November 20, 2004
Give Till It Hurts . . . And It Always Does
Via
Pirate's Cove comes
this chart, which purports to show how the inhabitants of various states rank when it comes time to give to charity. I didn't get a chance to study the methodology behind it, but I found the idea fascinating, since instead of simply adding up all the money spent and adjusting for population (which would presumably make New York and California look good) it adjusts for the actual incomes of the populations involved, creating a "generosity index" (and placing New York and California squarely in the lackluster middle of the pack).
The site provides ammo for those who maintain that "all stereotypes are true, up to a point." The list begins with two Southern states, Mississippi and Arkansas, and stays Southern and rural for a good 15 entries. The first Western state is Utah, at #8, then Idaho (# 10), Wyoming (11) and Texas (12). The first state from the upper midwest is Indiana, at #25, and the first state from New England is Maine, at #32. The bottom of the barrel (um, chart) is Rhode Island (47), New Jersey (4
, and then two more New England states: blue-blooded Massachusetts (49) and New Hampshire (50).
Posted by: Attila at
05:18 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ma'am,
I too blogged on this. Here are my thoughts on this phenomenon (copied from my blog for your convenience):
Charity is our duty. We who have should freely share with those who need, according to how the Spirit moves us. But charity must be voluntary. If I rob from the rich to give to the poor, there is no arguing that the guy I robbed gets zero credit for having given to the poor. He didn't; he was robbed! I am not being charitable, either, though. Why should I get credit? I robbed a guy of what he had to give it to someone else. Charity is giving of what you legitimately have, not of what you steal.
"Hey -- what about Robin Hood", you ask? He didn't rob the rich -- he robbed the government robbers who'd unfairly overtaxed the poor. He was giving back to the poor their own money. It was not charity in that case, either. You could call it a service, I suppose....
In the blue states, they like to raise taxes to help the poor. Does that say anything good for the citizens of those states? NO! They are voting to take money that isn't theirs (taxes) from citizens and give it to those the government decides is needy. If you take my money in this way, I am not giving to charity, for charity involves my choice. You are not being charitible, either, for you are using money you took from me. Plus, I now have less money that I can give to charity. Bad juju all around, that.
In the red states, there is less taxation for "social programs." So, there is a greater percentage of each person's total income available for charity. Thus, their individual giving can be and is a higher percentage of total income. Good vibes, there.
Those who try to use the Christian duty to give as an argument for raising taxes to pay for social programs really bother me: They are trying to take away our ability to perform this duty when they do so. Raising taxes to take someone else's money is NOT a Christian virtue!
Posted by: Ranten.N.Raven at November 22, 2004 10:35 AM (CgkPo)
2
Right. And I'm not such a libertarian that I want to go back to the type of society in which there is no safety net, any more than I want to live in a society that still has debtors' prisons. But the more charity can be handled privately, the better. There are many reasons for this, including the ones you state. One more: private/non-governmental charities have more freedom to actually make demands of their clients in terms of lifestyle changes, which--in the case of many pathologies, such as drug addiction--is exactly what's needed. Buidling a sense of personal responsibility is one way of "teaching a person to fish," and thereby treating the real problem instead of simply addressing symptoms.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 22, 2004 10:25 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Somewhere in Alaska, a Fact-Checker is Starting to Sweat
I
ran a quote a few days ago from Greg Hill of the
Fairbanks News-Miner in which he
maintains blogs can be highly inaccurate. The same writer ranted, as well, about the open sourcing of Wikipedia, and—oddly—referred to blogs that allow comments as "wikis," because of their supposed collaborative nature. (Speaking of which, why aren't you guys writing the
entries for me?)
Mr. Hill: "garbage in, garbage out."
Problem is, as reader Chadster noticed, the writer mentions "Dave Berry's" blog by name. That is, Dave B-a-r-r-y. And, as a copy editor and fact-checker myself, I reminded myself that I try to turn that part of my brain off when I'm online, lest I go nuts. (Or . . . more nuts.) But Chad didn't, which is the point. He noticed that someone hyping the superior accuracy of printed/mainstream news sources didn't get the name right for a writer who's been well known and in the public eye since the 80s.
