June 01, 2004
The WWII Memorial
I really want to see it in person, but that will have to wait until my finances perk up. It sure is beautiful. This is a restoration of the old rainbow pool, right? (Someone spot me on that.)

Photo by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Jane Campbell.
Via Photon Courier.
Posted by: Attila at
06:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
The Land(s) of Milk and Honey
Radly Balko had a piece in
Time magazine that apparently advocated the proposterous notion that there is a behavioral component in obesity, and that this behavior (let's call it "overeating") is generally voluntary--therefore, the responsibility of the person who indulges in same.
He got savaged by the nanny-staters, who know better. Their arguments boiled down to "we're wrong, and you're right." What are you going to do with a thing like that?
Via James, whose opinions on this seem to be as strong as my own.
Posted by: Attila at
01:55 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Balko is, unfortunately, mistaken, and not supported by the scientific research. And it really, honestly, has little or nothing to do with nanny-statism, although certianly the nanny-staters might do bad things with the knowledge.
Moderate overweight is a diet and discipline problem. Obesity, unfortunately, cannot be corrected anywhere near so easily in the vast majority of people suffering from it.
People don't want to believe this. That's a shame.
Posted by: Dean Esmay at June 01, 2004 05:30 AM (BFtUI)
2
What you're saying directly contradicts my experience. I have two family members who are obese, and I see them overeat every time I'm with them. I also saw my mother go from obese to only-a-little-round one year back in the 80s, but she started overeating again, and she's obese again. Personally, I think it's a way of keeping men away, but that's my own theory.
I understand that the current treatment is stomach-stapling, which may be a good first step for many.
There is behavior attached to this. And it's killing two people I love. And there's nothing I can do about it but watch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 01, 2004 11:36 AM (LcVoH)
3
It is certainly the case that overeating can cause obesity. Now mind you, there is substantial evidence that many people can overeat and never become obese, and that many obese people actually eat less than some non-obese people. But certainly, eating is one component. But even then, there's a problem in the presumption that it's a two-way ticket: eat too much, become obese, so eat less, and you become non-obese? This is like saying, "smoking gave me cancer, so if I just stop smoking my cancer will go away." It's not that simple.
Chronically obese people tend to be experts at losing weight and typically have lost a great deal of it. The problem is that barely 1% of them manage to keep it off for good. Weird things happen to their metabolisms, their appetites, and everything else, in a spiraling, vicious cycle.
The problem I have with Balko's argument is that it's very binary--either the nanny staters are right or they're wrong. BUt I believe the truth is somewhere between; yes, there's a behavior component to obesity, and yes, it would be bad if government started deeply meddling in controlling food content, portion sizes, etc. I agree with all of that.
But... oh never mind. We'll be here all day. BUt I'll just repeat: research on the chronically obese shows that most of them don't eat a lot more than non-obese people, some of them eat less, and barely 1% of them can attain and achieve normalweight status through diet and exercise alone, and the more their weight cycles up and down, the worse off they are.
I begin to suspect that within the next 20 years this will all be moot; the new drug therapies and other options are showing more promise all the time.
Posted by: Dean Esmay at June 03, 2004 08:02 PM (LOj+R)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
In Gratitude to the Dead--and the Living
Kelley
sums up what we're all thinking.
My husband and I took advantage of our one-week break in The Sopranos to start watching The American Revolution on Sunday nights (this is the A&E production on same, and it's a good one). The idea is to start it around now, be in the thick of it around Flag Day in mid-June, and finish up by July 4th--at the rate of one episode a week--so we can know what we're celebrating on Independence Day. Every year, especially once we have kids. As a matter of fact, depending on when the final Sopranos season finishes up, we might be able to get Band of Brothers in for the few weeks before Memorial Day. I truly love that show, and I'd love to see it every year as well.
* * *
(And I'd say the appeal of Band of Brothers is 98% being absorbed in the events, and in awe of the men who made these sacrifices--and only 2% finding the two male leads amazing . . . actors. Really good actors, Damian Lewis [as Major Richard D. Winters] and Ron Livingston [as Captain Lewis Nixon]. I mean, what if I had to act in a scene with the two of them, and there was this contrast of Lewis's fairness vs. the Livingston's dark, dark hair? I wonder if they have any bisexual tendancies . . . ?
Sorry. And me married and everything! Long walks and cold showers. And cornering one's spouse.
Remember when they told you female sexuality would peak at 30-35? It isn't so much a peak as a plateau. You've been warned. Long walks, cold showers. And have a husband who is persuadable at a moment's notice.
Enough red-blooded American female talk. But you know our soldiers died so it could be okay for women to be human, and treated as such. Especially in our current war, the one against Islamo-fascists. They don't like red-blooded American girls. Not at all.
As has been pointed out by far cleverer bloggers than I, the fact that we have choices, and flexibility, and openness--all the stuff of freedom, whether it's picking out music or being able to dish about how sexy certain actors are--is a debt we owe our young men--and some women--in uniform. No matter how mundane the choice--or even ignoble the thought--we have it [or can articulate it] because of these people.)
So we're back full-circle: freedom isn't free, and there are many who paid dearly so we could live normal lives in safety across the water.
Posted by: Attila at
12:18 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 429 words, total size 3 kb.
1
...so I'm really good at proofreading, catching typos and missed words/bad grammar and whatnot. How do I actually get a job doing copyediting and/or proofreading?
Posted by: nathan at June 05, 2004 04:08 AM (Mgg99)
2
If you want to actually make a living wage, I'd suggest you look into another line of work. If you want to "break into" an industry, it should be something more exciting, and glamorous than publishing--and it should definitely pay better. How about plumbing?
Okay. Where do you live, Son?
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 06, 2004 11:58 PM (LcVoH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
32kb generated in CPU 0.045, elapsed 0.2262 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1839 seconds, 464 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.