January 31, 2005
January 29, 2005
Moxie!
Discusses our lives as conservatives, and how some of us must pretend not to be
quite so super-rich:
One of the great secrets of being a conservative is that you only pretend to pay taxes. We let the liberals do all the heavy lifting. After all, they're the ones who support useless tax-funded social services and redistribution of wealth. Might as well be their wealth.
Looks like I will owe a whopping $5.40 -- that is if I canÂ’t manage to conceal my Halliburton dividends and all the 6 figure checks the Bush Administration paid me to pimp their agenda.
Otherwise itÂ’s a fat, fat refund check. All of which will be spent on war, my weather machine, and shiny pebbles to throw at the homeless intellectuals.
Of course in order to reduce my taxes I had to buy another Hummer. But the ash tray in the old one was full, so it seemed like the practical thing to do.
I can't help but think she's making a mistake, what with the Hummer and the shiny pebbles—but no diamond earrings. But, hey: it's her refund check.
A special "thank you" to the White House for all the little presents they've sent me over the years. (Pssst: they shouldn't look like pictures of Laura and George on the White House Lawn. They should look more like checks, with lots of zeros in them. There's a good lad, Karl.)
Posted by: Attila at
11:42 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Eddie Murphy did a short on SNL about 20 years ago called, if memory serves, "White Like Me." He got all made up and pretended to be a white man to see how whites behaved when they were alone. It's one of the funniest things I've ever seen. I don't think liberals have the same suspicions about conservatives. They think we all ride around in pickup trucks shooting our guns and sleeping in our trailer-park homes.
And by the way, don't ever forget that your tax refund isn't a gift from the government. It was your money that the government took from you and is giving back to you without interest.
Posted by: Attila (Pillage Idiot) at January 31, 2005 10:18 AM (C31gH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 28, 2005
Jeff Harrell
. . .
updates us on his life, which has been interesting in a low-key sort of way. He quickly sums up the political realm:
George W. Bush started his second term in office on Thursday, and contrary to the doomsaying of what feels like about half the Internet, the Earth continued to revolve around the sun. Flying space dragons did not burn our cities to the ground. Secret police did not emerge from the shadows to drag our grandmothers off to prison. The Constitution did not burst into flames. Gravity continued to hold stuff down, and egg creams continued to be delicious. So we really dodged a bullet there. Or something.
Dan Rather is still on television Â… I assume. I haven't actually tuned in to any CBS news show since September. I think I'm probably not alone in that, either.
There's gonna be an election in Iraq next week. Rock on. In related news, the President thinks we need to invest $80 billion more in the reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm not crazy about that, but better to spend money rebuilding Iraq now than to have to spend money bulldozing collapsed buildings and burying American dead later.
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi went on record to say that he thinks democracy is "the big American lie" and that anybody who votes is an apostate. He said, "We have declared a bitter war against democracy and all those who seek to enact it." Who did he think he was going to impress with this? "Freedom bad! Me hate freedom!" Z-Man needs to fire his PR firm immediately.
Yup.
Posted by: Attila at
12:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 2 kb.
January 27, 2005
People Without Lives
In the course of my extensive research into the culture of
West Wing fandom, I dropped by the bulletin board for that show over at
Television Without Pity, where I immediately noticed the deleterious effects of Televisions Dweebishness on the human brain.
It's just nauseating: they have, like, their own little language. Really. Little "in" terms that only they recognize. Outsiders are expected to . . . I dunno. Read a whole bunch of their postings and sort of pick up on it gradually. I just couldn't get it out of my mind that these television nerds are building an entire subculture around TV!
From the Site's FAQ:
• Anvil/anvilicious: Used to indicate obvious or heavy-handed writing that has no regard for the viewer's intelligence, thus bludgeoning them over the head with parallels, et al. in the manner of Wile E. Coyote and his Acme Brand anvils.
• HoYay: Short for "homoeroticism, yay!" A celebration of textual and subtextual homoeroticism.
• Mary Sue: A character who's just a little too perfect to be believed.
• Ship/shipper: "Ship" is short for "relationship." If you are an X and Y "shipper," that's short for "relationshipper." That is, you want those two characters to be together.
