September 06, 2006
The Anchoress
cautions us about the supposed harmlessness of
forced conversions.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:06 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I also think all this goes back to "what would you do if you were in their shoes." Would you choose your faith over your life or fake the conversion because you have such strong faith?
Posted by: Greta at September 07, 2006 06:22 PM (Cbtbf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Evangelical Outpost
. . . on
the role of sex in marriage. Too conservative for my taste. Yet there are some kernels of truth in it.
Of course, every time I read one of these essays I get the impression that the author enjoys great sex with his or her spouse, and imagines that all couples would be in the same situation if they would only stop being silly. Once you've had a few girlfriends cry on your shoulder because things are awful and always have been, the issue doesn't look quite that simple.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:59 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Bah. If things are awful and always have been, why did you get married in the first place? Regardless, work to fix it, or give up and get out if that's your style. Whining about it is counter-productive.
Posted by: Kevin at September 06, 2006 08:47 AM (++0ve)
2
Saw a study somewhere that showed most women lose interest in sex with their husbands after about 3 years. They were either attracted to other men or more often just not interested at all. For men the interest level stayed the same.
This wasn't my personal experience but does seem to be common. If that's the way things are then maybe people aren't set up for easily having happy exclusive sexual relationships like the writer seems to think.
Posted by: anon at September 06, 2006 11:32 AM (SpkYG)
3
Seems a bit harsh, Kevin...wouldn't it be normal for a person to agonize and to talk with friends before making a major life decision like "getting out"?"
Posted by: david foster at September 06, 2006 03:57 PM (/Z304)
4
I guess you're right David. It wasn't the 'things are awful' part that bothered me. It was the 'and always have been' part. She should have been agonizing and talking it over with friends before starting the relationship if things started out awful.
Posted by: Kevin at September 07, 2006 03:50 AM (++0ve)
5
Difficult, because somehow we've gotten to a "she" that seems to be a composite of a few of my female friends--whose circumstances are different from each other's.
1) Kevin, is sex everything in a relationship? Is there no chance that a relationship has worth even if the sex is sub-par?
2) Within the reasoning of the Evangelical Outpost essay, how would one know ahead of time about a sexual incompatibility? One would, until widowhood, only know one person sexually, and he/she would potentially bring a low level of sexual skill into the relationship. Mightn't this be a problem?
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 07, 2006 10:59 AM (LEEsJ)
6
My issue is with airy-fairy religious people who assume that if everyone has good intentions, the sex thing will magically work itself out. I just don't see that happening in the real world, and some of these people appear to be "coaching from some pretty comfortable sidelines."
Hey. Just pick up the violin. If you're right with God and you love your spouse, you'll be able to play Vivaldi without any guidance whatsoever. How hard can it be? Love will conquer all.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 07, 2006 11:02 AM (LEEsJ)
7
"1) Kevin, is sex everything in a relationship? Is there no chance that a relationship has worth even if the sex is sub-par?"
I would not call it 'everything', but I would say it's a necessary ingredient, and the relationship is not workable without it. Much like the relationship would be unworkable with great sex, but you find your spouse uninteresting, or pursuing opposite goals than yours.
Since your girlfriends were crying on your shoulder about it, I assume they agree with me on this. Being able to read between the lines (very often incorrectly), I'd say they considered this in the beginning of the relationship, and went ahead with it anyway for some other reason (money? security? lonely? money? love? money?). And... now they are whining to you about it.
It just doesn't seem fair

On your second point, I guess if you never had sex with someone else, you wouldn't know it's bad (if it is)? I doubt it comes up much though, since virgin marriages is more honoured in the breach than the observance.
Posted by: Kevin at September 09, 2006 11:33 PM (++0ve)
8
Kevin, you are a cynical man when it comes to women.
Buy me a steak dinner and drinks one night, and I'll explain to you exactly why we aren't the greedy, grasping golddiggers you perceive us to be.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 09, 2006 11:59 PM (LEEsJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 05, 2006
I Need a New Hobby.
