November 13, 2007
Overheard, 11
"I'm really annoyed by That Prominent Blogger," she complained.
"Hey. We like him. What did he ever do to you?"
"Well, he's a sexist, and kind of ageist, too. I had an exchange with him that went on for 400 comments or something, in which he argued that by definition, I couldn't be attractive because I'm in my forties. It wouldn't bother me if he'd ever seen me, because I may not be his type—and I suspect I'm not. But the sight-unseen thing bugged me."
"He wants you," says the blogger wearing the hoodie.
"Oh, yeah," chimes in the one in a T-shirt. "Have you ever seen a picture of him? No great shakes there."
"Listen," Mr. Hoodie says. "His arguments can go up to 200 comments easily. But 400? He wants you bad."
"He's never seen me, though."
"Oh—like he really cares about that."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
Simponsized!
By my main stalker, Darrell:
http://simpsonizeme.com/ecard.php?lang=en_us&code=dvuumzmygltdqkpnvhkbmpqjsveeuiyj
It takes a moment to load.
Some of it is familiar, but removing people's chins and jaws can lead to confusion—especially for those of us with weird, angular jawlines (it looks good on my father—on me, not so much).
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
November 12, 2007
Let's Blog Those Stories, Boys.
Of course, they're all getting to 'em faster than I am, because I'm female and oppressed and shit.
We all took slightly different quotes away from the meeting with Sarnow. My recollection, contra Rusty's, was that Sarnow said he owned the Mad Magazine satire of 24 personally—not that he had sent the artwork to Parker/Stone as a gift. But I could be wrong, and I know Klein has the entire meeting on tape, so we can check on that if we like. (Or we could simply decide what we want the facts to be, and report it that way, as the MSM does.)
I do remember him saying that "you know you've made it when Mad Magazine does a parody of you."
Don't trust my memories, though: I had left my writing pad and computer back in the banquet room, and was busy taking pictures and attempting not to freeze to death.
But I did like Sarnow.
I know people have been asking whether the blogosphere is simply a circle jerk, and I feel that the final answer is "yes." We are blogging about a meeting we had with a producer on the basis of our having blogs. Then we are blogging on each other's coverage.
So: the same thing the MSM does, but with more wit and verve.
Ace covered much of the Sarnow speech, along with our private meeting and the public Q&A, here. Stacy McCain's account is here.
Goldstein shares some tidbits about that meeting here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 259 words, total size 2 kb.
Former Attorney General
. . . John Ashcroft was everywhere Saturday night. I kept bumping into him. I think he and his wife were stalking me.
(Actually, he was speaking at the YAF Conference, getting an award at the Reagan Center in Old Town Santa Barbara, promoting his book in a relatively low-key way. But that doesn't sound quite as good, does it?)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:29 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Joy,
I don't know that running into him is such a good thing. I met him once (when he was governor) and my wife knew both Mr. & Mrs. Ashcroft. My comments on him becoming AG were succint - He's an a$$h01e, but he's honest, honorable, and capable. I don't like the man personnally, but he was more than competent professionally. My wife has even fewer words of praise for personal habits (she was a tour guide at the capital building/governor's mansion) but she did say he was more competent than others. She (and I) really liked Carnahan for his ability - he was a hard on defense Truman democrat. It was a shame what his wife did to his memory in the two-year fill in.
Anyhow, just figured I'd throw in my two cents on Ashcroft.
SGT Dave
"Wow, this really dates me, doesn't it?"
Posted by: SGT Dave at November 13, 2007 01:30 AM (ETOgW)
2
Weeeeellll . . . when someone at the podium became overly exuberent and stated that Ashcroft really
should be our next President, there were odd, pained looks at the bloggers' table. Though we managed not to roll our eyes or anything.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 13, 2007 04:39 AM (aywD+)
3
Following up a bit late here, but it happened that Jim Hoft and I left Santa Barbara on the same commercial small plane with Ashcroft and his wife. In fact I was seated right across from them in the back row, and Jim was right in front of me.
The Ashcrofts worked a crossword puzzle together. They were very friendly and charming, once we broke the ice a bit.
Not at all the kind of bad guy he's been portrayed as, and actually quite funny.