• TPTB: "The Powers That Be." Generally designates writers and producers.
Can you believe these losers? Can't they get, like, a real hobby or something?
Posted by: Attila at
11:19 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What an unbelievable coincidence. I just got through being mad at that Web site. I learned from a friend of a friend that they established a message board for fans of the TV show "Battlestar Galactica," and who isn't, really? So I signed up and made some new friends.
Or, rather, I thought I did. In short order, I'd piqued the ire of what I only assume are employees of Television Without Pity, Inc., not once, not twice, but three times.
My most recent crime against humanity was using the word "um." "Um," evidently, is not allowed on that site. I got an extremely nasty message from somebody informing me that I was not to use the word "um," and that I'd been "warned."
My reply, sent via e-mail, included the following:
"All facetiousness aside … what exactly is the rationale behind demanding that contributors live up to an utterly arbitrary standard of civility — 'um,' for cryin' out loud? — while showing no particular interest in maintaining any civility of your own? From downright abrupt scoldings about topicality, to the mercurial deletion of entire comments without even so much as a terse e-mail to the author, to shutting down access to an account for days for absolutely no reason whatsoever … it'd be hilarious if anybody were laughing about it."
I went on to say:
"The people who contribute to this site, as individuals, seem to be real nice folks, pleasant to talk to and entertaining to hear from. But if this site could be thought of as a metaphorical person, if it could be described as having a personality … well, 'Television Without Pity' is kind of an asshole."
It surprises me not in the least that Aaron Sorkin, back when he was still writing "The West Wing," devoted an entire B-plot to taking these people down a peg.
On that subject, tell me nothing. This past Wednesday's "West Wing" is still waiting for me on my TiVo.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at January 28, 2005 12:22 AM (UAuME)
2
I think I saw that on posting FAQs. Believe me, I've been to the strictest bulletin board in the world, the one at Casebook: Jack the Ripper, and the FAQs there constitute a long list. What they want is to prevent serious ripperologists having to explain over and over to the newcomers the basics of the crimes. You really only want to comment there if you've been doing your homework and have a legitimate question.
But there certainly aren't rules about which colloquialisms one may and may not use.
Wonder how the Television Without Mercy people feel about people starting a post with "Uh."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 28, 2005 02:13 AM (RjyQ5)
3
I don't know about "Uh," but I can tell you that they're not wild about people who start comments with "Dumbass."
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at January 28, 2005 09:06 AM (UAuME)
4
I believe that the term "shippers" arose out of the X-Files TV show. Shippers were those who wanted Mulder and Scully to get together. At least that was the first time I ever heard the term.
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 29, 2005 08:49 AM (l2SlJ)
5
The sexual tension is certainly reminiscent of that on the X-Files.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 29, 2005 05:18 PM (RjyQ5)
6
Not just rude, but downright vengeful, too. I suppose somebody from Over There saw my comments Over Here. I am no longer allowed to post comments on "Television Without Pity."
I know I should be all broken up about it, but … you know. Not so much.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at January 30, 2005 04:55 PM (UAuME)
7
That's pretty twisted, by any measure. These people wouldn't last 10 minutes in the blogging world.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 30, 2005 05:58 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
So, I Wasn't Credentialed
. . . for CPAC 2005, the conservative convention to be held in the Ronald Reagan building (in Washington, D.C.) in late February. Instead, they are
inviting some of the more obvious candidates, like
James Joyner, Kevin Aylward, LaShawn Barber, and . . .
Ana Marie Cox?
WTF? She's not even a conservative. I mean, what does Wonkette have that I don't have? I guess that would be: delicate Irish good looks, an actual readership, and a 55-gallon drum of KY jelly.
Fine. I had better things to do that weekend anyway. In fact, some of my friends may just get a cabin in the woods, and we could be playing in the snow like the SoCal boys and girls we'll always be at heart.
Posted by: Attila at
02:09 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
1
“I mean, what does Wonkette have that I don't have?”
Interns. ;-)
Posted by: Watcher at January 27, 2005 02:28 PM (mLuhB)
2
I can send u the KY, will that get you started?
