March 14, 2007
Over at Hit and Run
Jacob Sullum takes Michael Medved
apart for a Townhall
column about what "real conservatism" means.
Medved doesn't get it right, though: nearly no one does. A "real conservative" is someone who is running for President of the United States, and hopes to get the GOP nomination. That is all.
The money quote is in Sullum's comments on Hit & Run, by someone named Ashley: "The Right wants control of your body. The Left wants control of your production."
Correct. And they each want control of your mind.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:53 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Which is why I keep trending in the libertarian direction--consistency.
Conservatism is becoming only so much "MY statism is better than YOUR statism..."
Posted by: Desert Cat at March 16, 2007 06:55 AM (xdX36)
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 16, 2007 07:24 AM (0CbUL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
An Alternative to No Child Left Behind?
Robert Bluey on the
"A-Plus" plan the Heritage Foundation espouses.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
Ace on Obama
Regarding his remark that "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people":
The left euphemizes the Palestinians' self-defeating choices by saying "The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." By which they mean the Palestinians never forgo an opportunity to kill Jewish children, nor actually choose peace over war, nor to accept reasonable, if not generous by their lights, proposals to cede back most of their lost land. All in favor of killing, and killing, and killing some more.
My own reservoir of pity for the Palestinians ended on September 11th when I saw that grotesque witch handing out cake in celebration of the American dead. They've chosen their path, and that path is misery and murder.
They are suffering. They chose to make others suffer, and to suffer themselves in return. Let there be no tears over their embrace of murder and masochism.
Democratic Jews are demanding to know exactly what Obama meant by the remark. Democratic Jews are, I've decided, idiots. Let me explain what he meant: He meant precisely what you think he meant, and he further meant all the implications that flow from that.
Grow up. Your party has collectively decided that no Muslim outrage cannot be mitigated or explained away by pointing to supposed sins of the west compelling them to behave as monsters.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.
Sometimes, Identifying the True Irish
. . . is almost as
difficult as finding a Real Conservative.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
04:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
More From Hillary
Cousin Attila has
the scoop.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:12 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well done! As a bonus, you too can save the images and use your photo editing software to make Hillary voice your own words. The viewer will have to guess the regional accent/dialect, though. Hillary is so versatile with that. So is Barack Obama. I'd swear he grew up in Mississippi--if I didn't know he grew up in Honolulu and Indonesia. Someone will have to explain that to me sometime.
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 08:21 PM (D0E+J)
2
Oh, dear. I'm afraid the Clinton Slime Machine will be showing up momentarily, or as soon as they're done burying Geffen and Barak "Don't make fun of my ears" Obama.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at March 15, 2007 07:26 AM (1hM1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Time to Nuke "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
Alan Simpson shares his
epiphany with the readers of
WaPo.
My thinking shifted when I read that the military was firing translators because they are gay. According to the Government Accountability Office, more than 300 language experts have been fired under "don't ask, don't tell," including more than 50 who are fluent in Arabic. This when even Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently acknowledged the nation's "foreign language deficit" and how much our government needs Farsi and Arabic speakers. Is there a "straight" way to translate Arabic? Is there a "gay" Farsi? My God, we'd better start talking sense before it is too late. We need every able-bodied, smart patriot to help us win this war.
Via Ramesh Ponnuru, who points out that
At one point [. . .] Simpson seems to suggest that regarding homosexual sex as immoral is "completely out of the mainstream of American thinking," which seems false.
Yeah. On the other hand, I know both evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics with strong feelings about homosexuality being sinful: one Roman Catholic theologian I spoke with said the Church's stance was that a homosexual person was called to celibacy. The evengelicals seem divided on whether homosexuality is intrinsic, but do not seem to regard its expression as worse than any other form of sexual immorality, such as premarital sex. Both groups—the hard-core Catholics and the evangelicals—seem prepared to accept minority status in mainstream society, particularly when it comes of matters of human sexuality.
