April 29, 2007
Did Google Change Its Formula?
My search traffic has been up for weeks, but now it's increasing even more. Along with a handful of other bloggers, I'm noticing an overall increase, and an increase in traffic from Google images as well.
Anyone know what gives?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:33 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think someone in the Cotillion sweet talked them Google people!
Posted by: Greta (Hooah Wife) at April 30, 2007 03:20 AM (Xl4tG)
2
Maybe they think you're left wing, and so they're sending more traffic your way.
Posted by: John at April 30, 2007 01:37 PM (7C8kd)
3
I saw a similar spike in Google image searches recently. But I see this as mostly junk traffic, siphoning bandwidth while most of my actual content gets ignored.
I've deleted a couple images that were generating huge volumes of worthless traffic.
Posted by: Desert Cat at April 30, 2007 09:00 PM (ogl5V)
4
I think one reason could be that there has been a change in the Yahoo searches. It used to be that they would have those links to the sites within a certain category, such as "LA Dodgers" or "San Francisco Steroids." Now, nada. It might be pushing people to use Google more.
Or, I could be full of what Harry Reid is.
Posted by: William Teach at May 01, 2007 01:36 PM (IRsCk)
5
I've noticed a lot of worthless zero-second visits from google image searches. Very annoying.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at May 01, 2007 03:58 PM (Q6JEL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Out of Action, Tonight.
I'm working on my motive, and doing character sketches. Sorry! But my deadline is a scary one, so blogging and housework are the first things to go. Be thankful you don't live with me.
My sidebar is your friend, and with any luck I'll be back later tonight, or first thing in the morning. After all, I still have some writing to do on Senator McCain.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
Re-Reading David Linden's Book.
You
should, too.
Fortunately, he's gotten rid of the dreadful British/scientific style punctuation the manuscript sported. Or, rather, his copyeditor has.
I hadn't remembered quite so much science in the first chapter, but a bit of that is to be expected, and I know there's a lot of juicy stuff about sex later on. The volume could, however, use more dialogue. Or perhaps a dismembered corpse: you can never go wrong with dead bodies.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:50 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
April 28, 2007
Goodnight, then.
Off I go to read. When you speak of me, speak of one who blogged not wisely, but too well.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
"Yeah, I Know," I Say. "Too Dialogue-Heavy."
"No, this section is fine," Bridget tells me. "But we need to know more about these people before we find the body."
"I can do that," I reply.
"Um, what do these people do for a living?" Maria pipes up. "I mean, they seem to spend a lot of time drinking coffee and finding corpses."
"Well," I answer, slowly, "I could give them jobs, of course. But that might cut into the time they have for solving crimes."
"If you want them to be independently wealthy, there are ways to accomplish that," Fred points out.
"Hell, no. I don't want them to sustain that kind of damage," I respond. "Fine. I'll get 'em jobs."
These stupid people in writer's group and their un-fucking-reasonable demands . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:36 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Can't they just live on their Lotteria Italia windfall? Since it came after their formative years, I don't see a problem.
If they were published authors of, say, crime novels, they might have a case for some tax deductions as well.
Posted by: Darrell at April 29, 2007 07:06 AM (6vAU/)
2
Dorothy L. Sayers made her heroine into a mystery writer, but she did make sure to draw some distinctions between her character's detective and her own detective.
She was, of course, accused of inserting herself into her own series, but I'm not sure that was fair: in fact, it made a nice little contrast, to show the different methods people might bring to real-life crime solving if they had real forensic experience vs. if their interest had been strictly literary.
There is always a huge level of artificiality in these books, even the "mean streets" variety.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 29, 2007 07:15 AM (f3SX3)
3
Well, I can see three possible options, knowing nothing else about this book or the previous one.
1. They could be, not independently wealthy, but comfortably well off and not interested in getting richer. Perhaps they have an income from investments/trust fund/whatever, which affords them a reasonable standard of living, and they prefer leisure to wealth, as the economists say.
2. Investigating crimes is part of their job. The obvious ones for this (besides making them cops) are private investigator, reporter/writer, and lawyer. I am not a great mystery fan, but it is my impression that all of those have been done a lot.
3. They have jobs that are seasonal or intermittent. I was once told that beekeepers, for example, don't work five months of the year. (Don't quote me on that.) Or some sort of event planner type job, where you work insanely for three weeks, and then have three weeks before the next gig. Any sort of job where your time off comes in big blocks, not regular weekends. If you go this route, of course, you will need to educate yourself on how those jobs actually work. Good luck.