But I can't decide between crochet and smack.
Thoughts?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:17 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You could crochet a hyperdermic needle cozy.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 05, 2006 10:33 PM (RiZPJ)
2
That's like . . . that's deep, man. Clean works: really important.
That could really work; I'll be back later to implement the plan: need some yarn, a hook and a syringe.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 05, 2006 10:40 PM (LEEsJ)
3
You could sell them on eBay. Just don't mention what they really are.
Then when sales take off--I'm eyeing the Dutch market--you could expand into coke spoon cozies and something for marijuana. "You can put your weed in it."
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 05, 2006 11:46 PM (RiZPJ)
4
I believe the smoke shops around here persistently use the term "material."
To me, of course, a coke spoon is a 70s-revival nostalgia item, and I could see getting one for that reason.
I suspect the Feds wouldn't see it that way. Hyperactive folks: They're all on meth. Had you noticed?
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 06, 2006 12:36 AM (LEEsJ)
5
Back in the early 80s I was in England, and my girlfriend and I went into an antique shop to look around in this little country town. She bought me a little tiny silver antique spoon. Or I thought it was an antique baby's spoon, until she told me what it was. DOH. Later, I wondered if the little old lady that ran the shop knew what she was selling, for they had several "baby spoons" in their display case. LOL It definitely gives new meaning to "antiquing".
Posted by: clyde at September 06, 2006 04:36 AM (6m+7s)
6
Shrooms. Crocheting on shrooms.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 06, 2006 06:23 PM (xdX36)
7
well, smack wouldn't eat up as much closet space. i swear all that yarn is breeding.
Posted by: maggie katzen at September 06, 2006 10:01 PM (wIQcY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ya Gotta Love a Country
. . . that contains
more male voters than it does actual men.
Please pray for genuine democracy in Yemen. Or agitate. Or send good vibes.
There are a lot of people suffering there right now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:40 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
So Who's the Bigger Liar?
Boston writer Michael Blanding, or the founders of the "pro-gun" American Hunters and Shooters Association itself?
Cam Edwards tries to sort it out.
Via Insty, who's getting mail from genuine grassroots activists who bitterly resent these "Astroturf" groups—and with good reason.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cam Edwards is the one who's right.
Posted by: Kevin at September 05, 2006 03:21 PM (++0ve)
2
AHSA is part of the Left's gun ban program. See the UN for another. Michael Blanding is the useful idiot in the media, seeking not to clarify, but to obfuscate. Michael Moore appears as himself. The complete cast list can be found at the DU and Kos. Let's hope it doesn't last as long as "Commander in Chief."
Posted by: Darrell at September 06, 2006 08:41 AM (fSi0x)
3
The NRA warned us about this group at least six months ago, if I recall correctly. They are an anti-gun front group with a deceptive name.
Posted by: Desert Cat at September 06, 2006 06:26 PM (xdX36)
4
No! They are a "moderate alternative" to the NRA! Hallelujah!
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 06, 2006 11:35 PM (LEEsJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 04, 2006
It's Something to See
. . . when the blogosphere
gang-rapes the United States Senate. Fortunately, it was the pro-Pork Senators' own fault: they were dressed like
crew sluts, from what I hear.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
Glenn Reynolds on "The Joys of Flex"
Apparently, teaching at the college level
rulz.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:36 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
September 03, 2006
World Trade Center.
We saw
the movie today. I believe Oliver Stone may have tripped and accidentally made a pro-American film.
It was well-done. At least, parts of it I were: I have a phobia about entombment, so while Attila the Hub watched the movie, I watched his shoulder. He was wearing the green Hawaiian shirt with the white flowers. Good choice, well-crafted. Durable weave.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:21 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
1
When I first heard that O.Stone was doing a 9/11 film, I figured it was going to be yet another movie I was going NOT to be seeing.
Color me surprised at the positive reviews.
