December 21, 2005
One Day I'll Just Scream
I meet a friend at a mutual friend's house. I've never been there before. I'm thrilled by his collection of Buddha statues, because they come from several vastly different Eastern traditions: one is Indian, another is southeast Asian. Yet a third is Chinese. He has a laughing Buddha; I love laughing Buddhas.
We stop there for tea, and I hit it off with my host, he of the many Buddhas. The topic of taxes comes up, and he remarks, "you have to pay taxes, unless you're Halliburton." He winks at me; his meaning is clear.
He's a nice guy, but like everyone else in artistic L.A. he takes it for granted that we all hate the Bush administration and the war and the nasty capitalists and the dirty republicans, and the rich. (Oh, wait: what about the rich in the entertainment industry? Do they get a special dispensation?)
We—creative Republicans—are the Last Minority. In the 1970s one used to be able to get buttons at the Sisterhood Bookstore in Westwood that asked "how dare you presume I'm heterosexual?" Others queried, "how dare you presume I celebrate Christmas?"
If neither my husband nor I ever needed to work again, I'd get us buttons that read "how dare you presume I hate the President?"
It would blow a lot of people's minds to know up front that we don't.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:23 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He also takes it for granted that you nothing about the tax system, & are as big an idiot as he is
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 22, 2005 10:06 AM (i4gdx)
2
And that I'm just as ignorant of how slim Halliburton's profit margin on it Iraq-related operations really are.
(Not to mention the liability it suffered from acquiring a division that had dealt in asbestos decades earlier. That has kept the whole organization financially stagnant for some years.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 22, 2005 10:32 AM (zZMVu)
3
He also takes for granted that you won't pee on his oriental carpet...What's that spot?...I don't know!
Posted by: Darrell at December 22, 2005 10:41 AM (Mfoza)
4
I assure you, academia is just as bad. I never, ever talk about politics at work. My colleagues do all the time, though, agreeing with each other about the evil of Bush and everything he stands for. His supporters are evil, too. Or maybe just stupid. Although they might be evil and stupid.
The notion that colleges value diversity is the biggest crock since the notion that a degree proves you're an educated human being.
Posted by: utron at December 22, 2005 01:03 PM (CgIkY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mark My Words
Steyn:
The Democratic Party have contrived to get themselves into a situation where bad news from Iraq is good for them and good news from Iraq is bad for them. And as there's a lot more good news than bad these days, that puts them, politically, in a tough spot—even with a fawning media that, faced with Kerry and Murtha talking what in any objective sense is drivel, decline to call for the men with white coats but instead nod solemnly and wonder whether Bush is living "in a bubble."
Oh, wait, and this, too:
George Clooney, the matinee idol, made an interesting point the other day. He said that "liberal" had become a dirty word and he'd like to change that. Fair enough. So I hope he won't mind if I make a suggestion. The best way to reclaim "liberal" for the angels is to get on the right side of history -- the side the Iraqi people are on. The word "liberal" has no meaning if those who wear the label refuse to celebrate the birth of a new democracy after 40 years of tyranny. Yet, if you wandered the Internet on Thursday, you came across far too many "liberals" who watched the election, shrugged and went straight back to Valerie Plame, WMD, Bush lied.
Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. That's what this is about: Millions of Kurds, Shia and Sunnis beaming as they emerge from polling stations and hold up their purple fingers after the freest, fairest election ever held in the Arab world. "Liberal" in the American sense is a dirty word because it's come to stand for a shriveled parochial obsolescent irrelevance, of which ''Good Night, and Good Luck,'' Clooney's dreary little retread of the McCarthy years, is merely the latest example. (Clooney says he wants more journalists to "speak truth to power," which is why I'm insulting his movie.)
Isn't he precious? Read the whole thing.
Via good ol' Whathisface.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:02 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Good point on the liberal thing, and Clooney forgets that his own father lost a race for Congress as a liberal Democrat in 2004. I am boycotting most of the Hollywood movies and save my money for politiics. I find that our effort to promote Condoleezza Rice for President to be more for the GOOD in comparision against the blame game of the libs. As we saw ith Kerry, the libs offer no leadership, no solutions, no vision, just complain, whine, and naysaying no matter how well President Bush is doing to protect our nation. Just call him LOONEY CLOONEY.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at December 21, 2005 02:42 PM (ywZa8)
2
I suggest that Leftists stop using the term "liberal" to hide the fact that they're Socialists and Communists(or Marxists, Bolsheviks, or the thousands of various combinations). "Liberal" is an ambiguous term, not suitable for describing anyone's politics. I would contend that most Americans(of both parties) are "Liberals" according to the accepted definitions in the West. Definitions vary by country. In some countires a 'liberal' is someone that allows filming of "honor" rapes.
