January 07, 2006
I Was Considering
. . . asking my doctor for a Wellbutrin prescription, to balance out the Prozac. But, you know—what was I
thinking? I must have been on drugs. Jeff's idea is much better.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:13 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
Gin-Blogging.
Wow. I've been away from Bombay Sapphire for a while now, just drinking plain Tanqueray. But Sapphire was on sale, so I bought a little. I was probably still drinking mini-dirty martinis last time I had Sapphire around, but its strong gin taste is a bit much for a gin and tonic. I deliberately make them pretty weak, with no more than an ounce of gin in each, and the Bombay has a rather uneasy truce going with the tonic and lime: it's as if it wants to be in a martini. I see why I was fond of it at one time: the juniper taste can knock you over if you let your guard down.
I need a lot of hydration these days, so I'm not too interested in martinis. Still, I should have one more while the Bombay is still in the house. The stuff just begs to be mixed up with a little vermouth and olive brine. Who am I to argue?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 1 kb.
Traffic.
Pretty hot for a Saturday; thank you,
Cold Fury. (Yes, this is the first time I've paid for an outside ad; they are awfully cost-effective over there. I decided to buy their inexpensive ads, so I can continue charging an arm and a leg for mine. You should buy one of mine, now. Or I won't have a happy 2006, and it'll be all your fault.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:49 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hmnmm, must try one, or both

Just to make you happy, you know.
Posted by: Rae at January 08, 2006 10:36 AM (4YdLE)
2
When Attila Girl's happy, everybody's happy!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2006 11:26 AM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Look How Clever I Am,"
I remark gleefully to my mother. "I got a bleach stain on my favorite black cords. See here, where it used to be? And I filled it in with a black marker. You can't even tell."
"Yup," she agrees. "It looks fine. Sometimes I have to do that, too."
I put the pants back in the drawer. "You know, theoretically, one shouldn't ever buy clothes that aren't either white or black."
"Don't be silly," she replies. "You can buy clothes that are in any color at all, so long as you have a pen in that same color."
It's not often that I have such a pure appreciation for my mother's genius.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:26 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ok if you have the pens, why not just always buy white pants and color em in as needed?
Posted by: tommy at January 07, 2006 10:34 AM (Qmfgc)
2
It might take a bit too long.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 06:02 PM (zZMVu)
3
The correct pen should come with every article of clothing. Business idea, anyone? It will be bigger than Garranimals for adult males!
Posted by: Darrell at January 07, 2006 09:34 PM (itie5)
4
Darrell, you're right. I'm in. We'll make a mint.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 09:35 PM (zZMVu)
5
darrell, my mom is gonna be so dissapointed you had the garranimals for men idea too. or did she steal that from somewhere?
Posted by: maggie katzen at January 07, 2006 10:30 PM (rVzXG)
6
As far as I know, I thought of the Garranimals for men idea back in the early 80's...as a joke I'd often use to impress women. It didn't work. Your mom is welcome to go with the idea. I think "Hello Kitty" for adult women would work too. Subtle use of "Ms Kitty" on, say, silk lining for blazers for business wear--fine embroidery, too. Upscale jewelry. I better get out the Tanqueray now...and pop "Last Man Standing" in the DVD player...
Posted by: Darrell at January 08, 2006 08:06 AM (gH1nI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well, This Kind of Freaks Me Out.
I live in the U.S., and I had the idea that there were certain last names that granted one a license to more or less
unlimited drink and lechery, and automatically excuse any consequences related thereto.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:19 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ah now if we could get ol' Teddy to come clean in a similar manner...
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 07, 2006 05:15 PM (xdX36)
2
Don't be silly. I'm sure that he's willing to admit that George W. Bush is an alcoholic.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 06:04 PM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oh, Those Airheaded Brits.
Jeff of BA seems slightly
irritated at the scandal that erupted when Britain's Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association suggested that Islam was homophobic, a statement I cannot see as anything but empirically true, but caused an outcry for its putative bigotry.
In a letter that starts, "Dear Stupid British Homos," he reminds us that
While you queens have been frauleining about gay marriage, homos under barmy Islam have been crushed, hung, stoned, & beheaded. I notice that 60% of British Muslims want Shariah law. Have you seen their birthrate compared to non-Muslim Brits? Maybe GLHA should start running more timely articles like Scaffold-Proof Hair Mousse & Fabulous Accessories from Neck to Toe!
George Bernard Shaw, that pacifist flaneur, said if the Nazis landed, he'd welcome them as tourists. New flash, sisters: the tourists are already in the house. Under Shariah, you'll really be giving head, & not in a good way.
And I could say the same for a lot of idiotic quasi-feminist chicks, who don't quite seem to realize it's hard to live up to your human potential when you're denied education, beaten, kept under house arrest, swaddled in a desert clime, and occasionally murdered for the crime of having been raped.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:20 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I could say the same for a lot of idiotic quasi-feminist chicks
SELF-HATER!
Posted by: Darleen at January 07, 2006 11:18 AM (FgfaV)
2
occasionally murdered for the crime of having been raped
Or occasionally murdered because you
might commit adultery like an elder sibling did. Can't be too careful, you know...darn females!
Wait...I thought the reward for "martyrdom" was 72 virgins? what's wrong with
that picture? Women are no good in the here and now, but they're perfectly fine in the afterlife???
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at January 07, 2006 03:45 PM (1hM1d)
3
As I love to point out, Christian and Jewish martyrs get
experienced women who know what they're doing in the sack; the fact that Muslims are stuck with virgins shows that God doesn't like them quite as much.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 06:09 PM (zZMVu)
4
You're all jumping to conclusions here - what makes you think the virgins are female?
Or even bipedal?
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 07, 2006 09:09 PM (j4Cpd)
5
Steve, you slay me.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 09:37 PM (zZMVu)
6
Hopefully with fully developed vaginal and anal dentata...
Posted by: Darrell at January 07, 2006 09:38 PM (itie5)
7
The best pic about this subject was the kamikaze bomber arriving in the after life and being told "Actually, *you're* the virgin."
Posted by: John at January 08, 2006 06:33 PM (3z9W/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2006
Dear Israel,
This would be the perfect time to bomb Iran back to the pre-nuclear age; they won't be expecting it just now.