Posted by: Robert Stacy McCain at November 14, 2007 02:48 AM (/TiIG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yeah, Well.
The real reporters among us went ahead to
file stories about how Joel Surnow endorses Rudy Guiliani. Others of us wondered how Surnow could not know that there really are talented writers out there who cannot get their work looked at by studio executives, due to the fact that most executives are not as smart as he. Then we endured his (probably correct) speculation that the
Writers' Strike will drag on for months, and could end up breaking the Guild.
"Who is the real winner in this situation?" he asked us. I sat there like an extra, and he chided us for not realizing the answer. Bloggers, he asserted, should know this stuff.
"Who, then?" I asked.
"Nikke Finke."
"Oh, yes. Of course."
I spent most of the interview admiring the partnership between Surnow and his charming, intelligent wife, and attempting to frame tricky shots in the luscious winter light.

Joel Surnow talking to the usual suspects: Philip Klein of The AmSpec Blog, Ace of Ace of Spades HQ, Rusty Shackleford of The Jawa Report, Jeff Goldstein of Protein Wisdom, Stacy McCain, and Jim of Gateway Pundit.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 2 kb.
November 11, 2007
Talking 'Bout Last Night.
I struggled with a bad case of exhaustion last night, because I had forgotten to take some of my nighttime meds the evening before. (Yes: my pill case rivals that of your average recently released psychiatric inpatient, NTTAWWT.)
But despite it all, I went down to the hotel bar and joined Rusty, Ace, the Goldsteins, Philip Klein (to whom I was rude last winter—and I still haven't apologized, because I'm hoping he'll just forget) Stacy McCain, and our benefactor at YAF (the Media Wrangler Who Can Handle Bloggers) for one last drink.
And it was all good. Even Rusty decided to come down to the bar for one more, although he was getting up very, very early to get on his plane the next day, and fly to . . . wherever it is that Rusty lives. I've always assumed, myself, that it's in Area 54.
It was kind of like being at Count Linguist's house after a party on a Saturday night. You've got a crowd of ridiculously smart people who are all exhausted and/or impaired by caffeine/alcohol/THC/overstimulation of their tender wittle brains, and the definition of "funny" changes accordingly. On Saturday night Mrs. Goldstein and I lounged on a loveseat while the guys threw out lines, seeing if we might laugh. I always did, because I could see that some of 'em were in "comedic brute force" mode, and the earlier we laughed, the better it would go for us.
I've been sworn to secrecy, but I can divulge that many of those present had somewhat. . . um . . . mixed emotions about Andrew Sullivan.
The subject of torture came up, and I opined that my having to wait more than 10 minutes for a second bloody Mary was a coercive questioning technique that should be banned internationally. So Goldstein came back with more tomatoey, vodka-infused goodness.
You heard it here first! This is hard-hitting news, boys and girls!—with a few notable exceptions, bloggers like the drinkey.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 339 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Miss Attilla, you were extraordinarly gracious and are owed mucho drinkey when next you are in DC.
I should point out that I was absent for much of Saturday night's session, because I was filing my story for Monday's front page, which was
just linked at Inside the Beltway
I'll be doing a wrapup blog post about the Santa Barbara trip, and then plan to sleep a long, long time to recover from the jet lag.
Yeah. "Jet lag." That's the ticket ...
Posted by: Robert Stacy McCain at November 12, 2007 06:10 AM (/TiIG)
2
So bloggers go for the silly sauce, huh? I guess they
are like journalists, after all!
Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at November 15, 2007 02:19 PM (uw+0A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Funny Thing About This . . .
is that my nephews
wouldn't get it at all. Kinda like
L.A. Story, but completely different.
Via Bidinotto.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Funny stuff!
They missed the boat about some things (floppies in 1994 held about 1 MB of data)* and the computers shown were modern... but all things considered, they captured the spirit of the times. And showed why field agents were on their own then. Consider that when you pay for their pensions.
*Usually mislabeled as 1.44 MB, although it actually held 1,474,560 bytes of data.
Posted by: Darrell at November 12, 2007 09:05 PM (+py+e)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 10, 2007
Jeff Goldstein was
. . . in rare form last night. He doesn't get out to many of these events, so he had to compress a lot of showmanship into one evening. He brought the funny, but it was also rather wearing, trying to keep up with him.
