June 11, 2007
"So. Have You Seen That CD?"
"Which CD, Dear?"
"The one your sister burned for us for Christmas."
"You have it."
"You let me have it? You're sure?"
"I'm sure."
"But I want to listen to it."
"So maybe you should find it."
"But why didn't you hang on to it?"
"Because I didn't care if it got lost for a while."
Now that's patriarchy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
June 10, 2007
Sure.
Being a closet liberal, I'm faced with the temptation so see gray areas. To say,
"maybe, if the sandal completely covers the junction between the nylons and the bare toes."
But what's next?—advocating the custom among Japanese tourists of wearing knee-high nylons with shorts?
Look: stockings are one thing, and are fine between consenting adults. But panty hose of any type are not sexy. They are meant for one purpose, and one purpose only: to attenuate one's lack of tan/unevenness of skin tone.
If the environment you are going into is so casual that you can wave your bare toes around, you have no business wearing panty hose of any sort.
Or, if the environment requires panty hose, you shouldn't be showing off your pedicure—no matter how cute it is.
Get a spray-on tan, or buy some leg makeup, or suck it up and wear linen slacks. But come on, now, Girls: let's not bring about the utter collapse of civilization, just because it's summer.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Let me get this straight, there are rules?
1) First-row phalanges strickly verboten*?
2) Second-row phalanges situation dependent?
3) Breastfeeding appropriate always?
Situations requiring pantyhose? Lambeau Field in late January? Attending priapism support group?
*Your spam filter won't allow the English synonym.
Posted by: Darrell at June 11, 2007 08:10 PM (llsWd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 28, 2007
May 18, 2007
Here's a Koan for You.
Is it ever possible for a female to wear shorts with high heels and not look like a complete whore?
If not, it's rather mysterious, no? I mean, put a skirt on her, and make it even shorter, and it just looks like she's about to go clubbing. More fabric, more modesty as shorts, and . . . instant [ironic] sluttitude.
Why?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:59 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Depends on the cut of the shorts. And what else she is wearing. And the woman. And whether she'll be on your patio.
I am sending a few pics, but do you think this is true with a Hampton's look? (sweater tied around the neck over layered tops?) With fuller cut shorts? Women in the '40s(and earlier) seemed to pull it off. And speaking of brick construction again, do you think it's Victoria Beckham's shorts or high heels that make her look like a . . .sex worker?
Posted by: Darrell at May 18, 2007 09:45 PM (PbpgE)
2
This must be a sign of how far out of the loop I am on cultural indicators.
I would probably think she was just sexy, along with the girl in the skirt, of whom I would have no clue that she was on her way to the club.
The whores that I am aware of (at least the streetwalker sorts I see now and then around the perimeter of my 'hood) stand out like a sore thumb and it's not so much because of their attire. It's their body language and inappropriate eye contact that screams, "pick me up for a fistful of bucks".
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 21, 2007 06:57 PM (ogl5V)
3
Are they women whom one might consider attractive, given a different setting and more orthodox body language?
BTW, your approach is much more conventional/male/engineer-like/quasi-autistic than Darrell's. I am making no judgements; I am merely a student of the male mind--and of human nature.
The fact is, there are some very left-brain guys out there who nonetheless study women's fashion.
Fascinating when they do. Fascinating when they don't. And women are fascinating, too. Though some of us talk way too much.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 21, 2007 11:36 PM (3F7vn)
4
Some yes, most no. The "crack-whore" stereotypes are particularly disturbing. They have all the moves down, and then you catch a glimpse of just how hollow and ugly they really are...
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 22, 2007 07:02 PM (ogl5V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 12, 2007
By the Way . . .
this isn't me. It's the other Joy McCann.
Though Joy McCann's refusal to bow to her son's wishes in how she runs this foundation is absolutely inspiring to me (a non-lawyer, IANOL). Once I pass the age my mother is now, I won't just wear purple—I'll drive a purple freaking convertible.
Because . . . why not?
I am positive that my 96-year-old grandmother (my only surviving grandparent, and dad's mom . . . thanks for asking) has never read this poem, or heard of this society..
And yet, her life is suffused with lavendar, a color she didn't pursue when my grandfather was alive (he had been very partial to red).
If anyone knows where I can find a lavendar flag that can be mounted on her scooter, that would be awesome. Bonus points for a cross or a fish on the flag (I have a vision of it being a purple pennant, but I could be wrong about that).