Posted by: jeff at January 27, 2005 05:53 PM (Pp88j)
3
The best "lube" would be Wonkette's Conde Nast-financed stipend.
Once we've got that covered, we can move on to the niceties.
Liquid Silk. The 8.45-oz size, in the pump dispenser. Thanks.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 27, 2005 09:44 PM (RjyQ5)
4
If that's what passes for "delicate Irish good looks" these days, I weep for the Emerald Isle. I mean, she wouldn't put the hogs off their feed or anything, but I'm not exactly filing her phys away in my Spank Bank™, you know?
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at January 28, 2005 12:26 AM (UAuME)
5
I do think she's a pretty woman, and I believe a detect a little Celtic in her appearance. That's all.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 28, 2005 02:17 AM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2005
Dan at Riehl World View
May have a few
tantalizing leads on the identity of the mysterious
EWP.
Turns out she may be a female after all. Though maybe not elderly.
And Ed Wonk also claims to know; the plot thickens . . . It turns out we might be able to find out for less thatn the price of a 2004 pickup truck.
Posted by: Attila at
01:37 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Where does EdWonk claim to know?
Posted by: jeff at January 26, 2005 10:29 AM (8cFQU)
2
Sorry. Right
here, in the comment section of the post wherein EWP calls us "suckers."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 26, 2005 11:31 AM (RjyQ5)
3
Hate to tell you, but your "here" link doesn't work either.
Posted by: Kathy K at January 26, 2005 05:05 PM (KEyce)
4
Oops. I'm having a day. Try
this, which will at least get you to the post in question, and you can scroll down through the comments to Ed Wonk's.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 26, 2005 05:53 PM (RjyQ5)
5
Hm. Curiouser and curiouser. None of the links work. Let's do cut and paste:
http://topicdrift.blogspot.com/2005/01/good-thing-i-would-never-call-you.html
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 26, 2005 07:00 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 24, 2005
Esther
Makes
this important point:
I assume this synchronicity comes down to the usual astrological hooey. I suppose another one of those tiresome planets is in retrograde. Not that there's anything wrong with that; I don't care what planets do in their own space, as long as they don't request special rights, or orbit in public parks, or collide in front of my children. My children will learn astronomy when I feel they are ready, and not a moment before. And I see no reason to teach them about astrology at all.
That's holding the line.
Posted by: Attila at
02:42 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It is sad to see that some people do not take the science of Astrology seriously. The next thing you'll be saying is that Phrenology is a load of crap. Actually that would be Scatology....
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 24, 2005 03:07 PM (S24bh)
2
I'll ask Laurence for his insights on that.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 24, 2005 04:16 PM (RjyQ5)
3
Being fairly new to this blog, there must be something underlying that response. Dare I ask?
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 24, 2005 05:32 PM (PU5io)
4
Go to the ad in the top-right corner of this blog. Click on "read more." That will take you to Laurence's blog, and all will be revealed.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 24, 2005 07:24 PM (RjyQ5)
5
Yes all is clear. Anyone with 4 cats has my sympathies. Having 3 myself I have no desire to empty more litter boxes. Speak about a load of crap. Of course I could bring my dogs into the house and they'd empty them for me...
Yum, yum, doggie treats...
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 24, 2005 08:10 PM (HReYA)
6
Jupiter's passed through Orion,
And come into conjunction with Mars.
Saturn is wheeling through infinite space,
To its pre-ordained place in the stars.
And I gaze at the planets in wonder,
At the trouble and time they expend.
All to warn me to be careful,
In dealings involving a friend!
Flanders and Swann, "My Horoscope"
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 25, 2005 06:59 AM (+S1Ft)
7
Twinkle, twinkle, little star,
I donÂ’t care what you are.
Up above the world so high,
My lifeÂ’s down here, not in the sky.
Twinkle, twinkle, little star,
If I ignore you, IÂ’ll go far.
Traditional nursery rhyme, perverted by:
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 25, 2005 11:30 AM (S24bh)
8
Doesn't anyone check facts anymore? It is this sort of poorly researched story that gives the blogosphere a bad name. For the record, only 58 of the cats were really sick.