Love,
Joy
Would everyone stop looking at me like that?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:04 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Flap at January 06, 2006 03:24 PM (A8i+J)
2
Someone better do it soon
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at January 06, 2006 03:59 PM (0QxXE)
3
Israel usually handles this kind of thing for us. That way we can denounce it and proclaim ourselves shocked--shocked!--to hear what they've done.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 04:29 PM (zZMVu)
4
Look at you like what? Half-grin and half-disapproval?
If we could selectively bomb the mullahs and the Ayatollah into little glass ornamants, I'd be ever so pleased.
But a good number (probably a majority) of the Iranian people are not our enemies.
Posted by: Kathy K at January 06, 2006 05:07 PM (+Dxgi)
5
I agree with KathyK. About half of the Iranians are under-25-YOs who are sick of the theocracy, and will be the future leaders and citizens of a (hopefully) democratic republic or constitutional monarchy.
Just take out the nuke plants, okay?
Posted by: Mikal at January 06, 2006 05:27 PM (IQTeT)
6
Like what? Doesn't my expression convey the impression of stunned awe at your brilliance?
I rather like the equation: Iran=radioactive glass parking lot.
[eeeeevil grin(tm)]
-- R'cat
CatHouse Chat
Posted by: Romeocat at January 06, 2006 07:51 PM (CNIj+)
7
I always look this stunned when someone reads my mind.
Now everybody repeat after me "I'm shocked, shocked that there is a millitary action going on in Iran."
Posted by: Jack at January 06, 2006 08:09 PM (lZ5cx)
8
Preemptive strike haiku:
Winter's sun rising
Geese paddle in cooling pond
Are those F-15's?
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 06, 2006 09:23 PM (IKyv9)
9
Steam rises in air
Reactor core is humming
JDAMs sing dear song
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 06, 2006 09:28 PM (IKyv9)
10
From the east, from sun,
Hellfire missiles screaming home--
Mullahs rend their shirts
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 06, 2006 09:31 PM (IKyv9)
11
Aw, c'mon, Kathy and Mikal: did I need to specify "please minimize civilian casualties"? Obviously, I'm hoping for a surgical strike on the nuclear facilities. I love Iranians: I just don't want their crazy leaders to have nukes.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 09:58 PM (zZMVu)
12
In the air, I see
Planes, and--are those
yarmulkes?
Holy shit! Kaboom!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 10:58 PM (zZMVu)
13
In the skies I see
C130's I believe
With drilling rigs
and pipe whose diameter
is just slightly larger
then the nukes diameter
sorry about the pentameter
Posted by: Jack at January 07, 2006 08:18 AM (+JCSV)
14
To do serious damage to Iran's nuclear sites requires a lot more resources than Israel has. They have indicated they may try something anyway.
Rumors have also come out of Washington.
Of course Iranian allied militias sit astride our supply lines and around the Green Zone in Iraq, so there are complications,
100 to 200 a barrel for oil is also possible.
And as for bombing someone "back to the stone edge" that is genocide and rejected by our and Israelis military. It's the sort of thing Iran and North Korea might do. We work hard to directly target the threats.
Posted by: john at January 07, 2006 03:34 PM (9kZbq)
15
Thanks, John. I said "back to the pre-nuclear age," which implies rather a different thing that either the stone age or the stone "edge."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 06:14 PM (zZMVu)
16
"Yarmulkes" . . .
Heh.
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 07, 2006 08:49 PM (YUWOy)
17
Flap reads there are about 80 presumed sites in Iran that may be involved in their nuclear program.
About 5-6 B-2's with precision munitions should do the job nicely.
Flap
Posted by: Flap at January 07, 2006 11:48 PM (A8i+J)
18
What are we waiting for? We can use my father's barn!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2006 02:03 AM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well.
My mood swings were more violent than usual yesterday; I went from being giddily happy to cranky as hell, secretly hoping someone would cross me so I could eviscerate them.
Part of it probably comes from writing about some of my experiences as a teenager, and letting a few emotional genies out of that bottle. Some of the rest is probably the letdown I experience after spending time with my mother, since she often absorbs a lot of emotional energy.
And the rest, I must conclude, has to do with hormones. It usually makes me edgier when I realize that I'm edgy for female-specific biochemical reasons—and that's the reason I went back on the pill for a time—but I'm just not interested in taking any more drugs than I absolutely have to right now. Besides, I'd like to track my menopausal progress.
So I'll have to learn to surf this particular wave. Preferably without maiming any of my near and dear.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:04 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
One day I'll learn how to set up one of those *VOTE!* blurbs. Then I'll run one that says,
Is Little Miss Attila allowed a PMS day here and there?
***VOTE!*** Yes___ No___
I bet you'd take it in a landslide.
Posted by: k at January 07, 2006 01:18 PM (ywZa8)
2
Unfortunately, the vote that really counts is you-know-whose. And goodness knows what he'd say. Therefore, I haven't asked.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 06:16 PM (zZMVu)
3
That's one of those questions you don't want to ask unless you already know the answer.
Posted by: k at January 07, 2006 09:07 PM (M7kiy)
4
There's an old Jewish truism--I believe it comes from Talmudic law [someone fact-check me, here] to the effect that if you ask a question, you're taking responsibility for hearing the answer.
So: if you don't want to know, don't ask.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2006 09:41 PM (zZMVu)
5
oh, YES. I'm going to remember that one. I have a certain neighbor who really needs to hear it.
Here's part of what led to a cooling of what could have been a nice and mutually beneficial friendship:
He'd ask me questions about himself - I'd answer very diplomatically, gently, but truthfully - and he'd have a temper tantrum at me. Even call me really nasty anti-female names. Then when I quietly said, --Not allowed, guy-- he'd reply, --Oh, that was just a figure of speech! don't be so sensitive!
?!? Wait. Which one of us had the temper tantrum again? over a gentle answer to a question, instead of over name-calling and such? Who's being over-sensitive here?
He set me up.
He plays out these scenes that have nothing to do with me, but instead with his parents and so forth, people from his past. It's so textbook obvious it's kind of pathetic. Still, those are games I have no desire to play.
Now he wonders why I don't visit any more.
And some mutual friends - get this - feel like I may have done HIM wrong.
I'm under no obligation to anyone to tolerate temper tantrums and verbal viciousness. Even if they were *earned* somehow. Which they weren't.
That one little setup, with the three sets of friends [me, the neighbor, and the mutual-friend couple caught in between] could fill a whole book with boundary issue discussions.