Posted by: wanderingmoderate at May 03, 2007 01:30 PM (aL8t5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yeah. Another Day from Twelve-Step Hell.
I found out on Friday night that I truly was expected to show up at yet another fundraiser today, and man the literature booth. And since it fell under the rubric of my paid functions, I felt that I should do it.
So I got through the day, participated on my panel, and billed the organization for the rest of the time I spent on the event. Next year, I'll make sure they make a decision much further in advance about how they want to handle this.
This year, I said some smart-sounding bullshit, sold some literature, and got through the day without either bursting into tears or cussing anyone out.
This is not, by the way, about my being some sort of victim in any sense. It is about my being a complete nut.
There's a difference.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
April 27, 2007
How Come
. . .we never talk about
transexualism?
It's important, I think. Scripture says not one word about it, of course.
Thoughts?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:59 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There are two kinds of people in the world - those who don't talk about transexualism and those who simply will not shut up about it. For the first kind it simply doesn't come up OR they've had one conversation with one of the second kind in the past and know enough to strangle the topic whenever encountered.
Posted by: Colin MacDougalll at April 27, 2007 02:54 PM (Zydip)
2
Scripture clearly states that God created us just like he wanted us. Including our gender assignemnt. To tamper with that is to be in rebellion with God.
Posted by: Bloggermouth at April 27, 2007 03:12 PM (ebBOD)
Posted by: Barry at April 28, 2007 12:29 AM (kKjaJ)
4
You cannot change your sex. You can mutilate your body, fill it with foreign hormones, dress as the opposite gender and pretend that you have changed you sex....but you cannot actually change your sex.
Sorry.
Posted by: Ringo the Gringo at April 28, 2007 11:19 AM (glvsI)
5
I would venture to say that the Bible does not speak on this topic because back in those days people who felt this way were probably considered to be mentally ill.
Posted by: John at April 28, 2007 03:03 PM (QtBo9)
6
Bloggermouth,
Do you mean "in rebellion against God"? Or is God rebelling along with us?
I'm confused by the notion that God wants us to be the way we are in every particular. Because part of human nature is sinfulness. Does God want me to be a sinner? Just askin'.
Ringo,
Does that hold for those who have atypical chromosomes? What if someone's cells don't align with his/her outward gender?
John,
Maybe it has to do with the fact that the Bible was written before gender-reassignment surgery was widely available. Of course, it was also written before heart bypass surgery were developed.
So is that a reason for those who need it to decline the procedure? Inquiring minds, and all that . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 28, 2007 03:45 PM (leK0u)
7
LMA,
Something bugs me about the abuse of the word "gender".
Even the Merriam Webster Collegiate dictionary still defines
gender as having to do with grammar and even psychology.
Nothing about external physical attributes.
See for yourself:
gen·der
Pronunciation: 'jen-d&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English gendre, from Anglo-French genre, gendre, from Latin gener-, genus birth, race, kind, gender -- more at KIN
1 a : a subclass within a grammatical class (as noun, pronoun, adjective, or verb) of a language that is partly arbitrary but also partly based on distinguishable characteristics (as shape, social rank, manner of existence, or sex) and that determines agreement with and selection of other words or grammatical forms b : membership of a word or a grammatical form in such a subclass c : an inflectional form showing membership in such a subclass
2 a : SEX b : the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex
On the other hand, sex is all about _physical_ attributes.
It seems that once again, so-called progressives have mutilated the dictionary to conflate physical and verbal.
Or physical and mental.
-Bob
p.s. The Bible does have something to say about men
who mutilate their bodies and lie with other men.
Posted by: Bob at April 29, 2007 06:54 AM (aTv/9)
8
The gender-for-sex thing became popular in the early 80s, as I recall. I really felt at the time that it provided a way to discuss sex as in men/women without it souding ambiguous as to whether perhaps the discussion was on a more-loaded topic, human sexuality.
Perhaps it was an abuse. But it filled a gap in the language as it existed at that time.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 29, 2007 07:22 AM (f3SX3)
9
In fact if you have actually read the Bible it does tell about, men dressing as women and that when this starts it will be the end of time, i think it is in Revelations, so it depends on how you want to translate it....
