June 08, 2007
Iowahawk for Prez!
Dave is
in da race!
I have not taken this decision lightly. When considering a run for public office, the first thing a candidate must ask himself is: what can I, as newly elected public servant, expect to get out of this deal? I have researched this question thoroughly, and believe me: being President is a pretty sweet gig. Not only does it pay 400 large, it has plenty of perks including "three hots and a cot," and the world's most fearsome military force at my disposal.
The second thing a candidate must ask is: am I qualified for the position? Let's look at the facts. First, I am a native-born citizen of the United States. Second, I am over 35 years old. Third, I have never had a felony conviction stick beyond the appeals court. And Mister, if that's good enough for the Constitution of the United States, then that's good enough for me. Google it.
We aren't worthy!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
Watch Out for Colored Index Cards.
They are very dangerous. The husband and I have learned to be careful about what affirmations we place on our bulletin boards and bathroom mirrors, because they all come true. Even the ones that say "I weigh X (X being 15 pounds lighter than what my husband weighs, or five pounds lighter than what I weigh).
Even my car came about as the result of an affirmation: After I'd decided that it was too impractical to get a PT Cruiser, I bought a tiny one on a keychain, and it lived on my bulletin board for months. I saw it there every day. I think it worked on my unconscious, which in turn appealed to my Higher Power.
We become what we surround ourselves with, so those things have to speak a positive message about our aspirations.
My current affirmations:
• I show up on-time or five minutes early for all my business and social engagements. [My tendancy to multi-task sometimes wreaks havoc with this aspect of time-management, so I need to make it important.]
• I weigh 120 pounds. [This figure is just south of the truth. I don't actually care that much, but the older we get the more most of us seem to acquire around the middle, and a round belly is a health risk I don't need.]
• We own a second property, up the coast from here.
• My freelancing brings in $55K a year.
• I keep scrupulous track of my business expenses.
• People find the puzzles I write to be deliciously entertaining. [So far, so good on that score. But the positive affirmation will help me to send my babies out into the world, and given all the time I put into them, they may as well bring in some money.]
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:27 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The good news is affirmations work.
The bad news is concentrating on things you don't want
is like praying for them to happen.
Also, there's the Law of Unintended Consequences:
you get what you wanted, but it brings an "opportunity"
with it.
-B
Posted by: Bob at June 08, 2007 06:14 PM (k94s3)
2
Uh-oh. Is that, like, a growth opportunity? Those are my least favorite kind.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 08, 2007 07:28 PM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 07, 2007
On "TrophyGate"
The fact is, my husband is my senior by nine-and-a-half years.
One of my employees once referred to me as John's "trophy wife." Not being particularly intellectually insecure, I assumed this guy was kissing up to me, so I just thanked him, and that was that.
Question: If Woody Allen had married a woman the age of his current wife who was not, by cultural convention, his stepdaughter, how would people have reacted to that? I suspect they would have found it acceptable: it was the quasi-incestuous angle that bothered people.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:52 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I do not remember anyone calling Heather Harlan Tony Randall's "trophy wife" - although he was born in 1920 and she was born in 1970. Yes, 1970.
Posted by: Mark at June 08, 2007 05:15 AM (AjXhV)
2
Ah, but with anyone who has political leanings, there is no decision he/she can make that is too personal for remarks in the public sphere. I'm waiting for the day that we start comparing the brands of nosehair clippers the candidates use.
Look. Any woman can be considered a "trophy." When I was in my twenties one of my male cohorts--several years younger than I--dated a woman in her forties. She was a trophy, too, though: he had bagged an older woman who was experienced and articulate and (presumably) knew something about the world. He really dug showing up with her on his arm.
The fact is, most guys like bringing their wives and girlfriends to parties, because they feel like they make them look good. It's actually pretty normal for a guy to want to show his woman off.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 08, 2007 06:04 AM (VgDLl)
3
It's actually pretty normal for a guy to want to show his woman off.
I would go so far to posit that if he
doesn't want to show her off that there is something wrong: either with him, her, or the nature of their relationship.
And it isn't a man-thing, either. Women like showing of their men, too. Admit it, LMA: on occasion you encourage AtH to dress in a certain way when you're going to a social event together.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 08, 2007 08:28 AM (1hM1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Anyone Want To Place This Quote?
