June 11, 2005
The Airport Shuttle
. . . gets here in two hours. It's 4:30 in the morning, Los Angeles time. Attila the Hub and I are flying to Chicago for my niece's graduation on Sunday, and we'll be in the Upper Midwest for six days, catching up with family (and, in my case, touching base with one client).
This happened last time we both flew out to Chi-town together, back in 1998. I was up all night and damned bitchy the next morning as my husband dealt with the car-rental people.
I'd like to think I've grown so much in the past several years that I'll get through the next 24 hours without snapping at anyone. But let's just say I'll be putting the old antidepressants to the test soon.
Posting from me will be light to nonexistent; Desert Cat, however, will be checking in over the next week, performing guest-blogging duties and sharing his unique perspective. Be really polite to him; no trolling for the next week.
I'll be 43 in less than a month; I'm getting a bit long in the tooth for all-nighters.
Sweet dreams, boys and girls.
Posted by: Attila at
04:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
June 10, 2005
How to Survive Marriage
David Sedaris, in the midst of a very funny New Yorker story,
discusses how he handles fighting with his boyfriend:
We’ll be arguing, and I’ll stop in mid-sentence and ask if we can just start over. “I’ll go outside and when I come back in we’ll just pretend this never happened, O.K.?”
If the fight is huge, he’ll wait until I’m in the hall, then bolt the door behind me, but if it’s minor he’ll go along, and I’ll reënter the apartment saying, “What are you doing home?” Or “Gee, it smells good in here. What’s cooking?”—an easy question, as he’s always got something on the stove.
For a while, it feels goofy, but eventually the self-consciousness wears off, and we ease into the roles of two decent people, trapped in a rather dull play. “Is there anything I can do to help?”
“You can set the table if you want.”
“All-righty then.”
I donÂ’t know how many times IÂ’ve set the table in the middle of the afternoon, long before we sit down to eat. But the play would be all the duller without action, and I donÂ’t want to do anything really hard, like paint a room. IÂ’m just so grateful that he goes along with it. Other peopleÂ’s lives can be full of screaming and flying plates, but I prefer that my own remains as civil as possible, even if it means faking it every once in a while.
Via Beautiful Atrocities.
Posted by: Attila at
10:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
Sage Words from "Sam Yorty"
The blogger currently known as "Mayor Sam" has some
advice for Los Angeles GOP (and, yes—he's talking to
both of you):
We've recounted several times that the Republican party under control of Linda Boyd here in LA has got to make some radical changes if we ever want to elect any GOP candidates in LA.
Its bad enough that Linda and her husband Doug treat the party as their personal little social club and do stupid shit like endorse James Kenneth Hahn for Mayor, while never supporting actual Republicans like Walter Moore or going a step further and trying to recruit someone who could win like Keith Richman to run.
One of the problems the Republicans have is their constant rebuffing of gay Republicans. Now Mayor Sam is not gay, but to me a Republican is a Republican. The GOP in LA could make HUGE strides in local races if they could begin to include gays in the mix. Many gays are high income indiviuals with views that reflect a world with limited government and a strong defense. But for now many gays toss that aside because stormtrooper Republicans have hang-ups about buggery. Hey, no one is having sex in the voting booth, so get a grip. Even though they want lower taxes and less government, most gays still vote Democratic.
I honestly think that purging the homophobes from the party would open things up quite a bit. (And, no: homophobe doesn't mean someone who thinks that civil unions for gays is a reasonable compromise, or someone who feels gay marriage can wait a few more years until everyone's used to the idea.)
Posted by: Attila at
10:40 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Purge the Party? DA!
No, really? You can't be thinking that. There would go half the party.
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 10, 2005 10:32 PM (xdX36)
2
All right, all right: bad choice of words. Hasty, etc. Ill-thought out. Hyperbolic.
(And I'll bet you were being ironic anyway, but others wouldn't be, so I'll just answer the surface meaning here, since it's bound to be on people's minds.)
I do think a position is possible that respects Christian tradition
and the fundamental right of the individual to be left alone and make his/her own domestic arrangements.
And therefore I think that a lot of people—the hard-core "faggot haters"—could take a hike and I wouldn't cry at all. Not at all.