Posted by: serge at May 01, 2007 06:29 AM (TTy8F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
John McCain: Branching Out Beyond Defense
As usual, McCain was great today on the Bloggers' Conference Call. We got a bit beyond Iraq, which had been the focus of the first Call I participated in.
I like the fact that he feels the GOP has to get California back in play, and/or at least actively campaign there. He's right: not communicating here only perpetuates the problem. He maintains that he can make a difference here, that he can talk to us as a fellow Westerner. Maybe. The problem is, he's never done that well with libertarians, and most of us who fall right-of-center here have strong libertarian leanings. We'll see how it goes.
It was nice to see him discuss domestic issues such as tax reform, pork spending, revamping Social Security and Medicare, at the same time he's as well-versed in military matters as he ever was.
More later.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:53 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've lived in Silicon Valley since before the implants. I promise you the line "I'm a Westerner like you - why, I'm from Arizona!" not only won't sell, it won't even translate.
Posted by: Colin MacDougall at April 27, 2007 02:57 PM (Zydip)
2
There are times when I feel like I'm more of an Arizonan than Senator McCain. And I'm an Angeleno, born and bred.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 28, 2007 03:32 PM (leK0u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Senator McCain: The Announcement, The Interview
Much as one doesn't want to like Senator McCain, the politician (for we all love John McCain, the hero—and that's as it should be), sometimes it's impossible not to. I know that a lot of us have resistance to McCain's candidacy for two very good reasons:
1) McCain-Feingold;
2) the mainstream media's lionizing him as a maverick.
But the media no longer regard him as their darling; they no longer need him as a counter-balance to Bush. And he is an educated voice standing up for the necessity of finishing the action in Iraq properly, rather than abandoning good people to repression and mass murder, like we did with—say—the Vietnamese and the Cambodians.
He is also willing to educate the public about how to do what is required to win, and that makes him, frankly, a bit seductive. It's no secret that the major failure on the part of the Bush Administration in the conduct of this war has been on the public relations side. There is plenty to "sell" in terms of standing up to tyranny and making an example of one country, so others in the region will understand that the U.S. is still capable of playing for keeps. But neither Bush nor anyone on his team has really been out there, making that case, over the past four years.
For all my quarrels with him, I think McCain would.
Anyway, I'll be on a conference call with him tomorrow on the heels of his recent official announcement. (Yeah, like that was news. I'm sorry: Fred Thompson announcing a candidacy will be news. McCain announcing his? Dog bites man.) I'll be sharing my impressions briefly, before I head out to work, and then in a more extensive form later in the weekend.
[Copyeditor alert: I know that title case doesn't require the definite articles in my headline to be capitalized. But it just didn't look right the other way. I claim poetic license, and the fact that this is my blog. It turns out that the house style of Little Miss Attila requires capitalization of "the" when its editrix so mandates.]
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:09 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 2 kb.
Safari Problem Solved!
I still had some of the old Blogads code lingering in my template. I thought I had removed the cancer, but—alas!—more surgery was required.
The person responsible was harshly reprimanded, and then treated to a dirty martini. (Kind of a good cop/bad cop approach to behavior mod.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:21 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
April 25, 2007
I'm Writing Tonight.
I'm polishing chapter 2 of book 2 to present at writer's group tomorrow night. And I have to put some time in for a client tomorrow, so the work has to be done
now—which is really my least favorite word.
Go read Hackbarth's meditation on the difference between mental illness and evil as it relates to Seung Hui Cho.
Or check out Goldstein's thoughts on why Rosie O'Donnell makes Democrats nervous, at the same time they just can't take their eyes off of her.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
April 24, 2007
London Calling.
Rusty has the
scoop on six radical Islamists arrested for charges of incitement.
I know that sometimes law enforcement/intel on both sides of the Atlantic prefers to monitor those it could arrest for "incitement," so they can get to bigger fish, but I hope they cooperate with each other, and remember that combatting terrorism is not like fighting organized crime: the "broken window" principle requires that at some point these people be brought in. Threats against people and property are crimes here, and they should most certainly be crimes in a country that has essentially decided there is no universal right to self-defense.
(As usual, I skimmed the comments section for a moment. Alas, Rusty's comments are still as chock-full of the "all Muslims are terrorists" sentiment as the generally are with the "homosexuals are out to destroy the family" nonsense. And, as usual, I fear that he comes awfully close to endorsing both positions in his posts. But he is a good source of information on Islamic terrorism, and despite his myopia in those arenas, a genuinely nice guy.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
Just in the Nick of Time!