Just no rainbows, please--or woman-identified-woman symbolism. I do not want to have to explain that to her.
Thanks.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:53 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is 4" x 6" acceptable? How about a plain lavender flag and a separate Christian flag with a white background and a red Cross on a blue field in the upper left corner? Made in Ameica by a little company in Danville California. And we can't see your visions, btw, at least not yet. It would be nice to put them down on paper and scan them--or see what Photoshop can do until we can.
I would have to know some more details before I decide who is right in that legal battle. I would like to see a list of the old charites and the new ones, for example. Don't you think Hugh Culverhouse Sr.'s wishes matter? Or the court's decision 10 years ago? What about that Daugherty character?
Posted by: Darrell at May 12, 2007 03:08 PM (3lHEJ)
2
Somehow the ones I've seen have been triangular. I saw an elderly lady scooting along in my little town the other day, and almost accosted her to ask where she'd gotten her little flag.
I think my grandmother would totally dig the dual-flag idea. And blue goes really well with lavendar. How about a link?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 12, 2007 09:09 PM (2WBcM)
3
More scooters! More scooters!
One day I'll really go to town on Scooter Accessories. I think the flag will be easier to find than the mounting assembly.
And that, actually, probably isn't hard to find either.
I have a cool rear-view mirror and a wondrous variety of cupholders to install. Somehow, something tells me this will be done by Walter rather than myself.
Posted by: k at May 13, 2007 12:50 AM (zBbuE)
4
http://www.colorfastflags.com/index.php?method=Detail&ItemsId=10227
http://www.colorfastflags.com/index.php?method=Detail&ItemsId=9288
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 07:23 AM (2a74D)
5
In my grandma's case it's a safety issue--she truly does zoom along, and when cars are parked on her street it's hard for her to be seen.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 13, 2007 11:42 AM (2WBcM)
6
One easy mount would be to go to a Dollar store and find something with rubber/vinyl suction cups on it. They all have some suction mount hooks and such. Look around. Use Gorilla glue or a silicon-based glue/caulk to place those where you need to. Glue the flag in place in the suction cup as well. A bonus would be a certain amount of give in case of accidental contact. Vinyl and silicone based rubbers for the suction cups will hold up better to UV rays if she spends a lot of time outdoors.
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 08:04 PM (7cB5r)
7
It occurred to me last night that you are looking for a marker/safety/whip flag on a six-foot, 1/4" or 5/16" high-strength fiberglass pole, not a little flag. The kind you might see on riding mowers along the Interstate, or ATVs or farm equipment. Sorry.
Try these--
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/safetyflags.html
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/specialtyflags.html
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/specialtyflags.html
Holders are available here too. Their spring holder is a bit pricey. . .I would probably adapt a spring car antenna from a discount auto parts store using one of their holders for the flag(integrate both).
You might find something like these at WalMart, btw. I don't know for sure.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2007 08:18 AM (S+FtZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 09, 2007
So, What Does This Mean?
It means an orange glow beyond the horizon as my constant companion, driving up through Chevy Chase canyon just after midnight.
It means devastation around the Hollywood sign, and the peak—Mt. Hollywood—from which one can see it best. It means farewell to countless movie sets, and the site of several early dates between my husband and me, back in the days when we assumed we'd grow out of this madness.
It means that there is soot in the air, and there are weird noises around the house—from hyperacive insects, and from the particles in the air as they begin to settle.
It means that the venue wherein I saw the Bangles in the 80s is now a staging area for LAFD.
How strange. I'm lookin' for the good in this, but it isn't visible yet.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:38 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 02:31 AM (zBbuE)
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 10, 2007 09:42 AM (2WBcM)
3
Whups!
YOUR fire is visible here from TV. Actually, the hundreds of square miles on fire in FL right now are also only visible from TV, for me. Thank heaven.
The fires are so huge and so bad, including an enormous one on the FL/GA border that's eating up my beloved Okeefenokee Swamp, that the air is full of haze and grit and the sunsets spectacular. The new TS off the east coast pushed huge patches of smoke all the way from the Panhandle to S. FL.
They ordered us inside for a few days - the very young very old infirm and COPD types.
Today the air is a little clearer and I feel a little better, breathing wise.
It's really terrible. We're watching yours and ours, both.
