September 08, 2005
Covington Update
We have a family friend who, with many of her relatives, evacuated Covington (adjacent to New Orleans) before the storm hit. Please pray that her three remaining nieces and nephews are found alive.
Her home survived; the house of one niece was destroyed.
Covington is on its own, and the Red Cross is not operating there at all. Citizens are taking it upon themselves to try to get food to those who need it. Many of them are carrying firearms, since people undertaking rescue work have been carjacked (and boat-jacked).
Our friend asks that people not give money to the Red Cross, as it isn't present outside New Orleans at all. She has found that her Amex card actually works, so she is getting cash advances to people who need money.
Obviously, her friends here in Los Angeles are trying to figure out a way to get money to this woman and/or the local Baptist Church in Covington, which is the staging center for the local citizenry.
I'm a little concerned about how my friend is going to pay her Amex bill, since most of her income comes from tending bar (a bar in New Orleans that presumably doesn't exist any more).
If anyone wants to Paypal me, send me a note designating "barmaid" or "Baptists," and I'll hold it in my business account until we can figure out a way to get it to the church—or to my friend.
In the meantime, please don't forget those in the areas outside N.O. who are struggling with no power, no phone service, limited gasoline for rescue missions, and little food/water. People like my friend are hiking out to centers where MREs are being distributed, and taking them back to those with limited mobility.
They can use your prayers right now.
Posted by: Attila at
02:14 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.
Regan and Preston
. . . tell us it's time to re-think politics in Louisiana and in New Orleans. Too late, for sure—but perhaps not
too little.
Posted by: Attila at
03:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
The "Tired But Happy" Post
After a mad drive back to Los Angeles from Scottsdale, AZ on Monday I spent a day preparing for a visit from my sister-in-law, and I've been playing hostess for 36 hours or whatever.
No, I haven't caught up on my Arizona posting, but I've got several more entries in draft that I'll polish up and post as time permits.
Tomorrow (okay, today—it is after midnight) I'll be catching up on some personal business and then frantically putting together another chapter for my murder mystery. It is, as my husband reminds me, the reconvening of our respective writer's groups tomorrow: how glorious and awful.
I had lunch today with a family friend I'll call "Ship Ahoy," a man I've known since 1988. In that time we've been colleagues at two different organizations. I was his editorial assistant at one local magazine, and he was my managing editor. I transferred to another department. I fell in love with someone else who worked in editorial, and ended up marrying this person, to my eternal good fortune. Eventually, Mr. Ship Ahoy worked for me at an outdoor magazine; I was his ME that time around.
This time, Mr. Ahoy had looked over the outline and sample chapters for my book, and was giving me his input in exchange for lunch. We talked about the problem of motivation, which is pivotal for anyone who's writing about mysteries that are not police procedurals. Ultimately, one has to "sell" the idea that Lord Peter preferred solving murders to seducing young heiresses—at least part of the time.
I sighed, because I hear this from my writer's group all the time. None of them are big mystery fans, and they'd all like to know why any normal person would try to figure this sort of puzzle out, instead of leaving it to the police and coroner, and knocking off early for a gin and tonic vs. looking at dead bodies.
Mr. Ahoy doesn't think the motivations for my characters are watertight.
"You do understand," I ask him, "that real fans of the genre might be willing to suspend their disbelief?"
"Yes," he tells me. "So you have a tactical decision to make. Do people have to enter the world you create, or are you going to bring it to them?"
"I do want it to be enjoyable by non-mystery fans," I tell him. I resist the temptation to add, "and fuck you." (Because he's doing me an enormous favor, and because I truly admire him.)
He hands me the pages as we part ways, and asks to be kept abreast as I produce more chapters. He explains that he found "a few little things," which scares me because I'm a copy editor/proofreader myself, and I know "a few little things" generally means a mass of pencil markings all over one's [previously] clean, white paper.
I promise myself that I'll look them over later, because I have errands to do before I go home. I make two stops, and then I can't stand it. Getting back into the car, I sit in the back seat and read his remarks. One has to do with a man's non-jealous reaction to the news that someone's been putting the moves on his fiancee. In retrospect, I realize that it serves my plot for this character not to care too much. Mr. Ahoy simply writes, "not a 'guy' reaction. He would either be pissed or extremely pissed." Fair enough. So he would.