And I honestly believe those haters are a much tinier slice of the GOP than any of my Democrat friends believe.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 11, 2005 12:45 AM (8e5bN)
3
GOP never would have gone near a "ban gay marriage" amendment if studies hadn't shown that would be the goose that laid the golden eggs in the politics of fly-over country. Homophobia and theocracy aren't front and center in the minds of Republican leadership, but that is indeed the electoral powerhouse of how they get to go into Washington with Majority Leaders rather than Minority Whips.
If they turned away from the tent-meeting bible-thumping types, they might as well just adopt the Libertarian Party platform and edit a few of the platform planks on foreign policy. They'd pick me up as a loyal member.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 11, 2005 07:58 AM (F0SRJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 09, 2005
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You.
I'm now past the 100,000-hit mark. Very small change compared with some others, but satisfying nonetheless. (For instance,
James Joyner took three months rather than two years to reach the same watermark. But I'm a boutique blog, and I'm happy.)
Posted by: Attila at
04:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Congratulations! I like the term botique blog... I think if you're a botique blog, then I am probaly a kiosk blog.
Posted by: jody at June 11, 2005 01:05 PM (6k5Dz)
2
And I am that staple of storytelling: "The Hidden Prince". See,
the Once and Future King
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at June 15, 2005 10:56 PM (wPte4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Women as Property
I had meant to link this post last week: Stacy
discusses the extreme misogyny in much of Islamic culture (while showing off her rather impressive arms).
I would assert that there are strains of Islam that are not any more oppressive to women than, say, Orthodox Judaism (in fact, the restrictions are similar: covering the head and so forth). But certainly our enemies, the Islamo-fascists or Islamists (versus ordinary Muslims), view women as slaves. A woman in my country in the nineteenth century was far better off than most women in many Muslim countries.
I don't happen to be against Islam, but I am dead-set against Islamo-fascism, and I don't care for those who believe slavery is A-OK as long as it's "part of your culture."
Posted by: Attila at
12:58 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When the islamofascists took over Fallujah for a time, they seized all the women and distributed them out to their insurgent fighters as "wives". The women themselves were not consulted for their opinion on whom to be paired (or tripled or quadrupled) with.
In Europe any of the cities there with a high concentration of middle eastern immigrants will try their damnedest to hide and obfuscate the sharp increase of rape statistics that correlate with the influx, for fear of insulting "Islam" with ...the truth.
They've tended to be far more well-behaved in the U.S., partly because a lot of the ones who migrate here are doing so to get AWAY from islamofascist lifestyles, while the ones who go to Europe tend to be the ones carrying out a fattwa commanding "conquest through immigration" of the European continent. (The islamofascist goal for the U.S. is annihilation rather than conquest...)
Posted by: Ciggy at June 09, 2005 09:45 AM (q9YxC)
2
Quote from an Egyptian former co-worker, shortly after 9/11 (when we were talking about terrorists, etc.): "If I could live in a community that was really setup the way Mohammed intended, in all ways, without any of the terrorists being in charge and messing with us like if we went to prayer or not that day, people with power issues like that, I'd do so in a heartbeat. But right now the only way to Shariah is through the terrorist bastards, so, screw the Shariah. I'll live like an American instead." (This just before taking a long swig of alcohol and a big bite of barbecued pork LOL.)
Posted by: Ciggy at June 09, 2005 09:56 AM (q9YxC)
3
I kinda like his style!
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 09, 2005 12:23 PM (8e5bN)
4
He gave me a lot of insights on "what's really up" in the world of Islam: the good, the bad, and the very ugly. Good news is, they're human beings just like us. Bad news is, they're human beings just like us, LOL.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 10, 2005 08:08 AM (Sy2Fl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
So We're at Mi Piace
. . . in Oldtown Pasadena. I'm having waffles, but everyone else—my husband, my father, and my father's wife—has decided it's lunchtime, even though it's only 1:00 p.m. They're eating seafood or something yucky like that.
Dad ordered red wine like he always does no matter what he's eating. And when it came he complained that the glass wasn't full enough. I instantly mutated into a fourteen-year-old and almost died of embarrassment, right then and there. They poured some more wine into his glass.
Somehow the 2008 elections came up, though my husband and I try to avoid talking about politics with . . . almost anyone in L.A. who doesn't belong to the Bear Flag League.
"It's almost certain that Hillary will run," I point out. My father's eyes light up, and he smiles and sort of coos, even though he hasn't had that much wine. "She has such a nice . . . smile," he tells us.