Posted by: Darrell at December 21, 2005 08:57 PM (33ea2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Latest from Michael Yon!
Today's
dispatch covers the election, and includes some meditation on the last two elections held in Iraq. How is it, Yon wonders, that we've often had so much less courage for and confidence in the Iraqis than they've had in themselves?
Read it all: "Third Time's the Charm."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:06 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
Privacy Is as Privacy Does.
Via
Malkin:
Democrat Rep. Jim McDermott of Seattle, who leaked the contents of an illegally recorded cell phone conversation between former House speaker Newt Gingrich and Rep. John A. Boehner, is complaining about the NSA's warrantless surveillance progam.
Her commentary is brief: "chutzpah." Yup. Here's the audio.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
"Wouldn't It Be Nice."
I wish I could imagine that Saddam had been
beaten by his captors. As it is, I'm left hoping that some enterprising MP accidentally swung a rifle butt in the wrong direction when no one was looking. Ah, well.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hit 'em again, harder, harder.
Posted by: Chuck at December 21, 2005 05:54 PM (R/J3m)
2
One thing you can be sure of is that Saddam will always get much better treatment than his victims ever got.
Posted by: olddawg at December 22, 2005 06:52 AM (7nc0l)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oh, For Crying Out Loud
Could we get
ANWR drilling passed if we simply prohibited northeasterners who've never even been to Alaska from voting on any bill that includes such drilling?
This can be done in such a way that the ecosystem is protected. Alaska needs it, and the country needs it. Drill.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
December 20, 2005
Well, That's One Book
. . . I won't read unless I feel a burning desire—and can get it on inter-library loan. Like Michael Moore,
he won't see a dime of my money.
UPDATE: Against my better judgment, I've fixed the link.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:38 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I won't either, because I don't know what it is
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 20, 2005 08:30 AM (nmwUl)
2
The antiwar groups failed to drag down President Bush in 2004. They seem to forget that a guy in Minnesota was trying to take flight lessons without landing. No one could figure out why until after Sept. 11, but at the time, access to his home and to his computer had been blocked by those same laws the Dems are bickering about now. So let's remember these naysayers and how they blocked the FBI and police from finding information which could have saved our nation from horrific attacks and slaughter of US citizens.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at December 20, 2005 09:10 AM (M7kiy)
3
WHAT BOOK ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?? I DON'T SEE A LINK! IS IT JUST MY HANGOVER OR WHAT?
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 20, 2005 11:35 AM (nmwUl)
4
Things have sure changed between then and now.
Then, our forefather’s signed the Declaration of Independence at great personal risk and sacrifice. They signed their names below this last line of the Declaration: “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
Now, politicians put party and personal gain ahead of our country, forfeiting their sacred honor. Congress routinely votes for large pay increases for itself while refusing to address the important fiscal issues facing our country. Campaign financing, personal fortune, book deals, gaining power and personal destruction are the priorities of Washington. God knows they would never make any reference to “divine Providence.”
Then, we faced the adversity war as one nation, undivided. We didn’t forget Pearl Harbor. We supported our President and the troops. We maintained an optimism that we would prevail, no matter what it took, or how long it took. Roosevelt’s only “exit plan” for World War II was total victory over Germany and Japan.
Nobody expected our plans, strategies and timetables to be splashed in the newspapers to sooth the masses, or enlighten our enemies. Newspapers were bastions of integrity. Newspaper comics were….well, “comical.”
Every victory was celebrated. Everyone contributed. Everyone sacrificed, either at home, or at the front. Our soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen were sincerely appreciated, admired and welcomed home with ticker tape parades. We valued and mourned every person who gave that last full measure, but we accepted that price because we knew we had no choice.
Now, four years after September 11, 2001, many have forgotten. The leaders of the Democratic Party, such as Howard Dean and Senator Joe Biden, ascribe either diabolical, evil intentions or utter stupidity to our President. There is a tired expectation that our newspapers will have a liberal slant. The “comics” pages serve in part, as extensions of the editorial page, with cartoons that are mean-spirited, misleading and simplistic. Newspaper readership is in decline, along with the quality and fairness of the newspapers. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial page will never say; “The President got this one right!” The same Democrats and newspaper editors who spoke of the eminent dangers presented by Saddam Hussein during Clinton’s terms, pretend their warnings never happened and scream to the entire world that “George Bush Lied!” about the presence of weapons of mass destruction. They demand a detailed timetable and “exit plan” which would serve only the interest of the disloyal opposition and our enemies. Every successful event, such as the peaceful election in Iraq is minimized with “Yeah, but…” from the Democrats. No success is big enough. No setback can be exploited enough.
