January 17, 2007
Glenn Reynolds on Municipal "Gun Control."
If you didn't read his op-ed in
The New York Times, go take a
peek.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:30 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
December 27, 2006
"Interesting . . .
to see an advocacy group impeached by its own grading system."
Insty links some fun facts about the Brady Campaign's "successes."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:32 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
September 05, 2006
So Who's the Bigger Liar?
Boston writer Michael Blanding, or the founders of the "pro-gun" American Hunters and Shooters Association itself?
Cam Edwards tries to sort it out.
Via Insty, who's getting mail from genuine grassroots activists who bitterly resent these "Astroturf" groups—and with good reason.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cam Edwards is the one who's right.
Posted by: Kevin at September 05, 2006 03:21 PM (++0ve)
2
AHSA is part of the Left's gun ban program. See the UN for another. Michael Blanding is the useful idiot in the media, seeking not to clarify, but to obfuscate. Michael Moore appears as himself. The complete cast list can be found at the DU and Kos. Let's hope it doesn't last as long as "Commander in Chief."
Posted by: Darrell at September 06, 2006 08:41 AM (fSi0x)
3
The NRA warned us about this group at least six months ago, if I recall correctly. They are an anti-gun front group with a deceptive name.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 06, 2006 06:26 PM (xdX36)
4
No! They are a "moderate alternative" to the NRA! Hallelujah!
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 06, 2006 11:35 PM (LEEsJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 29, 2006
The Gun Fad
Wish we'd talked about
this last weekend, Rusty. Great to meet you, though. I'll just echo what everyone else has
said: get a revolver (.38 Special or .357, please), get some training, spend a little time at the range. Keep it away from kids, and the untrained.
And have fun. Firearms are the greatest.
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:33 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
One? That's like having one potato chip. You need several. Little ones for tin cans and gophers. Shotguns for being able to say, "I can't miss". And really really big ones to get the frustration out of your system.
Posted by: Jack at July 30, 2006 06:59 PM (me6+k)
2
I own a 20-gauge, a .40-caliber Glock, a .357 Ruger revolver, and a Ruger Tomcat .32.
I used to have a nice S&W Chief's Special--my first, and favorite, firearm--but my mother stole it from me.
The husband owns mostly rifles and .45 ACP sidearms, though I did get him a .22 for target practice.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 30, 2006 07:11 PM (4IuF2)
3
Psh. Getting a .22 as practice for using a .45 ACP is like masturbating as practice for having real sex.
Posted by: Desert Cat at August 01, 2006 06:36 PM (xdX36)
4
Right. It's just not done
I know, I know: there's virtually no perceived recoil, unlike with "the real thing." But the ammo is cheaper, and getting those microscopic bullets where you want them is still a challenge.
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 01, 2006 10:06 PM (4IuF2)
5
I know this is going to sound 'funny', but I really don't know how many guns I have. I have a list of them with serial numbers.
My favorites are in no particular order;
S&W Mod 19 combat mag.
Win Def 12 g pump
1911 45
Lugar 9mm (grandfather got this in WWI)
S&W Mod 12 38 spc
S&W 456 9mm with 3-15 shot clips
Posted by: Jack at August 02, 2006 06:57 AM (jQkj2)
6
Wow! I want a Luger. But WWII vintage.
And a Colt Commander in .45 ACP.
And a single-action revolver.
And a Sig Sauer.
Then I'll be done
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 02, 2006 11:21 AM (4IuF2)
7
Ever see a desert eagle. I got to shoot one. They are fun, but very heavy. They tried to sell me a .50 mag version at the store. But I don't have any elephants in the yard.
I also saw an interesting gun recently. A seven shot titanium revolver. It was light, I mean really light. You could carry that backpacking all day. And it was a .357 so it would stop most anything.
Posted by: Jack at August 02, 2006 05:18 PM (K3B7+)
8
Naturally, I saw Desert Eagles when I was working at the gun magazine. But the biggest sidearm I ever shot was a .44.