Meanwhile, not being either parent or therapist to this character, I've no interest in his childishness, and no responsibility to *help* him. He must take responsibility for helping himself.
And I go back to being the courteous, friendly, ordinarily-helpful neighbor I was from the beginning. Same limits. Reset.
Which is what seems to confuse everyone most of all.
*sigh*
So you see why I love your truism.
Posted by: k at January 08, 2006 10:37 AM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Other Survivors of the R.L. Hymers Cult
. . . seem to be
concerned that he not take in any more innocent people with his warped execution of (otherwise conventional) Christianity.
And from the caption on the photo, it looks like they're, well, annoyed at him.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
January 05, 2006
Wallpaper!
Professor Purkinje used to like to talk about how he was lied to when he was young: "all my life I was told that science was really, really hard, and getting a girl pregnant was really, really easy. It turns out that science is really, really easy, and getting my wife pregnant was really, really hard."
Ditto on the getting pregnant part. Sheesh.
But the other thing I've been lied to about is wallpaper. For years people have told me that getting wallpaper off of walls is really, really hard. And not only is it easy, it's also rather fun.
All this floral crap on my walls is toast.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:46 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Huh. *I* coulda told you THAT!
Are you using a paper scraper? I bet so. That's one of those Tools that Makes a Difference.
You usually don't have to use solvents, either. Hot water works great. Cheaper, and no breathing in chemicals and dealing with gross cleanups.
Wipe on the hot water with one of those sponge mops - you can do a whole wall in less than two minutes. Let it sit 10 minutes or so, then pull up a corner. Lots of it won't even need any scraper at all.
It's kind of like getting the labels off of glass jars. The glue they used makes the most difference in ease of removal. But often, jsut soaking it does the trick.
And talk about satisfying! Lovely clean pure walls. You get to do Throwaways of the Old Junk. Then a blank canvas awaits your artistry.
Posted by: k at January 05, 2006 06:01 PM (6krEN)
2
You're more likely to have a problem when the house is quite old and the wall paper is many-layered. Go for it.
Posted by: John Enright at January 05, 2006 08:53 PM (ESV/5)
3
You were lucky! The previous owner prepped the walls correctly. probably used sizing or primer beforehand, and used a modern paper with no additional adhesive. One day you will meet an old house with real, old, plaster walls. And someone who didn't follow directions... or listened to his brother-in-law. The adhesive won't be water soluble and you'll have to score it and find a suitable solvent. And plaster will break away from the wall. And you'll finally decide that a complete tear-out (of the walls) is the only possible course of action. And you'll have to hide your firearms.
For most modern cases, a gentle scoring and a little steam do the trick.
Posted by: Darrell at January 05, 2006 08:59 PM (vbhJL)
4
That's because you are dealing with "modern" strippable wallpaper (around since at least the '70s.
Try stripping wallpaper from an old victorian - paper that was put up with wheat paste.
Posted by: Zendo Deb at January 05, 2006 10:41 PM (S417T)
Posted by: maggie katzen at January 05, 2006 11:11 PM (rVzXG)
6
There seem to be three layers: 1) the paper itself, which comes right up; 2) a sort of "underlayer" of paper that needs to be wetted, scored and scraped; 3) the stubborn glue, which is also water soluble.
The goal is to get a section all around the edges of the room completely clean tomorrow, so I can put up sample patches of the two paint colors I want to use. And that way we can see them in a few different types of light before finalizing our decision.
But I need a third color, for the trim. I'm considering something daring, like cobalt blue or cranberry. (The main color is a sort of sage, with tan accents.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 01:40 AM (zZMVu)
7
I feel for you. I tackled such a project a few years ago. May I recommend a putty knife? It requires a deft touch, but it does remove the paper pretty nicely...
Posted by: caltechgirl at January 09, 2006 02:02 PM (/vgMZ)
8
Well, I got the Spartan model of wallpaper scraper, and it's just a smidge wider than a conventional putty knife. I might need the knife for those corners, though.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 09, 2006 04:01 PM (/y+/O)
9
Cranberry.
I just LOVE cranberries. Last night I finally polished off the rest of my homemade cranberry sauce.
Your blog always makes me hungry.
Posted by: k at January 09, 2006 05:47 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I Know Everyone's Going to Get Bent Out of Shape,
but they
shouldn't.
Just think of North Korea and Iran as very large aspirin factories.
Hat tip: one of my former comrades-in-cultism.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
January 04, 2006
Defending the Legacy Media
An editorial by a friend of mine who leans leftward and might be regarded as a present-day conventional liberal (as opposed to those like Dean Esmay, Jeff Goldstein, and this author, who call themselves classical liberals).
Terrible news about the miners in West Virginia. I was awake, of course, and watching when CNN broke the news that initial stories of twelve survivors were wrong and, in fact, there was only one survivor. Over on MSNBC, they were running tape of an eariler press conference on the subject, and on FOX a panel of conservatives were assuring each other that the scandals surrounding the White House and Republican congressmen weren't really scandals and wouldn't affect the Administration or the Republican grip on Congress.
Only CNN was live. Only CNN had the story. An astonished Anderson Cooper broke the news of a single survivor after a women ran down from the Baptist Church where miner's families were gathered and blurted the distressing news to him.
The New York newspapers, which are put to bed before 3 a.m., when the news of the "miscommunication" broke, all ran headlines like "ALIVE" (the New York Daily News).
But again, experience and class tells. The New York Times ran the story saying that families had told them twelve miners were alive, but they (the Times) were unable to confirm it. It seems the other papers published the news as fact, whereas the Times did not.
CNN and The New York Times take it in the balls about every fifteen minutes on FOX and conservative talk radio, where they are called un-American, pro-terrorist and things even more vile. They are favorite targets of the Right wingnuts. It's all bullshit, of course.
Last night, CNN and the New York Times showed why they are the preeminent news sources, world-wide. They are the best at what they do, and the fact that they're not perfect detracts not one whit from that.
I'll remind everyone here that this friend of mine has been very kind to me in a lot of ways. So, sticking to the facts, how would you begin to quantify the degree of error in various news sources? If you accept the premise that we all want to believe what we want to believe—and would prefer to get our information from organs that share our respective slants—how would you cast doubt on either my friend's conviction about the New York Times, or my own?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:49 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 415 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Oh yes, this one data point completely demolishes the argument that the major media is left-leaning and unreliable.
Not.