***Your Email Address Have Won*** Inbox
Lotteria Lotto Management
Sir/Madam,
You have been selected as victorious via your email address. Click here to
see how much you have won:http://claiming.rules.i8.com/index.html or paste
it in your browser.This must be claimed not later than the 9th of May 2007 .
You must read the rules and understand them before responding.
We are required to disburse the award to the correct recipient, but we must
verify that you are the owner of the selected email address before we can
send this money to you.
Contact us with reference number: OBM/AERAL/2007.
Contact person: Enrico Mancini
claimmancini@libero.it
Lotteria Italia
Venezia.
It looks like my ship has finally come in.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:57 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a coincidence! I won 2 million Pounds Sterling just a coupe of weeks ago! Who knew these email lotteries could be sooooo lucrative! I'll buy you a car after I receive my deposit. I'm sure you will do likewise??? Happy days are here again!
COVENTRY PROMOTIONS National Office, 157-197 Buckingham Palace Road, Victoria, London SW1W 9SPSerial Number: xxx-xxx Batch number AT-xxxxx.xx. TO WINNERS IN OUR PROGRAM We wish to congratulate you over your success in our computer balloting sweepstake held on 9th. April. 2007. This is a millennium scientific computer game in which email addresses were used. It is a promotional program aimed at encouraging internet users; therefore you do not need to buy ticket to enter for the game. However, your email address was attached to ticket number xxx xxxxx; with serial number xxx-xxx draw the lucky numbers 06-09-13-15-40-43-02, which eventually won the lottery in the first category of the draws. Therefore, you have won a lottery jackpot prize awards of £2,000,000.00 (Two million pounds Sterling Only) This is from total prize money of US$30,000,000.00 distributed to winners from 1st to 3rd categories. Note that this program was largely promoted and sponsored by a group of philanthropist, industrialists from the internet ware industry and some other big multinational firms who wish to be anonymous. You may wish to establish contact via e-mail with the particulars presented below citing the batch and reference numbers to this letter. Telephone lines are open between the hours of 8.00am - 7.30pm on Monday through FridayCustomer Service Unit,Tel/Fax No: +44-702 406 3701 +44-702 406 3971Email: process.claimsagent1@yahoo.co.ukContact person: MR. DANIEL WALLACEProviding him with the information stated below
Posted by: Darrell at April 24, 2007 08:14 PM (s1jT/)
2
Hey! Even I received the same email today!
Sir/Madam,
You have been selected as victorious via your email address. Click here to see how much you have won:http://lotteriaclaimrules.5u.com/index.html or paste it in your browser.This must be claimed not later than the 11th of May 2007 .
You must read the rules and understand them before responding.
We are required to disburse the award to the correct recipient, but we must verify that you are the owner of the selected email address before we can send this money to you.
Contact us with reference number: OBM/AERAL/2007.
Contact person: Enrico Mancini
claimmancini@libero.it
Lotteria Italia
Venezia.
Do you think these guys are for real? Did you reply back!
Posted by: Ankita at April 27, 2007 08:12 PM (0okU1)
3
Real? As real as fake can be! At worst, they will "need" your bank account info. so that they can "deposit" your "winnings". At best, they will say you need to pay a fee to their lawyers for the transfer. In between, they now have your email address. You'll have to beware any emails with attachments/viruses/spyware coming your way in the future. That way they will mine for your personal information themselves. Lucky you!
Posted by: Darrell at April 28, 2007 08:16 PM (ZQyAP)
4
yea i got it 2 funny when i googled the address it comes up as the depertament of aduiting in london so i mailed em and told em that there address was used in a scam Maybe ill get a pay out from them in stead well heres hoping
lol
i did replay and gave these details
name I C Wierer
address A real place unlike u
phone number 1-800-Kiss-my-ass
sort code 666666666
account number 99898738746234287364762354872164872364876328
i could go on
so if u read this its a scam u dont get something 4 nothing theres always a catch although i could of used the $$$$$$
Posted by: Dman at May 03, 2007 01:25 PM (eK7/V)
5
Haha.. I wish I would have been that creative and replied but I just didn't reply back
.. Well.. so much for becoming a millionare.. with a million spam mails!