And so, Chadster wrote a note to Dave Barry, who blogged the Fairbanks News-Miner article. And thus I've helped to entertain thousands of people by writing one little old blog entry. You never know what might happen, huh?
Wiki, wiki, wiki.
Posted by: Attila at
02:08 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 2 kb.
1
How about: Little Miss Attila is a wonderful website by one of those incredible GOPers that send Liberals into a tizzy, and has just smacked Greg Hill silly. She is one of the special people out in Ca, who is trying to keep the dems in line.
Feel free to add more, y'all. I'm not getting LMA mad at me for unilaterally creating something there. She scares me.
Posted by: William Teach at November 20, 2004 03:35 PM (KCG7N)
Posted by: Kathy K at November 20, 2004 05:55 PM (Aq6qj)
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 20, 2004 06:28 PM (SuJa4)
4
Thanks for the link. Still waiting on Glenn. =(
Maybe I shouldn't have put "Avenge me, Insty!" in my link-beg email...
Posted by: Chadster at November 20, 2004 10:28 PM (t3o/A)
5
Let's just say that the person who figured out the magic formula for Glenn-linkage could get . . . if not money, a hell of a lot of links.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 20, 2004 11:03 PM (SuJa4)
6
Changing my name to Roger Simon, the name of my blog to JustOneMinute, or discussing nanotechnology might help...
Posted by: Chadster at November 21, 2004 01:27 AM (t3o/A)
7
The Puppyblender linked to the Dave Barry entry today, crediting it to Tim Blair. I must say, I'm disappointed in him—though we must assume he just never happened to open your e-mail.
But you deserved that hat tip: you really did. It's an annoying injustice.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 21, 2004 02:43 AM (SuJa4)
8
Well, I sent it yesterday (Central European Time), *after* he posted that link. So, I don't think it was an intentional diss. I guess he just didn't read the email, like you said, or maybe it's because I'm an Alabama Crimson Tide fan.
This makes me wonder if I should join the Alliance all the more.
Posted by: Chadster at November 21, 2004 03:55 AM (5odbR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Protein Wisdom
has
the goods on Democratic racism. You follow the links, and are just shocked that anyone would dare portray Dr. Rice in these awful ways—based on the color of her skin.
Of course, I've never been much of an Aunt Jemima woman myself. Plain old Bisquick does it—with lashings of Mrs. Butterworth syrup, the libertarian choice.
So perhaps that's one less thing to worry about. I guess.
Posted by: Attila at
04:02 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
From Team Esmay
Dean
sparked a great discussion on how those of us who lean libertarian ought to look at corporations, and at unionization.
It's a long comments thread, and we mostly kept it civil. The ideas in it are intriguing, so check it out.
Posted by: Attila at
03:47 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Boy, you're not kidding. There are some hefty arms swinging the bats in that one.
Posted by: douglas brown at November 21, 2004 04:45 PM (Sm4lQ)
2
Yes
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2004 06:21 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 19, 2004
Grab Those Cameras!
Michele is having a contest: She's
requesting that you document the ugliest, most over-the-top, excessive and inappropriate Christmas decorations on your local buildings and humans and send them on in. And she links some lovely and grotesque examples, so RTWT.
Posted by: Attila at
12:51 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I always get a chuckle out of those big "Happy Birthday Jesus" signs.
Posted by: Daniel at November 19, 2004 06:14 PM (SW/zP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2004
The Spy Who Flirted with Me
Jeff Goldstein, on reforming the CIA:
So let me get this straight: GossÂ’ plan is to replace people like Valerie Plame with actual deep-cover operatives whose mission it will be to infiltrate terror groups? And this is supposed to make us more popular on the UN cocktail party circuit how, exactly?
No. This wonÂ’t do. I beg you, Mr. Goss, think of the shrimp puffs!
Full story and links over at Protein Wisdom.
It continues to amaze me that so much of our "intelligence" capability appears to have been devoted strictly to getting information that was easy to get. And yet we know of at least two Americans who "infiltrated" terrorist organizations. Unfortunately, they were sincere.