A woman honks at me as she tries to maneuver out of the space adjacent to me, so I close the passenger door and realize after I've finished going through Ahoy's notes that—once again—I've locked myself into the back seat of my own car, because it has some sort of childproof feature that keeps it from being opened from the inside. So I climb over the front seat and free myself from the tyranny of my own scatterbrained nature.
And I exit the parking structure smiling. With something that looks almost like a plan to fix the plot holes. Or at least a renewed commitment to a project that's as maddening as it is fun.
Bear with me, okay? (Actually, there aren't any bears here at all. I don't know why I said that.)
Posted by: Attila at
03:05 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 722 words, total size 4 kb.
Dean's Got
. . . the most novel
fundraising idea I've ever seen. Give money for Katrina relief and he'll write an essay on any topic you like. Including "How to Understand Women," or "Why Cancer is Good and We Should Have More of It."
Go.
Posted by: Attila at
02:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
September 07, 2005
No Transport, No Peace

Behold the Nagin "Black Magic" Water Park. Isn't it spooky?
Posted by: Attila at
12:02 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I guess a school bus is not good enough for the poor and homeless to use to leave town on in advance of a hurricane.
Posted by: Allen at September 07, 2005 07:50 AM (KJVaG)
2
There should have been an advance plan that said if levee breaks use all available vehicles to evacuate. A plan that requires someone to push a button falls to pieces if the button pusher is not around.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 07, 2005 12:35 PM (ss8Gt)
3
Drudge had this snippet on his site briefly, taken from the Louisiana disaster plan:
Louisiana disaster plan, pg 13, para 5 , dated 01/00
'The primary means of hurricane evacuation will be personal vehicles. School and municipal buses, government-owned vehicles and vehicles provided by volunteer agencies may be used to provide transportation for individuals who lack transportation and require assistance in evacuating'...
Which makes their failure to use them all the more egregious.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 07, 2005 06:51 PM (xdX36)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 06, 2005
Presented Without Comment
Authorities were . . . castigated by British bus driver Ged Scott, from Wallasey, Merseyside, who was on holiday in the New Orleans area.
He stayed in the Ramada Hotel during and after the devastation with his wife, Sandra, and seven-year-old son Ronan. At one stage, Mr Scott, 36, had to wade through filthy water to barricade the hotel doors against looters.
He told the Liverpool Daily Post: "I couldn't describe how bad the authorities were. Just little things like taking photographs of us, as we are standing on the roof waving for help, for their own little snapshot albums.
"At one point, there were a load of girls on the roof of the hotel saying 'Can you help us?' and the policemen said 'Show us what you've got' and made signs for them to lift their T-shirts. When the girls refused, they said 'Fine' and motored off down the road in their boat."
Via Lair.
Posted by: Attila at
10:38 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ain't it strange that when chaos breaks out men seem to think about sex so much?.
Posted by: indcoup at September 07, 2005 11:07 PM (zQk8L)
2
Well, I have the impression that you do.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 07, 2005 11:25 PM (EtCQE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is It Me, Or
. . . is
Goldstein a little tense?
Posted by: Attila at
04:00 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, but understandably so. I've been gritting my teeth all week over the leftist BS machine in full-throated roar.
What I like about Goldstein in comparison however, is that he makes sense, as opposed to the raw emotion that is pouring out of the left.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 07, 2005 06:48 PM (xdX36)
2
Well, he appears to be really looking for answers, as opposed to simply scoring points.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 07, 2005 11:26 PM (EtCQE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Via Mayor Sam
Bob Denver of Gilligan's Island just
died.
Posted by: Attila at
12:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Back in the City of the Fallen Angels
I still have a lot of entries from my stay in Scottsdale to bring up out of "draft" format and get onto the main page.
In the meantime, I've been listening to a lot of criticism of New Orleans officials—and some in Louisiana—who just did not appear to take this impending crisis seriously until it was too late. Some people chalk this up to the corruption that's rampant in the Big Easy, but I'm not so sure.
