February 28, 2005
Kate
posits that Canada's purpose is now to serve as a "warning" to the U.S., and recounts a charming encounter with an addled American:
Last weekend a woman who was purchasing artwork from me at the dog show began to ask about "what it was like to live in Canada". She confided that they had to sell their house while it was "still worth something" and leave before the country was completely destroyed. Her young son's skills made him very attractive to the military and there was no doubt he'd be drafted. She was enthusiastic about our health care system, and wanted to live in a "more socialist" country.
Sometimes I wonder that there may be some force .... (fate?) .... that places people like myself in just the right place, at just the right time. For a moment I felt a twinge of guilt in the realization that my Canadian citizenship had been twisted into cruel bait for a hapless little moonbat - like savory French cheese perched temptingly in a leg hold trap.
Posted by: Attila at
09:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 176 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder if these lefties realize that Canada's economy isn't all that great? Granted, most of what I know is from listening to the financial reports regarding hockey teams, but when the national sport of Canada has trouble paying and keeping it's teams, there is a problem. Senators in bancruptcy. Even the Maple Leafs have monetary issues. Yet they have full houses and lots of support. There was a big report on NHL Tonight a few years ago regarding the monetary troubles in Canada and how they relate to the NHL. Or is that the NPA, Not Playing League?
Posted by: William Teach at February 28, 2005 07:16 PM (HxpPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
He's At It Again
Iowahawk unearths the episode of
Scooby Doo, Where Are You? that featured
Hunter S. Thompson as a special guest:
We were ten minutes south of San Clemente when the putrid green daisy walls of the van started closing in. I recall the fat four-eyed lesbian sweater girl saying something like "are you okay, Mr. Duke? We've got a mystery to solve..." when suddenly the gullet of the garish chartreuse steel beast began to spasm, as if a digestive track readying itself to vomit. I began clawing at my hamstrings and when I turned my head I was looking into the irridescent eyes of a grotesque animal screeching "Ruh Roh! Ruh Roh!" in a hoarse irritating dog-accented gibberish. That's when it things began to turn weird.
It gets better from there; don't miss this one.
Posted by: Attila at
07:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
February 25, 2005
The Latest on Ward Churchill
Yesterday's revelations on Ward Churchill had the effect of reversing my position on what should be done WRT him. Malkin has the
best summary of the '03 transcripts. That goes beyond mere speech, in my opinion, and crosses over into the realm wherein one is, indeed, yelling "fire!" in a crowded theater. Toss him out.
Via Mikal the bookseller comes the latest wrinkle: Churchill has also been in the habit of selling his own personal artwork, which draws on existing art about/by Native Americans to the point of plagiarism: it sparked this discussion on Little Green Footballs. Also, Malkin has a few of the side-by-side comparisons here, with links to the Freepers' coverage on this issue.
I can't believe this bozo was being supported with public money. I knew some elements in academia were beyond accountability, but the degree to which that is the case shocks me.
Posted by: Attila at
01:58 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
1
But is he much worse than the others? Or just more indiscreet?
Posted by: jeff at February 25, 2005 02:22 PM (wtf6E)
2
Ugh. If this is widespread, I just don't know what to say.
Other than, thank god for the hard sciences, where I know there's still some integrity.
But I suspect there are still plenty of hard-working, honest people in the humanities and social sciences. We shouldn't extrapolate too much from this one case.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 25, 2005 02:31 PM (RjyQ5)
3
Well, Paglia's been saying for years the humanties depts are full of theorists who'll blackball anyone who doesn't agree with their (passe) French theories. But anything ethnic studies, women's studies, gay studies is probably a sewer of agitprop with very little breathing room for scholoarship
Posted by: jeff at February 26, 2005 03:01 PM (mvjRt)
4
My problem when I was an English major is that I was never sure if/when there was a there there. One wasn't ever dealing with facts, but only with interpretation. Essentially, I felt like I was making up a new "take" on something that was made up in the first place (fiction).