Posted by: Attila at
12:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
More on the Pajama Brigade
Greg Hill, a reporter for the
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner is more of a "Cathedral" guy than a "bazaar" fan:
Blogs focus on whatever subjects their creators care to expound upon. While some are academically rigorous, most are merely personal rants. When bloggers feel passionately enough about a subject, often themselves, they create and regularly update blogs expressing their views, usually including hyperlinks to other Web pages that confirm their opinions. All it takes is some inexpensive and user-friendly blogging software, strong opinions and time. Actual knowledge is purely optional.
There are many credible blogs dealing with serious subjects, but most bloggers aren't experts. As the old computer maxim GIGO states, "garbage in, garbage out," and the person believing everything he reads--especially on blogs--is living dangerously indeed.
Some blogs are intentionally unserious, like humorist Dave Berry's blog that features funny inanities of American life sent in by his readers. A recent Berry blog posting, for instance, had a hyperlink to the "Frozen Critters Inventory Price List," where consumers can purchase frozen whole skunks for only $75 apiece, a "Real Rattlesnake Egg with Real Head, Open Mouth, Peeking Out of Egg" for only $18, and, just in time for Thanksgiving, frozen unpainted turkey heads for only $40, with the painted ones running $15 extra.
Blog owners usually don't allow their readers to add their own comments, preferring their monologues to others' dialogues. On the other hand, a "Wiki," which gets its name from the Hawaiian word for "fast," is a type of Web site that encourages active participation. It's the approach taken by Wikipedia, the most pervasive quasi-encyclopedia on the Web. Wikipedia is free and contains millions of articles in scores of languages that pop up early in many Google searches, but the articles' authors are anonymous and can be anyone, so their credibility is dubious.
We must keep the dirty, unwashed masses out of the information business. Otherwise . . . it's chaos!
Posted by: Attila at
01:31 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 332 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Dave "Berry?"
DAVE "BERRY?"
BWA-HA-HA!!!!
There ya go. He went and married Halle, and didn't keep his maiden name.
Sheesh, and the guy complains about accuracy.
Posted by: Chadster at November 18, 2004 07:26 AM (5jLSZ)
2
To repeat: Dave Berry?
Boy (girl), it is a good thing that most of us leave our comments turned off, stopping the free exchange of ideas and discussion.
Lord forbid that we write our own opinions on the semi-coherent anti right ramblings of the MSM's.
Enough sarcasm in that comment? Oh, wait. Most do not allow comments. My Bad!!
Posted by: William Teach at November 18, 2004 04:29 PM (KCG7N)
3
Seriously - Is there anyone out there who refers to a blog as a "wiki"? Like - "Yeah, man, I was checking out this really cool wiki over the weekend."
This guy writes for the
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner? I think his brain is frozen. He needs to get a gig at the
Miami Herald but quick!
Posted by: Daniel at November 18, 2004 08:15 PM (fZ/6L)
4
Makes me wonder whether mr hill has some deal with Wikipedia. I think I am pretty Internet(s) savvy, and I have never heard the term "Wiki" before.
Mr. Hill is correct on one point: garbage in, garbage out. He did a wonderful job in demonstrating this. He does take a nice jab at the MSM's ability to produce garbage, if ye get my meaning
Posted by: William Teach at November 19, 2004 05:15 AM (KCG7N)
5
Actually, I found this because I was curious about where the term "Wikipedia" came from--what the root word was.
I swear, though: Apparently if someone posts inaccurate information at Wikipedia it takes around five minutes for it to be corrected; that's not bad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 19, 2004 09:30 AM (SuJa4)
6
Onnnnne morrrrrrrrre thinnnnnnng...
Did the author of this hog wallow consider the thousands of teen-run Livejournals that have open comments so that emo kids can all engage in their weird little cyber group-hugs?
They count, as well. Sadly enough.
Oh yeah, and Wikipedia is a target because it's the most successful serious internet attempt at accuracy and jazz. If we're going to go with the "THE INTERNETS R INNACURETE OH NOES" meme, we have to hit the big, respected guns, won't we?
Why am I referring to a third party in the first person plural?
Posted by: Chadster at November 19, 2004 03:08 PM (ZueMK)
7
Yeah, they do do a pretty good job at that site. I have run across it many a time when looking for some documentation. It is funny when one searches "moonbat." Also, Democratic Underground looks like it was almost written by them. Sorry, no Little Miss Attila. But, no Right Wing News, either. However, you can actually write one yourself there.
