March 15, 2007
Rick Moran on Mrs. Clinton
He recognizes that the most vocal Democrats want her to renounce the war, but doesn't seem to remember that the further she veers to the left for the primary, the more ground she has to gain in the general election, when it's time to tack back to the center.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Furthermore, it's still very early in terms of what's going on in Iraq and the War on Terror in general: apologizing for her vote now could cost her a lot later on.
I do think, however, that she ought to put her husband on a shorter leash: he's a brilliant politician, but he brings a lot of baggage with him, and she doesn't need that additional weight.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:02 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So she would make a good president then?
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 16, 2007 06:49 AM (xdX36)
2
Ow! That hurt.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 16, 2007 07:22 AM (0CbUL)
3
Wow. I was thinking out loud there. I don't exactly remember posting that.
Reminder: never never comment before the caffeine kicks in...
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 16, 2007 11:14 PM (xdX36)
4
I actually think Mrs. Clinton might be an effective wartime President, if not "the most uncompromising wartime President in U.S. History."
My argument with her has to do with the havoc she could wreak economically, even in four years. And, of course, the ties any Democratic president would be stuck with WRT the teachers' unions, lawyers, etc.
That would be the major distinction between her and, say, a GOP statist. But goodness knows she'd be better than Gore or Edwards or Obama.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 19, 2007 02:05 PM (0CbUL)
22kb generated in CPU 0.1707, elapsed 0.2499 seconds.
208 queries taking 0.2308 seconds, 430 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
208 queries taking 0.2308 seconds, 430 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