Posted by: John at January 04, 2006 07:06 PM (Jo+I7)
2
Well, of course it doeesn't. But if you were constructing an argument from the ground up--and making it as user-friendly as possible--where would you start?
That's the thing I can't quite figure out: where one would begin. It would help if the NYT had its own version of Patterico: at least there would be a concentration of the data all in one place. But how would one structure such an undertaking?
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 08:19 PM (zZMVu)
3
So Fox was NOT spreading an unsubstantiated rumor(they were talking politics, according to the author) and they are a-holes? And didn't CNN spread the unsub rumors, before they reported the facts? And that makes them "pre-eminent"???? I wish someone would come up with an injection to make up for a deficiency of linear thinking.... Maybe if reporters weren't trying to overhear conversations(or one part thereof) or using modified scanners to intercept communications...or would wait for the officials at the scene to make announcements---this wouldn't happen. Nope. It doesn't wash. Back to kicking them in the balls--if only they had them!
Posted by: Darrell at January 04, 2006 10:23 PM (lzxi1)
4
Late-Breaking News.....CNN is reproting on the sighting of a Giant Sand Squid. No reports of casualties....YET!!!! NYTs in holding pattern...
Posted by: Darrell at January 04, 2006 10:27 PM (lzxi1)
5
Late-Breaking News.....CNN is reporting on the sighting of a Giant Sand Squid. No reports of casualties....YET!!!! NYTs in holding pattern...
Posted by: Darrell at January 04, 2006 10:27 PM (lzxi1)
6
i'm just not sure he's right actually. i was up, had fox on, the story broke around 2 a.m. during the rerun of special report. maybe they were a few seconds behind, i don't know. don't have cnn.
Posted by: maggie katzen at January 04, 2006 10:32 PM (rVzXG)
7
I truly love that sand squid.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 05, 2006 01:02 AM (zZMVu)
8
I have an idea...what about "No Official Word" or "Waiting..."and leave it at that? Recap the rumors, if you must. Can't we wait? The Chicago Tribune is reporting today(Thursday) that the early edition of the NYT got it wrong, too. No 'awards" to go around on this story. plenty of blame.
Posted by: Darrell at January 05, 2006 08:30 AM (PC9LD)
9
If you use the media standard that they use for Bush and WMD's then the answer is clear.
They LIED.
Posted by: Jack at January 05, 2006 08:37 AM (RlrMY)
10
Re the supposed excellence of CNN, you might cite Eason Jordan's remarks about that network's handling of reporting from Iraq.
I'd also note that "Fox" and "conservative radio" are totally irrelevant to the opinions of many of us whom this individual would doubtless categorize as being on the Right. I for one don't watch much TV, and Fox news almost never. I don't enjoy radio talk shows; indeed, my car radio broke about a year ago and I haven't bothered to get it fixed.
Posted by: David Foster at January 05, 2006 11:21 AM (yV7ws)
11
Here's some background.
I'd say if they couldn't confirm it, don't print it/put it on the air. The responsible thing to do considering the situation. It should have headlined "Unable to confirm if there are any survivors" with "families were informed they were alive" on paragraph 33 instead of a headline of "12 of 13 Alive" with "unable to confirm" in paragraph 33. They decided they wanted a scoop instead of acting responsibly.
Posted by: dorkafork at January 06, 2006 08:09 PM (mI+u5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How Fun.
I hate to admit it, but I love to watch the ever-changing Google graphics. As a matter of fact, that's one disadvantage to being a Mac user: being able to access Google directly from the browser means we sometimes miss the "illo du jour."
Today it was even funner than usual (copy editors may use words such as "funner"; civilians, of course, are forbidden to do so):

I must admit that it took me a moment to figure out what it was, but after I looked at the two o's, I knew. It's in honor of Louis Braille's birthday. Here's more.
UPDATE: In the comments section at the above link, one reader produced this braille key.
That's one of those things I'm happy to pay taxes for, by the way: services to the blind.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:58 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The "key" didn't help...It always helps if the key shows the patterns that are needed. Are we supposed to, like, work(think) or something? Too much like work. I'll assume it says "screw the Left" until further notice.
Posted by: Darrell at January 04, 2006 10:34 PM (lzxi1)
Posted by: tkBar at January 05, 2006 08:24 PM (8LwRE)
3
How would someone needing braille know it was there?
Posted by: Darrell at January 05, 2006 09:06 PM (vbhJL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Things We Do for Drugs
More depressing news: a young actor,
Lillo Brancato, Jr., took part in what he claims he thought was a small crime: breaking and entering. A gun battle ensued, and another man was killed. Says Brancato:
“If I would have known, I wouldn’t have allowed him in my car,” Brancato said. “Imagine, we get pulled over and I get caught with an armed felon in my car. Since I’ve been in the movies, it would have instantly drawn attention.”
Brancato said he might take the witness stand at trial to tell the jury “how horrible I feel about my stupidity.”
Stephen at Crime Blog wonders about Brancato's sincerity; I wonder how plausible it was that he attempted to burglarize an occupied apartment on the understanding that he and his accomplice were unarmed.
The motive? Apparently drug-related.
I know Jeff Harrell took a lot of grief for this impassioned post about the evils of addiction to drugs. I gave him some grief myself. And I'm still a libertarian who thinks a lot of the secondary evils of drug use will disappear if they are legalized. But the kernel of truth in Jeff's diatribe is this: no food junkie or television junkie or credit card junkie ever killed someone else by accident in pursuit of their chosen compulsion.
We cannot say the same about either alcohol or street drugs (though perhaps, accounting for crimes of passion, we can say it about sex and love addiction).
There is no cost-free public policy to be had, one way or the other.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:13 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I am ambivalent about drugs and drug policy, and believe that the two major effects of the federal war on drugs has been to 1) militarize law enforcement and 2) provide a sick parody of current agricultural policy by raising the street price of drugs and make the illict trade hugely profitable.
However, I cannot subscribe to the "victimless crime" view of drug use, nor to the libertarian "my body" one either. Drug use is not victimless, it destroys people. If it were only the users, then I could shrug and say "you pays your money, and you makes your choice." Drug use harms and destroys people around the users as well, including people not even connected to the user by family or social ties.
So while in favor of decriminalization of drugs, I cannot support any plan that would channel my tax dollars towards people's self destruction and mayhem, so no state provided fixes in my universe. Nor can i support any attitude that excuses acts committed under the influence of drugs, or in pursuit of them.