Posted by: William Teach at November 19, 2004 03:17 PM (TFSHk)
8
The wine urges me on, the bewitching wine, which sets even a wise man to singing and to laughing gently and rouses him up to dance and brings forth words wh
Posted by: fx contact lenses at November 24, 2004 03:47 AM (CFHBk)
9
And David's lips are lock't, but in divine
High piping, Pelevi, with "Wine! Wine! Wine!
Red wine!—the Nightingale cries to the Rose,
That yellow cheek of hers to incarnadine.
Come, fill the Cup, and in the Fire of Spring
The Winter Garment of Repentance fling:
The Bird of Time has but a little way
To fly—and lo, the Bird is on the Wing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2004 06:38 AM (SuJa4)
10
See if you can place that quote. (And I don't want to hear either "where do you want it placed?" or any of the obscene possibilities.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2004 06:01 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Megan McArdle
(writing as Jane Galt, of course) recommends a book on welfare reform, and then
tells us:
My own thoughts on welfare reform: it's clear to me from the research I've done to write about poverty, and from reading books like DeParle's, that the poor suffer from three main problems: their own poor impulse control or decision making; a culture that encourages poor decision making; and limited means, which give them no buffer against the results of their poor decision making.
Liberals want to change the third variable, but this is somewhat recursive. As long as our society offers housing to everyone who needs it, the poor will be stuck living with people whose bad behaviour makes them impossible neighbours . . . so that even if the housing stock is physically perfect, crime and various other sorts of antisocial behavior that flourish in a world without evictions make the housing for the poor actually unbearable. Also, if people have very bad problems, such as mental illness or drug addiction, no reasonable amount of cash will improve their lot without adding things like forced institutionalisation. The people with those problems, unsurprisingly, are the overwhelming majority of the truly immiserated poor, who have rotting housing, insufficient caloric intake, and so forth.
Conservatives, by and large, want to change the first two variables, and there's a lot to this. There's simply no question that welfare enables women to make short term choices that are all right in the short term (dropping out of school, having a baby out of wedlock), but disastrous in the long term. Enabling women to make awful short term choices means enabling some proportion of them to ruin their lives.
But it's not enough to say to these women "Get married" or "Ignore your friends and pay attention to school". Some extraordinary people do, of course, but we all tend to overestimate how easy it is to be that extraordinary. Most of us reading this blog, after all, went to college and/or got nice steady jobs because we had enormous social and familial pressure on us to do so. How many of us were strong enough to overcome our environment, drop out of high school, and sell drugs?
I jest, of course, but not totally. The fact that every inner-city kid isn't a Horatio Alger story doesn't mean that inner city kids couldn't be, if their environment were more like the one I grew up in. After all, the girls in my high school didn't fail to have babies at 16 because they were more virtuous than the ones down the road at JFK High; they failed to have babies because they had a very clear idea that something better awaited them. How do we give those kids a more hopeful vision of their futures?
Part of the answer, I hope, is that by ceasing to enable those bad short-term decisions, the culture changes to focus more on the long term. Girls stop having babies at fifteen, and start demanding committment at 25--and they demand, too, that the boys stop selling drugs, because a husband in prison is one who can't provide for his family, and the government won't replace him any more. I doubt that's the whole answer, but I hope it's a big part of it.
There's a lot I agree with in there—and a little I do not.
But she's certainly a smart cookie.
Posted by: Attila at
01:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 572 words, total size 3 kb.
November 17, 2004
Terror in the Skies
Annie Jacobsen's series on airline security concerns has been renamed "Safety in the Skies" in an apparent attempt to make it more palatable to the readers of
Women's Wall Street. The tenth installment focuses on what a joke the "no fly list" used by the airlines is: you can read it
here, and discuss it amongst yourselves. Scary stuff. (There is a sidebar next to the story that contains links to all the "Terror/Safety in the Skies" stories.)
We need to place more pressure on Congress and the President to get the Department of Homeland Security to do its job. Bureaucracy can be such an intractable evil . . .
Posted by: Attila at
08:38 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
Light Blogging Tonight
. . . as I'm trying to get my "pages" ready for writers' group tomorrow night, and as usual Ye Olde Fiction Project is giving me trouble.
My husband has his group in the morning, and mine is in the evening. So his pages are done.