Posted by: Kingslasher at January 25, 2005 11:32 AM (SOfML)
9
Actually I think they only counted 49 hairballs in the van. Along with the 238 cat feces and 12 gallons of urine in the carpet, it presented quite a biohazard.
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 25, 2005 02:06 PM (S24bh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2005
Cat Blogging
Isn't that what you call it when you blog a cat fight between two whip-smart (and good-looking) bloggers?
By all accounts, Laurence started it.
And then Jeff responded in a couple of ways. But scroll his page to get the full bouquet of parmesan cheese posts.
Laurence got one of his cats to weigh in on the matter.
And I'm left to wonder which is more disturbing: a minor skirmish between two great bloggers, or the realization that Laurence Simon owns pre-grated parmesan!
The horror!
Posted by: Attila at
05:33 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My wife uses the canned stuff mostly. I shred my own more often than not.
Posted by: Laurence Simon at January 23, 2005 05:43 PM (sfoh8)
2
Oh, thank God. I wasn't ready to have one of my culinary heroes take a fall.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 23, 2005 05:54 PM (RjyQ5)
Posted by: Jeff G at January 23, 2005 08:44 PM (EiRj3)
4
What Would Martha Stewart Do?--that's a different question from what she's doing now at Camp Cupcake, I suspect.
There's decent pre-grated stuff in the deli case, but my argument with Kraft and the like is that it doesn't really melt properly: it's got horrid little stabilizers in it so it stays powdery. Ugh.
Even if I'm opening a can of minestrone, I like to put real parmesan on top of it. It melts; it gets gooey. It's happy. I'm happy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 23, 2005 10:17 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oakland Jeff
Has slipped into something
comfortable.
For those of us who were fond of his blog's old look, it's worth noting that there are still camels on the site; it's just that one has to go looking for them.
Check out the new look.
Posted by: Attila at
04:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
For the Price of a 2004 Pickup Truck
. . . we will be given the keys to the kingdom. We will know the true identity of
Esther Wilberforce-Packard.
As Chris himself admits, he's the weak link. We give him a late model truck, he gives us a picture of Esther herself (himself—and somehow I suspect Esther's a guy).
Who's going to start collecting the cash, and who wants to set up the "Free Esther" fund? And who will make the first pledge?
I'm tired of sending toys to children in Iraq. I'm tired of giving Afghanis shoes. I'm tired of care packages to our fine men and woman in uniform, tired of aid for tsunami victims. Tired of doing nice things. I'm just plain tuckered out with using the power of the internet for good.
Come on. I gots to know.
Posted by: Attila at
12:21 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I will also accept a good-condition 1980s C-10 with flareside bed. Them are cool.
Posted by: Chris at January 27, 2005 07:41 PM (2jq3D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2005
Margi Lowry
(with a hard "g," remember)
has an opinion about electric stoves.
And she is correct. My electric stove has two virtues: 1) it has a little shelf in front that swings out (and it damned well better, since the burners are all squished together in a teensy row and I can only use 2-3 of them at a time), and 2) it looks like something out of the 1960s, and therefore goes really well with my retro-house.
I'd trade that to be able to cook effectively. In a lot of instances where the heat has to be changed quickly I need to use two burners, setting one to the high temp and one to the low temp so I can just switch the pot over from one to the other.
And there's only one burner that's big enough for most of my pots and pans, and that really gets hot.
Still, the whole matter is a damned high-quality problem, considering all that's going on in the world right now.
Posted by: Attila at
07:07 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Electric stovetops are the devil's tool. They take too long to heat up and too long to cool down. In order to achieve real control you've got to use multiple burners and transfer from one burner to another.
Electric ovens on the other hand are just great.
But I love my
Jenn-Air. Gas cooktop. Convection oven. Simply the greatest.
Posted by: Dave Schuler at January 23, 2005 09:01 AM (OLr4c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2005
Erotic Lesbian Post
If we take it as a given that it would be wrong for me to leave my husband for an elderly woman living in the upper midwest, does it become more wrong or less wrong when one considers that she doesn't really exist? Should I talk to my priest about this?