Any way, we cut a hit and we toured a bit
With a song he said he couldn't use.
And now he calls, and begs and crawls
—It's telephone deja vu!
We've got percentage points, some lousy joints
And all the glitter we can use, Mama,
So—huh—don't call us now. We'll call you.
Translation: I just got a major client. It dropped out of the sky, more or less.
So. You know.
But can someone just a few years older tell me whether that Beatles riff is, indeed, from "Day Tripper"? I totally missed that in the 70s, due to certain deficiencies in my education that I really don't want to discuss right now.
Please continue to send me money and gin. Because I like gin. And money.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:06 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Don't Call Us". . .by SUGARLOAF
. .."Listen kid, you pay for the call
You ain't bad, but we 've heard it all before
Yeah, it sounds like John, Paul and George."
Don't call us...we'll call you.
Don't call us...we'll call you.
Maybe you heard their other big song, "Green-Eyed Lady"?
Fun Fact: The touchtone sounds you hear in the recording are the number at CBS Records and the White House. They did sample the guitar riff of The Beatles' "I Feel Fine" on the record. So you're close...
Posted by: Darrell at June 07, 2007 08:42 AM (/rmVT)
2
Hi! qlrpq
It sites good, but it seems themes are similar:
byqjib
dom fem spanking fathut teenah
adul-tvideo.mydyn.deindean indean http://adul-tvideo.mydyn.de/sex4/leasbian_fucking.html leasbian fucking http://adul-tvideo.mydyn.de/sex8/ncest_story.html ncest story
Posted by: zvvnyvp at June 27, 2007 01:41 PM (QTL23)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
So . . . Am I Hawt?
Or nawt?
Personally, I suspect that I'm overvalued. Which means that I should probably sell me, but I'm really a buy-and-hold sort of gal. Except when I'm in debt.
This probably explains my passionate involvement in real estate.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:31 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
As of Now,
there is no reason to go anywhere else for your
news. We've got you covered like a black fishnet burqa.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:10 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For someone with the name Attila, you're awfuly nice to us.
Posted by: David Mastio at June 07, 2007 11:37 AM (muawU)
2
I've been told it's a bit of a misnomer; perhaps that's just as well.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 07, 2007 02:57 PM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2007
Ace on the Republican Debate.
Apparently, CNN is in
rare form:
CNN supposedly picked "likely Republican voters" -- both actual Republicans and right-leaning indepedents -- to ask the candidates questions.
Let's see how scorchingly liberal the questions are.
Off to a good start -- a woman who lost her husband brother to the war wants to know how to get us out of Iraq.
I'm so surprised CNN found this questioner!
Why, you'd think liberals had some sort of premeditated strategy to put forward victims to push their policies or something!
More! Environmentalism, prescription drug subsidies, and now, from the affiliate's handpicked (liberal) blogger, a question as to whether or not to install a Canadian style single-payer national health care system!
Wow! These "likely Republican voters" sure are reflecting my concerns and interests!
I'm glad I skipped the debate. Maybe someone will bait Fred! into another mini video tomorrow, which would at least liven things up a bit.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:20 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I caught part of it. I agree with you on the baited liberal pablum questions. CNN sucks.
Posted by: Rich at June 06, 2007 01:02 PM (4j8Ry)
2
Since when is it liberal to ask when a war that's killing off our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters?
I think it's a rather important question to ask, since war typically involves sacrifices, and people who are asked to sacrifice might like, you know, what to know how long they have to bleed.
Is anyone in your family actually, like, fighting in this war?
Posted by: dejah at June 09, 2007 04:24 PM (pD1u6)
3
dejah, you are so full of it!
I watched the debate, I watch all of them for BOTH parties, just as I watch BOTH the DNC and GOP Conventions.
The woman that stood up and asked the question that night and started her question by saying a her brother had been killed in the war then went on to ask her question was either a plant by the DNC or Yesssss a liberal.
Liberals do not realize that war is about killing on both sides and there is nothing that can be done about that. But Conservatives know that there is only Peace through war. We only pray that the peace will last as long as possible.
I know where I stand and that is along side our awesome military. Liberals seem to have forfotten the first attack on the World Trade Center, the USS Cole, 9-11 and many, many other attacks to many to mention here and all done by the followers of Islam. ......terrorists.