On the other hand, if drug producers were engaged in a legal business, then the liability lawyers could have a crack at them.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 04, 2006 06:07 PM (j4Cpd)
2
But when one considers what we spend on this ineffective (and Constitutionally destructive) "war on drugs," we could pay for a hell of a lot of rehab clinics with the same number of dollars.
Minimize the damand, and the supply will go down.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 06:22 PM (zZMVu)
3
Or demand, either way. Let's minimize both. (Too lazy to go fix it!)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 08:21 PM (zZMVu)
4
And here I thought you were making some subtle point... "damn demand?"
And I don't buy the financial shifting argument (but if we spent the same amount...) I didn't like it at all in the early nineties when people were talking about the "Peace Dividend" because the same people were claiming we were bankrupting our children's future with a military we could not afford.
Oh, so the money we can't afford on defense should be instead spent on social programs? If we can't afford it, we can't. Afford. It.
My ex had a similar theory in her personal finances. If she decided against buying an item that we couldn't afford, that meant that she could instead spend the same amount of money we didn't have on something else.
Anyway, that is not the whole gist of my objection, although not spending the money at all and letting taxpayers keep it, or else having it devolve from the Feds to state and local government is more appealing to me. Transferring the funds from trying vainly to stop the traffic and simply spending it on the results of the traffic doesn't appeal to me. And any social engineering solution is probably going to involve me subsidising a person's habit and another person's treatment.
It'd be a lot tidier if hard drugs made you feel really great for about ten seconds and then killed you. And caused the corpse to diasappear.
Oh well. Maybe we should set up an island somewhere for druggies, offer a free one way ticket to it to anyone on demand, and impose the death penalty on anybody distributing drugs anywhere off that island.
And if anyone is going to accuse me of being hard hearted, yeah, okay. I've seen way too many people destroyed to weep for abstract victims. Right now my inclination would be a hands of, laissez faire approach. It isn't illegal, all other criminal penalties apply, and nobody spends a dime of tax money on it again.
Which I know is unrealistic and unworkable.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 04, 2006 09:12 PM (eguza)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 03, 2006
Fear of Painting
I don't know what my problem is. I shouldn't have a hangup about house paint, but it does seem to trigger that weird hand-wringing behavior. This is the sort of thing I see in my mother: she can make the important decisions. But small choices drive her to distraction, because she's afraid of getting beaten up over having done The Wrong Thing. For good reason, because as soon as she does something she beats herself up for it.
Oddly, this leads to moments of paralysis.
When I was 15 or 16 I painted my bedroom, and it was great. It had always been an awful dark yellow color, and I found a nice off-white that had some yellow in it (no, I don't think it was Navajo white, but it was likely similar--it reflected the light in a room that generally received only filtered light).
Ordinarily I can chant The Mantra: if you don't like it, you can always change it. It can be painted over. Painted over. Painted over.
But in this house I have wallpaper in nearly every room. With two exceptions I despise the patterns, but I haven't quite had the courage to take it down. I've even considered trying to paint over the wallpaper, since a small fringe minority of home-improvement people claim it can be done. Cooler heads prevailed, however, and I eventually realized that the only path to nice walls went right through the valley of nasty solvents, weird tools, and tremendous amounts of elbow grease. After which I would have to climb Mount Decision, where the paint samples live, and get married to pick a color.
It's finally happening in the hall bathroom. There's a little seam that's been lifting a bit, so a corner has peeled up ever so slightly. It's near the floor, barely noticeable. But I've known it was there. It's been there for months.
Yesterday I took that corner and just started pulling. The top layer of the wallpaper peeled right up, leaving a material reminiscent of drywall. I'll be cleaning the rest of this up papery stuff up with solvent and a scraper.
Today I bought to small paint samples. I'll clean up a section on each of the walls and paint a few large patches. Then when my color consultant comes over to help me make the final pick, I'll have an idea where I'm going with this. I'm thinking of a sponging effect, or a combing effect. Or even the walls in my main color with my accent color as a stencil around the edges. I guess I'll have to get a third color for the molding in any event.
But in that first moment, when you take a corner of the horrid floral wallpaper and just tug, there's no deluding yourself that "if it doesn't work, I'll just do it over." After all, some poor soul was hired by the previous owners to accomplish something exquisitely that—to my mind—should never have been done in the first place. And I'm undoing all his/her work.
My first act of vandalism—the peeling, the tearing, the "no turning back"—horrified me at first, until I saw how much better the walls looked without that cluttered, annoying pattern on 'em.
"Time to murder and create." I'm ready.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:21 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 552 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Its a good feeling when theres no going back. We've just painted our home 2 tone and we hate both of them. It was design by commitee that sunk it.
maybe this helps.
Posted by: dave bones at January 04, 2006 04:47 AM (OIJbx)
2
I've always been a fan of white walls.
Posted by: the Pirate at January 04, 2006 09:51 AM (0ZKi5)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 09:58 AM (zZMVu)
4
sounds like what we did, were worried about getting the wall paper off but once i started pulling i couldn't stop. it was sooooo easy.
Posted by: maggie katzen at January 04, 2006 10:37 PM (rVzXG)
5
Does the blue-collar job help you with the Painting Thing?
Posted by: k at January 06, 2006 04:43 AM (M7kiy)
6
Yes! It de-mystifies it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 11:46 AM (zZMVu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I Wonder
. . . if I'm going through menopause. I'm definitely not pregnant, and I haven't taken the pill in 6-8 weeks or so.
Nothing. No hot flashes. No cramping. No achey boobs. Zip.
And I'm 43.
What if this is one of those strange areas of my life wherein I just experience dumb luck out of nowhere? To tell you the truth, I'm kind of ready for it.
UPDATE: Spoke too soon. My uterus is saying hello, so I've taken a few Tylenol and await the red tide tomorrow. I hate chicks who complain about this stuff, so I'll just point out that I got my first period at the age of 14, and over the past 29 years the novelty value has worn off. It turns out the whole thing is rather inconvenient.
And, no: a few free lunches/dinners haven't really made up the difference. Not as a practical matter.
(Hey, boyz: do I need to flag these posts? Should there be an "icky girl stuff" warning, as K uses? Please advise.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:45 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Joy,
Define "dumb luck". Take the pregnancy test (I know you said you aren't, but...). Then consider stress. My wife sometimes missed or went 5-7 weeks when she was wound tight. She also didn't believe she was pregnant with our son for about two months. We'd been playing roulette for about three years at that point. Then our daughter surprised us with her arrival 19 months later.
