October 31, 2004
Time for Bunnies!
Madman Entertainment in Australia just made a little music video for a band called (as I understand it)
This Is Serious, Mum, or TISM. The new single from their album
The White Albun is entitled "Everyone Else Has Had More Sex Than Me," and it's now time for you to
go hear it (if you're not in a major hurry, I recommend the album mix, but I'm a take-your-time, 70s-style, album-ey girl, so what the fuck do I know? Nada).
But I think I'm beginning to understand John Edward's strange affinity for bunny-rabbits.
Hat tip for the bunny video goes to Lileks (who, in the last big paragraph of the linked post, explains how he handles it when his toddler sneaks into the room while he's playing a video about angst-ridden bunnies who are dissatisfied with their erotic histories—that lay in the house that Jack built).
Ye gads; could I be any wordier? Goodbye.
Posted by: Attila at
03:12 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now that damn song is stuck in my head, thanks for sharing Miss Attila!
I'm an old school rocker at heart, but that song sounded excellent on my computer stereo. I'm also a sucker for cute, cleverly-animated cartoon animals coming to terms with social angst.
I also think it's a bit ironic that their video would have no doubt been "cutting edge" in MTV's heyday. "Internet Killed the Video Star" indeed!
p.s. Did you see their "message from the band" video? It looks like they're dressed as Hershey's Chocolate Kisses or something. I'm keeping an ear out for TISM!
Posted by: Zoot at October 31, 2004 04:02 PM (buRV3)
2
No, I'll have to check that other one out.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 06:33 PM (SuJa4)
3
Bunnies! (Finally I'm at a computer with Quicktime installed.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 01, 2004 03:44 AM (+S1Ft)
4
LOL YES! i love that video! i have watched it 18 times today (and counting) O_O
those lyrics are really cool too....but i cant seem to find the rest of them
meh - its still cool
Posted by: Uberfominian at November 19, 2004 10:10 PM (BFw8t)
5
does anyone have that song as an audio file? i really want it really bad!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: sprrrm at November 20, 2004 12:46 PM (ywoFM)
6
I've looked.........it's just not out there yet....
Posted by: Ruteger at November 23, 2004 11:22 AM (WltZP)
7
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Does anyone else get that feeling?
Teenagers naked,
Couple in threes
Grandparents swing from the ceiling.
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Corporate chambers and office amore.
Shenanigans outdoor and in.
Resist and then later your find out there's more
Regret in not doing the sin.
Our lives have to die
Of that there's no help
My favourite way to end them
Is the orb-weaver spider's whose pedipalp
Enters the female pudendum.
Then dies on the spot
His corpse there still stuck,
Left for his rivals to curse at.
He would rather die than not get to f^ck
Personally I reckon it's worth it.
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Does anyone else get that feeling?
Everyone else has had more sex than me.
Does everybody else get that feeling?
...
Does everyone think...
Posted by: chieftain at December 02, 2004 09:31 PM (rJcoj)
8
This song is great and funny. Just the fact that they use BUNNIES...thats just great... Rock On!!!!!
Posted by: wacky hack at December 13, 2004 01:41 PM (6tnQ0)
Posted by: itsmemario at December 13, 2004 08:06 PM (zB8Cn)
10
Where can I get a copy of this song either MP3 or WMA or somethin!! IT ROCKS.. I wish i could find a bunny that could sing! cuz then i'd train it to sing this song......!!!
Posted by: V3k at December 17, 2004 11:11 AM (GoM83)
11
Just ordered the boxset with the album containing this song and 2 DVDs of video stuff, including both versions of this video.
Hope noone kills me for advertising this company, but i can reccomend http://fbo.com.au/ for getting this boxset, it's about $25US including shipping to europe.
This song is definately going to be the next geek anthem...
Posted by: Ghlargh at December 19, 2004 02:30 AM (GfL9q)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Killing Joos and Americans
I don't know whether to weep or to eat my gun when I
read things like this:
A talking animal on a Palestinian children's television show has advocated starting a massacre with AK-47 firearms.
The violent suggestion came in response to a question from a child moderator on the program, which runs on official Palestinian TV, reported Palestinian Media Watch.
The recently aired episode was dedicated to the importance of trees. The moderator asked "Tarabisho," a talking chick, what he would do if someone, specifically a "little boy," were to chop down his tree. In his squeaky little voice, Tarabisho answered that he would shoot the little boy with an AK-47 automatic rifle, create a massacre and make a riot.