Liberals USE the death of the troops to push their agenda to cut and run. Conservatives never use the death of one single soldier to push any agenda. We mourn their deaths but we also celebrate their lives and honor them as true American Heroes.
When a liberal has to use the deaths of soldiers they dishonor his/her service to our country and that is a fast. Learn it, own it and shame on you dejah for not getting it.
Do I have a member of our family serving now in the military? Or a friend in the military? Yes I do, several and I am proud of each one of them and I would never dishonor their service like a liberal would. Liberals are the enemy within, they aid the enemy with their spew of saying things like kill your officers signs they hold up at anti-war rallies.
LIberals should get down on their knees and thank God for our military and for all of America's finest for all they do each day.
dejah your comment......"you know, what to know how long they have to bleed. "....is absolutely disgusting!!!!
Posted by: Wild Thing at June 10, 2007 12:15 AM (t259v)
4
When's the last time CNN had a military family member who actually SUPPORTED the war on the air?
*crickets chirping*
Statistically, they are far more numerous that those who don't support the war, yet miraculously every time they air an "in-depth look at how military families feel" we see some non-representative "military family member" who... Oooo! surprise surprise! AGREES WITH CNN!
Hey, I know some military family members don't support the war, and I'm perfectly happy to let them say their piece. But don't you find it just a
little suspicious that CNN can never seem to find any of the vast MAJORITY of us who do when camera time rolls around?
Got bias? CNN does.
Posted by: Cassandra at June 10, 2007 04:09 AM (G/Ncc)
5
"Dejah"--as in, "deja vu"? Sorry, Doll: Iraq isn't Vietnam. (Nor was El Salvador, for that matter, though I suspect a lot of your friends have a hard-on for another "defeat.")
Since the e-mail address you gave me was fake, I'll ask you publicly what I tried to ask you in private: do YOU have any family members or friends serving in Iraq (or even Afghanistan)?
I want to know. But I think I already do.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 10, 2007 09:48 PM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 05, 2007
Back to Basics on Iraq
Senator McCain reminds us what
the stakes are.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
Cuba's Revolution Wasn't Televised.
At least, not very well. Bella Thomas gives us a window into the post-Fidel future, and concludes that it does not look very different:
There were a few signs of change. I heard of some market experiments in certain villages, and that Raúl Castro was quieter and more pragmatic than his brother. I noted the sophisticated restoration of old Havana under the dedicated eye of the official historian, Eusebio Leal, making use of international funds and hotel developments. (The architectural legacy of the enemies of the revolution—the Spanish empire and the high days of the capitalist era—are now, more than ever, keeping Cuba's revolution afloat.)
But there was no real sense of a transition. And I was told that levels of control were, if anything, stronger. Fewer journalists were being allowed into the country, only a few of the 75 political prisoners who had been jailed in 2003 had been released, and at least another 200 were still in prison. Some private restaurants were still open, but two thirds of those in Havana had been closed in recent years because the government did not want to see too much competition with the state-run restaurants and hotels.
Read the whole thing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
And So
. . . it
begins.
The "I'm With Fred" slogan/identifier is very clever, reminiscent of "Join Arnold," or "I Like Ike." And using it as the site's URL is another way of separating F. Thompson from the rest of the pack.
Hackbarth is concerned about how the Fred! strategy will affect the primaries:
If Thompson goes the “travel little but make up for it with big gulps of the internet” he won’t win the nomination. Iowa and New Hampshire voters are spoiled. They expect and demand candidates suck up to them in person in private homes and at town hall meetings. How can a candidate have a good ground game when the he doesn’t bother covering much ground?
The question becomes: how addicted are voters in Iowa and New Hampshire to having their asses kissed? Or, to put it less bluntly, will they get enough hard data on where Fred stands to feel comfortable voting for him without a lot of hand-holding? And if they are accustomed to acting as the presidential gatekeepers, can they set their egos aside and vote for a man on his merits, rather than based on how much time he spends in their states?
Fred!'s advantage here is the fact that he doesn't necessarily want the job of President: he's being drafted. So an unorthodox campaign might just work. The danger, as I see it, lies in the fact that most people still get their news from the mainstream media rather than the web. And the producers of segments for television like soundbites. They like to send reporters to cover the news on the ground. So people like my mother won't have much of a sense that Fred! is really running, unless he makes a splash despite being physically absent.
