May 19, 2008
Barack Obama:
on the GOP:
to start attacking my wife in a political campaign I think is detestable.
Hm. A lot of people feel that way about Michelle attacking the country and its values.
Look. I don't like people attacking the families of candidates; I'd love to see us get away from attacking Presidential offspring, in particular. But when a full-grown adult woman is making independent campaign appearances, she can probably take any criticism the media and campaign spinners want to throw at her. And to take the stance that she can dish it out, but not take it, is sexist and detestable.
Obama cannot have it both ways.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:27 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I noticed the sexism as well. He'll point out things Bill Clinton has said during the campaign, but everybody has to ignore what his wife has said? Interesting...
Posted by: Donnie at May 19, 2008 02:55 PM (my2hQ)
2
It's a page from Bill Clinton's original playbook. When anything works for the Left you always see it again. Leftie women are supposed to swoon when Leftie men defend their life partners. I suppose because it's so different from their real life experiences.
With David Axelrod at the helm of the Obama campaign, expect to see a lot of tricks before election day--vandalism at Obama offices around the country, 'threats' on staffers and family, signs pulled from lawns, calls for international election monitors, reminders that the whole world is watching, claims that if Obama doesn't win the whole country will be a'rioting and a'looting and a'burning the next day. Etc., etc., etc. Good times.
Posted by: Darrell at May 19, 2008 08:15 PM (XWhkN)
3
Speaking of having it both way (and since we can't comment on the farm bill) how about high commodity prices and record subsidies at the same time? Did every Democrat join Jim Jones cult?
Posted by: Darrell at May 19, 2008 08:19 PM (XWhkN)
4
I just can't figure that one out. I can't even summon every liberal molecule in my body and figure out how
theyrationalize those freakin' subsidies.
Sorry about the commenting problem, but I'm working on it. Progress has been slowed, however, because of the bias against women of shortness in the blogosphere. It makes me tired. Or not-proud. Or something.
Oh, hey--here's my husband! He'll explain it!
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 19, 2008 08:55 PM (Hgnbj)
Posted by: Darrell at May 19, 2008 09:19 PM (XWhkN)
6
No dice. He's tired of my trying to hide behind his, um, tool-belt . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 19, 2008 10:39 PM (Hgnbj)
7
When a black woman criticizes her country, that's an attack. When a white woman criticizes her country, that's a thoughtful critique.
In response, McCain's wife said that she's "always been proud of her country." I wonder which moment was proudest for her:
A. When no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.
B. When the federal government bungled Hurricane Katrina.
C. When George Bush stood on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier like a big hero, and announced the end of major combat operations in Iraq.
Yet, I see no mention of her inane statement in the main stream media.
Posted by: The Hipnerd at May 19, 2008 10:49 PM (XmFK6)
8
Come on, now: you cannot suggest that it is reasonable for any upper-middle-class/wealthy person who went to law school and lives in a tony part of Chicago to suggest that she was never proud of this country until her husband became a real contender for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
That isn't criticism. That's large-scale condemnation.
Naturally, I'm curious about which white woman you had in mind. There are at least a few dozen of us in this country, and our approaches to civic involvement . . . vary.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 20, 2008 05:50 AM (Hgnbj)
9
You're right, her statement isn't reasonable--it's an exaggeration. I'm sure Mrs. McCain's statement is one as well.
However, if you're willing to ascribe Mrs. Obama's to some deep seeded hatred for the U.S.A., then Mrs. McCain's is jingoism, and deserves equal scrutiny.
Posted by: The Hipnerd at May 20, 2008 03:34 PM (mElWK)
10
I actually do not see a contradiction between having pride in America and imagining that there aren't things that could be done better in the U.S.A.
So, no: I do not see Mrs. McCain's statement as problematic.
But I continue to see Mrs. Obama's statement as troubling, particularly in concert with some of the other outrageous things she has said.