"And she may be running against Condi Rice," I add. Dad's eyes get big once more and he remarks, "oh, she's so . . . nice, too. Though I could never vote for a woman who was once a Goldwater Girl."
If people knew what Goldwater was about they would have been down on their knees begging for him.
I want to remark that the next presidential election is not Dad's own personal swimsuit competition, but, you know—he's 68 years old. And if I had said something he would have almost died of embarrassment, right then and there.
So I remained silent. Thank you, Mr. Prozac.
Posted by: Attila at
12:36 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"She has such a nice . . . smile,"
Indeed.
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
  The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at June 09, 2005 07:40 AM (cGSCP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It Looks Like the Tide May Have Turned
. . . on
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell." 'Bout time.
(Via Beautiful Atrocities.)
Posted by: Attila at
12:20 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Attila Girl,
Thanks for the link to a thoughtful article.
I still can't come to a comfortable conclusion on this as a matter in law, but Rep. Gilchrist speaks to my more reasonable inclinations.
When they fit that prosthesis or lay the flag on the coffin one certainly isn't a "gay" American any longer.
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at June 09, 2005 07:53 AM (cGSCP)
2
Thank you for keeping an open mind.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 09, 2005 12:25 PM (8e5bN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 08, 2005
The WSJ Editorial Pages
. . . didn't support the Golden State's "medical marijuana" laws, but it doesn't approve of the Raich decision, either.
Neither do I, and I'm wondering what part of "enumerated powers" the Supreme Court doesn't understand.
(Insty.)
Posted by: Attila at
11:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
What's Next—Visalia?
The FBI may have just broken up a terrorist cell in
Lodi, California. Yes:
that Lodi. Yipes. Or, rather:
Oh, Lord.
Posted by: Attila at
11:12 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Jane Galt
. . . has an interesting discussion going on in her comments section over
here. I'm only a quarter of the way into it, since it got Instalanched and is very long. But it's fascinating.
Fighting poverty nation by nation is perhaps the hardest job in the world today. A while back I had an interesting debate with Laura, of the ever-excellent Apartment 11D, on whether or not "unregulated capitalism" was good for the third world. My answer is that when we look at the third world, our heart cries out, as it should, but that doesn't mean that those in the third world are victims of anything but nature. The appalling poverty of Sri Lanka or Mozambique is not some bizarre aberration that can be tracked to a cause we can cure. We are the aberration; Sri Lanka and Mozambique are the normal state of human history.
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila at
10:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 154 words, total size 1 kb.
White Trash Wednesdays
Start with Beth, whose blog got
hijacked by a white-trash abortion activist. Then follow the links!
Posted by: Attila at
10:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
June 07, 2005
California Dreamin'
Miller's Time has an
excellent roundup of the Bear Flag League blogs.
For those who don't know, the BFL is a coalition of Golden State bloggers, and it's grown from around 20 members (when I joined) to around 100. We're going to be hosting a political blogging event in July, so stay tuned for that. (Credit for organizing this event—and the League itself, for the most part—must go to Justene of CalBlog. She's a whip-smart lawyer and dedicated mom, as well as being a neighbor of mine in my little town near L.A.)
Posted by: Attila at
09:40 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
War!
Rick at Right Wing Nuthouse has some
misapprehensions about female warriors:
“Who guards the louvetrain? The direct approach to Politburo?
Avtari blanched when he glanced down at the map. “Attila.” he whispered.
Superhawk pondered that bit of news for a moment. The former barbarian queen and her horde of Amazonian warriors were a formidable opponent. But ever since her marriage to the son of King Rusty of Jawa Land the Amazonians had forsworn war and taken up farming. Superhawk also remembered AttilaÂ’s tender caresses, the warmth of her kisses, the softeness of herÂ…
The Barbarian King sighed. It woudnÂ’t have worked. Both of them wanted to lead. Neither could yeild. Their parting was for the best. Perhaps he could buy her off with chocolates? It had worked in the past. Or some shiny trinket? ThatÂ’s it!
“Avtari, send a rider and have him fetch the Jewel of Mathwrate. Instruct him to present it to Queen Attila with my compliments and these words; ‘You are my one. I am yours. When next Siddira opens her arms, I will be with you again.”
“But M’Lord, the moon will be full in less than a fortnight. How can…” Superhawk cut him off.
“Leave that to me. Unless I am mistaken, the Queen will take our bribe and slip quietly away. And without her, the Amazonians will not fight.”