We hear the constant drumbeat of mounting deaths, now over 2,000, comparing the war in Iraq to Vietnam and the 58,000 who lost their lives there. Senator Kerry continues his thirty-five year campaign of smearing our troops with the libelous charge that they are terrorizing women and children in their homes. The head of the DNC states that we will not win the war in Iraq.
Then, Hollywood was on our side. They served in uniform, made films and songs that boosted morale. They traveled the world, entertaining our troops.
Now, Bill Maher, George Carlin, Johnny Depp and others never pass on an opportunity to ridicule and castigate their President and their country. It is not that they do not have their causes. Many, such as Snoop Dogg and Bianca Jagger have donated their time and energy in support of Stanley “Tookie” Williams, the convicted murderer of four, who started the “Crips” gang.
Then, Germany was tricked into thinking that the allies were going to invade in the Pas-de-Calaise, when General George Patton was put in charge of the “1st US Army Group” which did not exist. This ruse contributed to our ultimate victory at Normandy. America and our allies knew that “Loose Lips Sink Ships.” Germany never knew that their “Enigma” code had been broken by the British. Our intelligence gathering helped win the war. The press even refrained from publishing photos of Roosevelt in his wheelchair. We knew that our intelligence efforts were vital to our success. The media knew that it had a responsibility to contribute to that success.
Now, media reports blast the Pentagon for promoting true stories that are favorable to America. At the same time, they ignore, excuse or deny their own published stories of false and forged documents, damaging to the President. The media and the Democratic leadership wring their hands, bemoaning the intelligence gathered by listening to phone conversations between potential terrorists in America and certain foreign countries. A smiling Minority Leader; Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) stood over George Bush as he signed the Patriot Act into law, on October 26, 2001. He attended a Democratic rally late last week where he proudly proclaimed; “We killed the Patriot Act!” At the same time, he and other Democrats complain that the administration isn’t doing enough to protect us.
Our media and the leaders of the Democratic Party give aid and comfort to the enemy. They play into the hands of our enemies, who learned much from Ho Chi Minh and General Giap. They know that they cannot defeat us militarily. They can only undermine our will. Dean, Kerry and other Democrats detract from the image of America in the world and confuse our allies and our enemies. They are heard on Aljazeera and other media in the Arab world. They detract from our war on terror efforts and our ability to make America safer. The philosophy and strategy of the leftist Democratic Party seems so disconnected from mainstream America that it almost seems to lack any intelligent design. Unless the Democrats move away from the far left noise of Biden, Kerry, Kennedy and others and move towards the center, with Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller, they will continue to harm America and lose elections. Unless newspapers change, they will continue to lose readers to the internet and cable news. Then again, maybe we would have “then” again.
To All of My Liberal, Democrat Friends, Merry Chri... Uh, Enjoy this time of year!
Terry M. Sater
807 Emerald Oaks Court
Eureka, Missouri, 63025
(314) 422-4520
Posted by: Terry Sater at December 20, 2005 06:10 PM (IKoDW)
5
okay, this post is phreaking me out
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 20, 2005 06:44 PM (nmwUl)
6
I give! What are we talking about?
Posted by: Chuck at December 20, 2005 07:06 PM (R/J3m)
7
beautifulatrocities and Chuck,
Follow the link:
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9nyt.htm
That's what it's all about.
Posted by: raz0r at December 20, 2005 07:21 PM (pXvxA)
8
It was more fun when we didn't know: The possibilities were endless! I was going to post about irritable bowel syndrome...
Posted by: Darrell at December 20, 2005 09:11 PM (4IUEI)
9
Was the link there & just not highlighted, or are u ledging us? For me, it won't take very much.
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 20, 2005 09:18 PM (nmwUl)
10
I'm known far and wide for my sloppy html work and broken links.
Scatterbrained people shouldn't have blogs. It's a well-known fact.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 21, 2005 02:19 AM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Sky Is Falling! And Our Civil Liberties Along With It!
Matt of
Froggy Ruminations:
The idea that the US should put its fingers in its own ears and repeat, “I can’t hear you, I can’t hear you!” when terrorists communicate with their agents in the US is one of the most ridiculous and silly ideas that I have ever heard.