If, BTW, you agree with Barack Obama that his wife should not be criticized in this campaign, do you see Bill Clinton in the same way? If not, why not?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 20, 2008 03:39 PM (Hgnbj)
11
She didn't say "I have pride in America." She said, "I've always been proud of my country." Big difference.
I didn't say I agree that Obama's wife shouldn't be criticized, I'm just pointing out the double standard in leaving out criticism of McCain's wife.
Posted by: The Hipnerd at May 21, 2008 06:31 PM (XmFK6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Examiner on the Farm Bill
Via
Insty, some harsh—and well-deserved—words about the "Farm Bill":
Pathetic. Craven. Irresponsible. Unprincipled. Those and similar adjectives apply to every member of Congress who voted for the bloated, anti-consumer piece of legislative corruption known as the Food and Energy Conservative Act of 2008 a k a as “the farm bill.” President Bush has promised to veto the bill. To put it plainly, everybody in Congress who votes to override the coming Bush veto should be retired come November because they will have voted for a measure that is nothing more -- or less -- than a $300 billion giveaway of the taxpayers’ hard-earned money. This is especially true for conservative Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats who brag about their fiscal rectitude.
We’ve already editorialized that the bill is a budget buster even without the grab bag of spending gimmicks. We’ve noted that it will continue to give subsidies to millionaires who actually live in Manhattan and who might not even use their “farmland” for food crops. (Those subsidies will come from tax dollars confiscated from millions of working families of four making, say, $35,000. How is that fair?) But we actually understated the expense and duplicity of providing retroactive “disaster relief” for crop losses for which the 2002 farm bill previously covered in advance through federal crop insurance. As it turns out, the bill also keeps the crop insurance going forward, plus provides $3.8 billion in advance for any unforeseen “disasters” that may, uh, crop up.
On these pages last Friday, columnist Tim Carney described how the bill increases subsidies for domestic sugar growers that, combined with restrictions on imported sugar, will drive up U.S. food prices substantially -- and, even worse, how it provides for the government to buy “excess” sugar at high prices, then re-sell it to ethanol facilities at as little as one-tenth the price.
There also are inexcusable local-interest flimflams such as a $250 million tax credit for a private land sale in Montana and a provision to “sell” national forest land, necessitating a shifting of the Appalachian Trail, to benefit a Vermont ski resort. Worse -- and this is brand new -- House and Senate negotiators “air-dropped” several expensive provisions into the bill that neither chamber had voted on, including $170 million for salmon fisheries in California.
Emphasis mine, just because I'm so pissed, and I suspect my lib friends may skim that passage; I do want them to grasp how hyper-destructive this bill is.
Please find out if your congress-scum and senate-idiots voted for this thing, and let them know how you feel about it.
Let me put it this way: the bill is so egregious, President Bush even found his pen: he plans to veto it. Most of the time, he can't spend money fast enough.
The pathetic thing is that as it stands, the our fine legislators can override the veto. The ray of hope being that we can kick them out in November.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 504 words, total size 3 kb.
May 18, 2008
Just Returned from Anaheim.
We had a nice little party to celebrate Joe's launch into the world of shrinkdom.
I asked him where he learned to read lips, and unfortunately he picked that up from his speech therapist as a child. I still think I should earn lipreading and/or ASL before my hearing starts to go in a few years: I have seen the future, and it is my grandmother. If there are steps I can take to avoid becoming quite so isolated, they would be a good idea.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
May 16, 2008
Just When You Think You Despise Huckabee As Much As You Can, He Outdoes Himself.
What was NRA thinking in the first place, letting an idiot like
Huckabee address its membership?
But if it's killed any chance of him being considered as VP, it might be worth the fact that the lefties will use this to malign gun owners.
Huckabeen. Please.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:56 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who was McCain's first choice again? John Kerry? Maybe an Exorcism would help at this point. Look, John, by going after that magical 10% of swing voters, you are going to make your 40-something-% base stay at home until Wednesday, Nov. 5th. Can't you see that all those bridges you built with the Left are made of cotton candy? See anyone rushing from the Left looking to join the "Straight Talk Express"? Could you have picked a lamer name for your campaign? Are you trying to book an appearance on "Laugh-In" to seal the election? Get some professional help while you can.