Somehow I'd like it to be his fault that I'm still working on mine this close to the deadline, but that taxes my creativity almost as badly as the pages themselves do.
Posted by: Attila at
07:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
It's Hurtful, If You Want To Know the Truth
Glenn is boycotting me. It makes me sad that he would throw out our friendship this way. All those long nights, talking almost until dawn till he went upstairs to the Instawife and I walked down the long hall to where Attila the Hub waited, asleep.
And now this utter silence. This refusal to recognize my blog.
Next thing you know he'll be saying he never went to Idyllwild, California for a vacation in a cabin covered with snow. He'll say I never made Moroccan Stew for him, the Instawife and 15 other people.
He's trying to disown me. He's acting like the history we share is somehow embarrassing to him.
Fine. Two can play at that game: I will stop linking him. Beat him at his own game, until he cries "mercy" and acknowledges our true, deep—yet Platonic—connection.
Posted by: Attila at
01:22 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dont count on mercy A real frend evean a asshole frend would not turn ther back just let it be, If your frend dosit see that hes not a frend.Just be cool un like me you got a lota readers a lota pull. Who gives a damm wat he thinkes this is your blog, you nead not be sorry to iney one. just stand and be you.
Posted by: gutterman at November 17, 2004 02:01 AM (Ak62X)
Posted by: gutterman at November 17, 2004 02:04 AM (Ak62X)
3
He'll link the Liberated, Vanities, Recipes, and Capitalists, but will he link Cats? NooooOOooOOooOOooOOoo.
He also links the OLD me instead of the NEW me. How bad is that?
Linking to him in unrequited fashion is almost like sucking up to Sullivan now, only without the bad taste in my mouth... and the fact that it would prop up a pathetic MSM tool who squeezes his buttocks on TV.
Posted by: Laurence Simon at November 17, 2004 06:52 AM (uBCxH)
4
Linking to the old you--that's almost as bad as spelling your name wrong. Oh, wait--I did that once.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 17, 2004 10:32 AM (SuJa4)
5
Why not link to people that treat you well? One of the sad things that I've noticed about SOME large blogs is that they seem to forget that it is the SMALLER blogs that make-up the VAST majority of readers. If a GIANT blog treats its readers cavalierly, as seems to be the case here, then that giant might find itself a very small blog someday.
As for myself, I get less than a 100 readers per day, and I adore every one of them and hope that they keep coming back. That is why I answer their emails and address their concerns. It's about the readers.
You have a large and well-rounded blogroll. You can do without him. I would be most pleased be on it, if you could put-up with a teacher in your Realm.
Posted by: EdWonk at November 17, 2004 05:29 PM (EyLEO)
6
Actually, I was . . . um. I was joking.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 17, 2004 06:35 PM (SuJa4)
7
I don't think Glenn is biting like Hawinks did
Posted by: William Teach at November 18, 2004 04:30 PM (KCG7N)
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 18, 2004 09:31 PM (c8BHE)
9
Good satirical writing! You certainly had me fooled. I would give you an A+ if you were in my English class. Still..It IS about the readers. ;-)
Posted by: EdWonk at November 19, 2004 12:39 AM (rvmEE)
10
In the case of John Hawkins, he just linked me out of the blue, and I linked him in return.
In the case of Glenn Reynolds, I was just throwing a line out into the water, as many do periodically. I've never received an Instalanche, but I'm sure my day will come.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 19, 2004 09:33 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 16, 2004
The Other Attila,
Pillage Idiot,
discusses the evolution of the Jewish vote, the problems with polling data, and the phenomenon of "closeted Jewish Bush voters" (a phenomenon that presumably moves in concert with that of "closeted liberal Bush voters").
Remember: outside our respective blogs, he comments as "Attila," and I'm "Attila Girl" (or sometimes "Miss Attila"). And he's in Maryland, so we're on opposite sides of the continent (not to mention the gender divide).
Attila writes to Attila Girl, whose head is filled with visions of MoxiePop and MoxieNu, and bad feelings, bad blood, lost jobs, And he suggests:
What's funny is that before I set up my blog, I did a lot of searching for the blog name to make sure I wasn't taking anyone else's name. I didn't dream of having to search for Attila, too.