I called my husband yesterday morning from the desert to ask if this kind of negligent response would have occurred in Chicago under the first Mayor Daley.
"No, no," he tells me. "They were crooks, but they were competent crooks. That's why the people of Chicago went back to the Daley dynasty: ultimately, the matter of honesty mattered less than having a well-run city."
Posted by: Attila at
11:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
September 04, 2005
Goldstein Confronts Kingfish
—who seems a little
defensive.
Posted by: Attila at
03:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
Jonathan Rauch:
With It Takes a Family, Rick Santorum has served notice. The bold new challenge to the Goldwater-Reagan tradition in American politics comes not from the Left, but from the Right.
Terms like "left" and "right" become meaningless after a point, but Rauch's take is that replacing the individual with the family as the basic unit of society is an invitation to governmental growth, and that Santorum is drastically revising—perhaps even reversing—the Goldwater-Reagan formula.
Posted by: Attila at
03:30 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think Rauch may have missed the point of the family as the core unit of self-reliance...as it was back in the days prior to WWII. People took care of their own, took responsibility for their actions and didn't go looking for the Feds to bail them out.
THAT only started with the Depression and FDR's attempts to fix things. (Which didn't work, by the way. Only WWII got the country back on its feet.)
Posted by: joated at September 04, 2005 04:10 PM (OqZGl)
2
It is the family that lays the foundation for upstanding, intelligent, and self-reliant individuals. If you have sick or broken families, you have sick or broken individuals. It's the foundation. The soil out of which the tree grows.
Posted by: mariana at September 04, 2005 09:14 PM (qiUf8)
3
"Goldwater and Reagan, and Madison and Jefferson, were saying that if you restrain government, you will strengthen society and foster virtue. Santorum is saying something more like the reverse: If you shore up the family, you will strengthen the social fabric and ultimately reduce dependence on government."
I don't know that it is so much the reverse as it is "cart before horse". While I agree with his premise that strong families represent the bedrock of society, I'm not so sure his vision of a government that is strongly invested in "promoting virtue" is wise. Everything he says (as quoted in that article, at least) about the connection between duty, responsibility and freedom rings true, but this is a matter of the heart, and not (in my view) something any government institution can inculcate.
What shall we call this new governmental function?
"The Department of Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice"? This is the sort of thing that invites comparisons to the Taliban.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 05, 2005 10:05 AM (xdX36)
4
I should add, that I don't mean to say the government can't do the opposite. The last fifty years have proven that it is very capable of damaging the family as a social institution. But the way it has done so is by making people dependent upon government, and also thereby discouraging and drawing artificial proscriptive boundaries around people's natural inclination to private charity.
So is the solution really a need for new government intervention to "shore up the family", or would the family as an institution be better served by the government disentangling itself from the programs and policies that have weakened the family over the decades? The latter would be more in keeping with the conservatism of Reagan and Goldwater.
If Santorum wanted to shore up anything, he would do well to shore up his own church, by working to remove the artificial secular/religious barriers that have pushed religious institutions to the sidelines of American society.
In the absence of "gummit programs", it has traditionally fallen to religious institutions to provide all of the things he seems to wish goverment to provide in this regard. The chief difference, of course, is that one's participation in a church community is an entirely voluntary association.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 05, 2005 10:27 AM (xdX36)
5
I think my relationship with the government is as a free agent who has entered into a whole set of contractual arrangements with another individual (my "husband")
Our child, when he/she arrives, will be encouraged to see his/her relationship with the government as one that is monitored by mom and dad, who act as his agents in that regard.
I would hope that those of my friends who don't ever intend to marry or have kids wouldn't become second-class citizens if Santorum ran the circus.
In other words, I see the individual--meaning any adult--as the actor who has a direct relationship with the State.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 06, 2005 02:03 AM (EtCQE)
6
You know, I've read a lot of these kind of articles that decry the replacement of the The Family with The Individual as the unit of society, and I have to wonder... precisely what government policy is it that has caused this to happen? The New Deal? The Estate Tax? Married Filing Separately? It's described in almost horror-movie tones, like some miasma is floating out from Washington DC causing people to think of themselves as individuals (the horror!) through insidious mind control or something.