We had thought one (or both) were incapable of having kids. We married at 30 and 28 respectively; we were not monks prior to that.
If it is that, some go easily. But check with the doc when you get a chance. Other things can cause stops.
BTW - I have four older sisters, so "girl stuff" is pretty easy for me. I lost whatever was left during my active duty time; I had several troops that were women and worked for a bunch. One joker noted that I had an emergency box of Kotex in my field kit - until he had to come borrow some for one of his kids that had forgotten. It was precious.
SGT Dave
Posted by: SGT Dave at January 03, 2006 10:04 PM (blfs0)
2
Well, I've taken two store-bought tests, and they were the extra-sensitive kind. But at the end of this month I run out of the good insurance and have to go back to the low-cost plan, so maybe I should drop by the OB-GYN's office.
Actually, either option would be "dumb luck."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 03, 2006 10:38 PM (zZMVu)
3
Oh, and I thought all soldiers and Marines carried at least pads, if not tampons, strictly for their value in wound-treatment; as I understand it, the California Highway Patrol has carried Kotex for years.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 03, 2006 10:42 PM (zZMVu)
4
Joy,
I didn't have pads; they were tampons because that is what the girls used.
I have seen it; though they usually choose the generics instead of name brands. We have moved to some really good new stuff, though. There is a powder and a chemical-impregnated pad that will stop bleeding faster than a pressure bandage. I have two friends who would have died without the new kits. Really good stuff, should be on the civilian market really soon (though I am "moving" a few packets to my private first aid kit when I get home).
SGT Dave
Posted by: SGT Dave at January 04, 2006 12:47 AM (blfs0)
5
Hey, boyz: do I need to flag these posts? Should there be an "icky girl stuff" warning, as K uses? Please advise.
I don't think you need to. But it's been a long time since I was a boy - I just turned 43 myself - and "icky girl stuff" doesn't bother me too much these days.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at January 04, 2006 09:33 AM (1hM1d)
6
The OB GYN can do a hormone level test to let you know for sure.
Posted by: gail at January 04, 2006 09:45 AM (jMroL)
7
43 and use the word "boyz" and gets all red about icky girl stuff. Boy we really have created an indulged, childish, I'll never grow up country!
Posted by: laura at January 04, 2006 10:09 AM (QkVgy)
8
Are you telling me it's time to ditch the "Hello Kitty" handbag?
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 10:28 AM (zZMVu)
9
Don't ditch "Hello Kitty." It is just becoming popular with little ones again.
I'd rather not see these discussions, just like I'd prefer if The Anchoress didn't talk about her drooping boobs, but it is your blog.
Posted by: olddawg at January 04, 2006 11:56 AM (7nc0l)
10
Well if you're asking me, you're asking the guy who gets himself (and his readers) in stitches over the "tampon angel" craft at Christmastime, so...
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 04, 2006 03:20 PM (B2X7i)
11
You can talk about the icky girl stuff. Just don't make it an all "Icky Girl Network". It would get boring real quick.
And by the way, 43 is not too old to have the bunny die.
Posted by: Jack at January 04, 2006 03:35 PM (1yMIg)
12
Yeah, DC: I saw that post. I actually thought the tampon angel was convincing, but couldn't imagine who was bored enough to want to create tampon crafts.
I mean, all those women who buy a big box of supplies and then get blindsided by menopause should just
give them to a younger woman and get on with their lives. (Actually, keep 2-3 in your bathroom just in case, okay? More if you're my mother. Though maybe not any more. Yay!)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 03:47 PM (zZMVu)
13
I don't object to the icky girl stuff. It fuels my schadenfreude at having much better designed internal plumbing.
But heck, for disgusting personal observations, when I went to Officer Candidate School in 1979 I didn't have a bowel movement for the first four days. Not constipation, just didn't feel the need. Noticed it at day three and got a little concerned, on day four everything was back to normal and I just wrote the episode up to stress.
There, don't you fell better now about posting icky girl stuff?
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 04, 2006 06:14 PM (j4Cpd)
14
I had a bad breakup in my 20s. Got dumped by someone I'd pinned some piece of my ego on (for reasons I can't figure out, decades later) and I found it hard to eat. I dropped below 100 pounds, and by then my mother and I were on speaking terms again, so I was sort of trying to hide it from her lest she push more food at me. She noticed it anyway, though I'm not sure she understood how low the number got (it was the cliched 98 lb).
Anyway, during this time I forced myself to eat lots of beef and green salad, figuring that I could use the protein and minerals. And I reminded myself, over and over, that as long as I was shitting occasionally, I'd be just fine.
[surveys chunky middle-aged belly] Better by far to be ten pounds over vs. ten pounds under.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 06:28 PM (zZMVu)
15
My wife's time of the month was so regular that this conversation actually happened:
She says: "I'd like to do this and that on Sunday."
I says: "Can't. You start Saturday. You'll be too cramped up to get out of bed Sunday."
She says: "Oh."
Posted by: John at January 04, 2006 07:00 PM (Jo+I7)
16
*ahem*
Now just because that extra-big box got acquired just before the first misses, didn't mean I'd never need them again. As I discovered.
And by next Christmas, if that same box is still hanging around, DC's got great ideas on what to do with them. Not just the tampon angels, but a link to a bunch of other tampon crafts. Which, of course, can lead to even more.
Besides, what if one of those putative Younger Ladies comes to visit and finds herself All Out? Maybe she'll need more than 2 or 3.
Don't worry. That big ol' box isn't an albatross around my neck. I've gotten rather fond of it.
Posted by: k at January 05, 2006 06:34 PM (6krEN)
17
I wasn't directing that just at you! I'd heard the same story from a few other quarters. I think I'd started to consider it a sort of archtypical thing, like the Murphy's Law of the uterus.
Sorry, K!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 06, 2006 01:33 AM (zZMVu)
18
OH!
Life as an Accidental Hermit. Having seen no other references to that Murphy's Law of the Uterus experience, looks like I subconsciously assumed I was the only one. As usual, it turned out to be a silly assumption.
It was still funny anyway. The mental image of a giant-sized box of tampons around my neck, slowly blooming themselves into Tampon Angels as next Christmas approaches...some escaping their confines and perching on the edge of the box like a ladybug, poised for flight...