The following is the full text of the translated dialogue between the child moderator and Tarabisho:
Girl: If a boy comes in front of your house where a tree is planted, and cuts it down, what would you do?
Talking chick: I have two trees in front of my house.
Girl: If a little boy cuts them down, what will you do to him?
Talking chick: What I'll do to him? I'll fight him and make a big riot. I'll call the whole world and make a riot. I'll bring AK-47s and the whole world. I'll commit a massacre in front of the house.
Palestinian Media Watch, which features a video of the exchange, reported the moderator twice checked her notes while asking the questions, suggesting this was not a spontaneous discussion but was a deliberate educational message planned by the writers and producers of the show.
The program aired shortly after the Israeli army leveled many of the trees used by Palestinian terrorists in Gaza to hide rocket launchers.
As WorldNetDaily reported, Palestinian Authority television produced a "Sesame Street"-like children's program called the "Children's Club" – complete with puppet shows, songs, Mickey Mouse and other characters – focused on inculcating intense hatred of Jews and a passion for engaging in and celebrating violence against them in a perpetual "jihad" until the day the Israeli flags come down from above "Palestinian land" and the Palestinian flag is raised.
In one song on the "Children's Club," very young children are shown singing songs about wanting to become "suicide warriors" and to take up "a machine gun" to direct "violence, anger, anger, anger" against Israelis.
During the show, which featured children aged 4-10, one young boy sings, "When I wander into Jerusalem, I will become a suicide bomber." Afterward, other children stand to call for "Jihad! Holy war to the end against the Zionist enemy."
It always makes me wonder how guys like Jeff and Laurence can joke about the sick, murderous nature of Palestinian society. How are you able to make light of the fact that people want you dead? I find myself railing at them each for a moment every now and then until I remember that I'm now in the same situation myself, and I've only really been aware of it for three years.
I'm just not yet accustomed to the fact that there are a lot of people out there who want to kill me because I'm from this country. And nothing else would matter to them.
A lot of aware Jews out there have lived with this their entire lives—at least on a theoretical level—and are therefore coping better than I am.
(Also, Laurence and Jeff are funnier people from the get-go.)
The riff started with Protein Wisdom, who provided the link to this rather horrific little bit of news.
Posted by: Attila at
04:22 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 601 words, total size 4 kb.
1
This may sound like a non sequitur, but I assure you it isn't.
The survival advantage of humankind comes from the group. We have evolved and inherited an incredible and unique range of mechanisms to constantly reinforce
and reiterate our belonging to our group. Music, pictorial art, story telling, clothing fashions, dance, and many others; all of these crazy human affectations are manifestations of a single mechanism that we have - that of bonding to the other people within our group AS a group.
It's flip side is that there is a radius for this bonding response and an opposite reaction to those who are perceived as outside of that radius. Those who are outside of the group are "other" and are naturally feared and hated. It's built in. We often label this force "tribalism," but the term doesn't allow for the full scope of behaviors that people manifest under its influence. It also implies that only primitive people possess it. Joseph Conrad answered that one to my satisfaction.
The mechanisms that trigger the sense of belonging to the group and of enmity toward those who do not belong to the group are basic emotions, and are easily heightened and aroused. Since our very survival as a species is ultimatley bound up with them they are very, VERY powerful.
As technology evolves, it gives us a mechanical advantage (pun intended) over our ancestors in every sphere of human activity - making things, growing and harvesting, inflicting harm in battle, and; for the purpose of this diatribe; communicating. That amplification of effect has obvious physical consequences all around us that we can all identify. What is not given nearly the attention it deserves is the exact means by which this amplification taps into the most basic human drives and what the results might be.
In the US we have learned to sell our products by tapping into the very most basic drives that people have. We use sex, temperature, appetite, and fear. We also use both halves of the group drive to sell clothing, attitudes, candidates, and policies.
The key is that these are BASIC drives; lowest common denominator triggers. Rest assured that the rest of the world has been taking lessons from everybody from Proctor and Gamble to Josef Goebbels to tap this incredibly powerful force and turn it to their own purposes.
In it's most powerful form, it is the force that allowed a man a Gettysburg or the Somme to walk with his fellows into certain death rather than lose his place in the group. It is the force that worked within a group of religious fanatics that got them to decide to die together by flying airplanes into the WTC. As you have just pointed out, it is a force that now is being nurtured in small Palestinian children for the purpose of jihad.