It is true that now we look to the government to provide some things that once were provided by a family or community. While reasonable people can argue as to where the line should be, I'm not wild about going back to, say, the days when one's personal safety was only as secure as the power of one's family.
Society has been moving from a society of families to a society of individuals since the start of the Industrial Revolution. (The collapse of families as people migrated from agrarian communities to cities has been decried since the late 1700s... not exactly the golden age of socialism.)
It wasn't FDR that created today's society: it was the factory, which fundamentally changed the way in which wealth was created. Adam Smith and Marx agreed on that point, if nothing else.
Posted by: Christophe at September 08, 2005 10:14 PM (td8Qe)
7
I don't really agree. I honestly believe that most of the Founding Fathers were big on individual rights--they just couldn't agree on whether women/black people were individuals, and had to put that off for another day.
Of course, I'm talking political philosophy, and you're talking economics, so we may have an apples/oranges thing going here.
This may or may not be the time to point out that Goldwater was big on gay rights--for his time, at least--and point out that he and Reagan really took a live-and-let-live attitude thereto.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 08, 2005 10:45 PM (EtCQE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Junkyard Blog
. . . seems a mite
irritated about all those unused buses owned by the City of New Orleans. Instead of carrying thousands of people to safety, they are now ruined by flooding, rusting away with massive oil slicks caused by their engines.
There's even a satellite photo showing how close the buses were to a freeway that led right to the Superdome.
Via Insty.
Posted by: Attila at
02:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Apparently they had an emergency plan, but the Mayor just didn't press the go button. Some have suggested he just didn't want to spend city money if he could get federal money instead.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 04, 2005 08:40 AM (ss8Gt)
2
Nagin should be arrested for criminal negligence.
Notice how the MSM coverage of Katrina perfectly mirrors its coverage of Iraq: that there is nothing noble or heroic going on, that it's broken, & most of all that's somebody's fault. Just like all the armchair pundits we had telling the Pentagon how to run a war, the empty-headed MSM pundits' message is that everything would work smoothly if only we had the right PLAN (which dovetails with liberal MSM ideology, which holds that the federl govt is responsible for & should be able to fix anything)
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at September 04, 2005 11:31 AM (V5qf0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Everyone Knows
. . . the difference between "looting" and "emergency commandeering of supplies."
Or they should.
Of course, they should also know the difference between "rioting" and "rebellion."
As the Los Angeles riots of 1992 commenced, no one was under any illusions about what it meant: color was irrelevant, and the only distinction to be made was between those who had some kind of values and those who were using the situation as an excuse to loot stores—and worse, much worse. I drove around town then in order to get across it—avoiding the center of the city—and spent the night in my boyfriend's more quiet neighborhood.
First, of course, I had to spend an hour in line at a Glendale supermarket, rubbing elbows with black and white and Asian people who all understood the score: there is something broken in human nature, and when it's not practical to fight it, you need to get out of the way.
So we all loaded up our grocery carts and prepared to stay off the streets for however many days it took before the thugs lost their stranglehold on L.A.
It appears that it could have been a lot worse. God have mercy on those who took advantage of the situation in New Orleans in order to commit violent acts.
I'm sure there's a special place in Hell for them.
Posted by: Attila at
01:47 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And the noble LAPD bunkered down and left public safety up to private gun owners like those Korean shopkeepers.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 04, 2005 08:37 AM (ss8Gt)
2
The LAPD's fear of coming on too strong--after all, the supposed reason for the riots was the Rodney King incident--made things much, much worse than they otherwise would have been. It should have stopped in South Central, and instead it spread to a lot of the towns in the L.A. Basin.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 04, 2005 12:00 PM (uPa3y)
3
Let us also not foget during the LA Riots we had members of the City's democratic leadership acting as apologists for the violence and in the case of Maxine Waters actively encouraging it.
Posted by: the Pirate at September 06, 2005 07:34 AM (SksyN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This Kid
. . . is going to go
far.
This action is the only thing he needs on his resume; he'll be working for the rest of his life.