Posted by: k at January 06, 2006 05:00 AM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Please Keep in Mind
. . . that when I say "fuck the Palestinians," I do not mean anything like "fuck every person who lives in 'Palestine.'" There are innocents there, being exploited by those who are determined to see Israel brought down.
So, fuck the Palestinians, and fuck every anti-Jewish asshole who is using the situation to serve his or her agenda.
Fuck those who use suffering of others to produce further bloodshed.
(By the way, I had a resolution going to clean up my language here, but I'm furious. And I hope to stay that way, because when I stop being angry sometimes I just want to sink to my knees and sob for the human race. So hard Anglo-Saxon syllables it is.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:25 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I say "fuck the Palestinians," I mean everyone who identifies themselves with the deathcultist, bloodthirsty lie called "a Palestinian" invented by Yasser Arafat and his KGB masters as a spearhead to continue the old Russian and Islamic traditions of murdering Jews.
Oh, and their friends, too. Fuck the friends of the Palestinians. Every one of them.
Posted by: Laurence Simon at January 04, 2006 06:18 AM (uBCxH)
2
The key questions to me are: Why are there so many people in our own society who sympathize with these monsters? Why are they so disproportionately concentrated in certain professions like college teaching and entertainment? Why are the very same people who object to rational military operations conducted by legitimate states so quick to make excuses for terrorist violence against civilians?
I keep thinking of Leonard Cohen's lines:
I know that you have suffered, lad
But suffer this a while:
Whatever makes a soldier sad
Will make a killer smile
Posted by: David Foster at January 04, 2006 06:55 AM (7TmYw)
3
"The key questions to me are: Why are there so many people in our own society who sympathize with these monsters? "
Damn good question. Look, I understand angry white kids rebelling against "Society", but how f*cked up do you have to be to be a de facto supporter of murder?
Posted by: Gordon at January 04, 2006 08:35 AM (JwR1N)
4
What do you mean by "fuck the Palestinians"? Every story has 2 sides. Personally I do not side with either the Israelis or Palestinians.
The whole Middle East is one large complicated mess where it is difficult to say one party is right, whilst the other is wrong.
Whilst any civilized person I know does not condone suicide bombing or murder, most civilized people I know hold some sympathy for the *average* Palestinian on the street because they live without hope. No education, no prospects, no decent jobs or accommodation- no hope for the future. So they may as well think what's the point and I for one do not blame them.
Put yourself in that position and see how that feels. For me hope is the bedrock of the human condition and without it what are we reduced to? You only have to look at any Palestinian "martyr" to find that one out.
Posted by: Cliff at January 04, 2006 12:30 PM (r8zxX)
5
Cliff, with all due respect. Pull eyour head out and quit equivocating. Be a man and take a stand.
No education, no prospects, no decent jobs or accommodation- no hope for the future. So they may as well think what's the point and I for one do not blame them.
How about they build a modern society out of a fucking desert like Israel has done? How abot they quit blaming Israel and get their asses to work. Por ejemplo: Have you seen the coastline they control? How about a resort to make some money?
Posted by: Patrick at January 04, 2006 01:13 PM (MDQPq)
6
'Palestine' is a place where a group of miserable Arabs are held up by non-miserable Arabs as a sort of weapon against Israel.
They are participating in one of the largest publicity stunts in history.
But they cannot be helped until they get out of the death-cult mentality. I weep for the children being raised to think their raison d'etre is to murder Jews.
The "two sides to every story" truism doesn't help us, here: there are two sides to the story of a rapist-murderer and the woman he tortured for days in a secluded cabin before killing. Should we assume the murderer's side is morally equivalent to that of his victim's, and give them equal weight?
Did you follow my link? These people target schoolchildren, for crying out loud! I've been depressed enough to contemplate suicide, but at no point have I thought:
Hm. Maybe I can take a few 10-year-olds with me while I'm at it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 01:22 PM (zZMVu)
7
Two sides to every story... hark! The mating call of the moral relativist!
So one side is gripped in a self imposed death cult, and are proxies of the neighboring Arab nation states themselves gripped in the same self inflicted death cult, and their stated goal is the elimination of a democratic state.
Okay, I see both sides. Fuck the Palestinains. They have no moral standing whatever. Whatever the sins of Israel, genocide is not one of them.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 04, 2006 06:31 PM (j4Cpd)
8
I am forced to conclude that Allah is punishing the Palestinians.
Posted by: John at January 04, 2006 06:57 PM (Jo+I7)
9
Clearly: Israelis get their virgins and grapes here on earth. How much clearer could it be?
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 04, 2006 08:29 PM (zZMVu)
10
Well I might have worded it differently but the sentiment is correct......though I would expand it eff Islam and its brutal followers....the Palis are just one group of evil terrorists that roam the earth in the name of Islam...
I would say eff the whole filthy cultic ideology of Islam and its cousins marxism and nazism!!!
Posted by: Albertanator at January 04, 2006 08:37 PM (Uagor)
11
When I say fuck the Palestinians, I mean to include every phony intellectualoid who wears a checked scarf kaffiyeh because he saw the Arafish wearing one and thought it was edgy and cool, and fuck every deluded college chick who thinks she is being progressive by obstructing the IDF.
When I say fuck the Palestinians, I mean to say fuck anyone who has ever cowtowed to the Palestinians after Munich '72, Lod airport, Rome airport, Vienna airport, Klinghoffer, the seder bombing a couple of years ago, ad infinitum.
Fuck them. And fuck you if you have lost your fury. Without it you're worthless, so fuck you.
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 04, 2006 10:56 PM (vBxdP)
12
Stuart, you've got to stop holding back. It's not healthy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 05, 2006 01:14 AM (zZMVu)
13
Ahh. . . It felt good to get that off my chest.
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 05, 2006 05:38 PM (hGXtW)
14
Great post AG- and I especially agree with what you say in the comments. Vast numbers of Palestinians are complicit in this game- they are after all martyrs for a cause. The whole "Palestine is the cause of all unrest in the Middle East " meme is just part of the theatre, and dignifies the Pallies to compensate for their pitiful existence.
Posted by: ed at January 07, 2006 01:52 PM (r+Jmy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Did You Fill Out My Reader Survey?
Please
do so.
And for the question that has to do with "how did you first hear about Little Miss Attila," please do not reply:
• We shared a pitcher of Sangria at Bicyle Shop Cafe in the 80s; you were sooooo fucked up.
or
• I had a wild, yet longstanding affair with your husband before he was your husband.
or
• I lost my virginity to you.