Please let me know what you think.  We should stay amicable about it. We're almost relatives.
My cousin Attila should get along with me just fine.
Posted by: Attila at
11:58 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You could be Lady Attila, and he could be Sir Attila. Lady Attila does have a certain "ring" to it. Just a thought from a humble History Teacher that dwells in your Realm here in California.
Posted by: EdWonk at November 17, 2004 12:21 AM (/816A)
2
Hm. It might sound a bit like Lady MacBeth. Which people could find appropriate.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 17, 2004 12:33 AM (SuJa4)
3
Thanks, 'Cuz, for being understanding and also for the linkage. I've posted
my own notice about you.
Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at November 17, 2004 04:20 PM (I4eb5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thank You, John Hawkins!
You know, for a sexist pig,* you certainly link me a lot.
In return, and on its own merits, I'd like everyone who hasn't to check out "10 Quick Warnings For The GOP." I'm not the same brand of conservative as John—we differ on a couple of social issues—but I agree with every single point he makes here.
* This is what we call, in the trade, an inside joke. No nasty e-mails—either to Right Wing News, or to me.
Posted by: Attila at
10:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
Kill Them All; Let God Sort Them Out
Apparently, it's all over the news today that
bad things happen in wars.
Jeff at Protein Wisdom runs a righteous linkfest, and points out that:
First, the filth US Marines have been killing in Fallujah are terrorists, not insurgents; and second, these terrorists routinely hide behind children, fire from inside mosques, feign injury and/or surrender with ambush in mind, and booby-trap dead bodies in hopes of slaughtering American soldiers. They’re not interested in the “rules of war.”
Unless it helps them kill more of us, of course. Americans have died because we've been so assiduous in avoiding any unnecessary civilian casualties; my eyes are dry today. Has everyone forgotten the use of Red Crescent vehicles to carry armed Iraqis in the first phase of the war?
Jeff again:
Kidnapped international aid worker Margaret Hassan has been murdered. On video. No word yet on whether or not she was armed at the time.
Lest anyone misunderstand, I'm glad that we've taken such care to fight a clean war. I'm glad that we go to great efforts to keep civilian casualties to an absolute minimum. But I do not want to see this war drag on and on because our boys and girls have to fight in handcuffs, while the opposition finds ever-more-outrageous ways to flout international law.
The mainstream media is, once again, guilty of an egregious double standard.
Posted by: Attila at
10:11 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 2 kb.
1
One may care to note that the famous Mr Fisk (yes, that one) asserts that she was killed by the US. No evidence, just the sort of thing that US people would do, since the nice Islamicist boys would never ever do anything like that.
Right.
Posted by: Don Meaker at November 18, 2004 01:03 PM (yTuVc)
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 18, 2004 01:36 PM (SuJa4)
3
We need to bring Hormel products into the war against terrorism. We need to spread the fact wide and clear that we are inserting a single one-inch square piece of spam into the mouth of every terrorist we kill. We need to inject every terrorist we capture with a few ml of pig blood before we question him. Of course, that would enrage the American left, who don't hold to any religion but who claim to respect all religions (except Christianity.).
Posted by: Bruce at December 08, 2004 04:22 PM (M3tM1)
4
You have a wonderfully wicked mind.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 08, 2004 10:05 PM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Head on Over
To Michael's blog,
The Common Virtue, to wish him a happy first blogversary, and to support his being the very first guy with the guts to advertise on Little Miss Attila. (More will follow, I suspect, but he's blazing the trail.)
His blog is interesting reading in particular because he really does represent the leadership of the future. It's especially illuminating for those of us who have no military background. (And, of course, I am such an ignoramous: all I know about military life I owe to my former Marine husband and to Tom Hanks. If the Attila Hub weren't writing a book about Vietnam, I'd know even less.)
The Common Virtue provides a peephole through which we can see today's military passing on its body of knowledge to the next generation. We infer, from reading Michael's posts, what the Army's priorities are in the here and now. It gives us insight as to what the "brass" is thinking. (One of the things I loved about seeing Band of Brothers for the second/third time is that when you see the guys from the 101st go to take the Germans' machine gun nests on the very day they land, you know you're seeing the actions that became the model for lessons being taught at West Point to this very day: that assault became the way to approach a fixed target.
