July 27, 2007
The Debate Issue
Sean is
into it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:28 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
July 21, 2007
"For a breath of ecstasy"
". . . give all you are, or can be."
Robert Bidinotto points out that the world has enriched J.K. Rowling a good deal less than she has enriched it.
Fuckin' A.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
July 09, 2007
"I've Never Rejected Sullivan."
So it looks like Glenn and Andrew are still
an item.
Good for Andrew; not so good for Glenn (or Helen, for that matter) . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:17 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Glenn should reject Andrew. It's starting to look like battered spouse syndrome. We don't want this weblogging "couple" to go the way of the Chris Benoit family.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at July 09, 2007 10:38 PM (8lL1c)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 10, 2007 04:57 AM (1hM1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Am I Wrong?
Or does Chris somehow manage to make pregnant women look
just as sexy as unpregnant ones?
It almost makes me want to go out and do something high-tech. Almost.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pregnant women are dead sexy. Period. Thought you knew that?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 09, 2007 04:15 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Chris Muir at July 09, 2007 04:59 AM (+CRDT)
3
Bill cosby didn't quite see it that way. Though possibly he was a product of his times.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 09, 2007 05:29 AM (VgDLl)
4
I remember-he congratulated his wife on giving birth to a 'lizard', because it changed colors like 3 times. That standup routine he did was fantastic.
Posted by: Chris Muir at July 09, 2007 06:31 AM (+CRDT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 05, 2007
Saying What Needs to Be Said.
Agreed, Sean.
The conservatives who are getting a bunch of schadenfreude out of Al Gore III's arrest should grow the fuck up.
When A the H was working at a Large Production Company in Southern California as a television writer/producer, a memo came down from the Division Head specificying that although the writers and story editors made fun of public figures from time to time, they should avoid making fun of Chelsea Clinton. He wasn't especially happy about it.
"What about all the things that people said about Amy Carter?" he asked.
"Yeah," I replied. "And the ripping on Reagan's family, too. But here's the Big Question: if Hillary hadn't handled it in such a high-handed fashion [calling all the industry bigwigs to tell them 'hands off of Chelsea, or else] wouldn't you have considered it a good policy?"
I'd love to see a "hands off the kids" custom instituted in the press. And if it has to start lopsidedly, then maybe it will expand eventually to cover Republicans as well as Democrats. In any event, I'm not going to get my hands dirty. Who among us wants to be held for the weird things our parents (or our kids, or our nieces and nephews) have done, or did?
Al Gore III is just a guy trying to make his way in the world, in a rather pathetic industry (last I knew, he was involved in print publishing, may G-d have mercy on his soul). And he may or may not have a problem with drugs—one can never tell with the young: they're always doing weird, awkward things in any event.
Now can we all, please, shut up? Please?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:05 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is meaningless, but I have the dubious distinction of being AG3's fifth cousin (AG1 and my grandmother were third cousins).
Anyhoo, our nation's history of presidential and vice-presidential children being involved with drugs goes back to Ford (at least).
Up until now I had chalked up Chelsea not being in the news as a result of her seeing what a big f***ing mess her father made of things with his personal-life choices, and learning better. Sigh.
Posted by: John at July 06, 2007 03:46 AM (0JPr+)
2
The conservatives who are getting a bunch of schadenfreude out of Al Gore III's arrest should grow the fuck up.
Keep that in mind the next time some...
progressive bring up any of the younger Bushes indiscretions, or maybe Mary Chenney's sexual orientation...
On the other hand, who knew a Prius could do 100 MPH?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 06, 2007 04:48 AM (1hM1d)
3
Keep that in mind the next time some...progressive bring up any of the younger Bushes indiscretions, or maybe Mary Chenney's sexual orientation...
