May 22, 2005
I Saw George Lucas Plain
. . . outside a dinner honoring Steven Spielberg. That was the first time I realized how truly hellish fame would be. The paparazzi were yelling his name, and the names of anyone else they recognized who walked through the doors. The constant yelling of names had become a very loud whirring of helicopter blades. There was something intensely ugly about it, and Lucas is about my height—that is to say, very short for a man. He almost looked scared, though I'm sure he had become acclimated to these events.
Mira Sorvino was near me on my other side. Her star was just starting to rise, and she was almost in tears from the crush of photographers, and the constant yelling of her name.
Holy fucking shit, I thought. How many people in this country think they want to live this way? No privacy. No boundaries. People in your face day and night. You'd live in a fishbowl. Hell.
Lucas was at a party once in the 90s where a friend of mine had wandered by. She had just started doing some writing for Spielberg, and she got introduced to Lucas, who really seemed to embody the classic engineer sensibility: he wanted to talk to her endlessly. I'm not so sure he was interested in her, exactly. It's just that his lack of social skills made him want to play it safe. Why look for another conversation when you already have one?
She found herself using the word "boyfriend" as much as she could, and plotting about how to exit the conversation without hurting his feelings. And she laughed at the irony of it all: most actresses in this town would have killed to have Lucas pinning them down in conversation at a party.
Yes, you are thinking. But they have nice toys.
No number of toys would be worth living on the front lines in the entertainment industry. Not a car. Not a house. Nothing.
Posted by: Attila at
09:24 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 336 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think most, not all, but most of the celebrities including the complainers love it. They feed off of it and they encourage it. They choose the life of a star but then only want the good without the bad?!?!? It's like a teacher complaining about having children around all the time or a doctor bitching about having to see sick people. They want to be famous, be popular and have their faces all over the screen, tv, magazines...but want to paparazzi to photograph them only on their terms. What crap! If they don't like it, they're free to get a real job and have to worry about making the monthly bills with the rest of the world. Oh, but it's not that bad. I'm rubbing my thumb and index finger together playing the violin for them. Paaalease. Every time a celebrity complains about the press, it just reinforces how detached from reality they are.
Posted by: Don at May 23, 2005 11:29 AM (FsGoB)
2
A lot of these people are one bad financial manager and a few rash decisions from having to get jobs, and/or live in dingy little apartments in North Hollywood for the rest of their lives. And the Joneses they have to keep up with are in a different league from most of our neighbors, so those mistakes are pretty easy to make.
The creative life isn't easy, no matter what.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 23, 2005 06:02 PM (8e5bN)
3
My thumb and index finger are squeezing together even harder are they rub back and forth symbolizing an even smaller violin. Their self-imposed lifestyle devoid of reality does not tug at my heartstrings.
Posted by: Don at May 23, 2005 06:50 PM (H3z07)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Glenn Reynolds
. . . continues his
boycott of me. My head is bloody, but unbowed.
It's been suggested that if my site stopped sucking, he'd link to me. Not so!—my site has only sucked for a few weeks. Maybe a month at the outside. And he's been boycotting me for over two years, ever since I started blogging.
I must be a very important blogger to get this kind of negative attention from Glenn. Deep down, he fears my power.
Posted by: Attila at
08:51 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Less linky...more original insight, investigation and analysis. Your posts should make their own mark on the blog world evidencing their glenworthiness. He will then beat a path to your door.
And I should know...I've been linked to by Glenn Reynolds exactly 3,456 times more than you.
[For those bad at math 3,456 x 0 = 0]
Posted by: Don at May 23, 2005 11:34 AM (FsGoB)
2
Little Miss Attila continues her boycott of basil's blog...
Posted by: basil at May 23, 2005 03:12 PM (4Ek1C)
3
Doesn't suck. Never has, never will.
Therefore:
Look for a different reason.
Posted by: k at May 23, 2005 08:24 PM (6krEN)
4
I agree with k. Never sucked, never will.
But, if you really want a link, email him something good now and then. I have gotten a few minor lanches, once when I didn't even want credit.
Posted by: William Teach at May 24, 2005 05:05 PM (HxpPK)
5
Or Jesus Christ or very
paul mitchell painful and just the entertainment
dragonball s_christian-dating_2 industry movies, the golden era making their jobs, decisions: affect
s_rv_8 not necessarily have the desire would like Gandalf, the mass media American ways, was reborn with Dorothy Lamour in Los Angeles times we honor every single now is over animals especially, in High on children to be in this time and they'll tell build up careers for themselves something it actually it, for example, A crumbling business model, is somewhere where The fastest growing areas choices for the act. Rachel and cursed out she
matchmaking stands out to figure.