Posted by: Ankita at May 09, 2007 08:26 PM (HMD8U)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Crittenden
On the current
Democratic Party train wreck:
Reid: Bush [is] in denial. This from a member of the Democratic leadership that is pushing a symbolic retreat plan he knows wonÂ’t survive a veto, simply to make the petulant point.
More on what he calls "the non-plan that is going nowhere":
Troop withdrawal begins Oct. 1, with the bulk of the troops out by April 1. It sets strict standards for resting, training and equipping troops, though itÂ’s not clear why Democrats want to waste money on that, if they donÂ’t plan to use them. It also sets benchmarks for the Iraqi government to reach on dealing with militias, re-Baathify, share oil revenues, etc. Not clear what incentive the Iraqi government has to meet any benchmarks, because all that is going out the window with the current government once open season starts, and any Iraqi official with half a brain is going to be actively working on an individual survival plan.
Meanwhile, my mother continues to insist that we should have "finished Afghanistan," before "starting in Iraq." Just like we finished Germany, before starting in Japan. Oh, wait . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:25 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
IIRC, there actually *was* significant political pressure to focus on Japan first, since they were the ones who had actually attacked us. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed.
Posted by: david foster at April 24, 2007 06:37 PM (uHjNe)
2
April 1st is appropriate . . .
Posted by: Darrell at April 24, 2007 08:32 PM (s1jT/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Okay. Sheryl Crow.
Bidinotto has a nice
roundup on the Crow Crap issue. (I shouldn't say that, perhaps: I do like her music. But when will singers, actors, and directors realize that when we like their creative work, it doesn't mean we find their ill-informed policy prescriptions less annoying—it means we find them
more annoying.)
As for Sheryl herself, I would like to point out that there are important issues, and very important issues. I can argue all day with my lefty friends about whether the Important Issue of the day is the environment, or women's rights and classical liberalism being under threat from radical Islam. But the Very Important Issue of the day is oral sex, and Sheryl Crow is not doing her part in that arena . . .
Okay. Seriously, I do believe that the single square of toilet paper proposal was a joke. It does seem, however, that both Sheryl Crow and Laurie David have are guilty of the same sort of slipperiness that Jim Treacher once busted Jon Stewart on: now I'm serious, now it's a joke.
"If I want to preach, it's serious. If you call me on my intellectual shortfalls, it's a joke." Or, in the cases of Crow and David, we will preach at you. But if you challenge us on the science, we'll say "blah blah blah" and refuse to engage (David), or make silly jokes about toilet paper (Crow).
And if you point out the disconnect between the way we live, we'll explain that it's okay, because we're "doing our part," despite our music tours (Crow) and our use of private jets to support a bicoastal lifestyle (David).
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:33 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Maybe in her part of Canada the squares are a lot bigger, eh??? Or her famiy was using paper towel rolls, eh???
Posted by: Darrell at April 24, 2007 08:40 PM (s1jT/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 23, 2007
I Don't Know About This Quiz.
It kept asking me either/or questions. Some of them were obvious: after all, of
course geometry is better than algebra, and of
course it's better to navigate via intuition than to actually get out a map (cheater, cheater!).
But "do I have my best ideas sitting up, or lying down?" Well, which kinds of ideas, for crying out loud? I do editing and expository writing sitting up; I do better fiction writing when I'm lying down (preferably with my eyes closed, so I can't read what I write as I go along).
It was ultimately a rather stupid test: its designers wanted to conflate my intellect with my personality. They are, of course, different things.
You Are 40% Left Brained, 60% Right Brained
|
The left side of your brain controls verbal ability, attention to detail, and reasoning.
Left brained people are good at communication and persuading others.
If you're left brained, you are likely good at math and logic.
Your left brain prefers dogs, reading, and quiet.
The right side of your brain is all about creativity and flexibility.
Daring and intuitive, right brained people see the world in their unique way.
If you're right brained, you likely have a talent for creative writing and art.
Your right brain prefers day dreaming, philosophy, and sports.
|
Via Virginia Postrel, who is apparently way more logical than I.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.
So. What Does Larry See in Her?
Laurie David is
all over the news.
Wow. Where does one start with this? She concedes that she's "confrontational" with respect to others' eco-crimes, but when presented with her own, she explains it all away: "Everybody has to strike their own balance between how they want to live and how they can reduce their impact." Everybody, that is, who can afford to drive a hybrid.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:56 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Apparently, a "... materialistic, narcissistic, superficial, bosomy woman from Long Island." can catch his eye.