At one point I whispered to his extraordinarily beautiful wife, who knew how many drinks he'd had—rather a large number, I suspect—"is there an 'off' switch?"
"Absolutely not," she told me serenely.
"Um, how about a 'low' setting, so we can all pace ourselves?"
"Not at this point." And she smiled.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:00 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
anyone old enough to know Gregg's Diamond Jubilee to take notes??
Posted by: Darleen at November 11, 2007 01:37 PM (Hto/+)
2
Is that shorthand? The answer is, "yes." (Not actual shorthand, but good memory for dialogue.)
Some anecdotes will be published in "roman a clef" format. Some will be published with pertinent details changed, to protect the guilty-as-hell.
Some will only be available via certain
back channels.
Rusty Shackleford: "Um--is there a whole line of communication that the male bloggers just aren't in on?"
Joy McCann: "Not one that you really want to know about. So, no."
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 11, 2007 08:38 PM (tkDpH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Up in Santa Barbara.
Last night's keynote at the
YAF conference was by Dinesh D'Souza, who gave a summary of his arguments against what we might call the
"Hitchens critique." His speech also hit—very effectively—some of the points outlined in his
book, which was available on the media table. (Of course, I couldn't find the media table, but I really liked the college students I sat with through dinner. And sure enough, my copy of D'Souza's book was waiting for me there at the blogging nexus after dinner, along with
Rusty Shackleford, Ace o' Spades and
Jeff Goldstein; the latter's lovely wife joined us for a couple of drinks in the hotel bar, until she and I both got too tired and cold to keep up with the guys, who had moved the conversation onto the cold beachside bar veranda to accommodate the smokers.)
I'm getting old, but I'm not wearing the bottoms of my trousers rolled, so I guess it's okay.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Head on over to Brophy Brothers... best clam chowder in town.
Posted by: Nick at November 10, 2007 03:08 PM (MQumS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 08, 2007
The Polls Are Closed.
. . . and thanks to everyone who helped me to attain a
respectable showing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:47 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Did what I could. Tough competition in that bracket. Some really excellent sites.
You're still the best!
Posted by: William Teach at November 08, 2007 04:58 PM (NaHh8)
2
Lots of problems voting there as usual. You're first in our hearts, if that matters to you. . .
Posted by: Darrell at November 08, 2007 11:21 PM (bckFZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
King Crimson
. . . just re-issued its first album, totally remastered.
The first guy I lived with—the architectural designer—used to go to sleep to that album. At that time, nothing would relax me enough to help me sleep,* but I still liked the music, and have fond memories of lying in a dark room listening to "The Court of the Crimson King."
Val bought the remastered CD recently for Beatty, and I got to hear it again. I'm trying to work on Beatty, to get him to loan it to me so I can rip it to iTunes. Though I might just break down and buy it. (That sort of thing has been happening with shocking regularity lately.)
* That was before I discovered meditative techniques and Ambien.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:13 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"If we make it we can all sit back and laugh,
But I fear tomorrow I'll be crying."
Posted by: CGHill at November 08, 2007 06:10 PM (7tYOI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Attention, Denizens of Cleveland!
Direct from the Moving Picture Institute's press release:
The Moving Picture Institute is proud to announce that The Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque will screen Indoctrinate U
on Sunday, November 18th at 4:00 pm.
Screening Location:
Cleveland Institute of Art Cinematheque
11141 East Boulevard in University Circle
Cleveland, Ohio 44106
216-421-7450
Tickets will be $8 and available at the door or in advance by calling 216-421-7450. Free parking is available in the Institute lot.
Featured on Hannity's America and in the New York Times, Maloney's pathbreaking documentary has caused a sensation among journalists and higher education leaders. "This film hits you in the gut" wrote Stanley Kurtz in National Review Online, while Carol Iannone, editor of the journal Academic Questions, has called the film "shocking -- even to someone who knows a lot about political coercion on today's campuses."
Indoctrinate U's Washington premier at the Kennedy Center during the American Film Renaissance Film Festival was filled to capacity with 500 people, who gave the film a standing ovation. Almost 30,000 people across the country have signed up at www.IndoctrinateU.com to see the film -- and in response, MPI is arranging screenings in a number of major U.S. cities. Details will be announced as the events are scheduled.