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 04:19 PM (zBbuE)
4
Though we live in a crucible of fire, seeing our beloved Griffith Park in flames shakes many of us to the core.
We hope you'll join us in supporting the long-term restoration and rejuvenation of this municipal jewel.
Respectfully Yours in Safety and Service,
Brian Humphrey
Firefighter/Specialist
Public Service Officer
Los Angeles Fire Department
LAFD Home Page:
www.lafd.org
LAFD News Blog:
lafd.blogspot.com
Posted by: Brian Humphrey at May 17, 2007 10:35 AM (nR0mD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 02, 2007
A Possible Explanation
for why males seem so enamoured of
IM-ing their female friends. (Scroll down to the third entry on the page, David Linden's.)
Of course, there is a sort of corollary from high school. Those of us who were female and cute and brilliant and not computer jocks would often call our male friends for emotional support, understanding, and practical advice. As time wore on, it became more and more difficult to ignore the sound of the keyboard tapping that accompanied these conversations . . . fucking computer programmers. Fucking guys.
But, you know. We needed the eggs.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
April 28, 2007
Goodnight, then.
Off I go to read. When you speak of me, speak of one who blogged not wisely, but too well.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
April 27, 2007
How Come
. . .we never talk about
transexualism?
It's important, I think. Scripture says not one word about it, of course.
Thoughts?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:59 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There are two kinds of people in the world - those who don't talk about transexualism and those who simply will not shut up about it. For the first kind it simply doesn't come up OR they've had one conversation with one of the second kind in the past and know enough to strangle the topic whenever encountered.
Posted by: Colin MacDougalll at April 27, 2007 02:54 PM (Zydip)
2
Scripture clearly states that God created us just like he wanted us. Including our gender assignemnt. To tamper with that is to be in rebellion with God.
Posted by: Bloggermouth at April 27, 2007 03:12 PM (ebBOD)
Posted by: Barry at April 28, 2007 12:29 AM (kKjaJ)
4
You cannot change your sex. You can mutilate your body, fill it with foreign hormones, dress as the opposite gender and pretend that you have changed you sex....but you cannot actually change your sex.
Sorry.
Posted by: Ringo the Gringo at April 28, 2007 11:19 AM (glvsI)
5
I would venture to say that the Bible does not speak on this topic because back in those days people who felt this way were probably considered to be mentally ill.
Posted by: John at April 28, 2007 03:03 PM (QtBo9)
6
Bloggermouth,
Do you mean "in rebellion against God"? Or is God rebelling along with us?
I'm confused by the notion that God wants us to be the way we are in every particular. Because part of human nature is sinfulness. Does God want me to be a sinner? Just askin'.
Ringo,
Does that hold for those who have atypical chromosomes? What if someone's cells don't align with his/her outward gender?
John,
Maybe it has to do with the fact that the Bible was written before gender-reassignment surgery was widely available. Of course, it was also written before heart bypass surgery were developed.
So is that a reason for those who need it to decline the procedure? Inquiring minds, and all that . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 28, 2007 03:45 PM (leK0u)
7
LMA,
Something bugs me about the abuse of the word "gender".
Even the Merriam Webster Collegiate dictionary still defines
gender as having to do with grammar and even psychology.
Nothing about external physical attributes.
See for yourself:
gen·der
Pronunciation: 'jen-d&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English gendre, from Anglo-French genre, gendre, from Latin gener-, genus birth, race, kind, gender -- more at KIN
1 a : a subclass within a grammatical class (as noun, pronoun, adjective, or verb) of a language that is partly arbitrary but also partly based on distinguishable characteristics (as shape, social rank, manner of existence, or sex) and that determines agreement with and selection of other words or grammatical forms b : membership of a word or a grammatical form in such a subclass c : an inflectional form showing membership in such a subclass
2 a : SEX b : the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex
On the other hand, sex is all about _physical_ attributes.
It seems that once again, so-called progressives have mutilated the dictionary to conflate physical and verbal.
Or physical and mental.
-Bob
p.s. The Bible does have something to say about men
who mutilate their bodies and lie with other men.
Posted by: Bob at April 29, 2007 06:54 AM (aTv/9)
8
The gender-for-sex thing became popular in the early 80s, as I recall. I really felt at the time that it provided a way to discuss sex as in men/women without it souding ambiguous as to whether perhaps the discussion was on a more-loaded topic, human sexuality.