If the policy of the Armed Forces is going to be that we can't have people serving who are sinners, then our military readiness is about to sustain a very sharp drop.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:29 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I see the main point being that someone changed the name of the General Accounting Office(GAO) to the Government Accountability Office when we weren't looking. What they couldn't stick in a "People's" somewhere?
You have to take what GAO says with a whole salt lick. Remember when they found no truth to the "rumor" that the Clintonistas had taken all the Ws off the WH keyboards? You probably saw the images with your own eyes on the CBS Nightly News even. GAO based their findings on the fact that no paperwork was filed. Maybe that's because the Bush transition team leader called the local Computer Disc. Warehouse and just bought new keyboards for $15@ after learnng that the official procedure would take months and $100s per keyboard. A few hundred-dollar bills, a half-hour of a staffer's time and problem solved. The GAO investigation cost, what, a few hundred thousand?
It's probably easier to get them dismissed by "Don't ask, Don't tell" then it is to make a case for terrorist ties/sympathies. If you can't trust the translators, you might as well use Babel. Maybe the Dems can ask CAIR to help out?
It reminds me of the Mafia Don that wanted to hide a few $million and chose a deaf mute to bury it that only 'spoke' an obscure sign language--only used in a remote part of Sicily. One of the Don's soldiers learned it caring for his grandfather. When the Don wanted it back, the fellow wouldn't budge, so finally the Don told the translator to tell him that the Don has plenty of other money and if he doesn't tell where he hid it right now , he is prepared to blow his brains all over the wall and just write it off. The man signed frantically telling everything. When the Don asked the soldier what he had said, the soldier replied "He says you don't have the balls to pull the trigger!"
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 01:40 PM (gYyMl)
2
D, I'm having a hard time believing that those who were dismissed as translators had terrorists ties--that seems like a real stretch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 14, 2007 02:43 PM (0CbUL)
3
All I care about is how best the military should kill people and destroy things. That's what they're there for. If homosexuals in the ranks doesn't prevent that let them be as open as can be. Hell, if the military would be better if it were 100% homosexual I'd be for that.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 14, 2007 06:23 PM (QJ5cf)
4
Do you now how hard it is to find people who don't have ties to groups that have aided radical causes? Links to groups in schools. Membership in groups contemporaneous with presence of known radicals/activists/terror suspects. Links to mosques where radicals have preached. Links to charities that send cash, then look the other way when funds are diverted for weapons purchase. You have to be able to trust translators that work in intelligence operations 100%. That is especially true for languages where you can find five experts that give you five different translations and meanings for the same phrase. The person doesn't have to be a radical themselves. They can have sympathies with those that do and decide on heir own to violate rules. Take, for example, that translator at Gitmo that secreted out notes to "family members" that turned out to be coded communications to AQ cell members in Europe. I believe he truly did believe he was doing acts of kindness. You can't have people deciding themselves what is right.
Sexual orientation doesn't matter one bit. I'd go on, but that about covers it.
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 07:55 PM (D0E+J)
5
I've done a little research and there is more to this story than is being reported. First off the numbers are all over the place. Secondly, they are being reported by advocacy groups to challenge the current policy that must be changed by Congress. Remember? The military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy allows gays and lesbians to serve in the military as long as they keep their sexual orientation private and do not engage in homosexual acts. Apparently, the people being dismissed are reporting their sexual status to superiors who have no choice under the current policy than to process their discharge. Are this people being sent by advocacy groups to challenge the policy to begin with? Do translators discover their orientation when they get their orders to ship out to Iraq or Afghanistan? Apparently that is a factor in some of the articles on the web. Is there a link between language skills and sexual orientation, one where the percentages seem to be so out-of-step with the norm?
I stick to my answer that sexual orientation doesn't matter, but what do you suggest if the people being dismissed are reporting themselves, rather than being "hunted down" or ferreted out by the military? Change the policy? Well, OK. But tell Congress, not Bush or the military. And a pox on advocacy groups for playing games during a time of war.