If I paid that much attention on the foibles of the Left I'd never get anything done.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at July 06, 2007 05:33 AM (HxQb8)
4
AGIII got in the cross hairs when the Gore people leaked W's 1976 DUI arrest(after it was expunged) and used it as an example of someone who got preferential treatment because of his daddy. We all know he had the book thrown at him and the leaker that committed a felony by passing around an expunged file was never even charged with a crime. AGIII was arrested for reckless driving, driving under the influence and driving at an excessive rate of speed(40mph over the limit) in Aug. 2000, and when the case was processed, conveniently after the election, he DID get preferential treatment with the serious charges dropped($125 fine). AGIII repeated the pattern with 2002 and 2003 arrests. Funny how the media can't even get that straight. ABC does manage to go on about W's daughters in the story of AGIII's current arrest though, and I suspect they're not the only ones. Forgive the Right if they have no choice but to rage against the machine of Leftist media domination and bias.
That said, AGIII's problems are his own. And AGII's life, words, and actions are sufficient to generate all the negative copy ever needed. And then some.
I must go purchase a carbon credit now to atone for my cigarette which is the principal cause of Global Warming, you know.
Posted by: Darrell at July 06, 2007 07:45 AM (Xi9mX)
5
If I paid that much attention on the foibles of the Left I'd never get anything done.
It never hurts to point out the foibles of those who claim
not to have such foibles. They're hypocritical, elitist snobs and it should be pointed out.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at July 06, 2007 01:59 PM (1hM1d)
6
The correct response to those who point to any advantages G.W. Bush enjoyed due to his father's position is to point to the advantages Al Gore, Jr. enjoyed by virtue of being Al Gore, Sr.'s son—and there were plenty of them.
The correct response to publicizing the hijinks of the the Bush twins is eye-rolling. Or, perhaps (in extreme circumstances) muttering the term "Kennedy clan" under one's breath.
Posted by: Attila Girl at July 06, 2007 10:24 PM (VgDLl)
Posted by: Chuck at July 06, 2007 11:11 PM (H4W1a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Please Buy This Movie: Mine Your Own Business.
If you're conservative,
buy it for your liberal friends. If you're liberal, buy it for your libertarian friends. If you're libertarian, buy it for your social-conservative friends. If you're a social-conservative, buy it for your environmentalist friends.
If you're an environmentalist, buy it for yourself.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:40 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
July 01, 2007
Another Way of Looking at Things
Once upon a time in a land far away, a beautiful, independent, self-assured princess happened upon a frog as she sat on the shore of a pond in a meadow near her castle.
The frog hopped into the princess' lap and said: "Elegant Lady, I was once a handsome prince, until an evil witch cast a spell upon me. One kiss from you, however, and I will turn back into the dapper young prince that I am--and then, my Sweet, we can marry and set up housekeeping in your castle with my mother--where you can prepare my meals, clean my clothes, bear my children, and forever feel grateful and happy doing so."
That night, as the princess dined sumptuously on lightly sauteed frog legs seasoned in a white wine and onion cream sauce, she chuckled and thought to herself: I don't freakin' think so.
Hat tip: the Evangelical Mafia.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:36 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Looks like the super-bitchy is kicking in. (just kidding)
Posted by: RWB at July 01, 2007 12:24 PM (4j8Ry)
2
Joy dear, I think you should be in bed. It is awfully late. You might feel a bit better with a little sleep. (Of course, what does it say about me that I am up reading all this realtime as you are posting it...hmmm.)
David
Posted by: Dacvid Harr at July 02, 2007 02:39 AM (v61r1)
3
Who is better looking Paris Hillton or Scooter Libby?
my vote is for Scooter not that I am gay or anything, just don't like that polished look.
Posted by: azmat hussain at July 02, 2007 04:42 PM (mdszq)
4
Pardon me, Azmat. What are Sandy Berger and Richard Armitage, chopped liver? Dick Durbin, Jay Rockefeller, and Jay Wyden-- steallth-satellite "leeks"? Hard to keep these comments on-topic, isn't it? I never met a black widow spider who had any trouble getting a date, did you?