The titanium holds no attraction for me: I'm a small person, and the reason I shoot .45s so well is that they are good and heavy, so I have a decent shooting platform.
Posted by: Attila Girl at August 02, 2006 11:21 PM (4IuF2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 03, 2006
I'm Not Really a Size Whore,
but
this is impressive.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:25 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You are a cutie.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at March 03, 2006 12:06 PM (FU1id)
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at March 03, 2006 12:08 PM (YCB6T)
3
Paging Michael Moore... Paging Michael Moore...
Posted by: John at March 03, 2006 12:43 PM (y1z3c)
4
I didn't know they came that BIG!... and LONG! (ItÂ’s big enough to do an elephant! Not that anyone would want toÂ… poor things)
Where can I get one?
Posted by: Yolanda at March 03, 2006 12:48 PM (dLzW2)
5
Yolanda: look here
http://www.ohioordnanceworks.com/lahti/l.htm.
Way back in the day, I read "God is My Copilot" by Col. Robert Scott, an account of flying with Chenault and the American Volunteer Group in China. One episode related was the recovery of a pilot who'd gone down in a rather remote area. The pilot reported that the locals firearms where of a larger bore than the .50 calibre guns on his plane.
Not terribly surprising, tho. A 10 gauge shotgun has a .775" bore.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at March 03, 2006 03:43 PM (1hM1d)
6
10-gauge! My shoulder would never recover, I'm afraid. 12 is plenty.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 03, 2006 03:45 PM (s96U4)
7
Yes, the biggest surprise to me was that you can actually buy one, for the low low price of only $8500 plus a case of Bud. Now THEre's a DEAL!
I suppose something like this could come in *real handy* when you get
charged by a wild pig!
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 03, 2006 10:00 PM (xdX36)
8
I'd like to see
this kid pull that gun out of his britches!
Clowns in a VW, indeed!
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 03, 2006 10:03 PM (xdX36)
9
In the useless information category, the largest shotgun I heard of still in manufacture is the Soviet KS-23, with a 23-mm bore making it approx. 6-gauge. It's a military weapon, sometimes carried by SPETsNAZ forces and can fire a number of projectiles including tear gas cannisters, rubber bullets, buckshot, and anti-vehicular rounds. It can also be used as a grenade launcher. Oddly enough, the weapon has a pistol grip, instead of a stock. I heard a story where a visitor, allowed to fire the weapon, knocked out some front teeth with his first shot. After persuading(taunting) him to try again, he broke his jaw with the second. I think that's a step forward for the Ruskies--accepting responsibility for your own actions! The punishment is built into the weapon!
In the past, there were 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 gauge shotguns, called punt guns because they were mounted to boats called, oddly enough, punts. You can still find some of these around--and the shells... We're talking rough 2" diameter bores here.
Posted by: Darrell at March 03, 2006 10:23 PM (yaaKe)
10
I saw a video a short while back that featured a fully automatic 12 ga gun (5 rds/sec) that could fire, among other things, small grenade rounds.
Just...damn!
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 04, 2006 12:00 AM (xdX36)
11
Thanks for the link Darth!
I wish I had $8500 to blow, but alas... Student loans take priority.
"The pilot reported that the locals firearms where of a larger bore than the .50 calibre guns on his plane"
Yeah but, please correct me if I'm wrong (i don't know much about guns)... couldn't a flintlock have a larger bore than a .50 calibre gun? I'm positive that pilot's guns were more acurate and reliable than those of the locals. As you said... Not terribly surprising.
Posted by: Yolanda at March 04, 2006 08:42 AM (dLzW2)
12
Good heavens. I can't say from personal observation whether that would Finnish off a tank, but it sure would Finnish off a quail.
Posted by: McGehee at March 04, 2006 09:45 AM (lAOTn)
13
Be vewy, vewy quiet. I'm hunting tewwowists!