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 09:22 PM (D0E+J)
6
Darrell:
1) I know one prominent right-wing blogger who was forced out of the military when his sexual orientation was discovered. He was, in fact, a translator. The numbers may be affected by people "coming out" voluntarily, but please recall that no one on the far left is likely to be working in military intel in the first place. WE SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRING PEOPLE TO LIE ABOUT THEIR PERSONAL LIVES IN ORDER TO SERVE THIS COUNTRY. Or even cover them up. I'm all for discretion--heterosexual and homosexual--but for people to live in fear of losing their jobs is a bit much.
2) How would you feel if we simply substituted another "wild card" means of firing people? Like "it's Tuesday. Intel services get to fire people randomly on Tuesdays." That way, those with suspected ties to our enemies can be gently let go, without any black marks on their records whatsoever.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 15, 2007 11:53 AM (0CbUL)
7
Fine. Let Congress change the code then. Once you do that, I think you will find that can staff the Castro District Military Recruiting Center with the Maytag Repairman. I hear he's available. And if advocacy groups have been playing games, expect to hear a lot of screaming when you no longer can get out by reporting yourself. I support the change.
Posted by: Darrell at March 15, 2007 12:17 PM (/KdxZ)
8
Why not have a policy of only gays in the military then their won't be any problem. You can send them to fight all over the world and not have to worry about them raping any young girls. The number of men or women lost in battle would become a good target figure. If you find any gays in the senete or congress, they would have to join their fellow brothers and sisters in the war on terror. Hey Your society will become clean of these people.
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at March 18, 2007 07:15 PM (mdszq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mmmm.
Pi.
I only know ten digits, myself.
But I can roll out an amazing crust, and that has to count for something.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:56 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The lies start early. "Pie are square." No, pie are round. Cornbread are square. Truth 2 power.
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 08:57 AM (4Ytvr)
2
"I only know ten digits, myself."
Why did you bother memorizing it? You don't even sound cool demonstrating your "talent."
Now, memorizing the soliloquy from Hamlet. That's something useful and impressive.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 14, 2007 08:37 PM (QJ5cf)
3
To be or not to be, that is the question;
Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows
Of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles, and by opposing end them.
To die, to sleep.
* * *
Life is an unweeded garden; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely. That it should come to this: so excellent a king that was, to this, hyperion to a satyr.
So loving to my mother that he might not beteem the winds of heaven visit her face too roughly.
* * *
To sleep, perchance to dream. But what dreams may come when we have shuffled off this mortal coil must give us pause.
Thus conscience makes cowards of us all, and the native hue of resolution is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought
And enterprises of great pitch and moment
in this regard their currents turn awry, and lose the name of action.
Soft you now, Ophelia; Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all thy sins remembered.
--Holy shit! I've lost some of it. How humiliating. I guess the three decades that have elapsed since I memorized it have taken a bit of a toll. Pity, that.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 14, 2007 09:01 PM (0CbUL)
4
GIMF:
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pitch and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.-- Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 14, 2007 09:04 PM (0CbUL)
5
Ok, so you know both better than me.
But who scored the winning touchdown in the 1967 NFL Championship game dubbed the "Ice Bowl?"
Stop typing "google" right now!
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 14, 2007 09:39 PM (QJ5cf)
6
The NFL is football, right?
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 14, 2007 10:13 PM (0CbUL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 13, 2007
The Nonprofit Center Where I Work
. . . has meeting rooms with names like the Felicity Room, the Serenity Room, the Harmony Room, and the Prosperity Room. And the Room of Rainbows and Cute Kittens.
Okay: I made that last one up.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:54 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Regarding Global Warming,
the news is not so much that Al Gore
exaggerated its potential consequences, and the degree of human responsibility for it; of course he did. The news is that even
The New York Times is pointing this out:
Critics have zeroed in on Mr. Gore’s claim that the energy industry ran a “disinformation campaign” that produced false discord on global warming. The truth, he said, was that virtually all unbiased scientists agreed that humans were the main culprits. But Benny J. Peiser, a social anthropologist in Britain who runs the Cambridge-Conference Network, or CCNet, an Internet newsletter on climate change and natural disasters, challenged the claim of scientific consensus with examples of pointed disagreement.