Posted by: Darrell at July 02, 2007 06:58 PM (YAj1h)
5
Well Paris Hilton and Scooter Libby have the same things in common as fairy tales. Secondly, they are both evil enough to eat the frog that is about to save them. Just my prediction. And Darrell, I can rent you some immagination, there was this chap who said in purely scientific manner "imagination is more important than knowledge"
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at July 02, 2007 07:09 PM (mdszq)
6
Better still, I'll lend you my dictionary. And proof reader.
Information is not knowledge
Knowledge is not wisdom
Wisdom is not truth
Truth is not beauty
Beauty is not love
Love is not music
Music is not free
But you can get it for 99 cents a download at the Apple website.
Posted by: Darrell at July 02, 2007 07:23 PM (YAj1h)
7
Very Funny Darrell, I don't need your dictionary, and I get your point. But I must ask you why don't you just ignore my comments. Does your Islamophobia not allow you the freedom to ignore? I predict that Scooter will have a tell all book about this administration and how they tried to frame him, wait for it till 2009. He will make lots of money and will be on CNN and Tucker, and O'Reilly.
Now as far as my ability to write is concerned, I was taught in 6th grade, that you got to keep in mind your audience. Out of the six billion or so people on the planet, not many are going to visit this site. And humble me was assuming that not many out of those are going to bother to read what i have to write. All except you Darrell, now if I started to make sense to you or wrote in correct grammer, well Darrell you might start to like me or respect me, and that would go against your grain. I am in the Fall state of my life, you know the leaves are changing colors, eyesight is going, plus add to that my kid has spilled orange juice all over the keyboard, and i am just to lazy to go back and read what I have written. So there you have it: If I said something true and nobody heard it does it really make any difference. Similarly, if I write only to annoy you and you ignore me would I still bother?
Posted by: Azmat Hussain at July 02, 2007 09:09 PM (mdszq)
8
Just because you post with an Arab name doesn't make you a good Muslim.
Besides, why wasn't leaker Richard Armitage, a State Department flunky and no friend of the current administration, not prosecuted for the outing of Plame?
Had Armitage commited such an offence against
my administration, he'd be begging for me to throw him feet-first into the industrial shredder.
As if.
Yours in mass murder, torture, and rape rooms,
Saddam
Posted by: Saddam Hussein at July 03, 2007 11:47 AM (1hM1d)
9
I used to ignore the Left and then I found that 100 million people or so died each time as a result. It does suck to be Left. But there is an easy solution, and an obvious one. I believe everyone is salvageable, Azmat. Even you.
"If the wheel wishes to be ignored, why does it squeak?" Roman slave, Slavic origin, circa 400 BC.
No more "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength." Ever.
Libby was convicted of having a different recollection of details of a phone call with a reporter. Trivial details. And the reporter's notes were proved to be inaccurate in some cases where the defense could prove that(with phone records and such). The reporter even admitted that his notes were sometimes made after the fact and that they weren't meant to be 100% accurate. Richard Armitage actually disclosed Plame's name to the Press. He wasn't charged because no crime was committed--Plame was not covert for many years--definitely beyond the relevant statute's requirements.
President Bush did the right thing. He did it for you as well. Would you like to go to jail because some of your distant, trivial recollections disagree with a reporter's? When no crime was committed to begin with? And when the reporter admits his journal is based on his recollections, not even looking a a watch contemporaneously with the event in question? Of course not.
The Right expects a response. The Left seeks to suppress all dissent Why should this place be any different? Four billion people reading this agree.
Posted by: Darrell at July 03, 2007 01:58 PM (6S6A/)
Posted by: Desert Cat at July 04, 2007 07:57 PM (ogl5V)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well, You Know.
Whatever
works.
Hope it's workin' for you, Mr. Demanding and Impulsive.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
45kb generated in CPU 0.0266, elapsed 0.1337 seconds.
210 queries taking 0.1175 seconds, 491 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