Posted by: John at March 04, 2006 10:04 PM (y1z3c)
14
I hope that quail isn't supposed to be dinner.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 04, 2006 10:07 PM (s96U4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 19, 2006
Toronto's Hoplophobes
. . . intend to
outlaw tragedy.
Next to go: human nature.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:46 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Will the children be banned from pointing with their index finger and yelling "bang?" That was my first, and still my favorite, toy gun.
Posted by: tommy at February 19, 2006 12:30 PM (Qmfgc)
2
So you have to be over 18 to play with your toy gun? I'm sure that is the fondest desire of everbody over 18.
So how many years does a 12 year old get for caring his own wooden gun?
Posted by: Jack at February 19, 2006 12:34 PM (gb49l)
3
When Andre Malraux visited Russia (sometime in the '30s?) he was listening to a lecture about how communism would create perfect happinesss. He raised his hand and asked "How about the child run over by a streetcar?"
"In a planned socialist transportation system, there will be no accidents," came the reply.
Posted by: David Foster at February 19, 2006 12:55 PM (5F0ML)
4
Now we have to get the fines doubled for plastic assault weapons--or ban them outright! If only they had that law in Britain when the first pictures of Iraqi prisoner abuse were published in the Guardian--later proved to be staged/faked by someone associated with the paper. The rifles used--Japanese replicas based on a prototype subsequently modified before issuance--were the first tip-off. At least someone would have gotten fined. But good!
Posted by: Darrell at February 19, 2006 02:11 PM (g0mZ8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 06, 2005
Yesterday I Had Lunch
. . . with Radio Lone Star, who brought me some nice gun porn, including an entire special issue magazine devoted to the .45 government model. Naturally, we talked about how the gun industry has changed: there was a time when it was harder for publishing folks to "admit" that they worked for firearms-oriented magazines than it was to concede they work down the street at the
Hustler offices. It started to change a little in 1999, when the underground "Y2K preparation" scare led some to re-examine their feelings about self-sufficiency in a number of areas, including home defense. But of course after 9/11 the public settled into a realization that all uses of force—even those that require hardware—are not evil in and of themselves.
That is, it might not be any more wicked to have a sidearm under your bed (secured so your children can't get to it) versus bondage equipment (which no one ever insists should be secured away from the kids).
Around the time we drift away from ordnance and onto media in general, the waitress comes by and I order a margarita on the rocks. No salt. Lone Star looks at his watch, which reads 12:40.
"Is this breakfast for you?" he asks.
"No. I had tea," I respond.
"But have you eaten today?"
"Well," I tell him. "There was milk in the tea. I think that counts."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:18 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Radio Lone Star.
I like that.
When we do lunch we always seem to discuss, among other things, firearms and alcohol.
(I wonder how many of your fans know there is an old issue of a gun mag out there showing you in your robe reaching for a Ruger .357.)
Too bad we don't smoke. Did I ever tell you about my idea for a magazine called Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms? If it ever comes to fruition perhaps you would like to apply.
Posted by: LBJ at December 07, 2005 08:24 AM (xUyci)
2
I actually own a T-Shirt that says, on the back:
"Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms . . . who's bringing the chips?"
And I do smoke cigars. I even own a humidor.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 07, 2005 11:50 AM (zZMVu)
3
1911's, nothing better.
Posted by: Alex at December 08, 2005 06:29 PM (D5tns)
4
Well, my dream gun (other than the WWII-era Luger I will obtain someday if I ever get rich and famous) is a Commander, which is of course one of the slightly smaller variants of the 1911.
It's still technically a bit big for my hand, but not to the same degree that the standard 1911 is, and I shoot these weapons very, very well: the weight provides a terrific platform, and there's little perceived recoil. It just takes me a split second longer to reach the magazine release--or the safety.