“Hardly a week goes by,” Dr. Peiser said, “without a new research paper that questions part or even some basics of climate change theory,” including some reports that offer alternatives to human activity for global warming.
Geologists have documented age upon age of climate swings, and some charge Mr. Gore with ignoring such rhythms.
“Nowhere does Mr. Gore tell his audience that all of the phenomena that he describes fall within the natural range of environmental change on our planet,” Robert M. Carter, a marine geologist at James Cook University in Australia, said in a September blog. “Nor does he present any evidence that climate during the 20th century departed discernibly from its historical pattern of constant change.”
Now that is what I call climate change.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:51 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
1
But, see, the deal is that people that do not believe in global warming as caused solely by Man have to prove that it isn't. That's the kind of science that the global warming adherents are using.
I love their whole "consensus" thing. At one time everyone believed the earth was flat. Science proved that wrong.
I'm sure, based on everything I have read, that man has some impact on temperatures around the world, but is it climate, or micro-climate?
And it just amazes me that those who believe feel that the Sun and natural earth forces play no part in the temps being up about 1 degree C since 1850. Just the emissions of a trace gas from objects that didn't even exist in the 1800's, and were not even all that widespread till the 1940's.
Posted by: William Teach at March 13, 2007 05:23 PM (doAuV)
2
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070312/ap_on_sc/polar_trek_1
"A North Pole expedition meant to bring attention to global warming was called off after one of the explorers got frostbite" "...Then there was the cold — quite a bit colder, Atwood said, then Bancroft and Arnesen had expected. One night they measured the temperature inside their tent at 58 degrees below zero, and outside temperatures were exceeding 100 below zero at times, Atwood said. "...They were experiencing temperatures that weren't expected with global warming," Atwood said. "But one of the things we see with global warming is unpredictability."
Yeah, 1 degree C in 150 years or so. Considering that you needed 132 degrees F to make it a "balmy" 0 F, maybe you should have waited a few years to visit--like say 8000 years. Or stop watching Al Gore movies or looking at those pictures in Time where the Inuit are wearing Speedos.
Posted by: Darrell at March 13, 2007 07:34 PM (DhFIp)
3
I am waiting for (not hoping for, mind you) one of these global warming as caused by Man zealots to get attacked and killed by a polar bear. They don't seem to realize that they are an apex predator with a bad temper.
Posted by: William Teach at March 14, 2007 05:44 AM (TFSHk)
4
Of course that's "132 degrees F to make it to freezing" above. I'd still check the weather forecast before I went.
Posted by: Darrell at March 14, 2007 08:31 AM (4Ytvr)
5
I love it! A perfect post. Your tagline is brilliant. :-)
Posted by: Sissy Willis at March 14, 2007 09:24 AM (Q6JEL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Does Islam Lead, Inevitably, to Islamo-Fascism?
Among the
Cotillion bloggers, we argue about this a great deal: some feel that Islam itself is a threat to liberalism and democracy. Some see the possibility that "moderate Muslims" can be brought back from the verge of extinction; others remain tremendously skeptical.
I think we all know that columnist Mark Steyn—a stud/god in so many other respects—is in the latter category.
I agree that Islam must be reformed, but I sympathize with those who are to do the reforming, since they risk death. That's why I admire the members of Muslims for America, and it is why I salute the participants in the recent Secular Islam Summit in St. Petersberg, Florida. Tashbih Sayyed reports at Family Security Matters:
Muslims being brought up under the tutelage of Islamism refuse to allow their co-religionists to think independently and indulge in individual reasoning. The situation has forced the world to believe that Muslims will always remain a threat to world peace and stability unless they find a way to challenge some of IslamÂ’s perceived foundations that are frozen in a time when barbarism, cruelty, ethnic cleansing and muzzling of opposing voices was the norm.