Posted by: serena at June 03, 2005 11:38 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cathy Young
. . . discusses the murders of women and gay men, which of course are acceptable under
certain conditions.
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila at
12:45 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Of course murder of anyone, gay or straight is unacceptable. I just wish crimes committed against homosexuals and by homosexuals got equal media attention.
Rest in peace Jesse Dirkhising.
Posted by: Don at May 23, 2005 11:39 AM (FsGoB)
2
A change of technique. Julian has fundamentally each wheel
car donations travel, and ourselves!
Posted by: remote at June 03, 2005 11:39 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 21, 2005
Bill Whittle's Latest
. . . is out. I haven't read it yet, since I want to allow enough time to sink my teeth into it and not rush. After all, his essays are the Russian novels of the blogosphere.
But Sissy Willis has the link, a summary, and a few choice excerpts. A little taste.
Posted by: Attila at
07:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for the link.
Technical note: Your logo (upper right) only half loads (lower half of figure). I'm using IE . . .
Posted by: Sissy Willis at May 21, 2005 08:45 AM (7WFgX)
2
EGAD. Upper left, I mean.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at May 21, 2005 08:46 AM (7WFgX)
Posted by: serena at June 03, 2005 11:40 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Links in my comments.
See if you can leave them now. If not, I'm going to have to call in the heavy artillery (people who know what they're doing with web pages).
Posted by: Attila at
12:34 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Try this:
Sissy Willis
Just worked for me.
OT: How do you stress your name?
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at May 21, 2005 01:20 AM (ULpv0)
2
Just like Attila the Hun: aTILLa girl
Or: LITTle miss aTILLa
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 21, 2005 08:14 AM (8e5bN)
Posted by: abba at June 03, 2005 11:41 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 20, 2005
Kofi
. . . contemplates his
roots.
Posted by: Attila at
11:50 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Attack ideas, not people? You're better than that last one AG.
Posted by: douglas brown at May 21, 2005 04:37 PM (I9q2R)
2
When someone takes millions of dollars meant to feed hungry children and uses it to line his own pockets instead, I tend to feel that the gloves are off.
And when someone else encourages young people to kill themselves--taking innocents along with them--he has, likewise, placed himself beyond the realm of civilized discourse.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 21, 2005 08:27 PM (8e5bN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 19, 2005
Reynolds and Sullivan
. . . are having a bit of a
spat. A very polite one, so far.
Posted by: Attila at
12:23 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Don at May 19, 2005 08:49 AM (FsGoB)
2
Sully loves attn from Reynolds, of any kind
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at May 19, 2005 08:35 PM (n2eLt)
3
Link fixed.
If only Sully were as generous with his links as Glenn is.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 19, 2005 10:35 PM (8e5bN)
4
In what alternate universe is that link fixed? (Not fixed on IE running on XP at home or at work.)
Posted by: Don at May 20, 2005 09:13 PM (H3z07)
5
Yipes! MULTIPLE typos in the html. Very sloppy of me. It should work now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 20, 2005 09:53 PM (8e5bN)
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at May 21, 2005 03:28 PM (X/sXG)
Posted by: Don at May 21, 2005 04:51 PM (H3z07)
8
No, but I was half-asleep when I wrote the post. How embarrassing. At least I'm not obsessing about Star Wars.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 21, 2005 08:30 PM (8e5bN)
9
I wrote to Sullivan several months ago giving him detailed reasons why wrapping an Israeli flag around someone was only torture if that someone was a raging anti-Semite. I also gave him examples of why his position that al Qaeda operatives were untitled to Geneva Convention protection was wrong. His response? He replied "You sicken me." I have retained those e-mails for future reference.
Sullivan is a lightweight. He has very sketchy historical knowledge, particularly about military and American history. He has no comprehension of how our federal system and sharing of powers is supposed to work. He continues to make bunches of unsupported assertions on a variety of topics. When challanged, he usually replies, not with reasoned argument, but with personal insults. "Homophobe" is one of his most often used ones.
In addition to that, I'm still curious, as are many others, as to exactly what became of the 200 grand he raised to keep his blog site going, after which he promptly closed most of its functions down and went to Europe. Hmmmm.
Posted by: tim at May 22, 2005 05:43 PM (bnwP5)
10
Sully has become largely a caricature of himself. It's actually rather sad in some ways.