One of the common topics that has been running through the blog has been the virulent polarization of Democrats and Republicansduring this election. This polarization is occuring within the confines of a society to which we all belong and love, and yet I would swear to you that many of the people I meet actually HATE members of the opposing politcal camp more immediately and passionately at this moment than they do Al Quaeda. The parties have learned to tap into this thing that is built into us all, and because it is effective to do so they have abandoned all restraint and opened Pandora's box. Once these forces are let loose in a mass culture, they don't subside easily or predictably.
The the techniques being used in the Middle East to create suicide bombers and mujahadeen are in evidence right here and now in our own land. Whenever any one of us notices that a feeling is becoming more influential than our reason, it is time to ask what is triggering it. Then at least we have given ourselves a window to choose how we will conduct ourselves. That is more than those little children in Palestine have.
Posted by: douglas brown at October 31, 2004 07:26 AM (mS5MT)
2
I think if you don't make light of it every now and then you'll go mad. It's rather like the gallows humour that my parents' generation exhibited during the Blitz. It's a safety valve.
This is not, however, to say that I don't want every single Islamofascist and Paleostinian self-guided munition to become messily dead, and right quick.
Posted by: David Gillies at October 31, 2004 07:29 AM (wA91W)
3
Thanks, Douglas. I think you're right. I hope we're able to bind up the wounds of the present time as we once did with the conflicts of the 60s, and the equally passionate ones in the 80s (back when that crazy Ronald Reagan was about to destroy the world).
I'm hoping our American society is resiliant enough to get over this period of intense conflict (the near Balkanization we're seeing). Certainly, American politics has gotten pretty bare-knuckled in the past without the larger culture going up in flames.
And yet I worry.
And, yes, David--anyone who's teaching little kids that killing is a happy, joyous thing should be yanked away and harvest, immediately, the fruit of that teaching by someone who is big and well-armed enough to make the lesson "stick." It's child abuse, and it helps to imprison the Palestinians in their destructive, self-destructive culture for years/decades to come.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 02:56 PM (SuJa4)
4
Douglas,
Excellent analysis. BUT... There's also an equal and opposite tendency running through some of the human race that causes a good portion of it to have a fascination with 'the other'. I suspect this one probably developed through inbreeding/outbreeding, since inbreeding tends to weaken the race.
Many of us have inherited both tendencies and can balance them to an extent. Others tend to go way to one side or the other. Another of our problems is with the extreme xenophilic tendency, who seem to assume that anyone who is different is automatically better than those who are not.
Posted by: Kathy K at October 31, 2004 03:37 PM (IRIcx)
5
I've heard this referred to by biologists as "disassorted mating." I think it saves us from all kinds of ills.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 06:34 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 30, 2004
Local Guy Makes Good
Power Line's
Hindracker hits the big time:
NBC News has asked me to be part of their election night broadcast team. I'm not sure yet exactly what the format will be, but I'll be in New York at the NBC studio. I'll once again be paired with the Wonkette. Given the long hours that these election night shows consume, I expect to get some air time. I'll try to lend whatever balance I can to NBC's coverage, and if I get the opportunity, I'll let Tom Brokaw know that I'm one of the guys he called a "Jihadist" in connection with Hurricane Dan.
So: tune in to NBC on election night. If it's a good night for President Bush and the Republicans, I'll be the only happy guy in the building.
I'll be with the Los Angeles Bear Flag Leaguers on the West Side, celebrating the Bush win, and I would think we'll probably tune in, though it certainly won't be up to me.
Posted by: Attila at
08:06 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at October 31, 2004 12:07 AM (+S1Ft)
2
You need to visit California, Pixy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 03:10 AM (SuJa4)
3
Is this your lost child?
Time for Bunnies!
Madman Entertainment in Australia just made a little music video for a band called (as I understand it) This Is Serious, Mum, or TISM. The new single from their album
The White Albun is entitled "Everyone Else Has Had More Sex Than Me," and it's now time for you to
go hear it (if you're not in a major hurry, I recommend the album mix, but I'm a take-your-time, 70s-style, album-ey girl, so what the fuck do I know? Nada).
But I'm beginning to think I might understand John Edward's strange
affinity for bunny-rabbits.
Hat tip for the bunny video goes to
Lileks.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at October 31, 2004 06:29 AM (+S1Ft)
4
Ooh, yeah, thank you! Did I mess up the coding that badly? Never mind! Time to go post it properly. Thanks, Pixy!