All guns are wonderful. Except some 9mms. For some reason that cartridge doesn't do much for me.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 08, 2005 06:42 PM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2005
May 24, 2005
Aaron
. . . has a
handgunning question. It's an interesting one.
I suggested a rifle, and then re-read Aaron's original question. Longarms are cheating.
Posted by: Attila at
12:39 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://www.sightm1911.com/Care/45acp.htm
Posted by: Ciggy at May 24, 2005 06:55 AM (0B3lJ)
2
There's always AP for a good through-and through but availability might be a problem - and less confetti.
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at May 24, 2005 08:09 AM (BCOHx)
3
I think I saw a "Mythbusters" about this very topic. The verdict was that a bullet carries enough kinetic energy to penetrate, but not enough kinetic energy to translate into violent motion in the target.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at May 24, 2005 09:57 AM (KZlQC)
4
It's going to depend on the bullet. Even shooting paper targets with different loads tells me that some penetrate cleanly, and others don't.
Hollow-points in particular are designed to expand once they reach their intended targets: they "mushroom" on impact (or, in some cases, peel out into a star shape, and continue spinning as they tear through the material).
Keep in mind also that hunters are able to observe the effects of their loads on the wound channels in game they hunt. And homicide detectives see instances where various loads will enter the human head, and take large chunks of the brains out the back.
So we know it happens. It's just a question of the ammunitions used.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 24, 2005 11:49 AM (8e5bN)
5
230 grain FMJ will probably go through that--it's said to be able to penetrate about 2' of muscle and was tested for the 1911 on young steers.
And yes, long rifle is cheating. Some guys I used to hunt with sighted in one year on a 9" diameter pine tree and were surprised to find exit holes (from expanding rounds).
I'd personally recommend an expanding bullet, though, to do maximum damage. It would still probably go through, leaving daylight the size of your fist.
Posted by: Robert Perry at May 26, 2005 09:28 AM (LZ2fB)
Posted by: eve at June 03, 2005 11:35 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 14, 2005
"I Kept Stopping by Your Blog,"
he told me. "But I kinda slacked off after a while when I didn't seen much about sex at all. And very little about guns.
And nothing about me."
Okay. Here's a cogent argument for the right to self-defense, and an explanation of why that is spelled S-E-C-O-N-D A-M-E-N-D-M-E-N-T
Posted by: Attila at
12:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
April 12, 2005
Some Good Gun Porn
. . . over
here.
Posted by: Attila at
09:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
March 21, 2005
Oh, Fuck.
Another fucking
school shooting.
Just fuck.
(No. This is not a family blog when kids are dead. Try me next week.)
Maybe we can make lemons into lemonade, though, by trashing the Constitution over this! Anyone want to time it out?—I figure the first calls for gun control will hit the media by tomorrow, noon Eastern.
Posted by: Attila at
09:10 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I figure that the calls to increase the money for the Department of Indian Affairs will come first. Along with a bill to exempt Indian Casinos from paying taxes forever, because we know deep down, its a underfunding problem.
Posted by: the Pirate at March 21, 2005 09:36 PM (u4v+M)
2
From an annual letter my husband wrote when we were still living in sin, circa ten years ago. "We visited my sister in Arizona for Christmas, and while we were out there we stopped by a local reservation. We gave the Indians the gift of whiskey and rifles. They gave us the gift of cash."
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 21, 2005 09:44 PM (R4CXG)
3
I don't know why you'd think that. Of course it's got nothing to do with guns. He could easily have killed his grandparents, a security guard, and a whole lot of other students with something else. Like a stapler. Boy, he could have gone on that rampage with a stapler, or a kitchen knife, or some really sharp paper.
Guns don't kill people! It's people armed with guns who kill people. Lots of people, efficiently and quickly.
Posted by: MrLefty at March 22, 2005 12:57 PM (Ba+lv)
4
As at Columbine, apparently this guy made no secret of his plan. Why do students not pass on reports of such threats?