Saith Mrs. Esther Wliberforce-Packard:
I couldn't find my Friday socks. Damned if I was going to wear Saturday socks on a Friday. Saturday socks have acrylic fibers; Friday is cotton-only. Somebody has to stand up for what they believe in around here, and it might as well be me.
How can I not love her?
Posted by: Attila at
11:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ms. Hun--
I discovered Esther Wilberforce-Packard thanks to Beautiful Atrocities (the same way you did, I suspect), and I don't know how I got by without her. Whenever I'm feeling glum or low in self-esteem, I read a few of Esther's posts. By contrast, I feel like William Hung OD'ing on Xanax.
Posted by: utron at January 22, 2005 09:34 AM (VVBQC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2005
From the Ebb and Flow Institute
Pile On has
his own take on Dr. Rice's confirmation hearings:
SARBANES: I think the secretary who adopts a unilateralist approach in the international environment may miss important opportunities to prevent conflicts and to build alliances. And in that regard I just note that it's not enough to have the ear of the president. I think the secretary of state must also win the ear of the world. Are you going to make friends abroad?
RICE: I already know an awful lot of people and until one of them dies I couldn't possibly meet anyone else.
If you do nothing else today, read the whole thing.
Posted by: Attila at
09:31 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for the link Miss Attila.
There is a cold beer waiting at the Institute visitors center for anyone who can name the movie and actress that delivered the Rice line quoted above.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 20, 2005 01:10 PM (vOU/O)
2
Ummmm...
Audry Hepburn as Regina Lampert - Charade (1963)?
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at January 21, 2005 08:47 AM (BZ0tI)
3
Make that Audrey Hepburn.
Can you deliver the beer to Ms. Attila for safekeeping until I get to it?
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at January 21, 2005 08:49 AM (BZ0tI)
4
Great idea. I'll give it to one of your kids, with instructions to hand it to dad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 21, 2005 11:12 AM (RjyQ5)
5
Sure I'll drop one in the mail, should I just send it straight to the kids?
You didn't google it did ya?
Posted by: Pile On® at January 21, 2005 05:42 PM (G0SBe)
6
Aww shucks. I was going to say Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany's and then I read the comments.
Charade is a great film. The best line is from Tex (James Coburn) "Momma didn't raise no stupid children" this shortly before he is murdered of course.
Also the scene of Cary Grant taking a shower with his clothes on is priceless.
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 21, 2005 09:06 PM (+gL7j)
7
I'm pretty sure LMM didn't Google it, until it came time to verify the spelling.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 22, 2005 09:47 AM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Blogosphere and the Mystery of the Elderly Widow
Desert Cat finally
popped the question: Who the heck is Esther Wilberforce-Packard, author of the blog
Topic Drift?
Smart money says, no sweet little old lady is actually producing copy like this:
This Country is Full of Sandwiches that Do Not Work
Man is born free, but everywhere his sandwiches are in chains. Last night I forged a sandwich so hideous that I capitulated immediately. I set the bready beast in the dogÂ’s bowl and walked away in despair. It was a complete waste of horseradish-mustard and good intentions; never again will I combine the two.
Apparently, Desert Cat had a few suspects lined up, including Jeff from Oakland, the Kommissar, and Allahpundit. But Jeff has denied it, and he was my top pick: I "liked" him for this "crime."
Furthermore, I don't think it's quite the Kommissar's style, and Allah has an alibi, if I recall correctly: he was dating on nights that a few of those posts were made.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Let me know if you have any hot suspects. This person is presumably maintaining an entire blog, just for the joke value, and has been doing it for months—on top of whatver other blogging duties he/she has. So it's someone who has patience.
The other thing we can do is try to identify Mrs. Wilberforce-Packard's earliest supporters. Those initial links must include a few from her creator's "real" blog.
Who's your top suspect? Let me know. After all, we blew RatherGate wide open: we can certainly determine the true identity of an eccentric widow.