Posted by: Darrell at May 16, 2008 08:58 PM (KKy19)
2
we can only hope that this takes care of the huckaphony issue for veep. i throw up a little in my mouth everytime i think about it.
Posted by: zoey at May 18, 2008 10:42 AM (oNP5F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Karl at PW
Just made Libby Copeland of
WaPo his
bitch.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
Goodbye, Robert Mondavi.
You
changed everything. And it's still changing.
Thanks for all the varietals. Thanks for the top-notch—yet dirt-cheap—vino.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
Aw. C'mon, Now.
If they really needed
understanding and such, why would they have been born male?
Checkmate, Bay-bee!
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:56 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Awwww.... Men are people too, I'm pretty sure.
And dating people over 30 (let alone 40!), whether divorced or not, you gotta assume they've got baggage, issues, and possibly scurvy.
It's worth it, though, to have a conversation with a grownup. Right?
Posted by: Rin at May 16, 2008 03:59 PM (m82W1)
Posted by: Darrell at May 16, 2008 09:01 PM (KKy19)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 15, 2008
Eric Classic
. . . on why black people should, as one of my African-American friends once put it, "
stop picking cotton on the Democratic Party's plantation."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Well, Then.
Let us go
gaily forward.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:55 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Bother! Just as I finished typing a beautifully worded rant about love and devotion knowing no gender, about gay marriage being just as valid and committed and honorable as straight marriage, about straight marriage having declined quite in the absence of any influence from gay couples, and about God not actually planning on smiting anyone if we legalize the democratically legitimate right of gay couples to marry in America, my internet connection froze.
Drat!
I will say this: I've known gay couples that weathered cancer, the loss of children, and other heartbreaks, and I can only hope that some day I'll have a spouse whose devotion, honor, love, trust, respect, compassion, humor, and generosity are as great as theirs.
Posted by: Rin at May 15, 2008 06:14 PM (cxzm+)
2
You will.
BTW, I generally prefer that these issues get decided by legislative means, rather than judicial fiat, but at least this is at the state level, rather than the one-size-fits-all Federal fiasco that was Roe v. Wade.
I see the problem as linguistic: now that everyone wants the word marriage, those who are deeply religious in an orthodox denomination/faith simply need a new word that suggests a female-male life partnership, since "civil union" fails, and doesn't carry all the Federal protections.
If they are obnoxious, they will simply put quotation marks around marriage when it's homosexual. But I would hope they try something else: (1) really BITCHIN' marriage; (2) New Testament/Old Testament marriage; (3) Complementary marriage; (4) gender-balanced marriage.
So that it's like, "I approve of people getting benefits who deserve benefits, but I've always thought that God/the forces of evolution favored this old-fashioned man-woman thing, and to me it's still the ideal. Or, at least that is what my faith teaches."
That would solve the language problem without resorting to scare quotes.
We would, for the record, be SO MUCH BETTER OFF if the state had not become so deeply involved in the marriage thing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2008 12:47 AM (Hgnbj)
3
Or, for the traditionalist with a sense of humor,
innie-outie marriage
;-)
Posted by: Rin at May 16, 2008 09:50 AM (7EbKE)
4
but if traditional couples invent a new word that means "REAL marriage," won't gay couples want that term applied to them too, both culturally and legally?
wouldn't it just be simpler to agree that any two people who agree to live together, have physical intimacy (of whatever sort or level), bring each other soup when they're sick, and not make too much fun of the other when s/he does something really boneheaded, are married?
it's all about the soup, baby!
Posted by: Rin at May 16, 2008 01:09 PM (bSHZa)
5
Nope. We cannot force people whose religious scruples force them to feel that society ought not place a "stamp of approval" on homosexuality to use the same word for male-female marriage as for female-female marriage.