And you need to visit California. Why don't you come out here for Siggrah in '05?
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 02:59 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
And at the Eleventh Hour
Over at Jane Galt, Megan McArdle has fiiiinaaalllyy
made up her mind. She goes through the issues close to her tree-hugging, libertarian heart and tells us which guy wins out on each issue before making her reluctant declaration.
It's good reading, because she in some ways a genuine centrist, and she's smarter—and better-informed—than I am. Good stuff. Go, now—no matter your political persuasion. It's one of the most thoughtful political essays I've read this whole damned election season.
Posted by: Attila at
12:12 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
October 29, 2004
Red Hoodies, and the Collapse of Civility
Oh, no fair. Eminem has this
new video to underscore the fact that we're never the cool kids on the block. And they're all wearing their black hoodies to the polls.
Nice video, though: I like the way the animation is integrated into the live action of Eminem himself.
Hm. Should I wear my gray zip jacket with the hood? Will it make me cool? At 42, I'm finding that quality more and more elusive.
We should wear hoodies that are white. Or multicolored ones in red, white and blue. Or orange hoodies, since it'll be two days after Halloween. Or maple-leaf brown, for autumn.
You know what we should wear?—red. It's the symbol of blood and bravery.
Michele praises the video, and notes that it's Eminem's right to speak his mind about the President. But she points out that it's a little hypocritical of the left to 1) lionize celebrities who speak out on politics only when you agree with them, and 2) suddenly decide they like Eminem after all, when just ten minutes ago they despised him as a gay-bashing misogynist who glorified violence.
Hey, Michele—that was then. This is now.
You know what sucks about this election? In a sane year, efforts like those of Election Protection would be bipartisan efforts, rather than the Democrats having their own poll observers and the Republicans, our own. Or we'd at least be able to cooperate to the point that we would have squads of observers, equally matched as to party, at each location to make sure that no one is intimidated, but that no voter fraud occurs. Instead, we have mutual suspicion and rumors of intimidation based on race—and yet, at times, an out and out celebration of vote fraud by Democrats. And of course that isn't right, either: whenever someone votes fraudulently another citizen is being disenfranchised.
This sucks. No matter what happens, I hope America regains its equilibrium, and I weep for what we've lost.
I hope it doesn't take another attack to bring us together again.
Please get this over with, and please—let there be some peace and reasonableness when it's done. And get my democracy to some radiation therapy, please: it has cancer.
Posted by: Attila at
10:26 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 382 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Ms. A,
Hoodies aside, it would behoove us all to realize the dems are going to try and suppress the Bush vote on election day. Among the ways they will do this includes: poking along the line and in the voting booth to take the max amount of time, asking poll workers unnecessary questions to slow down the line, or from the inside --being a poll worker who takes forever to find names in the registration book or list. The net result is long lines which discourage soccer moms, seniors, and people who work from standing forever in line to vote. So maybe making a "W" fashion statement with colored hoodies is one way to combat this repellant tactic. Another would be to have the resolve to stand in line to vote for as long as it takes -- whatever it takes!
Posted by: Politickal Animal at October 30, 2004 07:19 AM (KWF9c)
2
Amen to that. This election has been like a trip through an old-fashioned "fun house" with distorting mirrors and tilting floors working over your sense of equilibrium at every step.
Posted by: douglas brown at October 30, 2004 09:30 AM (3bhOT)
3
"We should wear hoodies that are white"
That sure would jibe with GOP efforts to suppress minority votes...
Posted by: md at October 31, 2004 11:54 AM (IKOz+)
4
Oh, you mean the ones the Civil Rights Commission scoured Florida for after the 2000 election, and were completely unable to find? The ones that appear to be largely the result of fevered thinking by people who don't recognize that the Republicans are the party of Lincoln and the Civil Rights Act? The imaginary efforts that only exist in the tiny minds of the paranoid?
Those efforts?
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 31, 2004 03:22 PM (SuJa4)
5
That's truly funny. if Lincoln were alive today, he sure as hell wouldn't be a member of the current version of the GOP. And to call the GOP the "party of the Civil Rights Act" is hilarious.
Posted by: md at November 05, 2004 02:55 AM (IKOz+)
6
Do you really want to discuss the ties between the Democratic Party and the Segregationist South? Do you really want to talk about Robert Byrd, the only Klansman in the entire U.S. Legislature?