The whole thing is a huge gamble, but if Thompson wins, he wins big. A strong showing in the first few primaries despite the "travel little" strategy will be big, big news.
And then the MSM will come to Fred!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:35 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 339 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Remember this is also the first primary season where so many states have moved up near Iowa and New Hampshire, so I am wondering if Fred! ends up getting the nomination (or comes awfully close to it) political strategists will have to redo their strategies of spending so much time in these two states...
Posted by: Mark at June 05, 2007 05:55 PM (Xl6MK)
2
To me it's looking like Kerry in '04. Dean had momentum but biffed Iowa. Kerry wins, wins New Hampshire, and the rest is history. With so much compression between races it will be hard for losers to let the media, webloggers, and voters catch their breath. POOF! Before we know it the race will be over.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at June 05, 2007 09:13 PM (8lL1c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Not Content to Simply Oppress His Own Wife,
Dennis is
oppressing Amanda Marcotte on the side.
"Knock-knock jokes." What a strange, fascinating creature Dennis is.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:23 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Technically, don't you need a "Knock-knock" and a "Who's there?" for it to be a knock-knock joke?
Example: Knock-knock.
Who's there?
Amanda.
Amanda who?
Exactly.
Posted by: Darrell at June 05, 2007 07:44 PM (Vcv+O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 04, 2007
Well, Scott Has It Partly Right.
If we
don't want the "forced pregnancy lobby" to get its way, then we must have utter reproductive freedom, with the lowest possible risk to the woman's life. I'd suggest that we simply legalize infanticide: allow the woman to give birth, and then give her four weeks or so to decide whether she wants the child to live or die.
Anything less is misogyny, you know.
Geez, Louise. I swear—some of these male "feminists" think we're made out of crepe paper.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:34 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
to Them babies are not humans they're aliens.
Posted by: gr8inferno at June 05, 2007 07:14 AM (VgP/D)
2
Since when did Peter Singer start prowling the blogosphere?
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at June 05, 2007 02:32 PM (8lL1c)
3
Why limit it to four weeks? Might as well allow retroactive abortions to, say, the 21st birthday. It certainly would give one more reason for children to mind their Mums, wouldn't it?
Posted by: Darrell at June 05, 2007 07:15 PM (Vcv+O)
4
But only the female parent is allowed to waste the offspring--otherwise, it would be sexist.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 05, 2007 09:22 PM (pDVAQ)
Posted by: Darrell at June 06, 2007 08:34 AM (jEd4K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dearie Me.
I'm feeling
quite a bit bitchier than usual tonight. I wonder what it is. Let's consider the possibilities:
1) Joy, it's just that you're tired. Go to bed. Like, now.
2) Either give up volunteering, or go somewhere where it'll be appreciated, rather than working with those slack-jawed, dimwitted ingrates you're hanging out with these days.
3) Men. It's their doing. All of them. They collude.
4) Welcome to menopause.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:17 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
Popular Mechanics Editors vs. the Loose Screws at Loose Change.
Start
here.
UPDATE: Okay, it looks like I've got a few readers who like them a Kool-Aid cocktail every now and then. So, one question: if the damage at the Pentagon and the crash site/"crash site" in Pennsylvania weren't caused by planes, then what happened to the two missing planes that day that didn't hit the WTC?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:02 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Zendo Deb at June 04, 2007 04:58 AM (+gqOq)
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) at June 04, 2007 08:35 AM (6pAmW)
3
Check out the new book by Dr. David Ray Griffin “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory”
www.amazon.com/Debunking 9-11 Debunking
Posted by: terry at June 04, 2007 09:05 AM (6AiQg)
4
About Dr. Griffin:
From Publishers Weekly, Starred Review. An emeritus professor of theology with no previous interest in conspiracy theories, Griffin has dedicated himself since 2003 to the "9/11 truth" movement, a group committed to "exposing the falsity of the official theory about 9/11," and this book is a thorough, highly detailed attempt to do just that.
Emeritus professor of theology? Deer Lord.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 04, 2007 10:32 AM (1hM1d)
5
"Emeritus professor of theology? Deer Lord."