Posted by: Darleen at September 04, 2006 11:10 AM (cXz8w)
2
I'd been wondering how the movie was. The only movie I've seen in the theatre in the last 16 years was Flight 93. Maybe I'll mess with my record and make it two moives in one year.
Posted by: Tammy at September 04, 2006 03:35 PM (zzgQt)
3
Was the shirt made in China?
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 04, 2006 04:31 PM (RiZPJ)
4
Korea, if you must know.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 04, 2006 11:19 PM (LEEsJ)
5
Hollywood is up to its old Leftist tricks, they're just being more clever this time. Stone was on a tight leash from what I heard. He was paying for his 'sins'--turning out box office bombs, But not to worry, he's back to his old anti-American ways speaking out in Europe about Hollywood glorifying war. And patriotism. He must be talking about Hollywood, Fla.
The "trick," the "revisionist history"? They turned the whole episode into a heartwarming tale of survival and personal victory--everything it wasn't. 9/11 was like turning a corner when you're walking down the strret and being hit in the face with a baseball bat. And being kicked repeatedly in the balls when you're on the cement bleeding. No victories there. Did any of you feel anything positive about that day? Of course not. You were thinking of ways to regroup and strike back. And pay back. A thousandfold. And then some....
Posted by: Darrell at September 05, 2006 09:44 AM (TBuoF)
6
Except that the character of the Marine explicitly mentions his intention to re-up to "avenge" what happened that day.
I'm not making a statement in favor of Stone; I'm only saying that this work is inconsistent with his other work, and that it is a worthwhile movie in and of itself.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 05, 2006 09:50 AM (LEEsJ)
7
Interesting, they still make clothes in Korea. I hope is wasn't North Korea because then the material for the shirt came out of someone's food ration.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 05, 2006 10:29 PM (RiZPJ)
8
I think in the North they're pretty much hunter-gatherers, without anything to hunt or gather.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 05, 2006 10:43 PM (LEEsJ)
9
Were they playing Connie Francis("Who's Sorry Now")after the marine speaks his line?
I'm torn on this one. I'd like to see great box office on "WTC" because it sends a message to Hollywood to play it straight with this story. Bad box office would give them the excuse to deliver the usual Stone fare(workers seen in the WTC drilling holes in the concrete walls for demolition explosives;Cheney and Rummy with their hands on an old-time, t-handled detonator).
Posted by: Darrell at September 06, 2006 08:55 AM (fSi0x)
10
Go see the movie. Then send Oliver Stone a "get well" card. Everyone walks away happy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 06, 2006 09:10 AM (LEEsJ)
Posted by: Darrell at September 06, 2006 01:18 PM (KEpng)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
All I Want
. . . is for someone to tell me that my book is
so bad, I should just give up on it and spend the rest of my days eating those little frozen Trader Joe's appetizers. You know: the ones that are like tiny little savory tarts.
None of my bulletin boards are active right now.
I shall have to resort to productive activity. And there aren't any little tarts in the house. (Oh, shut up! You know how I meant it.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:49 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I like savory little tarts, too.
Wait...what sort of treat are we talking about?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 05, 2006 06:05 AM (1hM1d)
2
Just couldn't help yourself, huh?
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 05, 2006 09:09 AM (LEEsJ)
3
No, of course not. Savory little tarts are hard to pass up. But you knew that... ;-)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at September 05, 2006 01:01 PM (1hM1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeff Makes the Multicultis
. . . into his
bitch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
September 02, 2006
Fun in Chatsworth
Reverend Kevin—really, "Mr. Kevin," since he's teaching school again—has now been installed into his mobile home.
A victim of gender stereotyping, I ended up putting a lot of the food, dishes, and pots and pans away in his kitchen, only moving a few of the smaller pieces of actual furniture.
Between all the different Christian groups there, it could have been a bit theologically eclectic. Perhaps I should have started a food fight over sola scriptura or some such.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:11 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
September 01, 2006
So, I Screwed Somthing Up.