Ah, but long-ago peacetime pleasures are lost in the crush of war, and my husband won't let me accept trinkets these days, unless they're from him. So the Amazonians fight. Which is bad news for the wingnuts, since most of my Amazonians are about twice my own height, and they all carry M16 A-2s.
And the Commissar admits that we might have a problem on our hands.
But remember, Kids: sometimes war is the answer.
Posted by: Attila at
09:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2005 09:50 AM (8e5bN)
2
Sigh. M16A2 is a weapon with a birthdefect. A .22 long rifle on steroids.
Friends don't let friends carry poodle shooters.
Posted by: jim b at June 07, 2005 01:11 PM (jCKCK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2005
Time to Act Like a Grownup
Although I never thought I'd see a situation in which O'Conner would get an issue right, and Scalia would get it wrong. What is that man
smoking?
Scalia is a piggy cow, I tell you: a piggy piggy piggy cow.
Posted by: Attila at
11:51 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, I can't understand at all why they would come down against medical marijuana. It's none of government's business, and this nannyism has gotten out of hand.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 07, 2005 07:19 AM (Ru8KL)
2
In other news...the number of reported glaucoma cases plummets.
Posted by: Don at June 07, 2005 08:07 AM (FsGoB)
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2005 08:11 AM (8e5bN)
4
Justice Thomas' dissent is more-or-less what I expected Scalia to say, and it's a corker:
http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZD1.html
I've argued on occasion before that Scalia is widely misunderstood; his judgements are rooted in his legal philosophy, not his personal politics, and whatever you can say about the merits or demerits of originalism, originalism is
not merely a pseudonym for "conservatism". Calling Scalia a "consrevative" Justice is therefore inaccurate - he's an originalist Judge, which is precisely what we need more of.
But I have to admit to being thoroughly flummoxed by
Raich going this way and turning on Scalia's vote; SCOTUSblog, IIRC, had predicted that this would be a 5-4 extension to
Lopez, written by Rehnquist, and instead, we get a Stevens opinion with a Scalia concurrence that baffles me. So maybe I've misunderstood him too, or maybe this is just out of character for him. Still a very disappointing result, but again, a fabulous dissent from Justice Thomas, who is very much under-appreciated, I think.
Posted by: Simon at June 07, 2005 08:11 AM (o+ba9)
5
The silver lining: perhaps people will stop accusing Thomas of being Scalia's mini-me.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2005 08:19 AM (8e5bN)
6
perhaps people will stop accusing Thomas of being Scalia's mini-me.
When
that happens, I'm going to start looking nervously at the sky for other impending signs of the rapture beginning. I've found the vitriol levelled at Clarence Thomas utterly stupifying, until I read the Thomas Sowell piece you posted last month (in re Janice Rogers Brown), which made an excellent suggestion (echoed, actually, a suggestion previously made by Tammy Bruce in
The Death of Right & Wrong) as to why, viz., that the Democrats can't stand to see successfulll black Republicans, as it undercuts the entire basis of their claim to be "the natural home of minorities".
Even a cursory look at Thomas' opinions shows that he has a distinct set of views of his own, and that he is a very capable Justice, whose primary misfortune has been serving at the same time as - and thus in the shadows of - two of the most consequential jurists to sit on that bench.
Posted by: Simon at June 07, 2005 09:18 AM (o+ba9)
7
Kudos to Simon.
Thomas Sowell has commented long on the fact that if the left cannot
create an underclass dependent on them for their
rights, as defined by the left, not the Constitution, who is going to support them?
As illustrated in a current NY Times series, the encouragement of class warfare, even if it has to be invented, opens the door for the
Vanguard Elite. That worked pretty well c. 1917.
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at June 07, 2005 10:04 AM (unQ25)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
My Husband
. . . is running a lot. So he's dutifully cross-training, and that means he's at the gym several times a week. One time he was chatting with another guy who wanted to know what vitamins he took.
"I'm not sure," he told the guy. "Every day my wife gives me several pills. I just take them, and try to stay on her good side."
I try to reassure him that I probably won't administer any poison that way: "don't worry until you see me wearing gloves when I hand you your vitamins."
Posted by: Attila at
05:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
CNN's Inside the Blogs
A few of us just got featured on CNN's "Inside the Blogs." This particular segment focused on bloggers' reactions to the Supreme Court decision on medical marijuana. Included were
Pennywit, ScotusBlog, and—me.