How about the fact that in the four years between 2000 and 2004, G.W. Bush doubled his percentage of the black vote?
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 05, 2004 11:59 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Latest from Our Bomb-Wielding Friend
Watch your backs, boys and girls. Bin Ladin might be getting ready for another attack over the weekend; CIA analysts are trying to figure out if there are hidden instructions in his
latest videotape.
Of course, he might not try to attack us, figuring that Americans could well react just the opposite of the Spaniards in such a case.
But keep on the lookout anyway; it'll be a scary weekend in a very literal, non-Halloween-like way.
Posted by: Attila at
02:31 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Watcher at October 29, 2004 09:42 PM (N6mFh)
2
Wow... did you know that hyperlinks are invisible in your comments box unless you hover over them?
Posted by: Watcher at October 29, 2004 09:43 PM (N6mFh)
3
Yeah. Sorry. I'm getting it fixed.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 29, 2004 10:28 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Has Anyone Noticed
. . . malfunctions in the Rove chips? I'm having trouble thinking straight. Lots of static.
Supposed to say . . . Russians took the explosives from Al-Qaqaa . . . Ter-AY-suh is ugly, and Edwards is dim . . . we're up in Florida and Pennsylvania, and still might take Ohio. Michigan is falling, falling to us fast. Hawai'i is being seduced by the dark side . . .
Out. Signal's out. Nothing to blog about.
Perhaps Voldemort can help me; as it turns out, he's a good IT guy. Who knew?
Posted by: Attila at
12:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
October 28, 2004
Arafat
All I can say is, I hope he's in
a lot of pain. Maybe he'll have a slow, lingering death—just in case there isn't a hell. (I'm not against hedging my bets.)
My favorite part of the coverage is the fact that his wife has to join him from France, reminding us that his family is safely ensconsed in Europe: he only wants other people's families to die.
Outside the Beltway:
It must be getting serious. The press is already dusting off the Arafat obituary. Apparently, contrary to my belief that he was a mass murdering scumbag, he was simply a dynamic leader who won the Nobel Peace Prize. I stand corrected.
That's vintage Joyner.
Posted by: Attila at
10:02 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Arafat will die before the election because Bush planned it that way and is desperate for a boost. After Bush steals the election he take the military completely out of Afghanistan and invade the Gaza Strip guns a-blazing, creating even more mayhem in the Middle East.
Bubba Bush won't stop until the entire Middle East - oil and all - is firmly under his thumb.
That's his psychotics plan, body count be damned.
Happy Halloween!!!
(Yes, I'm parodying myself. Even a bleeding heart pacifist can have fun.)
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at October 29, 2004 07:02 AM (BZ0tI)
2
Well,
I knew you were spoofing, but those who don't know you as well might not be so sure.
Happy Halloween! See you tomorrow night, I hope.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 29, 2004 10:23 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Got Truth?
A new group,
The Truth About Iraq, is trying to counter the media distortions and omissions about the liberation; they even ran an
editorial in the
L.A. Times to try to get it across to skeptical Americans that Iraqis really do want democracy:
Nearly 55% of Iraqis say that toppling Hussein was worth the price of the current difficulties. These figures are easy to understand when you look at another set of numbers. In an Op-Ed article circulated this year among the more than 200 independent newspapers now published in Iraq, an Iraqi democratic activist observed that Hussein tortured and killed as many as 750,000 of his own people. Iraqis don't understand the debate about whether Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. To them, Hussein was a weapon of mass destruction.
UNICEF, hardly an apologist for the Bush administration, estimates that 5,000 Iraqi children a month died of starvation and malnutrition while Hussein siphoned funds from the U.N.'s oil-for-food program to build his palaces and enrich French politicians.
Via Dean Esmay.
Posted by: Attila at
09:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 175 words, total size 1 kb.
October 27, 2004
Christopher Hitchens
Wrote a rather remarkable
essay called "Why I'm (Slightly) For Bush." And one of the most remarkable things about it is that it was printed in
The Nation.
Real Clear Politics has it listed right next to Andrew Sullivan's endorsement of John Kerry, of course.
Wonder if they're still talking. I hope so.