It isn't right. We cannot simply co-opt the language in an attempt to force our particular notions of inclusivity down people's throats.
Everyone has a fundamental right to be left alone. That applies to gay couples, but it also applies to the religiously orthodox. Society is best off when both of those groups participate, so each much do its best to avoid being too abrasive toward the other. And each must do its best to avoid being too sensitive.
It's the only way classical liberalism can work.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 16, 2008 03:32 PM (Hgnbj)
6
But it's a game of catch-up. If straight America allows gay couples to use the word marriage, but coins a new term (superduper marriage) for themselves, gay married couples will then want to be included in the new term. And so on and so on.
I absolutely agree, we cannot force people to like it, nor force churches to sanctify it. But in the legal, civil service sense, it should have the same name and standing as straight marriage, and churches should be free to call it a marriage if they want to.
Making up a new word just starts a new phase of the same old dance. The whole point for gay couples is that they want to be included in the agreed-upon definition, 'cus all the cool kids are doin' it.
Of course, an ever-shifting terminology is probably inevitable, but I don't think it's desirable.
Posted by: Rin at May 16, 2008 04:06 PM (m82W1)
7
I don't know if I believe there is any such thing as "straight America."
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 17, 2008 10:37 AM (Hgnbj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Morrissey on Agricultural Subsidies
I know I'm supposed to be even more pissed off at the Republicans than at the Democrats, here, but I'm pretty fucking pissed off at the entire House right now. There are a lot of people who are struggling to pay their bills right now, and
this fucked-up farm bill is what our congresspigs come up with? Unbelievable.
The subsidy program exists far beyond its intended purpose. Like many New Deal programs, FDR didnÂ’t intend on making subsidies permanent, and he certainly didnÂ’t intend on turning them into corporate welfare programs. Today, thatÂ’s exactly what these programs are. The majority of subsidies go to commercial farms, not family farms, and the average income from a subsidy-receiving farm is $200,000—an income which Barack Obama considers “wealthy” for tax purposes.
Price supports make some sense for food security when prices are low, but thatÂ’s hardly the case now. Thanks in large part to subsidies for ethanol production, food prices have skyrocketed over the last few years. The market distortion has created hunger worldwide while robbing American taxpayers. Thanks to subsidies, Americans pay twice for foolish policy—once with the IRS, and a second time at the store with higher food prices. Small wonder, then, that the average household income for farmers has risen to almost $90,000 and that land values have doubled in the last eight years.
Do subsidies have any place at all at the federal level? IÂ’d argue no, but at the least, we should stop subsidizing commercial farms and let the marketplace dictate prices, using subsidies sparingly to support independent farmers. We have to stop using corn and other foods for ethanol. We should use food to feed people and animals and not our cars. Our inability to deal maturely with our energy requirements has created food shortages and inflation where we can least afford it.
My emphasis.
The really charming part is that unless we can transform some more legislative piggies into rational human beings, they can override Bush's veto on this nonsense.
Call your congressasshole, and tell 'em corporate welfare sucks, especially when it distorts markets in such a way as to increase hunger.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:29 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 364 words, total size 2 kb.
May 14, 2008
Menopause: An Owner's Manual
Web M.D. has a
partial list.
Coping With the Symptoms of Menopause
There are many ways you can ease menopause symptoms and maintain your health. These tips include ways to cope with mood swings, fears and depression:
• Find a self-calming skill to practice such as yoga, meditation or slow, deep breathing.
• Avoid tranquilizers.
• Engage in a creative outlet or hobby that fosters a sense of achievement.
•Stay connected with your family and community and nurture your friendships.
• Seek emotional support from friends, family members or a professional counselor when needed.
• Take steps to stay cool during hot flashes, such as wearing loose clothing.
• Keep your bedroom cool to prevent night sweats and disturbed sleep.
• Take medicines, vitamins and minerals as prescribed by your doctor.
• Eat healthfully and exercise regularly.