I've seen several different versions of this movie, since it's been in-process for a few years, and there's always a new segment to be viewed at the Liberty Film Festival. Evan Coyne Maloney is one of a kind: he doesn't necessarily make the Academy look that good.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.
November 07, 2007
Write Enough . . .
on the
writer's strike. Keep scrolling; just because a person is a libertarian, doesn't mean he doesn't believe in collective bargaining.
At least one of the entertainment-industry locals—the makeup union—has informed its members that the Writers' Guild is not a real union; it's only a guild. So its members are required to ignore the strike, cross the picket lines, and go to work.
This has led a lot of industry folk into a "damned if I do, damned if I don't" mindset.
Ideally, however, I'd like to see creative people—those who actually come up with ideas that enrich our lives, whether they are writers or musicians, sculptors or painters—get better and more consistent rewards for what they do.
As things stand, being in any creative field remains a hell of a way to make a living (or, in many cases, not). Despite what People magazine would have you believe about the lifestyles of the rich and frivolous . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:57 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
MORE Money LESS Moonves!
Posted by: Darrell at November 07, 2007 12:00 PM (Yguc3)
2
Guild? Not a Collective? Or am I warching too many Dick Wolf productions? Amazing how big a role the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security play in everyday crimes in NYC.
Posted by: Darrell at November 07, 2007 02:56 PM (Yguc3)
3
I support the writers, and I support their strike.
Posted by: Chuck at November 07, 2007 07:35 PM (H4W1a)
4
What's up with the studios? It looks like the writers are looking for an extra dollar or so on DVD and electronic residuals. Don't the networks realize that making a 39% profit instead of a 40% profit will make for more motivated and happy writers? (WARNING!, guestimated profit numbers)
Posted by: Dieter at November 07, 2007 08:40 PM (bcVBL)
5
Happy writers?
I've heard of them, but I didn't think they existed anywhere in the universe... (paraphrase of Dr. Lexi Zarkov--Flash Gordon)
The "happiness" of a raise lasts about two weeks on average. About the same as the "new car" high. The industry knows that the actors will knock next. Then every other craft and trade. Right now, internet money consists of the higher ad rates that networks receive due to the ratings bump, since streaming is free. And I believe current contracts already reflect those revenues, no?
I do support writers(heck, I may even be one!). But I prefer to do it directly with premium gin. And socks. Nice socks. My old work is still floating around and I never get residuals. Unless if you consider people making fun of my predictions from twenty-years ago residuals.
Writers and actors can get a cut of TV series DVD sales. Fine. Both sides have to realize that the last time they lost their audience it NEVER came back. Maybe people will realize that they really can live without Leno, Letterman, and Kimmel. Settle now! So shall it be written, so shall it be done!
Posted by: Darrell at November 07, 2007 10:29 PM (v2X0x)
6
On the other hand, I'm not sure that the average engineering career encompasses the same risks as creative writing. Just a thought. And nothing against the fabulous socks I'm wearing AS WE SPEAK. (My warmest ones. So glad I insisted on keeping them, when you wanted me to trade them in for a scarf or something.)
I'm waiting for the Governor to weigh in on this dispute. After all, he went to some lengths to make sure
Terminator III was made here, rather than in Canada—including taking a pay cut.
If this drags on too long there are a lot of people who will be hurting; there aren't any easy answers, here. But the producers are, speaking in broad demographic terms, sleazeballs. Thought you'd want to know.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 07, 2007 11:33 PM (aywD+)
7
Who's average?
Been a consultant since 1990, and there are LOTS of similarities. And risks. And jacking around. Etc.
I see your point, but I will never pay a fee for every viewing of something I purchased, just like I would never buy a book that had a counter telling them how many times it was opened and assessing a fee accordingly. Ditto for paying for content on the internet.
Get your salary upfront. That's the best way to minimize future risks and uncertainties. And not have to deal with the sleazeballs and creative accounting, by the way.
Posted by: Darrell at November 08, 2007 11:35 PM (bckFZ)
8
I agree with you in theory, but there are a lot of writers and actors who out here who died in dark smelly little apartments while studios raked it in on the fruits of their youthful work.