These were some of the thoughts on the minds of many who participated in a recently concluded Secular Islam summit in St. Petersburg, Florida, that was organized by the Center for Inquiry of New York. The summit provided Muslims with a platform to voice their concerns regarding the regressive hold of radical Islam on their lives. The summit empowered the Muslims to challenge the growing power of political Islam that threatens freedoms totally and absolutely. The SummitÂ’s success ensured that the free thinking Muslims now have a stage and visibility to propose new ideas, introduce new concepts and advance the causes of secularism without being lynched.
It's hard to forget what happened to Theo Van Gogh, and to so many others who dared to criticize Islam and Islamism—both from within the faith and outside it. Read the whole thing for some of the grim stories, and a message of hope.
All we can do in this country is protect speech, encourage debate, and create a "zone of safety" around those who have left Islam and those who attempt to cure its pathologies from within. I'm not sure whether we are "America alone." But we are the foremost promoters of free speech in the world; we are the nation that placed it first on a list of entitlements God grants to human beings. And we are its primary safeguard in the world.
That could make us Islam's best hope. And that's irony you can take to the bank.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:22 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Mr. Tasbih Sayyed, fails to state that Islam is a religion of personal interpretation, it is only violent when you take your personal beliefs and try to impose them on muslims around the world. That is a mistake, which is central to all his examples, the personal was made political and not only that in all of his examples the personal beliefs were made public and were insulting and damaging to Islam. There is a difference between free-thinking and intentionally mis-representing. Now I for one would not condone the violence, but knowing the people and the culture, this kind of result is obvious. Mr.Sayyed is completely oblivious, when he makes the claim" But all of them were mindful of the totalitarian hold of a radical and facist ideology over Islam." DUH!I think freedom of religion is enjoyed in an environment of mutual respect. The Danish Cartoonist were guilty of just that, not having any respect for the beliefs of others. We have civility and decency present when certain boundries are not breached in the name of freedom. Otherwise we have to give Ann Coulter her right to use any word to describe anyone. Lets also get rid of the legal standard "the intent to incite or produce illegal action by speech " I think I have mentioned this legal standard before sorry for the repetition.
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at March 18, 2007 08:23 PM (mdszq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 12, 2007
Enter Fred, and
. . . it's time to rock. Frank J. has some
important information on Thompson, including the fact that "every night before going to sleep, Osama bin Laden checks under his bed for Fred Thompson."
Over at The American Mind, Sean's waiting for Godot Hegel. Me? I'm hoping for Fred.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:04 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Do you have some Law & Order fetish we should know about? Any infatuation with Michael Moriarty?
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at March 12, 2007 11:24 PM (/qEp0)
2
Funny you should mention that: I think the ones with Moriarty were
much better than the ones with Sam Waterston. The Waterston character is written in such a way that none of the previous nuance is possible: his character doesn't have the moral qualms of the Moriarty character.
Also, Moriarty is appealing in a way that Waterston is not.
I've also heard rumors that he got kicked off the show by standing up to the suits, though I've never done homework on that.
My favorite Thompson role is probably the one he played on The Hunt for Red October.
Posted by: Attila Girl at March 13, 2007 12:40 AM (0CbUL)
3
Can one check under their bed after they are dead?
I know, if OBL could, he would. After he listened for a MQ-1 Predator drone, of course.
Posted by: Darrell at March 13, 2007 07:41 PM (DhFIp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Inside Baseball
This
RedState Post reminds me of
Cousin Attila's assertion that when he plays softball he won't use a metal bat, because "the founders never envisioned them."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:36 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Native Americans in Afghanistan
Sean has
the scoop.
Gee, that's difficult: use our best trackers to hunt terrorists, or people bringing weed in over the border? That's a tough one; I'll have to think about it for a while.
Paging Tony Hillerman.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
Queen Ann: "It's Illegal
. . .
to be a Republican."