Maybe someone should tell her that Arnold's Hummers run on hydrogen, putting her Prius to shame. On the other hand why bother, given what she considers as 'education'. Perhaps she can join Sheryl Crow in limiting her toilet paper use to one square per 'visit'. I invite them both to go one better by suggesting people save that square to use the other side the next time nature calls. Actually, I am surprise they even need one, given their crowd is the "Saudi Arabia" of ass lickers.
Posted by: Darrell at April 23, 2007 08:44 AM (9uunm)
2
I mean, I know people who are lacking in introspection, but you have to admit that Laurie David takes the cake.
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 23, 2007 04:50 PM (f3SX3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 22, 2007
Double Trouble Is Over.
As far as I'm concerned, the day was a success: I scaled back on my emotional commitment, and got through the entire event without going off on anyone.
B. is concerned that our group didn't appear to make as much money this year as we did last year. I don't know whether that's true, though: when one takes into account the fact that neither he nor I subsidized the event in the way we did last year, I think we did just fine. After all, part of the point of throwing this annual party is to be of service, and show people—especially "creative types"—how to run businesses in a sober fashion.
I. didn't follow through on her commitment to handle the food, so it would have been an utter disaster if I'd counted on her—or if I'd been more than my requisite 15 minutes late. As it was, there were just enough of us to make the event successful. We could have used one more pair of hands (though not the perfectionistic gal with the catering background), yet we pulled it off.
And now I'm blogging and dozing and getting ready to go back to work tomorrow.
Life works better when one follows through, but doesn't over-invest. I've been telling people all about that for several years now, so it's rather delightful to learn how to do it myself.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:15 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Any day you don't come close to arrest is a good day.
Thanks for reminding me why I stopped volunteering. Can anyone share an experience when all the volunteers did what they promised to do? Anyone? Only those who took the the lead should answer. Few people down the "chain" ever know the real story.
Posted by: Darrell at April 22, 2007 08:24 PM (BGy9W)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Volunteerism Weekend From Hell.
Well, I got through the day yesterday without freaking out: mostly, I did it by imposing on my mother. I crashed at her place on Friday night so I could get some stuff done in the office where I do my nonprofit work, and she fed me oatmeal and tea on Saturday morning before I washed up, changed clothes, and went in for Meeting Day.
I knew I'd be receiving some [well-deserved] criticism at the Board for some of the paid work I do for them, but I also came under [undeserved] fire afterward for the volunteer side of my activities there. And I handled both just fine. In the first case, I admitted to the problem ("yes, I do have a tendancy to misplace receipts—which I must stop doing"), and in the second case, I was feisty-but-ultimately-accommodating ("I'm sorry you don't find our system for doing this convenient, but we are a volunteer-run organization. Here's my contact information; sometimes we can very likely find a way to make things easier for you, but I'm not promising anything.")
Today will be even harder, but B. removed me from the food committee and instead had me negotiate a better rate for the room we'll be using. So my role in setting up today's event will be more on the support side, which suits me fine. I haul the supplies in. I help with the setup. I put out fires. I avoid taking control, and I don't let myself get so wound up that I snap at anyone.
(Last year, I didn't go off until the event was over, and it was because two cops saw me loading supplies into my car, which was parked in the handicapped zone. We exchanged eye contact, and I figured they were going to give me five minutes to finish loading the organization's stuff. But when I came back out with my arms full of supplies, they were ticketing my car. We had a rather spirited discussion in which a friend of mine tried to intervene on my behalf, and I eventually told her loudly that it was no use trying to get them to change their minds, since both cops were "assholes." Thirty years ago, that might have got me arrested. This time, I hope it gave them some pause about how they are getting along with the community they supposedly "serve.")
And there's an event next weekend, too. May can't come fast enough.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 417 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Those lefty volunteers. They just don't understand conservatives, such as you, who give their time for just causes. Not like their causes. How dare they criticize you for anything in a volunteer setting.
I feel for you, that is why I just donated to your blogsite LMA.
Posted by: Richard_Manitoba at April 24, 2007 09:14 AM (9l5za)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 19, 2007
Light Blogging Today!
We're shopping for a car, and I'm behind on my pages for the Arizona mystery. See you tomorrow (or whenever)!
The house recommends: The cotillion blogroll on my sidebar.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:30 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
75kb generated in CPU 0.0271, elapsed 0.1612 seconds.
219 queries taking 0.1453 seconds, 526 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.