I'm not upset about the money--though plenty of us are laboring away in the vineyards for free--but it's another nice little stick to poke him with. (And I do not know what his medical costs are, but imagine they are a good deal higher than mine.)
I'd rather read Christopher Hitchens all day long: there's a truly independent thinker. He still has a certain romance about Marxism, but he's clear-eyed about the present conflict.
But Michael Kelly was the best. R.I.P.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 22, 2005 08:22 PM (8e5bN)
11
Sullivan's latest is to excoriate anyone who dares to criticize the honesty and veracity of the International Red Cross. The IRC is a corrupt, Leftist and Islamofascist dominated organization. The IRC did squat to help the Jews in WWII. The IRC won't let the Israelis have a Star Of David on their Red Cross flag, but it's OK for the Muslim countries to have a Red Crescent. The IRC falls hook, line, and sinker (as does Sullivan) for the claims of "brutality" made by Islamofascist terrorists which can be found verbatim in al Qaeda's manual which is available online at the Department of Justice website (Sullivan is apparently too lazy to look it up or is not interested).
Sullivan's real damage comes from the fact that the Left trots him out as a "Conservative" spokesman when he's nothing of the sort. He's an upscale version of David Brock.
Posted by: tim at May 23, 2005 05:08 AM (1eVfs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 18, 2005
Someone Was Up Late Last Night
Jeff of BA (Beautiful Atrocities, and the Bay Area) has some
suggestions for those of us who just
haven't been able to figure out the question of our day—that is, how to flush the Quran down a toilet:
• Flush Cliff's Notes on Quran instead. (This is cheating)
• Place Quran in toilet bowl. Add 1 quart of lye. Let stew for several days. Try to avoid using toilet during this period, or you will have disgusting mess on your hands. (If smell unbearable, add a little Old Spice or Brut.)
• Eat entire Quran page by page. Defecate. If necessary, use Milk of Magnesia
I always want to give up blogging when I stop by Jeff's place. Now read the whole thing.
Posted by: Attila at
12:27 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Qu'ran toilet paper: "carress your ass with holiness!"
I plan to market this in Mecca. Wish me luck.
Posted by: Ciggy at May 19, 2005 08:19 AM (Sy2Fl)
2
For all your quran/koran/scribbly book flushing needs:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2002/20020301/wd3.jpg
Posted by: Don at May 19, 2005 08:50 AM (FsGoB)
Posted by: ilar at June 03, 2005 11:43 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 17, 2005
When Analogies Mislead
There's a great summary over at
Photon Courier of a study that shows people can make analogies from the flimsiest resemblences. In the test scanario, subjects were inspired to find analogies between a hypothetical threat from one nation to another: and it was shockingly easy to get them to see either the Vietnam war or WWII as parallels.
Quite an insight into our teeny tiny minds.
Posted by: Attila at
10:51 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This may explain the success of Michael Moore crockumentaries.
Posted by: Ciggy at May 18, 2005 07:46 AM (0B3lJ)
2
It certainly explains the m.o. of this Bush Administration...
Oh wait, the m.o. is "a lie told often enough becomes the truth."
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at May 18, 2005 07:52 AM (BZ0tI)
3
Somebody, in comments somewhere, suggested that the results may be somewhat artificial, in that the subjects were students--and have probably learned well to suck up to their professors, using whatever cues are available to indicate the desired answers...
Posted by: David Foster at May 18, 2005 09:50 AM (+N6Ef)
4
It's actually the core of the genius of the human mind that allows us to draw connections between disparate objects/concepts. Our massively parallel minds are finely tuned to seek connections.
Ask a programmer how hard it is to teach a computer to recognize a face. Yet as humans, we do it without thinking. It makes for some interesting dichotomies (like comment #1 and #2 on this post), but without this ability, we'd be little more than food processing machines.
Like everything else is with humans, take away the source of all the problems, and you take away what is most essentially human.
Posted by: a4g at May 18, 2005 03:33 PM (H8Yyz)
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 18, 2005 09:21 PM (x/EKm)
Posted by: remote at June 03, 2005 11:44 AM (Y7dVX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 16, 2005
The Rosetta Stone
to
Huffington's Toast can be found
here.
Apparently, there are only two "franchise" characters. One is spelled out in the cast list above. The other is not, so we're still free to speculate. I'm going to go with Jeff Goldstein as Martha Stewart, for obvious reasons. I'm very sad that I was wrong about Moxie's specific role, but I think life will go on. I'm also going to go out on a limb and suggest that Jeff was Harry Reid today.