Perhaps it was an abuse. But it filled a gap in the language as it existed at that time.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 29, 2007 07:22 AM (f3SX3)
9
In fact if you have actually read the Bible it does tell about, men dressing as women and that when this starts it will be the end of time, i think it is in Revelations, so it depends on how you want to translate it....
Posted by: serge at May 01, 2007 06:29 AM (TTy8F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 22, 2007
The Volunteerism Weekend From Hell.
Well, I got through the day yesterday without freaking out: mostly, I did it by imposing on my mother. I crashed at her place on Friday night so I could get some stuff done in the office where I do my nonprofit work, and she fed me oatmeal and tea on Saturday morning before I washed up, changed clothes, and went in for Meeting Day.
I knew I'd be receiving some [well-deserved] criticism at the Board for some of the paid work I do for them, but I also came under [undeserved] fire afterward for the volunteer side of my activities there. And I handled both just fine. In the first case, I admitted to the problem ("yes, I do have a tendancy to misplace receipts—which I must stop doing"), and in the second case, I was feisty-but-ultimately-accommodating ("I'm sorry you don't find our system for doing this convenient, but we are a volunteer-run organization. Here's my contact information; sometimes we can very likely find a way to make things easier for you, but I'm not promising anything.")
Today will be even harder, but B. removed me from the food committee and instead had me negotiate a better rate for the room we'll be using. So my role in setting up today's event will be more on the support side, which suits me fine. I haul the supplies in. I help with the setup. I put out fires. I avoid taking control, and I don't let myself get so wound up that I snap at anyone.
(Last year, I didn't go off until the event was over, and it was because two cops saw me loading supplies into my car, which was parked in the handicapped zone. We exchanged eye contact, and I figured they were going to give me five minutes to finish loading the organization's stuff. But when I came back out with my arms full of supplies, they were ticketing my car. We had a rather spirited discussion in which a friend of mine tried to intervene on my behalf, and I eventually told her loudly that it was no use trying to get them to change their minds, since both cops were "assholes." Thirty years ago, that might have got me arrested. This time, I hope it gave them some pause about how they are getting along with the community they supposedly "serve.")
And there's an event next weekend, too. May can't come fast enough.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 417 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Those lefty volunteers. They just don't understand conservatives, such as you, who give their time for just causes. Not like their causes. How dare they criticize you for anything in a volunteer setting.
I feel for you, that is why I just donated to your blogsite LMA.
Posted by: Richard_Manitoba at April 24, 2007 09:14 AM (9l5za)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 15, 2007
Every Once in a While, I Just Get This Craving
. . . for a nice
fag. I mean, really: who doesn't?
Except those who are dreaming of spotted dick. Professor Purkinje's ten-year-old daughter once asked him if "dick" meant "penis." When he confirmed that it did, she asked about the spotted dick she'd seen on English menus.
"It's a sort of custard," he explained. "If you meet a boy who really has spots on his dick, you run fast in the other direction."
The next morning he woke her up and asked her what she wanted for breakfast. "Spotted dick!" she announced.
"We're fresh out of that," informed her. "How about cereal and milk?"
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:32 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Kids say the darndest things, don't they?
So do the people behing the Global Warming scares. Too bad the MSM doesn't care to report their words.
From Junk Science(April Archives):
"We must reclaim the roads and the plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers, and return to wilderness tens of millions of acres of presently settled land. -- Dave Brower, Friends of the Earth founder (also attributed to David Foreman, Founder of Earth First!, in his book Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkey Wrenching).
"The only real good technology is no technology at all. Technology is taxation without representation by our elitist species [man] upon the rest of the natural world." -- John Shuttleworth, Friends of the Earth manual writer.
"If you ask me, it'd be a little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we would do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that are adequate for our needs, but that won't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to the earth or to each other." -- Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute.
"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun." -- Paul Ehrlich, Stanford professor of biology.
Ehrlich is the very same twit who said: "Hundreds of millions of people will soon perish in smog disasters in New York and Los Angeles...the oceans will die of DDT poisoning by 1979...the U.S. life expectancy will drop to 42 years by 1980 due to cancer epidemics." -- Paul Ehrlich, 1969 in Ramparts.