Attila the Hub got miffed, and quite rightly.
I hate being in the wrong.
Finally, I went into the family room. He looked up and gave me that "I'm not ready to be friends yet" look.
"Listen," I told him. "I just came down to see if I could kiss your ass."
"Then you should have brought snacks," he replied.
So I went back to the kitchen and got him snacks.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:42 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 02, 2006 03:06 PM (RiZPJ)
2
Are you telling me there are women out there willing to admit they are wrong?
Tell me there are more like you! :-)
Posted by: Mark at September 02, 2006 05:08 PM (q0nS2)
3
She never said she admitted she was wrong.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at September 02, 2006 08:54 PM (RiZPJ)
4
BTW, does someone want to hire me as a proofreader? I did a great job, after all, on this post.
I implied to my readership that I was wrong. That leaves the question open of whether I admitted same to Attila the Hub.
This kind of butt-kissing is much harder when your husband is on a training regimen that limits his snacks to things like carrots sticks: "here, I'm going to make up with raw root vegetables." Something is lost, I fear.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 02, 2006 09:26 PM (LEEsJ)
5
Maybe, based on your ability to deliver snacks, you should change the name of this blog to
"Snack Girl". LOL
Posted by: clyde at September 03, 2006 04:26 AM (6m+7s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'm Almost Ready
. . . to wade back into the crime novel. But I don't know whether it sucks tonight. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
Sometimes I write a chapter or scene that's so amazing, the universe nearly hums along to the breathlessly perfect melody of the prose. Then I read it aloud in one of my criticism groups. By then someone's gone into the Word file to add cliches, bad dialogue, and typographical errors.
So it all comes down to this question: Do I feel lucky?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:39 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I know how you feel...Somebody always does the same with my witty comments!
Good luck with your writing!
Posted by: Darrell at September 01, 2006 08:37 PM (+EHSL)
2
this sounds like what happened to me at rehearsal tonight. the pianist wasn't there and the cd player was giving the director fits. usually, i sight read pretty well. but tonight the notes coming out of the piano did NOT sound like what i was trying to play. it was weird.
Posted by: maggie katzen at September 01, 2006 11:57 PM (wIQcY)
3
Damn. Sounds like your novel is going to have thirty-eleven authors, all listed alphabetically I hope. Royalties paid the same way. Remember, a camel is a horse created by committee. Other than that, I have no opinion. Well, maybe one question: if your "group" is so into participating in the writing of your book, how many have actually been published? If none, consider the source of their commentary.
Posted by: clyde at September 02, 2006 04:53 AM (6m+7s)
4
Thanks for your kind words, but I'm a perfectionist, so writing a first draft is bound to be painful for me. And I did do something experimental this week, and was acutely aware that it wasn't completely successful.
Or, like Edison figuring out the light bulb, I've "identified what doesn't work." Better way to look at it, I guess
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 02, 2006 06:25 AM (LEEsJ)
5
I sometimes cringe at phrases I've written but keep writing on so as not to get bogged down, I know what I meant and I can come back and tinker when it's time to re-write. I think the greatest danger to the novel we're all eager to read is the distraction perfectionism can create. I've recruited a couple of beta readers myself but I find I'm more productive the less I think in terms of what they'd like. Remember this is all rehearsal, opening night is when you put it in the box and send it off. Best of Luck!
Posted by: Colin MacDougall at September 02, 2006 09:05 AM (+z5C9)
6
Better than Edison, be like Michaelangelo. He carved the statue of David by cutting away anything that didn't look like him.
Posted by: clyde at September 03, 2006 04:29 AM (6m+7s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I've Heard of Video-Blogging.
I've heard of drunk-blogging.
But I'd never seen them combined so artfully before.
I'M A CITIZEN JOURNALIST, AND I WANT PUSSY PIE!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
57kb generated in CPU 0.0915, elapsed 0.2389 seconds.
215 queries taking 0.2177 seconds, 526 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.