Also, check out the Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, Government Officials, Professors, 9-11 Survivors and Family Members who have expressed significant criticism of the 9-11 Commission Report and/or allege government complicity in 9-11 found here:
www.patriotsquestion911.com
Posted by: terry at June 04, 2007 11:37 AM (6AiQg)
6
Yes, that's nice, Terry. Now, if they can offer a plausible, coherent explaination of the events that began on 11 Sep 2001 that doesn't involve pre-placed demolition charges, I'm willing to take a look.
What? I have to accept pre-placed demolition charges? do you realized how freakin' hard that would be to pull off *without* someone, anyone, noticing?
And in case you haven't been paying attetion, let me point one more thing out to you. This administration hasn't been able to keep any state secrets...well, secret. From NSA intercept program, the SWIFT program, to the most recent leak of plans to undermine the Iranian government, this administration has leaked like a leaky sieve.
And now you would like me to believe that they also have pulled off the conspiracy of a lifetime??
To coin a phrase,
oh, puuuuuuullllllleeeeeeeeeeezzzzzeeeeeeeeee.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 04, 2007 01:54 PM (1hM1d)
7
Seriously, is it even worth the time to debate what happened on 9/11 with Truthers, who, a couple decades ago, would have, at the least, been dismissed as complete cranks, if not stuck in mental institutions?
As for the planes, one of them was Lost.
I had a convo with the husband of a family friend who was working at the Pentagon that day, other side of the building, E Ring, regarding the camera footage. Security cameras there, like most places, are not set up with to capture that kind of speed. They are designed to capture vehicles through the gates, so the frame speed is not real high. To store that high a frame rate would require enormous storage.
Posted by: William Teach at June 04, 2007 06:14 PM (doAuV)
8
Two questions:
1. How does the theory explain Flight 93?
2. How come the US Government can keep this secret and NOTHING ELSE?
Posted by: Chuck at June 04, 2007 07:27 PM (H4W1a)
9
Note the '666" in the youtube link. . .
At least we know who is behind this crap. Besides the Left, that is.
Oh, and those nutters have an explanation for the missing planes and passengers--the people have been given new identities and are still alive. Remember the Tom Flocco story of Barbara Olson(Ann Coulter's best friend, wife of Bush lawyer, Ted, who helped him "steal" Florida, killed on Flight 77) being arrested on the Polish/Austrian border in 2005? Shocking because Poland and Austria share no border? And he misspelled her name. And said she was carrying millions in counterfeit Italian "lyra". She was carrying a Vatican passport, of course--never miss a chance to bash Catholics. I guess the Bush pals were given new IDs. The others? Not so lucky. The planes? Still on the NTSB tail number list. Probably in one of those junkyards in Arizona. Desert Cat should go take a look. Or start scratching paint off tail numbers to look for a re-paint. Why should the loony Left break all the "good" stories? Like who's gay.
Posted by: Darrell at June 04, 2007 08:48 PM (H8+in)
10
So is Ted Olson in on the conspiracy? Does he get to have secret liaisons with his wife, or is he expected simply to cope for the good of the cause?
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 04, 2007 09:27 PM (VgDLl)
11
I work for the government and have been in the military for the last 20 years.
I can debunk the 9/11 conspiracy with one concept.
We're not that good. Seriously, I wish we were. But we are simply not that good. No one is.
Posted by: redleg at June 05, 2007 07:38 AM (PaV2r)
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 05, 2007 09:17 AM (VgDLl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 03, 2007
The Grilling Report.
Week Two of The Kabob Project. The thing that both A the H and I noticed this week was how much pleasure we derived from eating last week's leftover kabobs. He heated his back up, but I ate mine cold over at work on Tuesday night in Culver City (20 miles away—but 45 minutes to an hour to get out there, given L.A. traffic).
Even unheated, rare grilled steak and grilled veggies with charred edges were great eating on the other side of town, particularly when washed down with a luscious ripe peach.
So back to the grill again, this weekend. Saturday night we had turkey steaks. I would have bought chicken breasts, but who has time to pound them down to the right thinness for grilling? [Insert joke here.] The turkey was cheaper, and it was easier to freeze the extras for next weekend. A little Asian-style marinade, rice, and a salad—and dinner was done. I boiled the marinade to use again as a sauce; I'm thrifty that way.