Naturally, it's just one step beyond to want to know not just the physical rigors Michael and his friends are going through, but to see the reasoning behind the exercises they perform. The war games, especially, fascinate me. (Another Band of Brothers moment: we begin to see that Captain Sobel, though a brilliant—and slightly sadistic—trainer of men is worthless in the field, and it shows up in the war games the guys engage in as "warmups" before they go into battle for real.)
As for Michael, he's not above providing "added value" by running the Carnival of the Recipes. He knows what we like—at 22, at 42, and at every age in between. Forget music: Food is the universal language.
Posted by: Attila at
12:37 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 355 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You're exactly right about
Band of Brothers! It's very interesting to watch that seen where they take out the German nests, because it is very close to what they teach us today. On Saturday we had Field Training, and we did assault fixed positions (called a Deliberate Attack). Watching that seen in
Band of Brothers gives you a good idea as to how we do the attack.
It's also important to note that actually carrying out such deliberate attacks are very hard, even in training. We screwed up in many different ways over the weekend, but we always completed the mission. I can't even imagine how hard it is for the guys fighting the real battles in Iraq right now.
Posted by: Michael at November 16, 2004 02:44 AM (EO7vd)
2
Heh, woops. Scene, not seen. Sorry, it's early.
Posted by: Michael at November 16, 2004 02:45 AM (EO7vd)
3
Good blog,But unlike him I'm a a**hole even My Mother says so but thats no big deal.
The best of luck Michael.
A short fat bald man Aagut Gutterman. "GUTT"
Posted by: Gutterman at November 16, 2004 03:04 AM (Ak62X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 15, 2004
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you
. . . the next
President of the United States.
(What? You don't want Condi to be CiC? Then don't nominate another Northeastern liberal—male or female. Give yourselves a fighting chance.)
It would be interesting to have two women jockeying for the White House. And Condi is simply an astonishing woman: switchblade-smart, and (the straightened hair notwithstanding) amazingly beautiful. She turned 50 the other day, and it just doesn't show.
Posted by: Attila at
06:56 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is the woman who got her bachelor's degree at 19.
What I find funny is that
everybody had this thought at exactly the same time. Every blog of note has a post on it about Condi and the 2008 race.
I think this is just the kind of situation that the term "presumptive nominee" was created for.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at November 15, 2004 09:19 PM (UAuME)
2
Sure she has done a great job at National Security and will probably do a great job as Sec. of State, as for running for president, I would think she would have to run for a Governor's (maybe in California) or Senate (how sweet would Condi taking out Boxer be?) Seat first to show she can win a election race and manage those politics associated with it. The way I see it is (in relation to my politcal experience or lack there of) that is she runs straight for President there will be the stigma that every office she has held she has been appointed to and never really 'earning' through votes her position. Which I see as a weakness that can be exploited.
Then again I could be wrong.
Posted by: the Pirate at November 15, 2004 09:34 PM (1ox/A)
3
I believe having held a governorship is a strength in a Presidential candidate. I'm not so sure that having been a Senator is.
I have heard discussions of her potentially wanting to run for Governor of CA, which would be a nice idea, but would probably put off her White House ambitions for another decade.
Assuming she has them, of course.
In this day and age--and particularly for a woman--60 is not that old.
So it could certainly happen that way. And, despite all the media hand-wringing about Bush leaving office without an "heir apparent," we may get a stronger Pres. candidate without having to cope with a Veep selected for all the twisted reasons people pick Veep candidates.
I could actually see Giuliani making a strong GOP candidate in '08. And I think he'd also be a match for Hillary.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 09:56 PM (SuJa4)
4
I can't think of off-hand how many Senators have gone on to become President, but the only two sitting Senators who did it were JFK and Rutherford B. Hayes (I believe). Like you I do see a inherent strength in a Governor running over a Senator the whole 1 of 100 vs. 1 of 1 theory, plus the nature of the Senate isn't quite as conducive as illustrated by the 'flip-flop' label (personally I prefer double talk to discribe Kerry).
Putting off ambitions for a decade to be a governor somewhere would make her a stronger canditate (provided she was a effective governor and doesn't flop like Davis did). I hope she does run for President at some point, she'd be good at it.