Posted by: Attila at
05:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
Oh, Those Missing Explosives
Jeff at Protein Wisdom
sums up the situation:
If we are to believe the subtext of The New York Times / Kerry / CBS missing explosives story—which argues, however obliquely, that US troops under the command of the Bushies allowed high-grade explosives to be pilfered by terrorists from beneath their noses—we must accept at least two conditional assumptions upon which the Times / Kerry / CBS News axis pins its hopes—first, that an initial cursory search by the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division overlooked (or, at the very least, missed the IAEA seals labeling) the explosives that were in fact still there at the facility; and second, that between this time (April 10) and the time “a special U.S. exploitation team looking for weapons of mass destruction searched all 32 bunkers and 87 buildings” and found nothing (May 27), hostiles were able to remove the explosives from the facility while many US forces remained in the general area (and where the roads were closed)—managing not only to avoid detection by US forces on the ground, but managing likewise to thwart surveillance by satellites and spy planes, loading the explosives on a large number of heavy trucks and disappearing unnoticed. Couple these two conditional assumptions with the Times / Kerry / CBS News’ cabal’s omission, in its recent reporting, of two reports from early April of 2003 suggesting the 3ID had already investigated the Al Qakaa facility, and we’re now left with yet another narrative nodal point where—if we are to believe the Times / Kerry / CBS version of events—we must assume US military command incompetence is ascendent.
...Or (and hereÂ’s the possibility the NYT / Kerry / CBS collective doesnÂ’t want to acknowledge) another explanation is, the explosives had already been either removed or destroyed before US troops arrived.
Granted, this second possibility isn’t so sexy—no stealth super terrorists to embarrass the dundering US military and its evil, arrogant Commander in Chimp by filching materials needed to detonate a nuclear weapon out from under our imperialist noses—but from the standpoint of plausibility (and, I almost hasten to add, terrestrial physics) ...well, I’ll let you decide which of the two scenarios is more likely.
Get over there for the links, updates, and other coverage of this issue—as well as pictures of John Edwards with bunnies and pages from Martha Stewart's prison diary. It's your basic one-stop shopping for info and entertainment.
Posted by: Attila at
04:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 411 words, total size 3 kb.
October 26, 2004
More Required Reading
. . . from
Mark Steyn, in which he uses the recent "assassination joke" on the part of a countryman as a point of departure to discuss cool irony and the European penchant for passivity. As in, how does it fit into the current world conflict, with people getting their heads chopped off just for attempting to do good works?
Not very well, he concludes:
This new war requires action, resolve, ongoing participation—and most of America's "allies" just can't be fagged. The Spanish vote was a vote for passivity, a call for inaction, and a quiet life no doubt with many "ironic jokes" about the absurd Americans. The "civilised world" sees itself like Continental skating judges at the Olympics, watching the Yanks career all over the ice and then handing out a succession of cranky 4.7s. The decadence of passivity does not express itself solely in "ironic jokes".
My problem is that John Kerry is part of that culture: he wants to criticize people of action rather than actually doing anything himself. Look at his lackluster Senate record, and listen to his micro-criticisms of the Bush Administration's accomplishments. Listen to his own plan: I'd have done everything better somehow, and people in other countries wouldn't dislike us so.
It may be too late for John Kerry to grow a spine, but I still have some hope the Western Europeans will figure things out soon. Certainly there are plenty of English who "get it." And then there are the Australians, to whom I'm grateful. Even a few Canadians (Kate, are you reading this?). And the Polish, for whom this is a labor of love. God bless them.
Posted by: Attila at
10:47 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 282 words, total size 2 kb.
Gmail Trouble
So, I can't access the old Yahoo account from this computer, probably because I need to clear out my LMA in box. I thought I'd mostly solved that problem when I opened the Gmail account, but now Gmail won't come up for me. Could this be because my machine is a little light on memory?—or is there another explanation. I haven't been able to get to my Gmail at all since I returned from Santa Barbara. So that's over 24 hours.
Let me know if you have insight.
Posted by: Attila at
09:46 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I somtimes have trouble getting g-mail to load. Normally I simply hit reload and it works for me.
Hope you get it straightened out; I'm still having runtime errors with my incredimail :-(
Posted by: Rachel Ann at October 27, 2004 03:22 PM (CrUiC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeff at Beautiful Atrocities
Gives us the
Complete Idiot's Guide to Bumperstickers. Brought to you from spectacular Berkeley, California—the bumpersticker capital of the world. Enjoy.
Posted by: Attila at
08:38 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks! I just hope I can find a Bush supporter or 2 to spend election eve with up here, lol
Posted by: jeff at October 28, 2004 01:29 PM (3z2rY)
2
Aren't you guys having a Bear Flag League party up there? You should . . .
