & are as big an idiot as he is
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 22, 2005 10:06 AM (i4gdx)
2
And that I'm just as ignorant of how slim Halliburton's profit margin on it Iraq-related operations really are.
(Not to mention the liability it suffered from acquiring a division that had dealt in asbestos decades earlier. That has kept the whole organization financially stagnant for some years.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 22, 2005 10:32 AM (zZMVu)
3
He also takes for granted that you won't pee on his oriental carpet...What's that spot?...I don't know!
Posted by: Darrell at December 22, 2005 10:41 AM (Mfoza)
4
I assure you, academia is just as bad. I never, ever talk about politics at work. My colleagues do all the time, though, agreeing with each other about the evil of Bush and everything he stands for. His supporters are evil, too. Or maybe just stupid. Although they might be evil and stupid.
The notion that colleges value diversity is the biggest crock since the notion that a degree proves you're an educated human being.
Posted by: utron at December 22, 2005 01:03 PM (CgIkY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2005
Here's an Interesting Study
regarding whether make-up enhances or mutes female beauty. I'm not so sure about the
methodology of the first part of the study.
Makeup in my own case doesn't seem to have much effect on whether men find me attractive. I wear it because I don't like seeing my face in the mirror of the Nordstrom ladies' room unless I've done something about those ever-present circles under my eyes. And once I've gone that far, I usually throw some lipstick on; it's a privilege of middle age.
Makeup, like decent clothing, is for us alone. Jane Austen got the principle right.
Posted by: Attila at
10:25 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"The use of make-up may compensate for or mask cues indicating low hormone levels"...would imply that it helps for those with low visual cue levels, and harms those with high levels.
In my Dogbert incarnation, I'd point out an obvious product opportunity; a kit to decide if makeup will help or hinder a particular woman.
I'm suspicious of the fairly small sample size, though.
Posted by: David Foster at November 03, 2005 07:11 AM (7TmYw)
2
"They used a computer to morph faces into composite photographs of women with high fertility and others of those with low..."
What the Hell does this mean?
Subjects were looking at "composite faces" of two separate women? Why didn't they just use the natural photographs of the same women at different hormone levels?
Posted by: Darrell at November 03, 2005 09:56 AM (ME0W0)
3
Makeup has another important factor - does it make your face taste funny? I don't mind the look of makeup, but if I give you a peck on the cheek or a long tongue-lashing to the neck, and I taste Revlon rather than attilla, the makeup has to go.
Posted by: me at November 09, 2005 02:06 PM (0BqBD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2005
The Mayors . . . Unmasked
Mayor Sam and Mayor Frank have
disclosed their secret identities, and show no sign of wanting to lay off of the Los Angeles City Hall.
God bless Hizzoner and Hizzotheronor.
Posted by: Attila at
01:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
August 15, 2005
On Class
There's a great (and somewhat disgusting) article by David Sedaris in the current issue of
GQ. Go out and read it in print: steal it from your dentist's office or something. (I don't believe in rewarding magazines that don't provide full articles online, so try not to pay for the damned thing. How are your shoplifting skills?)
Or, if you're just too busy, there's an excerpt here, but the original is better. And there's not too much of it.
Posted by: Attila at
12:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
July 28, 2005
June 10, 2005
How to Survive Marriage
David Sedaris, in the midst of a very funny New Yorker story,
discusses how he handles fighting with his boyfriend:
We’ll be arguing, and I’ll stop in mid-sentence and ask if we can just start over. “I’ll go outside and when I come back in we’ll just pretend this never happened, O.K.?”
If the fight is huge, he’ll wait until I’m in the hall, then bolt the door behind me, but if it’s minor he’ll go along, and I’ll reënter the apartment saying, “What are you doing home?” Or “Gee, it smells good in here. What’s cooking?”—an easy question, as he’s always got something on the stove.
For a while, it feels goofy, but eventually the self-consciousness wears off, and we ease into the roles of two decent people, trapped in a rather dull play. “Is there anything I can do to help?”
“You can set the table if you want.”
“All-righty then.”
I donÂ’t know how many times IÂ’ve set the table in the middle of the afternoon, long before we sit down to eat. But the play would be all the duller without action, and I donÂ’t want to do anything really hard, like paint a room. IÂ’m just so grateful that he goes along with it. Other peopleÂ’s lives can be full of screaming and flying plates, but I prefer that my own remains as civil as possible, even if it means faking it every once in a while.
Via Beautiful Atrocities.
Posted by: Attila at
10:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
61kb generated in CPU 0.0448, elapsed 0.1987 seconds.
216 queries taking 0.1755 seconds, 506 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.