Posted by: Attila at
01:34 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Denial aside, I guess I just assumed it was Jeff @ Beautiful Atrocities.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 20, 2005 06:40 AM (VohLU)
2
Attila, I barely have time for my own blog. I was going to do a fake Barbara Lee blog, but who has time?
Posted by: jeff at January 20, 2005 08:39 AM (pPFMG)
3
Well, that's the thing: whoever's doing it is achieving something impressive.
I probably thought it was you because you ran a picture of her on your blog, and I saw her mentioned in your entries before you actually linked to the thing itself.
It certainly is a work of art.
All in all, though, I'm glad you're not sacrificing sleep for something like that.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 20, 2005 08:55 AM (RjyQ5)
4
I happen to know that Chris Cope at http://chriscope.blogspot.com/ claims to have had dinner with the author. They are both in Minnesota, which lends creedence to the idea. He's the weakest link. Break him, and you have your answer.
Posted by: noisy ghost at January 20, 2005 09:48 AM (YdoIX)
5
So long as she/he/it keeps doing it, I'll be happy though. It's genius. It's art. Don't stop!
HERE she responds.
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 20, 2005 09:55 AM (0DDAz)
6
All I know is I wish I'd thought of it. It is indeed blogart and I hope it keeps on going ... and going .. and going
Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at January 20, 2005 10:06 AM (WsZ4F)
7
I was actually looking for a shot of an old bag's orthopedic hooves to add EWP to my foot post, but couldn't find one. I guess I could've staked out the church down the street.
Maybe it's Garrison Keilor? Lileks?
Posted by: jeff at January 21, 2005 07:19 PM (BQs+0)
8
I think it's the Artist Formerly Known as Juan Gato now blogging at Farm Accident Digest. It's got the same sort of humor, and I found Ms. EWP through FAD.
Posted by: Nathan at January 23, 2005 09:46 PM (HIQoA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 19, 2005
What Looks Good.
For the five blog readers who haven't seen it yet, Michele has a
post up about whether Teri Polo is too skinny, and what makes women attractive in general. It takes the post a moment to load, as she's pushing 300 comments.
Interesting discussion, though there's no way to read it all in one sitting.
Posted by: Attila at
10:43 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What's attractive?
A pinup in a really tight sweater that lives in the top left corner. Oink :©)
Posted by: Masked Menace© at January 19, 2005 02:54 PM (V0Xwj)
2
And who could easily be taken for my younger sister
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 19, 2005 03:27 PM (RjyQ5)
3
the question comes down to: Victoria's Secret? or Lane Bryant?
I go with the latter.. those ladies look more affectionate :-)
Posted by: pertinax at January 19, 2005 07:12 PM (E5kq3)
4
Does anybody think that's attractive?? Can you imagine what she looks like with no makeup?
Posted by: jeff at January 19, 2005 10:00 PM (pPFMG)
5
Well, the debate over at Michele's place was vigorous, but I think a lot of it came down to the pro-Polo crowd mostly looking at the
Playboy pix (where she doesn't look so gaunt) and the anti-Polo crowd mostly figuring her "real" look is closer to the publicity shots, because of the degree of airbrushing
Playboy does. I mean, a
Playboy picture is really a painting, when you get right down to it.
But the "how thin is too thin" argument has been raging for decades, all the way back to Twiggy, and continuing through the Kate Moss era.
My take? The girl should eat something. She's not anorexic, but she could stand to gain 10-15 pounds.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 19, 2005 11:19 PM (RjyQ5)
6
Back in my single days, between dodging Mastadons, I had an ironclad rule that served me well...never fool around with the girls who, if you stripped them naked and gave them a bottle of red soda pop, would look like a thermometer. That's just me, though.
Actually, men tend to like women who are at least something like their mothers. My wife and my momma have the same general build, the same quick intellect, the same absolute impatience with nonsense and both tougher than woodpecker lips.
It shouldn't be any kind of news, my momma taught me what a woman was, and should be. She was the first woman in my life.
Posted by: Peter at January 20, 2005 07:58 AM (ywZa8)
7
So few men admit that, but I think it's true. Just one more thing for mothers to worry about: being a healthy model for their sons' wives.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 20, 2005 08:59 AM (RjyQ5)
8
Oh, great, something else for kids to blame on their parents to their therapist when they're thirty. :-)
BTW, Polo is too thin. Girls should have smooth contours, not be angular.