Via Goldstein, who quotes a few intel experts at length here. A must-read.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Umm...we're not talking about not listening to terrorists. We're talking about having some reasonable checks and balances in place to make sure executive power is not abused.
At an event aimed at talking up the Patriot Act in April 2004, Bush addressed the question of wiretaps. "Now, by the way," he said, "any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think 'Patriot Act,' constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution."
That certainly seems to be different from what Bush is saying now -- that over the past three years, he has authorized and repeatedly reauthorized the "interception" of communications without warrants.
Due process, respect for the law i.e. congress the legislative body that represents the people-- these are real American values
Posted by: timmy at December 20, 2005 04:13 PM (VMBz6)
2
Yeah, except that I suspect that when he said that he was talking about regular people, as opposed to terrorists.
I mean, if I hear that this is happening to political enemies of Bush's, it'll be a whole different kettle of fish. But my understanding is that it's limited to harvesting information that comes from active members of AQ and similar groups calling people here in the states.
And, yeah: I do think that groups that might be planning to fly planes into buildings, bomb embassies, explode subways, etc. call for more scrutiny than ordinary Americans.
And it sounds to me like oversight is occurring: that key legislators are being informed of what's going on.
For crying out loud--Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War. FDR interred people during WWII. The rules are different during wartime.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 20, 2005 07:31 PM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 19, 2005
The Hubris/Liberace Connection
Why didn't I ever notice the
resemblence before?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
That Wascally Awdolino
Beautiful Atrocities has a fun little
interview with fun little
INDC Bill:
BA: What woman do you consider a guilty pleasure?
INDC: I used to feel guilty about Hermione Granger, but John Derbyshire disabused me of such silly artificial shame constructs.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Funny, I keep hoping they'll kill her off..
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 19, 2005 06:30 PM (gdWEQ)
2
I like Hermione quite a lot, in a
completely non-creepy way.
For Rupert Grint, OTOH, death would come as a sweet mercy. Puberty has been terribly cruel to that lad....
Posted by: utron at December 20, 2005 09:35 AM (CgIkY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A New Map!
The latest cartography from
The Commissar. Unfortunately, my little corner of Wingnery isn't shown, but I hope that will be fixed in the revision.
This effort is unique in that it displays the layout of Kostria (including Laurenthia and Jeralyn), as well as showing the relationship of Centro-Rinonia to Wingnery.
Check it out.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:09 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Video Montage on the Iraqi Elections
It's available at
Michael Yon's place; meanwhile, he's working on a dispatch about the elections. Stay tuned.
He's also still offering copies of his book, Danger Close, which would make a nice holiday gift for your favorite warmonger.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
How Do We Measure the Wealth of Nations?
Here's
one way. The World Bank's approach underscores something that has been on my mind for years: the fact that producing wealth often hinges less on "natural resources" than it does on what Thomas Sowell calls "cultural capital." The obvious example is Israel, whose natural resources are nearly identical to those of the surrounding Middle Eastern states (or inferior to them, if one takes into account the oil reserves in the area). Yet the Israelis have built a strong economy out of little more than education, salt water, and . . . sand.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:12 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Excellent piece, thanks. A pox on Jared Diamond!
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 19, 2005 07:56 AM (gdWEQ)
2
Egads--did you manage to get through that tome? It was so poorly written, and just went on forever and ever . . . I loaned it to someone to get rid of it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 19, 2005 08:51 AM (zZMVu)
3
Another interesting example is Japan, which has little in the way of natural resources.
I do think that American natural resources are likely to become more important again in the future, as demand from developing nations accelerates. I'm thinking specifically agriculture and coal. Of course, intangible resources are important here too; there's a lot of knowledge (and cultural attributes) that go with being a successful farmer or coal miner.
Posted by: David Foster at December 19, 2005 09:30 AM (7TmYw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Eugene Weixel's Slices of Life
I'm becoming addicted to the autobiographical vignettes over at
Fat Old Jewish Guy Who Lives in the Projects. I know Eugene's politics are at odds with my own; they were shaped by who he is. He's a night owl like me, and he tells amazing, gritty stories about life in New York City. They deal with his past (driving a cab, not quite being sent to Vietnam) and his present-day life (dealing with the bureaucracy he works for).
I happened to discover him because he chose my blog to advertise on. You can discover him by clicking on his ad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:32 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I found some of Fat Old guy's posts interesting, but his ideas about Israel are totally delusional.