[h/t: Goldstein.]
Posted by: Attila at
01:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
September 03, 2005
And Yet More on NFRA
I'm at the Ronald Reagan Awards Banquet. In a separate entry I will list the winners of the various NFRA Awards. Soon, there will be a showing of
In the Face of Evil, the documentary about Ronald Reagan's fight against communism, and how it bears on the current terrrorist threat. Of course, I've already seen it, at the
Liberty Film Festival last fall, where as I recall it was the world premiere.
At the moment, Tom Tancredo is speaking, and giving an eloquent argument against illegal immigration—an issue that most of you know I've been vascillating on for some time. (Why? Because part of the whole issue has to do with how the economies in our border states are going to conduct their business without the labor normally provided by "illegals," so the "seal off the borders and everything will be lovely" people [those who oversimplify the practicalities of the process] bother me. But the security issues tied into this are sobering, and a good place to start.)
Tancredo discusses the fact that some misguided teachers in schools with a lot of immigrants teach a cartoonish version of multiculturalism, encouraging high school and junior high school students to identify with their native lands rather than this country.
"I don't care whaere you come from," he says. "All I ask is that once you get here, you do what most of our grandparents did, and become part of this nation."
He gets a standing ovation.
And I have a lot to think about.
Posted by: Attila at
09:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
1
i am still on the 'wait and see' fence, too. but it's not just border states. i'm in idaho and the farmers and landscapers have inordinate amounts of illegals working. they h ave been wilfully dependent on them for years. in the summers when i was a teen looking for work in a small rural town, the girls would hoe beets, beans, the boys would set pipe and buck hay, both would work in the orchards. by the time i was a senior, those jobs were hard to find. there are lots of non-border cities that use illegals in industry, construction, domestic help. one issue i find disconcerting is the diseases the illegals are bringing/will be bringing in, particularly tuberculosis. it is an expensive and extraordinarily expensive disease to cure/manage. i think a guest worker/visa think could be one judiciously used part of a policy, but the illegals and legals need to be required to speak english, and take advantage of any opportunity to become citizens. they also need to pay into the systems that provide them health, education. can't pay??? one of the reasons vicente fox doesn't want the border closed is because the workers are sending millions and millions of dollars back home to mexico. if we are going to let them come, there needs to be certain social, legal, and monetary expectations put upon them and their employers. right now, it's free gratis for both.
Posted by: sue at September 05, 2005 10:24 AM (i0+3P)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Chief Justice Rehnquist
. . . has just
died.
Posted by: Attila at
08:40 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rest in peace good soul. I'm reading his book on the election of 1876. Now I'll always remember when I read it.
Posted by: Evon at September 03, 2005 09:41 PM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Glenn
has an interesting
compilation of statements from those who saw this coming, along with a few well deserved digs at the media vultures who like to overhype any hard rain as a "storm"—making it less likely that people will heed the warning when there really is a threat.
Posted by: Attila at
07:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
Sex and the Married Conservative
Dr. Judith Reisman is speaking on the counter-assault against Alfred Kinsey and his research, for which she has led the charge.
Her thesis is that Kinsey's research is based on outrageous sampling errors, and that some of his claims about the sexuality of the "greatest generation" reflected some of the claims made by Nazis in propaganda distributed to British and American troops.
One of the most egregious aspects of Kinsey's research, of course, was his promotion of the notion that young children were sexual in a way that excused adult-child sex.
There's more. I'll definitely have to read Dr. Reisman's latest book, Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences and review it herein.
Posted by: Attila at
03:10 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Of course, Kinsey being dead puts him at something of a disadvantage when replying to critics.
It is clear from reading her book (the things I do for work) that Reisman's problem is with sex research, period, full stop. One just shouldn't do it. From a New Yorker article:
“One doesn’t measure American sexual habits,” (Reisman) said. “That’s not a science.”
So, I think we can conclude that her problem isn't so much Kinsey as anyone talking about sex.
She also makes some astonishing claims, such as that gays were not persecuted in Nazi Germany (based on the fact that Ernst Rolm was gay). She states, categorically, that gays recruit with the tenacity of the Marine Corps. She repeats charges that Kinsey asked for pedophiles to molest children, a charge that has never been substantiated by any evidence whatsoever.