I'm not so sure overzealous prosecution is limited to the Vast Left Wing Conspiracy, or that all its victims lean right. And I doubt Martha Stewart thinks so.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:59 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Martha Stewart got caught up in the frenzy of the Enron aftermath when the Left was calling for heads. She was the closest thing to Marie Antoinette this country had. Remember those "fag hag" articles in Salon emag? I wrote her a long letter right when it all stated and told her to hold a press conference before the Congressional hearing and say that she had been a stock broker, she knows how ambiguous those insider trading rules can be, so she is giving ten times the profit she made on the transaction to charity. Surprisingly she chose another route--hiring at least two independent legal teams and three jury consultants. My way would have been a bargain, even if you don't factor her stock losses.
Posted by: Darrell at March 12, 2007 09:53 PM (ohaAk)
2
I hope this was your "good girl" pet. . .Your training program, if you didn't catch my drift.
Posted by: Darrell at March 12, 2007 09:56 PM (ohaAk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If You Have a Hard-On for Giuliani,
. . . here's one way to
lose it fast.
Just as I'd need to hear Thompson make a clear statement against rationing political speech—and expressing regret over his misguided support of "campaign finance reform"—I'd need to hear some statement from Giuliani about gun rights in order to be able to vote for him.
I think he's sent signals out about a "deal" on abortion, and in truth there's little that the executive branch can do about reducing abortion right now, other than appointing constructionists to the Supreme Court. The gun issue is a lot more worrisome, and that video clip scared the shit out of me.
H/t: Moe Lane, who's undertaken the project of dampening my Rudy ardor—at my request.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
According to the May 2005 interview of Secretary Condi Rice with Larry King, she believes the 2nd Amendment is just as valued and just as important as any other constitutional right in the US Constitution.
This is a key reason so many NRA members and gun owners admire and respect her for understanding the right to defend one's family, property and home.
In the battle of ideas, she is a key factor to be considered in the debate over gun rights for US citizens.
Posted by: Crystal Dueker at March 16, 2007 12:10 PM (Agnh/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 11, 2007
As Ace Has Discovered . . .
lefties can be awfully
gay.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:29 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Is Fred Thompson Running?
Glenn Ann says "yes!"
He She
quotes this exchange between Thompson and Chris Wallace regarding the current GOP field, and whether anyone in it can "carry the ball" in 2008:
CHRIS WALLACE: And if you search your soul and if you listen to what they're all saying and it doesn't seem to you that they're catching on, making sense—whatever—then what?
THOMPSON: Well, I'm going to give it serious consideration.
I'm not sure that's a "yes." It seems to me that Thompson is taking the same stance with respect to Giuliani (or possibly Romney) that Schwarzenegger took vis a vis Richard Riordan in 2003 after we recalled Gray Davis: "You may have the ball provisionally. However, I'm going to take it back if I don't think you can cross the goal line."
Me? The idea of voting for someone who truly believes in the Second Amendment excites me so much, I may have to send myself to bed without my supper.
UPDATE: Much discussion over at RedState, with one commenter claiming that Thompson doesn't have as much charisma as Giuliani: I see it in precisely the opposite terms, though I do admit Rudy has a better chance of getting the Golden State back into play.
Still: if the base is excited enough, California is optional. When in doubt, get people to vote for your candidate, rather than against the other person.
UPDATE 2: It wasn't Glenn; it was Ann. I've fallen into the "guest blogger" trap again. Thanks, James: for the link, and for fact-checking my entry.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.
Mrs. Clinton in New Hampshire
Patrick Hynes
caught part of her speech on video. It's a good old-fashioned warm-and-fuzzy speech about taking care of children, the elderly, single parents, and little puppies with big eyes.
Nicely done. She is certainly becoming one hell of a politician, which isn't surprising. She studied under the very best.
Obama has a steep hill to climb.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
75kb generated in CPU 0.1084, elapsed 0.2366 seconds.
217 queries taking 0.2126 seconds, 524 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.