Yipes. But that was fun; I haven't been on CNN in 12 years. (I appeared in a small segment for them in 1994 as a feminist—and female—supporter of the Second Amendment.)
Posted by: Attila at
01:43 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: David Foster at June 06, 2005 03:58 PM (7TmYw)
2
I would really like for you to look at my site and tell me what you think. Just click on my name.
Posted by: American at June 07, 2005 08:11 AM (xb27s)
3
You lost me with 1) your implication that the 60-senator supermajority in the Senate is written into the U.S. Constitution, and 2) your statement that President Bush "stole" the election in 2000.
But thanks for the tip. Feel free to e-mail me if you want to call my attention to a particular post.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2005 08:57 AM (8e5bN)
4
Congrats, as well. However, I cannot seem to find it on CNN's site, would love to read it. Would thou havest a link?
Posted by: William Teach at June 07, 2005 04:48 PM (HxpPK)
5
BTW, that probably came out rude, though not intended that way.
Posted by: William Teach at June 07, 2005 06:50 PM (HxpPK)
6
It didn't come out rude, but I haven't found a link to anything online. There are at least two of those "Inside the Blogs" segments for each edition of Inside Politics, which presumably airs at least once a day--so they just may not keep up with it online.
If you want to see what the format looks like, some of them are at
Trey Jackson's video blog.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2005 07:10 PM (8e5bN)
7
Oh, it's CNN live. Quite frankly, I've almost forgotten that CNN has a tv station, been so long since I watched it
Posted by: William Teach at June 08, 2005 05:02 AM (HxpPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Coalition of the Chillin'
The Commissar has a new
map. This one's devoted to those (like me) who didn't feel that the infamous Senate Compromise on Judicial Nominees was likely to end all life in the universe. (At least, not anytime soon.)
The names are lovely and charming, as usual. And it's great fun to guess which blogs they represent.
Posted by: Attila at
09:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Democrats tend to put better spin on their side of things when it's their nominees that Republicans are blocking. They usually emphasize the obstruction to the basic functioning of the government, such as when they pinned the whole gov't shutdown on Newt Gingrich.
Right-leaning blogonauts need to master the navigation of those same didactic waters.
Posted by: Ciggy at June 06, 2005 12:24 PM (0B3lJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Medical Marijuana
For those who need background, here's the previous
Althouse summary of the issues. Apparently she plans on reviewing the decision today, and posting a new analysis.
I'm not a lawyer, and I simply don't agree that growing pot for use at home is "commerce." And I think this whole affair is an egregious intrusion into state matters by the Feds.
But, you know: that's me. Just a chick with an opinion. We'll see what Ann has to say.
UPDATE: Ann's got a couple of entries up on the subject; hit her main page, and keep scrolling.
Posted by: Attila at
09:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Legal Theory Blog has a lengthy discussion as to what
Raich may mean for the "new federalism" doctrine the court had once been thought to be steering for in
Lopez and
Morrison.
One of the joyous things about following SCOTUS, rather than Congress, is that, as a rule, Justices are inclined to explain - in lengthy, written discussions - as to why they vote a certain way. I like Justice Scalia a lot; I agree with his conclusions in most cases, I agree with his thought process and legal reasoning, and I like his writing style. Thus, when he reaches - as he does today, in
Raich - a conclusion stunningly at variance with not only how I would have voted but how I would have expected him to vote, I can at least read his opinion and try to understand his logic. Alas, by contrast: when my Senators vote in ways that absolutley confound me, it's rather harder to get any insight into how they arrived at that conclusion.
Today's majority surprises me, but once I've read back through the four opinions - Stevens
per curiam, Scalia concurring, O'Connor and Thomas dissenting - I will doubtless have to think hard on whether I'm wrong about this.
Posted by: Simon at June 06, 2005 06:35 PM (GRyHA)
2
Except for the use of Zyklon B, the so called
WAR ON DRUGS has a lot in common with the Nazi WAR ON JEWS.
The proganda is almost identical, and those who are not shot by the cops (death by delusional paranoia) are to die of "natural causes" (AIDS, TB, Hepatitas, Violence) in prison.
Posted by: Eric H at June 09, 2005 06:57 PM (q2219)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
69kb generated in CPU 0.0372, elapsed 0.1776 seconds.
218 queries taking 0.1544 seconds, 525 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.