Let's not forget: "We've already had too much economic growth in the United States. Economic growth like ours is the disease, not the cure."-- Paul Ehrlich, Stanford professor of biology. And: “A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” -- Paul Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, “Population, Resources, Environment” (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1970, 323)
The Ehrlichs are not alone, however: "The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the United States. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are." Who came up with this elitist pap? Why, none other than Michael Oppenheimer, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University. Name sound vaguely familiar? It should, he serves as a lead author of the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, not to mention being a leading light for Environmental Defense. Our first clash with Oppie was over an article he wrote for then Environmental Defense Fund's quarterly claiming 'global warming' would cause sea level rises of some 200 feet by the middle of the 21st Century. As far as we can tell he hasn't improved much.
UN wallahs tend to have a bit of a thing against the U.S., energy and technology: "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" -- Maurice Strong, head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and Executive Officer for Reform in the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nations.
This is as good a way to get rid of them as any. -- Charles Wursta, Chief Scientist for the Environmental Defense Fund, in response to the banning of DDT ("Them" refers to "all those little brown people in poor countries.")
This is hardly a novel sentiment: William Vogt, whose 1948 book Road to Survival had an enormous impact in the United States, denounced the 'untrammelled copulation' of Indians who were 'breeding with the irresponsibility of codfish', and said that the greatest tragedy China could suffer would be 'a reduction in her death rate'. Coupled with this we had the Ehrlichs and Lester Brown riding the overpopulation bandwagon, the Club of Rome, with their 'Limits to Growth' and their panic over population and resource constraint and consequently mass media-induced fear of people with the underlying notion people must be limited because 'they' will 'kill' the world.
Regrettably the foundation of Gaia worship is hatred of people and, since DDT is one of the greatest human health aids ever invented, it is by nature "bad" by virtue of being good for people. The great 'global warming' scam and desperation to limit people through constraint of the energy supply is likely a simple extension of this collective psychosis.
Posted by: Darrell at April 16, 2007 12:15 PM (Ks+OS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2007
David Linden's Book Mentioned on Jay Leno
The Accidental Mind is getting
more media attention—albeit obliquely, in this case.
But a profile in Newsweek: Fuckin' A. Furthermore, Jan Steckel is buying copies for her near and dear.
David is now Bloomsberry-in-Chief from among the Santa Monica High School Crowd of Pimentos or whatever it was that they called themselves. Unless one counts Sandra Tsing Loh. I would certainly count David Coons. That is, David B. Coons. And Nora Zungri certainly qualifies, along with Kate Sanford, Greg Turk, and Keith Goldfarb, whose icon at the top of the page appears to be a photograph of him taken by a brilliant young photographer in her 20s, using a borrowed medium-format camera.
Aw, heck. One cannot be thorough about this, but I'm starting to dig embarrassing people: I've always liked doing that sort of thing. Let's mention Eric Enderton, his lovely wife Elaine, Jon Mandel, and Mike Marinacci, as well as Janine Ellen Young.
Here endeth today's catalog, but it remains to be seen who will emerge as the group's Virginia Woolf—and who's destined to only be Maynard Keynes.
BTW, I'd actually love to see an intelligent creationist take David Linden's book on. Alas, I'm one of those "creation through evolution" milquetoasts.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Wow! Seventeen links and they all work! You're going to lose your title! (Queen of The Broken Link). I'm starting to think that you don't care anymore! There was a time when readers had to figure out what you were referencing. Those were the days!
Posted by: Darrell at April 11, 2007 12:52 PM (yFzhj)
2
I'm sorry; I'll go in and mess a few of 'em up. I guess I'm at my best/worst when I'm name-dropping . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 11, 2007 10:45 PM (6C0F9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 08, 2007
Don't Ever Let Anyone Tell You
. . . that it isn't a freakin' blast to live near the sea. We walked down to the bluffs of Shell Beach today from my uncle's place, and it was really, really nice.
Memo to self: get rich again. Soon.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
I Witnessed an Interesting Conversation Today
. . . between my 70-year-old father and my ten-year-old nephew. (Well, nephew Ray will be ten in May.)
The difference is, my nephew doesn't just sort of blurt out whatever thoughts jump into his brain. My father does.
Grandpa J: If you ever want to know what Auntie Joy is thinking, just go read the blog Little Miss Attila.
Me: Dad!
Grandpa J: Oh, right. Ignore the naughty words. There are naughty words.
You know, your aunt is a Republican. She's sort of rare, inasmuch as she's a Republican who attended college.
[Thanks. Like I wanted to be out to my brother's family.]