If all else fails, vote early and drive down to LA, Orange County, or San Diego--and crash one of our parties.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 28, 2004 08:56 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
By This Time Tomorrow
. . . I'll be at 30,000 unique hits to this site, unless there's a huge drop in traffic.
Every 10K visit mark gets easier to get to—they come closer and closer together.
However, I'm not yet at the point that I can claim I'm getting all Dan Rather's old viewers. Not yet.
Posted by: Attila at
06:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What about the Dan Rather Neverviewers...it's a much larger of pool from which to draw people...like myself.
Posted by: Don at October 26, 2004 07:12 PM (FsGoB)
2
I think I was either really optimistic, or perhaps off by a decimal point. But it'll still happen soon, within the week. (And it would be closer if Site Meter hadn't gone on the blink for a while.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 29, 2004 10:25 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Why Bush Will Win
My husband has a friend who's a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat—a staunch union advocate, someone who associates the GOP with society's elites. He's had a troubled relationship with his party for years, especially when it was pushing hard for gun control in the 1990s. But on the whole he's been remarkably loyal. He despised Gore for the phony he was, and swore he wouldn't vote for him. But at the last minute he found himself at the polls pulling the level for Albert, Jr., with a heavy heart.
He's voting for Bush this year.
Why? Well, for one thing, he was in an army LRRP unit in Vietnam, and got wounded. When they offered him a purple heart, he refused it: in his mind, purple hearts were reserved for those who got badly wounded—shot up so much they needed surgery to survive. People who suffered, not people who got scratches. And for another thing, as an anti-elitist he despises the fact that officers can recommend themselves to receive decorations for valor—and enlisted men cannot. The fact that Kerry took advantage of this inequity disgusts him.
And Kerry's actions when he returned from the war do not help at all.
But most of all, our friend is convinced that we are locked in a mortal conflict with an enemy who wants to kill us, and we need someone decisive at the helm. Someone who really wants to win this war, rather than hold summits.
Kerry's history, and what it says about his character, doesn't help. But mostly, our friend wants the guy who's willing to do what it takes to protect this country.
So he's holding his nose and voting for Bush.
And he won't be the only one: there are plenty of Democrats who feel the same way. They may not proclaim it loudly right now, but in a week they'll let their ballots do the talking.
Remember the "Reagan Democrats"? They're back.
Posted by: Attila at
04:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 2 kb.
1
But will those be evened out by Republicans who vote for Kerry? And before you laugh, there are those out there who dislike his exploding deficit and mishandling of Iraq enough to go against him.
Posted by: frinklin at October 26, 2004 05:47 PM (4k5pf)
2
In 99 out of 100 cases, Republicans who are unhappy with Bush will simply stay home. Very few will actually vote for a tax-and-spend Massachusetts liberal who wants to give up more of our sovereignty to the U.N.
Very few.
Even Pat "out in right field" Buchanan has endorsed Bush.
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 26, 2004 06:07 PM (SuJa4)
3
The people who would vote for Kerry now who voted for Bush last time can be lumped in with the few who voted for Lincoln in 60 but McClellan in 64 or for FRD in 40 but Wilkie in 44.
Posted by: LargeBill at October 27, 2004 05:38 PM (O9g4v)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Election Projection
. . . has
Bush at 296, and Kerry at 242 EVs. Plus: Cal-ee-fornia has just moved from "Solid Kerry" to "Close Kerry." Mary Beth Cahill is in bed with a headache.
Real Clear Politics has it much closer, of course: Bush 234, Kerry 228, with a handful of undecideds—but those include both Florida and Ohio. Obviously, Bush needs both those states to win (well, he might not need Ohio, if he gets Minnesota and/or Wisconsin—but no one wants something close enough that the Dems can contest it in the courts).
Posted by: Attila at
04:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
Scrappleface Exclusive! Bush Admits He's "Hiding Bad News"!
Scott Ott
breaks the story! Bush concedes that there will be bad news after the election:
"My opponent speaks the truth when he says that some Americans are going to get some bad news--maybe even before the sun comes up on November 3," said Mr. Bush, "It will involve defeat and the realization that huge sums of money have been wasted on an unwinnable battle against a determined and entrenched foe."
Read the whole thing.
Posted by: Attila at
02:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
82kb generated in CPU 0.0503, elapsed 0.204 seconds.
217 queries taking 0.1752 seconds, 532 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.