Posted by: Masked Menace© at January 20, 2005 10:39 AM (ISV0b)
9
Thanks for the link. I would have missed it. Keep up the good work.
Personally yes she could put on a few pounds, but there are some who are even thinner than her (Lara Flynn Boyle for instance). She did not seem anorexic in the PB pics. In fact if you think about her build vs Audrey Hepburn's (yesterday's post) I doubt there'd be too much difference.
I always have liked the Maureen O'Hara type build myself and she was not a bone rack.
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 21, 2005 09:37 PM (+gL7j)
10
Again--if you're looking at the Playboy pix, she looks fine. But if you look at the publicity shots Michele links, she looks gaunt. The question is which is closer to her "real" look.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 21, 2005 10:35 PM (RjyQ5)
11
>>>The question is which is closer to her "real" look.
*eyes glued to the PB pics* Who cares?
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 21, 2005 11:17 PM (rAE/B)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 22, 2005 05:11 PM (RjyQ5)
13
Nah. I couldn't make myself like even the PB pics too much. It's almost impossible to not fill in the (literal) blank where her ribs were airbrushed out.
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 22, 2005 11:41 PM (c8BHE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 15, 2005
Speaking of Hugh Hewitt
Goldstein: “I AM A CITZEN JOURNALIST. I DEMAND PIE!”
As do we all. Make mine lemon meringue, please.*
* And I don't care what the mainstream media say; I'm eating it for breakfast!
Posted by: Attila at
11:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
January 13, 2005
Don't Be Fooled by My Hazel Eyes.
I'm full of crap, too. Why, just look at the crap on my blogad column. It's a harbinger of crap to come.
For the next two weeks, the protocol for accessing Laurence's site is:
1) visit Little Miss Attila;
2) skim over her brilliant postings and be really impressed;
3) click on the This Blog Is Full of Crap ad on the right to access Lair's blog;
4) repeat daily, to get the best from both a SoCal former English major and the world's cleverest Texan Jew (eat your heart out, Kinky Friedman).
Posted by: Attila at
12:21 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My my, what an effective graphic, someone is truly talented. Looks like something you might get on a cone at Dairy Queen, minus the steam and flies.
It looks like a site that Pile will have to check out.
Save it Cassandra.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 13, 2005 04:20 PM (n0vXU)
2
Ewwww. Someone alert cophrophilac Big Hominid
Posted by: jeff at January 14, 2005 12:59 PM (LYl+7)
3
I know. I don't even like potty humor, myself. But it's Lair, so it's funny. I think when I repeated some of the ad copy to my husband his mouth sort of dropped open, and I had to explain that Laurence occupies another dimension in which there's no such thing as sacrelige, and the only sacred cow is the spelling of his name.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 14, 2005 10:32 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Now THIS Is Art
Get your
velvet Jeff while they're hot.
Posted by: Attila at
10:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
January 11, 2005
Cassandra
is asking for
help in setting the President's agenda for the next four years. Please do your part.
Posted by: Attila at
09:00 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're so sweet - I had to do something to shut up all the yapping about his legacy - it was driving me apesh*t (can I say that here?)
Thanks for the link
Posted by: Cassandra at January 11, 2005 11:51 AM (289B8)
2
Believe me--you can say just about *anything* here, as long as it isn't a personal attack on another commenter.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 01:04 PM (RjyQ5)
3
Well, if I can't attack Cassandra personally, can I attack her snarkily?
Posted by: Pile On® at January 12, 2005 07:50 PM (pmW6d)
4
Don't make me turn into a CapitalOne ad, particularly when I hate that company!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 13, 2005 10:10 AM (RjyQ5)
5
No need to go all El Salvador Plan on me, I was merely trying to discover the acceptable boundaries.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 13, 2005 10:28 AM (n0vXU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
83kb generated in CPU 0.034, elapsed 0.149 seconds.
220 queries taking 0.1287 seconds, 562 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.