The thing no one ever spells out is that being a writer or actor in L.A. is very similar to being an athlete, stripper, or whore: one
has to sock it away while one is young. The difference being that once in a while one wins the "comeback" lottery, and suddenly finds oneself buying planes (or other silly stuff), a la John Travolta.
It's important to keep two things in mind: (1) in order to work as a TV/feature actor or writer, one must live in one of the 2-3 most expensive cities in the world (L.A., London, NY), and (2) most people who make it here just scrape by. Or, one year there is a $300,000 salary, from which the government takes $100-$150, which will never return. A few years later, the award statues need dusting, the bank account is depleted from an outrageous cost of living, and one cannot afford even to wash the car.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 09, 2007 12:19 AM (aywD+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Insecure on Sartorial Matters?
Let the army of Davids help you
pick an outfit for that special occasion.
In my particular case, I prepared for the Public Utility job by borrowing my husband's valet stand, and taking pictures of every business outfit I had (short of a suit, which would have been a bit much). I still have 'em all in a file, and I take 'em out for scrutiny whenever I get that "I don't have enough clothing!" feeling.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Polling does make that Clinton governance so special afterall.
I assume everyone wants me to look like a dork, so I usually do.
Posted by: Darrell at November 07, 2007 01:50 PM (Yguc3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 06, 2007
Beautiful Atrocities is Back!
And
as wonderful as ever.
(This has led to some catfights in The Cotillion over "whose gay boyfriend" Jeff really is. I've suggested that we determine this like ladies: paper targets, 25 feet, sidearms-of-choice. I'll shoot off-hand, to make it more sporting for the others.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
And the Ron Paul People Wonder . . .
why they are gaining a reputation for
internet-based hijinx?
Via The Accidental Mind/Blog, which has some great stuff on its front page. Keep scrolling!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:46 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Right. Ron Paul supporters are the only ones who could possibly come up with something like this, so sinister is the candidacy of Dr. Paul.
Sheesh.
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 06, 2007 07:54 PM (DIr0W)
2
But if the rest are parodies, and the Ron Paul site is genuine, then how would you explain it . . . ?
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 06, 2007 08:12 PM (aywD+)
3
No ABSOLUTE proof. But when did that ever bother Ron Paul supporters? Excuse me now while I'll go spend my Gold Standard dividend. . .
Posted by: Darrell at November 07, 2007 12:05 PM (Yguc3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hm.
Crab Orchard Review is
accepting work through the end of the month that focuses on the experience of adolescence. There's a piece I should submit, if I can remember for sure that they haven't already rejected it. I know they turned one of my stories/essays down, but I can't recall which it was, and I have a sneaking suspicion that I went all ADD and mis-filed the rejection letter.
Of course, if I re-submit the one they rejected, they'll know I'm persistent. That I care. That I'm a space cadette.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:12 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
I'm . . .
speechless.
Go. Now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:11 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I remember reading about Ferdinand as a child, but I had never heard of the other book. That was amazing to read! and made me long for an America whose children and grownups were as patriotic today as they were then.
Posted by: Anne at November 06, 2007 07:47 AM (R/ik3)
2
Well...I got a little different impression there.
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 06, 2007 07:59 PM (DIr0W)
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 06, 2007 08:14 PM (aywD+)
4
I came across the Munro Leaf book on IowaHawk. One of my right-wing extremist freinds sent it to me and, what do you know, I see a comment from little miss attila.What a small world! I hope you're doing well.
Posted by: Daphne Nugent at November 08, 2007 09:50 AM (Of/27)
5
The book appears to have gone AWOL now.
But yes, the book. I especially liked the parts about "keeping your mouth shut", "obeying the authorities", and "giving more money to the government". Good conservative patriotic values all.
Children and "grownups" alike, indeed.
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 08, 2007 09:55 AM (B2X7i)
6
not awol...just the dad gummed internet filtering software at my place of employ...
Posted by: Desert Cat at November 08, 2007 09:57 AM (B2X7i)
7
Hi, Daphne!
* * *
Desert Cat:
It was a different world during that war: you've got a point, but I've read a lot of children's literature from that time in which creative expression was actually tied to the buying of war bond (*The Four-Story Mistake* comes to mind in particular).