Tonight I continued with the kabobs, but I got a thinner type of steak, rather than the Top Sirloin my local market uses on its pre-assembled kabobs (the husband likes his meat well-done, which doesn't really happen when the meat chunks are the size of small aircraft). The unit price was acceptable-but-not-great; however, I figured being able to freeze the last few small steaks meant I'd get at least three meals/six servings out of that package. Not bad.
This was beef loin tri-tip, and thin enough that I knew I could cut it into tiny chunks, so the first few kabobs to make it onto the grill would definitely be well-done, in accordance with husbandly preferences. I used Spanish onions, instead of the red onions the market employed last weekend, and in addition to green bell pepper I added some red bell pepper. I also threw in some mushrooms. The last few skewers were only peppers/mushrooms, and spent much less time over the fire than the meat/onion kabobs had.
Most of all, I decided that all these flavors would probably be just fine on their own, and I forewent a marinade—just threw the suckers over the fire. We ate them with small amounts of salt and pepper, and a butter lettuce salad with cherry tomatoes on the side. We drank Trader Joe's blueberry soda; it was truly a royal meal. And not a bad belated anniversary celebration, considering we were able to fit it into our budget constraints and our respective diets.
Next, week, though, the plot thickens: we're going to add pineapple, and go Polynesian. (But, no: no wooden skewers. I'm not going to soak those suckers for 30 minutes before dinner. Metal is fine for us. I might get kabob baskets for the veggies, though, depending on what the casualty rates are there-among.)
But for Polynesian, I'll definitely want to marinade the kabobs. Suggestions?
And, of course, I will create a dessert using grilled peaches at some point this summer. After all, grilled desserts are the Final Frontier on my balcony.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 516 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Polynesian marinade? Pineapple juice(Dole), peanut oil, teriyaki or soy sauce, fresh ginger, crushed garlic. Add a touch of roasted sesame seed oil, if you wish, and ground pepper and onion powder. Marinate for 1-2 hours, keeping in mind the pineapple enzymes tenderize and start "cooking the meat. Keep refrigerated while doing this.
The pineapple juice and oil of your choice makes it authentic. The rest can be played with. Pork tenderloin would be a good choice here. If you are worried about the grilling time and pork, you can finish off in a skillet on the stove (or grill). If you do that, I suggest adding a little corn starch to the kabobs while being marinated. Simmer a few minutes in a little chicken stock.
Posted by: Darrell at June 04, 2007 09:16 PM (H8+in)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 02, 2007
Carbon Footprints
. . .
in the sand.
UPDATE: Link fixed. I blame society at large for the error.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:15 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Same link with Rush and The Lowe's commercial?
Posted by: Darrell at June 02, 2007 07:45 PM (cdfPw)
2
Oops.
Of course, the fact that I know you guys check my links probably makes me lazy--why verify after I've posted, when I know someone will point it out if I screw it up?
On the other hand, I do proofreading and fact-checking in "real life," and have
no intention of doing it on my blog.
So you're probably stuck fact-checking the fact-checker.
Posted by: Attila Girl at June 02, 2007 08:44 PM (VgDLl)
3
Was it a car or a cat I saw?
What makes this sentence unusual, besides being nonsensical, of course. . .
I refuse to proofread when not being paid, too. I just try to read the links to, you know, understand the post and comment. Sometimes.
Posted by: Darrell at June 03, 2007 06:43 AM (3VLdR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More on Traditional Male Skills.
From
Glenn, who mentions once again the
Popular Mechanics work on
recapturing handiness for males (and interested females), and points out that even
Rush Limbaugh is aware of the trend toward males being Distinctly Unhandy.
I've been wanting to get The Dangerous Book for Boys for one of my nephews. But the very title could get me kicked out of my family: my sister-in-law is a safety nut—to a pathological degree. I'm not sure either of my nephews has ever skinned a knee.
The loophole: I could get it for my brother, their father. You know—as an Item of Cultural Interest.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:04 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Just buy the book, already! Give them the book, the consequences be damned. Oh, and don't worry.... a trend is only that. There are still plenty of us (well, I can only speak for me, I reckon) that are quite handy. But, maybe if I was only 23 I might not be, but I am 50 and grew up when boys were boys. Lucky me... Interesting site you have....
Posted by: Joe at June 05, 2007 06:54 AM (lFp1m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
73kb generated in CPU 0.025, elapsed 0.0399 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0226 seconds, 102 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.