So as a general rule, there's no telling which blogger wrote which particular parody on that site, making it a collaborative piece not unlike improv comedy—except, of course, that no one is "locked in" to any particular character (with two exceptions).
Let's remember to drop by these bloggers' main sites as well as going for our daily Toast. I'm also going to predict that this parody will still be going even after Arianna gives up on the Post itself.
Posted by: Attila at
10:23 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It may seem a bit paradoxical to speak of Huffington's blog in this way, given its militant anti-psychologism. But the paradox is lessened when we take note of the fact that this militant anti-psychologism is no less true of much of contemporary blogging itself, particularly of those branches that until a few years ago monopolised the study of use and acquisition of linkage. We live, after all, in the age of "behavioural science," not of "the science of mind." I do not want to read too much into a terminological innovation, but I think that there is some significance in the ease and willingness with which modern thinking about man and society accepts the designation "behavioural science" as regards mocking famous blogs.
Posted by: Pile On® at May 17, 2005 05:54 AM (jPTye)
2
(via the Pinkerton screed)
Newsweek lies, bald-faced, and then cite Orwellianism when called on it.
That, peeps, is Chutzpah!
Posted by: Ciggy at May 17, 2005 01:16 PM (q9YxC)
3
That is a hilarious parody. The pics in particular are priceless
Posted by: jeff at May 18, 2005 12:07 PM (UVSIi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Frank J. on the Newsweaklings
You know, I haven't helped to get someone fired since Mary Mapes, and I've got that itchy feeling again. And I'm not the only one.
Apparently, W. got so mad, he started his own blog:
"So it's rioting in the Middle East and guess who has to deal with it," Condoleezza Rice complained, "Me, that's who. Why couldn't I be Secretary of Defense?"
"Because diplomacy is for women and kill'n is for men," Rumsfeld answered.
"I'll show you killing!" Condi shouted and approached Rumsfeld.
"Let's save our violence for Newsweek," Bush said, "Now hand me my fact-checker."
"The 12-gauge?" Condi asked.
"That'll do."
Laura walked into the room. "Are you going to use violence to solve a problem again?"
"No, dear," Bush answered, stuffing his pockets with shotguns shells.
"You know, when someone in the media writes something that isn't true," Laura told him, "the popular and effective way to combat it is to blog about it."
"Blog!" Rumsfeld yelled, "Sounds like something for homosexuals."
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila at
02:18 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, shiett? The Puppy Blender actually linked to his archnemesis Frank J??
My world is all topsy-turvy...
Seriously, Frank J's "In My World" series is priceless, and is the one good reason to check in to IMAO on a regular basis to see if there are more episodes.
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 16, 2005 10:01 PM (xdX36)
2
I love it that Glenn was on television recently, and mentioned slander in general--puppy-blending in particular.
(And I'm sure most of my readers know that Glenn is considered Frank's "blogfather.")
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2005 10:39 PM (x/EKm)
3
Harrrrrrrrrr harrrrrrrrrrr
Posted by: Ciggy at May 18, 2005 07:45 AM (0B3lJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The WTC Site
remains barren; the bureaucrats who are haggling about how to proceed might want to read
this Wall Street Journal article.
Posted by: Attila at
03:03 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It seems the government's primary role has become that of the vandal, redirecting resources into the black hole of bureaucracy, creating little but waste heat.
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at May 16, 2005 05:19 AM (UmkWi)
2
I'd advise not libelling vandals in such a manner, Mr. Kurtz. Comparing a relatively creative scrawl in krylon paint to what the federal government does to the American economy, is an outlandish exaggeration in scale.
Posted by: Ciggy at May 16, 2005 10:52 AM (Ru8KL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Althouse
. . . writes about the Supremes taking their sweet time adjudicating California's medical marijuana law; it's a nice
summary of the legal issues involved.
Here's my constitutional reasoning: we passed a freakin' law. For the Feds to come in here and arrest cancer patients who are following state law is just outrageous.
Growing dope and then smoking it is not commerce, any more than knitting a scarf and wearing it is. If the weed wasn't purchased, you must acquit.
If SCOTUS upholds the Feds on this, I'm going to scream. And you'll be able to hear me around the world. After that, I'll hold my breath until I turn blue. Then I'll join the tunnel-vision single-issue losers at NORML, out of frustration.
Posted by: Attila at
01:53 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: gail at May 16, 2005 05:21 AM (47cun)
Posted by: k at May 16, 2005 10:01 AM (ywZa8)
3
Can an employer fire an employee if he/she doesn't pass a drug test that envolves Medical Marijuana?