No comment on the age, I'm still waiting for lower insurance rates and car rental fees.
I agree on the Veep thing.
As for Giuliani, he would make a strong Candidate, but if eh did he would just barely win it out in the primaries, probabyl coming down to GOP primary wins in non-GOP states like NY, CA, & NJ.
Posted by: the Pirate at November 15, 2004 10:14 PM (1ox/A)
5
That might be good, though. We need someone who qualifies in some sense as a centrist.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 15, 2004 11:37 PM (SuJa4)
6
More of a centrist, so a moderate like Franco or Pinochet?
Posted by: the Pirate at November 16, 2004 03:15 PM (FvqEB)
7
Condi or Rudy? Rudy or Condi? Condi. She is going to mop the floor with Hillary "Cankles" Clinton. Thought the moonbats and their continued insanity will make it relatively easy, after another 4 years of their attitudes.
Posted by: William Teach at November 16, 2004 04:35 PM (KCG7N)
8
Maybe. The election was awfully close. We need to be careful.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 16, 2004 05:16 PM (SuJa4)
9
Even before this, there was already a site promoting her for President in 2008:
http://www.rice2008.com/
Posted by: Ranten.N.Raven at November 17, 2004 09:22 AM (CgkPo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Smash
has a lovely story about
an anti-war protest in San Diego, inspired by our Fallujah offensive.
Initially, he, da Goddess, and others were counter-protesting as usual with the other Protest Warriors.
Then a few Marines from Camp Pendleton wandered by. Seeing the point-counterpoint on the sidewalks of San Diego, they called their friends. Soon they had a righteous counter-demonstration of their own going on.
Go read the whole thing; Smash has pictures!
Posted by: Attila at
06:23 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
any time you find yourself down in San Diego, you're welcome to join us!
Posted by: Da Goddess at November 16, 2004 11:49 PM (59LyI)
2
Is it every weekend, or should I just monitor the BFL e-mails? I'd really like to do that sometime, though the next six weeks are starting to look ugly.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 17, 2004 01:04 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Protocols Cookbook
is being excerpted at
Beautiful Atrocities, which certainly lives up to its name this week.
Trust me: this one is sick.
Posted by: Attila at
05:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
If You Haven't Read This
. . . you should. It's
Iowahawk's take on how the Blue Staters are coping with the "Dollywood" values that ooze into their lives.
"It was one day last spring," says Ellen McCormack. "My life partner Carol and I were in the garage, working on a giant Donald Rumsfeld papier mache head for the Bay Area March Against the War, when Rain walked by. I thought he looked kind of strange, so I stopped him and looked closely into his eyes. Then I realized the truth -- he was wearing a mullet. I was shocked, but he swore to me that it was only ironic."
"After a few months, it was clear Rain had lied to us -- that hideous Kentucky waterfall was completely earnest," she adds, choking back sobs.
Her 18-year old son would soon exhibit other signs of disturbing changes.
"I was driving past a McDonalds one day last summer, and I thought I saw Rain's bike outside. He had told me earlier that he was going to a friend's house to stuff envelopes for the Dennis Kucinich campaign. I pulled a U-turn and headed back," she recalls. "When I confronted him in the parking lot, he started giving me a lame story about how he was only there to protest globalization, but I could smell the french fries on his breath."
McCormack says that Rain's erratic behavior would also come to include excessive politeness and deference.
"Everytime I tried to talk to him it was 'yes Momma,' and 'no Momma,' when he knows damn well my name is Ellen," she says, anger rising in her voice. "It was like I didn't even know him anymore."
Via Mikal, the selective, eclectic bookseller. And several other fine blogs.
Posted by: Attila at
12:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
November 14, 2004
Jeff/BA . . .
does it again, with some
Good News from America (cf. Good News from Iraq):
• Grace Leung, 73, woke with a clear conscience, knowing that she'd survived 52 years of open warfare without killing her husband. She looked forward to another day of battle.
• Tamara Huerta, 22, a waitress pulling a double shift, suddenly realized she could do just about anything with her life. Dazed, she sat down.
So go read 'em all—in context.
Posted by: Attila at
11:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
87kb generated in CPU 0.0316, elapsed 0.1493 seconds.
218 queries taking 0.1317 seconds, 547 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.