Aunt Joy: Did you know your grandfather once came within a hundred pages of actually finishing a book? I'm so proud of him.
Nephew Ray: Keep arguing, you two. I like this.
Grandpa J: So, is your older brother (13-year-old Alan) showing signs of heterosexuality yet?
Nephew Ray: I don't think he's made out with anyone—and he doesn't talk about girls to me or my parents. But I think he has thoughts.
Grandpa J: Lots of thoughts, but no action?
Aunt Joy: Sounds like your grandpa's life.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:26 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 192 words, total size 1 kb.
What a Day.
I just took my evening sedative; if I get my page quota done today, it'll be a minor miracle. Well, that's why I set it high: I knew there would be days I wouldn't be able to write.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
March 30, 2007
I've Decided
. . . that England doesn't really exist. After all, I've never seen it.
Someone just made it up. That's all.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:15 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I remember having that thought as a college freshman around 7 years ago. I tried to write a paper defending it, but realized half-way through that is was so absurd that I had to abandon it. I couldn't sustain the paranoia and solipsism necessary for it to make any sense.
Posted by: elvis at April 02, 2007 08:18 AM (zqSet)
2
Well, don't you think it's a bit suspicious that all of its place names sound like they are right out of
The Lord of the Rings?
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 02, 2007 01:40 PM (larLB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Third Strike on ".xxx"
ICANN says no, one more time.
James Joyner points out that this thwarts "the hope that pornography could find its way to the Internet."
Yup.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
March 25, 2007
On the Pet Food Recall . . .
Tammy Bruce has
up-to-the-minute coverage, and points out that cat owners need to be just as careful as dog owners. She has a listing of the affected sub-brands under the Menu umbrella.
I'm glad that my mother buys the Mandy-chow at specialty stores, and is watching the situation closely. Of course, if her stomach were as strong as her jaws, we wouldn't have much to worry about: she can destroy an expensive pet toy in ten minutes flat.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ironically, it's the frou-frou brands intended to guilt you into thinking that you don't love your animal companion enough if you don't spend 2-3-times as much on their food, that are affected-- Eukanuba, Iams, Science Diet, Authority. Guess it pays to stick with Purina products (who used to test their feedstock when I last heard.) This whole thing took WAY too long to diagnose! Anybody got a chemist on their staff and a gas chromatograph? They could have gotten an answer from CSI in a couple of hours.
The suspected poison, aminopterin (4-aminopteroic acid), was the RU-486 of the 50s.
Until I could get to my vet, I'd give my cat an activated carbon capsule(sans capsule), folic acid(30mg) and sorbitol to start waste elimination. From what I've been told, vets are trying the "do-nothing" approach. Good luck with that.
And food processors? (Human and pet) How about testing all components BEFORE they get into the mix? Hmmm? No matter where you get the feedstock. Are you aware we are at war? Spend a few thousand bucks and let us all sleep soundly.
Posted by: Darrell at March 25, 2007 04:04 PM (ikxJZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"You know," I remark . . .
"the strangest thing happened."
"Strange, you say?" A the H is intrigued.
"Yes. I was in the kitchen, having an intense discussion with a friend on the phone, and after you passed by I moved my head. A styrofoam cup fell onto the counter."
"Why were you wearing a styrofoam cup indoors?"
"'Cause I can't wear it outside; the wind would take it off. Come on: why did you put a disposable coffee cup on top of my snow hat?"
"You think I did that?"
"There wasn't anyone else in the kitchen, and I didn't put it there myself."
"So this relationship has devolved into finger-pointing now? That's sad."
"Oh. You think it would be healthier to wipe the slate clean and discuss this incident only from the moment that you left the kitchen with a coffee cup balanced upside-down on top of my head?"
"Or maybe from the time it fell off. I'll bet that was funny."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
March 21, 2007
Mandy Is Home Again.
She crept into my mother's house in the middle of the night last night via the dog door, went into her room, and licked her hand.
I've got maybe half of the flyers torn down; I'll get the rest of them taken down tomorrow.
I'm very happy now, but I wonder what that dog got into during her 36 hours on the lam: she smells awful.
Stupid dog: she gave us a heck of a fright. I've been punishing her by feeding her treats and petting her and throwing an oversized tennis ball for her to fetch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
73kb generated in CPU 0.0761, elapsed 0.2248 seconds.
215 queries taking 0.1933 seconds, 508 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.