I guess the "mouth shut" and "obey authorities" stuff didn't bother me much because it was a book directed at children. Keep in mind that I was raised by hippies, and the whole "question authority" mindset doesn't really work in a child-rearing context--even my most BoHo friends with kids seem to recognize that now.
The "question authority" approach to child-rearing very often ends up turning parents into hypocrites, more than anything else. At least, that's been my experience.
All that said, I do think a lot of people would find the WoT more palatable if there were some kind of sacrifice the common person--child and "grownup" alike--could make that would make him/her feel like part of the war effort.
And I don't think there's any danger of IowaHawk turning us all into mindless conformists anytime soon.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 08, 2007 01:57 PM (aywD+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 05, 2007
Nepotism Rears Its Ugly Head.
I know it's childish of me, but I kind of dig all the interrelationships within the 'sphere—like, the fact that
Glenn got both his
wife and his mom into blogging (who wants to bet that the Instadaughter already has a blog, but hasn't "come out" to her dad, yet?).
And then there are the prominent bloggers I'm not supposed to talk about who were dating for a while, and now dislike each other intensely. And the cousins who blog. And the drinking buddies. And the real estate partners. And the venture capitalists and their favorite startups. Etc.
But my favorite blogging family is actually this one:
Beth at Blue Star Chronicles, who is up for a Weblog Award in the "Top 250" Category, is the sister of
Carol, The Median Sib, who is up for a Weblog Award in the "Diarist" Category, and is the daughter of
Ruth of Ruthlace, who is also up for a Weblog Award in the "Diarist" Category, and is furthermore (stay with me, here)
oddly enough, the mother of Beth at Blue Star Chronicles.
And a partridge in a pear tree.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 2 kb.
On Fred Thompson's Commitment to Federalism
So far, so good.
Via Insty, Volokh discusses how "refreshing" it is to see someone running for President who takes the Constitution seriously:
"I think people ought to be free at state and local levels to make decisions that even Fred Thompson disagrees with. That’s what freedom is all about. And I think the diversity we have among the states, the system of federalism we have where power is divided between the state and the federal government is, is, is—serves us very, very well."
Many politicians say such things. President Bush, for one, spoke quite a bit about the need for state flexibility when he was a Governor and a candidate, but seems to have forgotten about such things over the past six years. It appears Thompson actually means it, however, as he stuck to his federalist guns even when confronted with issues where many "conservatives" abandon federalism and embrace federal power. He even endorsed state autonomy where such a position meant rejecting policy positions favored by significant portions of the GOP base.
On abortion, for example, Thompson said that he believes that life begins at conception, and that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overturned. Yet he further stated that he opposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting abortion and the language endorsing a federal prohibition in the 2004 GOP Platform.
Similarly, on gay marriage, Thompson said that he believes "marriage is between a man and a woman," but stops short of endorsing a constitutional amendment to prohibit gay marriage. Rather, Thompson said he supports an amendment to prevent the imposition of gay marriage by the judiciary, but that state legislatures should be free to recognize gay marriage if such a policy is supported by the people of a given state. As I understand it, Thompson's position is essentially that outlined by Michael Greve, and which would provide a constitutional backstop to the Defense of Marriage Act, but would not prevent states from making their own choices about gay marriage.
I keep looking for something about Thompson I can really dislike, but I'm not finding too much just yet. He seems to have the highest level of charisma among the GOP contenders, and the strongest principles. I also think he may have fewer skeletons in his closet than just about any of the candidates—from both parties.
UPDATE: More on Federalism (and Fred Thompson) at The Jawa Report.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:23 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 411 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I'm nervous when a politician speaks of "states rights". After all, the most fundamental political principle is *individual* rights. Once upon a time, some southern states thought their "states rights" trumped the individual rights of some.
It should be possible to support any valid law on the basis of individual rights. Except for non-essential things -- like choosing the state bird -- "states rights" can easily become an excuse for democratic mob-rule, at the state level.
Posted by: softwarenerd at November 09, 2007 01:01 PM (iFGPW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
74kb generated in CPU 0.149, elapsed 0.2567 seconds.
220 queries taking 0.2292 seconds, 526 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.