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at March 22, 2005 02:36 PM (MBCZx)
5
Incidently, Lefty, I won't mention it but there are more efficint ways to kill large numbers of students.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at March 22, 2005 02:37 PM (MBCZx)
6
Uh, didn't this kid off his grandfather first - y'know, the one who was *A COP* - and then use his service weapons to kill those people?
As long as we're disarming the general public, let's disarm the police as well. After all, criminals (and terrorists) have rights too. We wouldn't want them to get hurt now, eh Mr. Lefty?
Posted by: Daniel at March 22, 2005 06:40 PM (HhZDf)
7
1) If I wanted to kill a lot of people very quickly, I'd probably go for explosives. Not that it would be terribly original, but it would be efficient. And they're pretty easy to do, unless you guys are planning on pushing "fertilizer control" legislation. Which you probably are.
2) Mr. L, I'm 5'1" and I weigh 115 pounds (okay--120). Therefore, if you're an average-size man, you probably have lethal power over me just by virtue of how big your hands are vs. my neck. If you think I'm going to let that power imbalance stand by not owning a gun, you're simply wrong. Have a nice day.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 22, 2005 11:20 PM (R4CXG)
8
It's inevitable that after a tragedy like this there will be the obligatory round of people calling for restrictions on guns. It's human nature to immediately look for something to blame.
That's precisely why the Founding Fathers wrote a Constitution that prohibited government from restricting certain rights, and insulated the amendment of that constitution from popular (and transient) passions.
Liberals often like to say that the 2nd Amendment no longer carries weight, because they argue that "a well-regulated militia" means the police, not the people. But there are two parts of the 2nd Amendment: the first part justifies, the second mandates. The mandate is that the government may not infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms. You can try to explain away the rationale as much as you like, but no amount of rationalizing will change the actual text, which obstinately prohibits government, until such time as the 2nd Amendment is repealed, from infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
People can - and sometimes even do - make good, watertight arguments why the 2nd Amendment is obsolete. Why we should jettison it. To paraphrase Justice Scalia, if the 2nd Amendment is obsolete, if it's no longer a good idea, convince the nation, and repeal it. If you can't find enough votes to repeal it, then the Constitution is working.
Posted by: Simon Dodd at March 23, 2005 10:36 AM (o+ba9)
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 23, 2005 02:47 PM (R4CXG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 21, 2005
R.I.P., Hunter S. Thompson
Goldstein has the links/details on his suicide-by-firearm. Most of us are still in shock.
I heard him speak once, at UCLA in the 1980s. He was a talented man, and the world will miss him.
Posted by: Attila at
05:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
September 07, 2004
It's About Time
. . . we closed the
campaign-trail loophole.
I think this qualifies as a pistol grip, even though it isn't the military style of pistol grip that many people think of straight off when they hear the term. And—joking aside—most gun-control advocates do not seem to want to allow transfer of firearms as gifts: more often, the attitude is that the transaction must go through the state. (That is why I didn't give my mother my favorite gun, my Chief's Special: I loaned it to her, long-term. I don't think California allows me to just give it to her.)
I don't know what Kerry's voting record is on transfer of ownership, but I'll bet there is a contradiction, here.
[If you copy the photo, please know that I'm not the one who named it "Kerryrifle." That was several copies ago; people shouldn't name pictures before they have their coffee—or if they are only piss-ignorant members of the mainstream media.]
UPDATE: Cam Edwards weighs in.
Posted by: Attila at
02:18 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You are absolutely right - that's why I named mine, Kerrygun!
Posted by: John of Argghhh! at September 08, 2004 01:12 PM (AqZSF)
2
I was pretty amazed when I finally noticed that, as I downloaded the pic for this entry.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 09, 2004 01:48 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2004
63kb generated in CPU 0.0314, elapsed 0.1332 seconds.
214 queries taking 0.1171 seconds, 510 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.