Posted by: Miriam at December 19, 2005 11:24 PM (Re1zW)
2
Dear Attila Girl:
Thank you very much for your kind words. I was wondering why my percent of clicks to views was so great on your site, now I know!
How risque can you get with ads? I have a plan for a blog about the only Republican who lives on Sedgwick Avenue ( A street in the Bronx). Anyhow this guy owns this big old house and he rents rooms to college girls........
(I lived five years in a rooming house on Sedgwick)
Posted by: Eugene Weixel at December 21, 2005 07:22 AM (Qhao5)
3
I'm not too worried, though you are right next to a family-content ad. I'll send you a note if you cross the line.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 21, 2005 09:49 AM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 18, 2005
Goodbye, Steven Malcolm Anderson.
Steven Malcolm Anderson
died a few days after Thanksgiving, and I've been too preoccupied by the flu and Attila the Hub's marathon last weekend—not to mention our trip to Hawaii—to catch up at
Dean's World and find that out.
I just feel like the rug has been pulled out from under me. Steven was my favorite commenter at Dean's World, and his perspective was badly needed.
Up with beauty. Up with color. Up with guns and gays. Thank you, Steven, for all your wisdom. Thank you for your style.
I'll say a prayer for you today. You restored my confidence in so many things that were so dear to my heart.
The online world will never forget SMA; he is an institution, and he will endure.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wonderful, moving, remarks. Steven is very touched, wherever he is. Things just aren't the same without him.
Posted by: Eric Scheie at December 18, 2005 07:16 PM (SPuPS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Treason
Dean suggests
public execution for those who leaked the surveillance story to the
New York Times.
At any rate, those responsible must be tried. We need to send a message that exposing operations of this nature is not okay.
And, no: when it comes to plotting the murder of innocents, I don't see any reason to put off the gathering of intelligence.
UPDATE: More discussion here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:12 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
December 17, 2005
December 16, 2005
I Keep Getting Up
and thinking, "that's it. I'll need to rest a lot, but I'm able to at least function now." Flu effectively over.
That conviction is generally followed within minutes by: "holy shit; I'm exhausted. I'd better get back to bed."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:51 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Goodbye, John Spencer.
We'll
miss you.
One wonders what The West Wing's producers are going to do about Spencer's death. A delicate matter, that, and dependent upon who the next president was going to be in the parallel universe the show occupies: if Alan Alda's character were going to win the election, they might not need to replace Spencer's character at all. If Jimmy Smit is destined to get the job, there are a lot of scriptwriters who are very busy right now.
I'm also starting to worry about whether middle-aged and elderly actors are going to be affected by the deaths of their brethren who die in the middle of acting commitments. After John Spencer, Jerry Orbach, and Richard Harris, I'm a bit concerned that casting agents are going to hire fewer seasoned actors and rely instead on makeup to make younger actors appear older. I certainly hope not.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:59 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am surprized that you don't know who the winner will be in the alternate universe. When was the last time you even saw Alan Alda on the West Wing. All of Santos election people are heavily liberal in real life as is Alan Alda. If NBC let Alda win they would have to make sure that he was impeached mid-season and replaced by Santos (would just have to ignore that constiution thingy).
You must be just trying to be your polite sweet self and not being too judgemental.
As to Spencer dying, I don't even think they are done filming this season. This could cause a few writers a few sleepless nights trying to rewrite this years ending.
It is sad to see a good actor die but I doubt it will affect hiring in Hollywood. They still go for the bottom line no matter how liberal. I bet they would hire Robert Redford to replace him today if they could afford him.
Posted by: Jack at December 16, 2005 08:38 PM (vE0kD)
2
John Spenser was one of the best actors in West Wing. I thought he would be written out of the show when he had the heart attack at Camp David last year. Anyway, since I am part of promoting Condoleezza Rice for the White House in 2008, I think a woman should replace John on the ticket. Listen folks, it is just a TV show. But like Commander in Chief, it can make a huge BUZZ in the real political world if they cast a woman to replace John in the show and on the Santos ticket. Since he might be the winner anyway, why not do it with A BANG!!!
Just send a note to NBC if you think this is a good idea. I am sending the note today. Please join me.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at December 17, 2005 09:18 AM (F69Ii)
3
Aww, that's a shame. I confess I never watched The West Wing but I did enjoy his other work.
Posted by: Janette at December 18, 2005 02:57 PM (OcgcA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
72kb generated in CPU 0.4484, elapsed 0.595 seconds.
220 queries taking 0.5695 seconds, 528 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