That's fine, as far as it goes. Naturally, I had a few thoughts of my own:
• Invest in a Cool-Max pajama top.
• Buy your wine by the box.
• Use plenty of lime when burying bodies.
• Keep sorbet on hand for hot flashes.
• Consider alternatives to firearms, such as razor wire and edged weapons.
• Eat lots of Rice Krispies.
• Find a copendent friend whom you can endlessly berate over the phone when your estrogen levels are low. Avoid people with self-esteem.
• If you find yourself with a staff job, make a study of your boss's dietary habits. Buy a small manual on untraceable poisons. You may never need it, but it'll give you peace of mind.
• Read books on revenge carefully; learn to cover your tracks when you go on the karma-balancing prowl. Consider getting even with people other than those you imagine are somehow wronging you. After all, someone will pay it forward, some day.
"Did I get 'em all?" I asked Attila the Hub.
"Almost," he replied. "Just one more."
• Howl like a wolf for hours on end.
"I thought I was doing that already," I remarked.
"No, no. I don't mean internally, or using mere words. Or blogging, for crying out loud. I don't mean like Alan-freaking-Ginsburg. I mean actual, literal howling."
"Excellent idea. I'll try it. But I think I'll have some sorbet first."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:08 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 382 words, total size 2 kb.
1
When you kill people, remember, lift with your knees!
Try to make them dig their own pits, then just push 'em in.
Hot tea with lemon is very soothing to the throat after a nice bout of howling.
And above all, tell your hubby he's on high alert for the next 4 years. He's not to disagree with you or sass you in any way. You are to be coddled, pampered, and obeyed in all things.
hmmm. Better make that 24 years, just to be on the safe side.
Posted by: Rin at May 16, 2008 01:32 PM (bSHZa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yeah. When I Worked Graveyard at Ship's in Westwood,
a customer called me "Honey." Men need to be
careful using terms of endearment with strange women. (And remember—most women are strange as hell . . .)
I didn't mind "I love women in uniform." Because, after all, who doesn't look great in an orange dress, nylons, a bun in one's hair, and white tennis shoes with salsa stains on 'em?
But I didn't like "Honey." I just peered up through my bangs, leaned on the counter and told the guy. "I'm the waitress. I call you 'Honey.' That does not mean you get to call me 'Honey.'"
That was, BTW, the best job I ever had: I got to work all night, eat silver-dollar pancakes at 4:00 a.m., get the breakfast rush started, and walk home to my apartment just off UCLA's sorority row to have a second breakfast with my roommates before going to sleep.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:30 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Aww, c'mon, babe, you don't have to get all huffy, sugarplum.
After all, we mean them as
compliments, sweetcheeks
---
Just remember, Attila;
"IT COULD BE WORSE!"
For example, I've heard some fairly strange (and I mean strange) terms of endearments headed my way. And then some. Ever had some strange woman come up and pinch your cheeks? Really disconcerting. Or my classmate who rubbed my beer belly in a strangely erotic way.
Sauce for the goose and gander, y'know? Not to mention sticks 'n' stones.
Posted by: Gregory at May 14, 2008 05:49 PM (cjwF0)
2
Or my classmate who rubbed my beer belly in a strangely erotic way.
I hate that. I may look like Buddha, but I assure you that
rubbing my beer gut does
not bring good luck.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at May 15, 2008 05:28 AM (1hM1d)
3
In indiana, everyone is honey or hon, go get gas and the cashier will say that'l be $20 hon.
I learnt long time ago to look at the context before picking on words.
Posted by: azmat hussain at May 18, 2008 06:14 PM (+fapf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
On Vietnamese Nail Salons . . .
Yup. I started going to my
local one several years ago, after I gave up acrylic tips on my fingernails, and just had my toes done when I felt like it (usually during the summer).