And as far as Kinsey somehow enabling pedophilia, I would be curious to see if any child molester in the history of the United States has successfully avoided prosecution based on a defense with roots in the Kinsey Report.
Kinsey's research is a legitimate subject of criticism, as any scientific research is. But given the rather scattershot nature of the criticisms, it appears that the real issue here is a desire to put the sexual genie back in the bottle, rather than any of Kinsey's conclusions per se. Sorry, but time only flows one direction.
Posted by: Christophe at September 03, 2005 03:39 PM (td8Qe)
2
Interesting. I'll have to read some of the back-and-forth before I can reach a fully formed conclusion.
But if we do throw any of his research out, we'll still have to keep the Kinsey scale.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 03, 2005 05:04 PM (P2mGf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More from the NFRA
The official slogan for this year's NFRA convention is "turning up the heat on the left." Get it? We're in Scottsdale, Arizona, toward the end of the hot days of summer. This is a glorious part of the country, though: the physical beauty here is astounding.
Mike Spence, introducing Bob Barr as the keynote speaker, modifies the slogan, making the point that what NFRA really needs to do is to "turn up the heat on the GOP."
Bob Barr is speaking on the inadequacy of passively depending on the two-party system to represent the people. He makes a number of truly excellent points, one of which hit me right over the head: Republicans continually preach to African-Americans about the need to objectively evaluate what the Democratic Party is (and, more usually, is not) doing for them. True conservatives need, he tells us, so "practice what they preach.
Rep Barr also analyzed Ronald Reagan's presidency, pointing out that he was an outsider at the beginning of his first term, and remained an outsider until he left office.
Rep Barrr is an amazing thinker, attempting to raise the level of debate about all issues, and explaining that the important thing is to talk about substance, rather than to go along with the prevailing wisdom. Make sure to talk reasonably with people whom you disagree with, he exhorts us: you may have an opportunity to carry an important message.
He defends his relationship with the ACLU, pointing out that despite the many areas of disagreement between his own positions and those of that group, there are important discussions to be had about some provisions of the Patriot Act, and we'd be derelict to gloss them over.
In conclusion, he reminds us that "expediency is for cowards. Principles are for winners."
Posted by: Attila at
02:05 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 305 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Republicans continually preach to African-Americans about the need to objectively evaluate what the Democratic Party is (and, more usually, is not) doing for them
No doubt having a group of rich, white men lecture them will be a new, refreshing experience for black Americans.
Posted by: Christophe at September 03, 2005 03:21 PM (td8Qe)
2
Wait. Are you mad at me?
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 03, 2005 05:05 PM (P2mGf)
3
Are you mad at me?
Not a bit of it. But sometimes a nice, juicy piece of irony is a bit too tempting.
Posted by: Christophe at September 03, 2005 05:24 PM (td8Qe)
4
Irony is in the eye of the beholder. You're presuming that most members of the GOP are rich and white and male. And of course you see that, because that's what you're looking for.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 03, 2005 06:02 PM (uPa3y)
5
Hello again. Very much enjoyed meeting you at the event Friday night. Just added your site to my "Blog Round-up" favorites.
The best thing the GOP is doing is appealing intellectually to black folks. Rock on Ken M. His out reach to black folks is the real deal and the Dems can't handle it. As I told you last night, there are lots of us who have left their intellectual plantation. I ain't pickin' their cotton!
This president has been GREAT. And in my opinion, Condi the only logical choice to succeed him!
Condi - 2008
Posted by: Keith J at September 03, 2005 07:37 PM (kygMG)
6
Thank you, Mr. James. You're a true gentlemen. And thank you for not coming down too hard on my liberal friends who would like to think they speak for you, Councilwoman Johnson, Secretary Rice, Rep. Watts, General Powell, and—as I understand it—the entire
brotherhood.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 03, 2005 08:56 PM (P2mGf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
72kb generated in CPU 0.087, elapsed 0.2612 seconds.
217 queries taking 0.2178 seconds, 522 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.