September 03, 2008

Experience: Palin vs. Obama

So, if I'm getting this right, Obama supporters are irritated to see Governor Palin's record compared with his.

Hm.

UPDATE: Ah, here we go. Stole it from King Moron.


Posted by: Attila Girl at 11:23 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

1 The Messiah with a thin resume is a frickin joke and the media supporting this no-achievement Barry Hussien Osama/Obama is doubly a joke! Go Sarah go! In fact, dump Juan McAmnesty.....Sarah for President!!

Posted by: RSG at September 03, 2008 01:06 PM (HH3AB)

2 Sarah Palin could choose Lieberman as running mate and I'd still probably vote for her.

Posted by: Desert Cat at September 03, 2008 01:14 PM (6go9w)

3 Women in the media hate Sarah Palin because most of them are east coast elitists who think one like them should be the first woman to win a national election. An independent, frontier, tough-as-nails woman, educated in Idaho for gosh-sakes, doing so would be just, uh, ridiculous. Too delicious!

Posted by: John at September 03, 2008 01:58 PM (lO8Xg)

4 Where's the damn media investigating Barry's father (muslim-communist), step-father (muslim-communist) and mother (radical hippie communist)?

Posted by: Bruce at September 03, 2008 02:10 PM (HH3AB)

5 In the Bill Oreilly interview of Barack Obama, regarding the discussion about Obama's energy plan, in response to Bill asking Barack, what if the development of alternate energy sources don't deliver. Obama compared his approach to John Kennedy's space program, and how if you go for it , the answers will come. But, the distinction between our space program and our energy challenge is ... If it had taken us longer than we thought to get to the moon ... or, if we hadn't gotten to the moon ... no big deal. But, if we put all our hopes into alternative energy, and it doesn't happen in time ... or, if it doesn't work, our entire economy, as well as our national security could end up in ruins. Our country's entire energy infrastructure revolves around petroleum. 167,000 gas stations, the 250 million vehicles. Democrats keep citing how long it will take to get more oil out of the ground. But, even if an alternative fuel is found tomorrow, how long will it take America to transition from our existing infrastructure to a completely new one? In the meantime, people have to get to work, and goods have to get to market. This is an important reason to secure our energy needs with oil drilling and mining oil shale, while we try to develop alternate energy. Obama and Pelosi also want to dip into the strategic oil reserve, as a way of pandering to voters, but what if we have a true emergency, like Hurricane Ike, or Hugo Chavez cuts us off, or Amadinajad cripples the straits of Hormuz? Obama seems to be playing fast and loose with our country's future ... gambling with our future, all based on hope and faith ... with consequences which could be dire. Obama's plans, or lack thereof, are extremely irresponsible. Not suprising from a candidate who does not have the experience, qualifications, or judgement to lead, as President of the United States.

Posted by: Howard at September 13, 2008 10:32 AM (VUlvt)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0755, elapsed 0.1872 seconds.
208 queries taking 0.1751 seconds, 431 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.