The Vietnamese salon doesn't just have better prices than the white-run salon: it also has "spa chairs," in which one sits up high in a massaging chair with a basin of water underneath it, and less guilt (the women don't have to hunch down quite as far to reach one's toes). They throw in a few minutes of massage for free, and one can pay an extra five bucks for an extra five minutes.
There is also a Korean-run salon near one of my main clients' offices, and that is more unusual on the West Coast, though I understand in New York there are a number of Korean manicurists.
I think it's kind of cool that there are professions immigrants can study in their native languages to ease the transition into this country.
Oh, wait: I must pander to my culturally far-right, border-obsessed readers. Sorry. I'm outraged that instruction is offered in Vietnamese; people must learn English if they intend to live here! IT'S CALLED ASSIMILATION! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?!!!!!one!!!!eleven!!!
h/t: Virginia Postrel.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:00 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Asians have a great record of assimilation and the belief in a better life through education. And testing for technical expertise in one's native language makes sense. It eliminates the errors associated with language/translation in the process. And as long as private investment is driving the process, it is all good. And with bilingual Vietnamese cosmetology instructors, students can't help but learn a little English along the way. Ethnic groups digging into their own pockets to find the American dream. It once was the norm.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2008 01:17 PM (Bj6Ga)
2
When my mother taught math as an "ESL" teacher (she speaks no languages other than English, but didn't need to, of course), it was always the kids of recent immigrants who were most "into" learning--whether they were from Asia or Latin America.
She thought she wanted to teach kids who were more "affluent," so after years at The Urban Junior High she transferred to one in the San Fernando Valley, in hopes of teaching calculus.
Rather than finding it fulfilling, she was discouraged beyond belief by how spoiled all the suburban kids were; she took an early retirement at 55, and has never looked back.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2008 01:26 PM (Hgnbj)
3
In teaching it is all about attitude, I have taught "spoiled" kids and the "under privileged" and both will challenge one to find a way to engage and motivate. The reason why recent immigrants seem more receptive to learning has to do with their cultural background. And as usual I take exception to what Darrell has to say, Assimilation is neither about education nor about a better life. Assimilation is about giving up certain cultural norms that are so deeply imbedded that one is not even aware. I can only share my own experience of assimilation and my own community. Some folks do not assimilate and they come very highly educated backgrounds and are driven to success. Then there are others who maybe totally uneducated but assimilate easily in the new culture.
Posted by: azmat hussain at May 18, 2008 06:30 PM (+fapf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yes. Those Are My Feet.
No; I have no idea how they ended up in an entry about pit bulls. Though I admit that Mandy likes to lick them when they are bare.
I do keep all shoes away from her, of course. Her notion of engineering, whether it has to do with a shoe or a suitcase or a chair or a vacuum cleaner, is that anything built "to last" was actually built to be a challenge when it's time to destroy it.

Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:09 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
what this picture fails to convey, however, is how preciously tiny your feet really are!
I want to bite them. But I won't.
Posted by: Rin at May 14, 2008 09:50 AM (f8xXa)
2
If Mandy restrains herself, you can do the same . . .!
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2008 10:12 AM (Hgnbj)
3
I thought you were illustrating just how quickly Mandy moves. Or that spot by your right foot. Although it does appear to be too perfectly circular, and since it appears on your shoe--it is most likely lens flare.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2008 10:29 AM (Bj6Ga)
4
There is some dispute about that spot. My Mac consultant thinks it is a flaw in the lens.
My sister-in-law thinks it is the part of digital photography she calls "the orb effect." She smiles patiently when I tell her that I believe there is a reason having to do with physics, and the way light travels, that explains why there are "orbs" in digital pictures. I believe she believes it is some sort of mystical phenomenon. She likes to take pictures at night and count how many "orbs" there are in any given image (at night, a lot).
I tell her that from my camera there is always a "default orb," in that same spot.