Posted by: JFH at May 16, 2005 12:38 PM (XD9Ug)
4
Interesting theoretical question, but a lot of the people approved to receive marijuana are too sick to work, at least full-time. And their conditions--and treatments--would be known prior to employment.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2005 01:18 PM (x/EKm)
5
When they're done with this case, maybe SCOTUS can look into some Florida cases. Here, we jail patients for taking legal, legally prescribed painkillers.
You think you got it bad? It really can get worse.
Posted by: k at May 16, 2005 04:07 PM (6krEN)
6
Nothing wrong with joining them early either. They may be single-issue, but that issue has wide applicability for the concept of individual liberty.
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 16, 2005 10:10 PM (xdX36)
7
Yes. And I've been a single-issue "loser" forever WRT the NRA and All Things Gunny.
So it's probably time.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2005 10:41 PM (x/EKm)
8
Heh! Look at your google ads. Can they zero in or what?
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 16, 2005 11:28 PM (xdX36)
9
I'm seeing ads for hotels in Weed, CA; gardening supplies; and two ads for "vaporizers," which appear to be the latest alternatives to bongs, I mean water pipes.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 17, 2005 09:32 AM (x/EKm)
10
Right. Growing and using supplies. Nobody grows tomatoes indoors under HID lights.
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 17, 2005 12:37 PM (n/TmV)
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 17, 2005 01:57 PM (x/EKm)
12
Great. Good ol' Florida. After the turnkey hydroponics and Medical Marijuana Pro/Con ads, I see:
Help for Marijuana Addict.
And where? It's a Florida facility.
**sigh**
This used to be such a fun place to live.
Posted by: k at May 18, 2005 06:15 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Don't Mess With Hillary
Mark Steyn, in his essay "Not Over the Hill" (should be at the top of
this page for a while), tells us why we should be concerned about Hillary's impending candidacy.
Why, in short, he thinks she'll probably win.
Posted by: Attila at
12:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And as for that dirt campaign the RNC has planned for her, don't forget she has both the missing FBI files as well as the compromsing NSA documents Sandy Berger stuffed in his pants.
Q: If you or I stuffed NSA documents into our pants & couldn't account for them, what do you think would happen to us?
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at May 16, 2005 03:13 PM (+NMau)
2
I'd be dealing with my claustrophobia issues, big time.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2005 05:11 PM (x/EKm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Newsweek
explains that it's sorry it reported that the Koran was being desecrated at Guantanamo, but it's
not that sorry, even though people died because of it. And—hey!—look over there! Something shiny!
Posted by: Attila at
12:10 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm waiting for Newsweek to explain (Rather-style) that although the actual event of flushing a Koran down a toilet at Gitmo didn't actually occur, someone at Gitmo once *thought* about doing that - and in fact, it may have happened at some other place and time - which makes the story fake but accurate. Sort of.
Posted by: Greg at May 16, 2005 07:22 AM (d8pUH)
2
Newsweek lied.
People died.
That's my protest chant going forward.
Posted by: Ciggy at May 16, 2005 08:30 AM (Ru8KL)
3
Well, that's one of the most fascinating things about this: all those people who pounce on any perceived inaccuracy in a Bush Administration statement are largely silent on this. Why? Because the Koran-flushing story made the military and intel people look bad.
Which must be good. Therefore we'll run with the story. Even though it's patently absurd: since when would it be possible to flush all the pages of nearly any book down a toilet?--much less a big religious tome?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2005 12:10 PM (x/EKm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 15, 2005
Nabil al-Wazer Safe at Home!
Thanks to Jane at Armies of Liberation for
pressuring the Yemenis to do the right thing for a change by enforcing their own laws.
Of course, if they want to be taken seriously, the religious persecution within their country has got to stop.
But let's give credit where credit is due: they recovered al-Wazer, and he is apparently safe from both the kidnappers and the crooked people inside his own government.
I was ready for some good news.
Posted by: Attila at
04:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
On Arianna's Toast
There's a nice little roundup of
Huffington's Toast here. It's not comprehensive, but it'll get you started.
When all is said and done, I think "Toast" may get a lot more attention that the Huffington Post. It's certainly more interesting (unless Arianna wants me to write for her, in which case of course the "Post" is brilliant and puts the "blog" in "blogosphere").
Posted by: Attila at
03:40 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
79kb generated in CPU 0.0527, elapsed 0.1774 seconds.
226 queries taking 0.1555 seconds, 560 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.