June 10, 2007

Sure.

Being a closet liberal, I'm faced with the temptation so see gray areas. To say, "maybe, if the sandal completely covers the junction between the nylons and the bare toes."

But what's next?—advocating the custom among Japanese tourists of wearing knee-high nylons with shorts?

Look: stockings are one thing, and are fine between consenting adults. But panty hose of any type are not sexy. They are meant for one purpose, and one purpose only: to attenuate one's lack of tan/unevenness of skin tone.

If the environment you are going into is so casual that you can wave your bare toes around, you have no business wearing panty hose of any sort.

Or, if the environment requires panty hose, you shouldn't be showing off your pedicure—no matter how cute it is.

Get a spray-on tan, or buy some leg makeup, or suck it up and wear linen slacks. But come on, now, Girls: let's not bring about the utter collapse of civilization, just because it's summer.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 10:13 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Let me get this straight, there are rules? 1) First-row phalanges strickly verboten*? 2) Second-row phalanges situation dependent? 3) Breastfeeding appropriate always? Situations requiring pantyhose? Lambeau Field in late January? Attending priapism support group? *Your spam filter won't allow the English synonym.

Posted by: Darrell at June 11, 2007 08:10 PM (llsWd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0276, elapsed 0.2379 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.2044 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.