Thank you for following these guildelines.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:21 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at January 03, 2006 03:52 PM (mrcD4)
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 03, 2006 07:11 PM (xdX36)
3
Especially if they are true!
...The Campaign Staff
Posted by: Darrell at January 03, 2006 10:23 PM (XeCgX)
4
Glad someone's got my back
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 03, 2006 10:43 PM (zZMVu)
5
I've been pondering why I visit this site (not that you asked except in the initial surver), and by extension why I visit the other sites in my favorites list.
Some blogs I like because of their free ranging nature and links to things I don't have the time to search out on my own (Instapundit, for example).
Other blogs I like because they post thoughtful commentary and provide new perspective (Power Line, Belmont Club).
Some, like yours, I visit because I enjoy the blogger's "voice." Writing style, attitudes, opinions, whatever. And those blogs invariably also have another feature, which is the interplay in the comments, especially when the blogger takes part. In the early days of Slate's "The Fray" I was a frequent participant. I gave up around the 2000 election, when some commentors began wishing for Dick Cheney to have a fatal heart attack. In my proud history as a Bill Clinton Despiser (VRWC membership number in the low three digits) I never heard anyone wish for the things to happen to Clinton and his cohorts that are routine amongst the fever swamp of the left today.
So the give and take of civil debate is good, as is the friendly banter among people who have never been face to face.
But the Sangria thing, and the virginity bit? Was that you? Sorry, I was really wasted that day. I meant to call, but your husband and I went to Cabo the next morning.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 04, 2006 09:27 PM (eguza)
6
Beautiful atrocities. The link to Fuck the Palestinians.
Posted by: Stuart Fullerton at January 04, 2006 11:01 PM (vBxdP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
White-on-Black, Black-on-Black
It doesn't seem to matter: persecution of black Republicans continues. I had heard that my friend Ted Hayes was getting kicked off the land he's been using as a village for the homeless downtown, but I hadn't realized that it was because of his association with the Party of Lincoln until I went to
Goldstein's site today.
Bigotry against Republicans is a tragedy in the world today. And I'm dead serious: I had to take the Bush bumper sticker off my car. Not because of the honking and getting flipped off in traffic; I can certainly handle that. The problem was, it was costing me jobs in "tolerant" Los Angeles.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:46 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
On my system your masthead runs off the right side of the screen and sometimes the right text margin goes slightly "under" the ad on the right. Just thought I would let you know.
Posted by: noah at January 03, 2006 03:06 PM (E46tL)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 03, 2006 03:13 PM (zZMVu)
3
Yes, the Dems and libs call Colin Powell, Condi Rice and other black Republicans, OREO COOKIES, as well as tokens. Pretty lame, they can't bring down on issues, so they resort to namecalling. Anyway, here is an uplifting JOYFUL column for the New Year. It is excerpts. You can read the entire column :
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/columnists/zito
The Hillary-Condi avalanche By Salena Zito TRIBUNE-REVIEW Sunday, January 1, 2006
Curb your enthusiasm and fasten your seat belts; today marks the first day of Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential bid.
This is a moment of glee in many camps. Others are observing a moment of silence with a primal scream quickly to follow.
Yes, let the mockery begin: The Clintons are back and open for business. And according to Dick Morris, the Clintons' one-time confidant, the only person who can stop Hillary is Condoleezza Rice.
If you look just at the demographic argument for Condi's candidacy, Morris' theory is flawless. ... -- the real issue is swing suburban women and minorities.
....."I think that the only way to stop Hillary from winning is by running someone that will appeal to women and take that black vote away from her."
That someone would be Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a woman who probably has the best personal story to tell of any modern political figure since Ronald Reagan.
....Morris says. "Condi is a woman that has made it on her own, whose accomplishments are hers." Hold that up to Hillary, whose "accomplishments are entirely derivative of her husband's," making even the National Organization of I-don't-know-what-kind-of-Women wince.
The potential exists that America will have in front of it two models of feminine advancement -- one dependent on a husband, the other independent. Morris may be on to something when he says "the Condi Rice model will be much more attractive to women."
But will Condi run? Her answer is consistently "No," which of course means nothing. Nobody who is ever running for president is running for president. Well, except maybe for John Kerry.
...... When duty calls, Rice always has responded by serving her country.
Kent Gates, a GOP political strategist, lays it out this way: "If the scenario exists where there needs to be an alternative -- and she becomes the clear alternative, if the potential candidates and the assumed nominee is not acceptable -- Condi would be hard-pressed to say no."
......We all know who Hillary is -- a woman who fundamentally views government as the answer to what ails us. Although you will see her husband and former Cabinet members pointing to her as instrumental in setting the policy of the Clinton economic ascendancy, everyone would be wise to remember Hillarycare, her Alamo.
As for Condi, we'll just have to wait and see.
But it is compelling that, at the grass-roots level, Condi is spared many of the negatives that the Bush administration gets. .... Condi has consistently risen in early Republican polls.
Urban legend points to 1992 as the "Year of the Woman" in American politics. Yet when you think of a Condi-Hillary match-up, 1992 looks like a snowball compared to the avalanche that the presidential race will be, beginning today.
(Salena Zito is a Trib editorial page columnist.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at January 04, 2006 07:31 AM (PzHr9)
4
Here is good news about black leadership, on January 16th (the day to honor Martin Luther King), the first woman elected as president of an African nation will be sworn into office. World history will be united with US history on this day, with First Lady Laura Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice leading our nation's delegation. Madam Rice remarks, "this is an important moment in the history of Africa." You might remember that president-elect Johnson-Sirleaf came to Washington DC last month and met with Secretary Rice. The legacy of this republic (founded 1821) by freed Amerian slaves is one point to celebrate on Martin Luther King's birthday. On that same day, in Iowa, a citizens group of activists (americansforrice.com) will be interacting with over 2,000 Republicans from Des Moines to build support for Condoleezza Rice to run for president in 2008. Building a network to support this wonderful woman has already been achieved over the past a year, and it can only grow more each month as Secretary Rice continues to do her work on international affairs and foreign policy for the United States. Go, Condi, go go go in 2008. She can win the White House against any Democrat, male or female.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at January 05, 2006 09:41 AM (PzHr9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
115kb generated in CPU 0.1057, elapsed 0.2698 seconds.
224 queries taking 0.2131 seconds, 611 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.