Perhaps it is a flaw in my lens, but I've grown accustomed to it. I don't mind unless it falls on someone's face, in which case I curse my camera out and then promptly forget the whole thing.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2008 01:10 PM (Hgnbj)
5
BTW, D--do you recognize the socks?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2008 02:19 PM (Hgnbj)
6
HUE d'LUXE, circa 2008, I believe...an unassuming little vintage.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2008 07:48 PM (6B7A4)
7
I was secretly hoping for a pair of Mary Janes.
Oh well.
Posted by: radioboyatl at May 19, 2008 02:46 PM (91okd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 13, 2008
The Awesome Power of the Pit.
Eric
is not exaggerating. Though I've developed a sense for when Mandy might noiselessly pounce, and I can usually nip it in the bud with a command. (Unless she is trying to get out of the car and go off-leash; we have had some vigorous "discussions" about that, and if she really wants to make a break for it I will give the leash to my mother, when feasible: Mom has more weight than I do.)
Hard to explain: the girl can bluster and bark and growl, but if she goes into stealth mode, she moves like lightning.
She is a true athlete, and a work of beauty. And she has soft, silky fur.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
Okay. I Admit It.
Despite the fact that I've never gotten around to learning the names of all the birds that alight on my balcony here in La Canada, I may miss them after we move: they come in all sizes, from hummingbirds to crows—and everything in between.
At the condo in Glendale we've seen signs of pigeon-proofing all over the railing. Though no actual pigeons. I suppose it isn't pigeon season.
I guess that's part of the Urban Experience: supermarkets within walking distance, and fewer species of birds.
If I play my cards right, my next digs will feature pterodactyls. We shall have to pterodactyl-proof our balcony, lest the beasts get in our way when we grill chicken breasts on hot summer nights.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:38 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I would have thought pterodactyls would have been a bigger problem in La Canada, due to its greater distance from The La Brea Tar Pits. Just goes to show me. Better keep some Purina Pterodactyl Chow in your pocket to fling over the balcony in case of an attack. And get John McCain to work on another mythical problem. There's probably a multi-trillion dollar solution to that one too.
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2008 09:06 PM (pE9Mf)
2
Well, it turns out that the pterodactyls are all over the hills; they actually go out as far as Arcadia, where they are really big.
Apparently a lot of the medium-size ones nest in the Angeles National Forest, and that's what worries me. I don't mind the bitty ones--I was, in fact, thinking of putting out some pterodactyl feeders for the sub-foot-long ones--but the biggers ones apparently swoop in and steal the feed. They are reportedly more aggressive about that than squirrels.
And one has to watch out for the teeth, of course. Though I do have experience with Mandy, and I might be able to simply say "no!" or "ouch!" (She respects "ouch" more than "no," because we sound serious when we say it: so my mother has started to say it when she isn't in pain, like when the dog jumps on the new couch.)
I have never tried to train a pterodactyl. But, really: how hard could it be?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2008 01:17 PM (Hgnbj)
3
Maybe get them to extend their feeding range about 350 miles due northwest. That should take care of a lot of problems.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2008 07:52 PM (6B7A4)
4
No can do: too many friends/relatives up there.
Including the second-youngest set of nephews (the nieces/nephews go in clumps: early twenties, college age [Chicago area] the two Bay Area schoolkids, and the baby/baby enroute [in Connecticut]).
I don't know why I flagellate myself over not having had kids: there are plenty of 'em around, after all. I just have to decide which nieces/nephews I need to snooker into taking care of me when I get old.
Maybe I should make it a point to get rich. Then the snooker-ee can cut a better deal in my will, and everyone wins.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 15, 2008 12:02 PM (Hgnbj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well, of Course It's Racism.
Just like it's sexism when people don't visit my site, or send me enough money.
This isn't rocket science, ya know . . .
Nor is this. Or, so CalTech Girl claims. She is, by the way, a bit down right now, and she needs a new laptop. So give her traffic and money. Or you're a freakin' sexist.
Peace out.
h/t: Insty.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:30 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
77kb generated in CPU 0.1995, elapsed 0.3446 seconds.
216 queries taking 0.3148 seconds, 533 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.