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 26, 2005 06:38 PM (RjyQ5)
5
Churchill is just the tip of the iceberg. The guy is not exactly shy about his opinions, yet not only did the system put up with him, until a few weeks ago he was a department head. Academia has degenerated into a swamp that breeds algae like Churchill, and that chokes out any other kind of life, at least where liberal arts are concerned. Imagine what the career prospects would be for a young Assistant Professor who publishes anything positive about America when Ward Churchill is the department head.
Posted by: Van Helsing at February 27, 2005 07:11 AM (S1suo)
6
I personally believe that the problem of people marching in intellectual lockstep is more pervasive in academia than in Hollywood, because in Hollywood it's possible to have a successful career if people know you're a Republican. It isn't easy, and you have to REALLY make a name for yourself befor you come out of the closet. But it's possible. After all, when push comes to shove the studios want to make money.
But in the humanities and social sciences, a person's views on political issues can be considered a window into how good a "thinker" he/she is—and a good thinker is likely to be one who thinks like one's department advisor.
I remember hearing someone I know from the journalism world discuss
The Atlantic vs.
Harper's. "The writing is better in The Atlantic," he proclaimed. "But the
thinking is better in Harper's."
"I'm a libertarian," I replied.
"So maybe you prefer The Atlantic."
"I think I do."
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 27, 2005 10:57 AM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 24, 2005
Hollywood on Blogspot
When
Oakland Jeff posted a link to
this site, I wasn't sure what to do with it—other than to stare at it in awe, and wonder, as usual,
where does he find this stuff?
But I sent the link to my husband, who forwarded it to his best friend (also a veteran of the entertainment industry) with the subject line, "if studio executives wrote scripts."
Disclaimer: Not all studio executives are idiots, though many are. No studio executives were hurt in the writing of this post.
Posted by: Attila at
09:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I like the disclaimer. It reminds me of the note at the tail end of the credits for "The Positively True Adventures of the Alleged Texas Cheerleader-Murdering Mom," which read: "No spiders or cheerleaders were harmed during the making of this motion picture."
BTW, I've revisited that blogsite more than once, a fact which suggests things about me that I'm sure I'd be much happier not knowing.
Posted by: utron at February 24, 2005 12:33 PM (CgIkY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 21, 2005
February 18, 2005
Ahoy There!
When LMA asked me to guest blog, the prospect was a little daunting. How to connect? Hmmm. Well, one of the interesting things I have thought about recently, via
MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, is the circles that we in the Blogosphere run in. We all tend to hit the big folks, Right Wing News, Powerline, Instapundit, Captain's Quarters, etc. But it is the small fry, Large Mammal and under, along with the readers, who really make the whole thing work. I hope everyone will indulge me a bit.
We all get some interesting overlap. For instance, I live in North Carolina, but I probably have about the same amount of NC bloggers on my roll as I do Bear Flag League folks. As well as from all over the country, and a few international.
That being said, let's take a look at one of the others Bear Flag League members, Byron from Slings and Arrows, who has an interesting excerpt from The Opinion Journal:
In his new role as chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Dean has stressed that Democrats are stronger than Republicans on defense.
"Defense is a lot broader than swaggering around saying you're going to kick Saddam's butt," Dean said Thursday, drawing cheers from the crowd in this city that overwhelmingly voted Democratic last November.
It's not clear how this shows that "Democrats are stronger than Republicans on defense." After all, "swaggering around saying you're going to kick Saddam's butt" was precisely the policy of the last Democratic administration. The current Republican administration actually kicked his butt and even took down names. That strikes us as a pretty broad policy.
And from my NC blog buddy Ogre, we have a story about how Some Freedom Remains regarding the Christians who were arrested in Philly awhile ago for peacefully protesting.
Posted by: William Teach at
04:10 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 307 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I can't think of many people to whom the term "swagger" applies to more than it does to Mr Dean....
Posted by: david foster at February 19, 2005 07:47 AM (muk3h)
2
I have yet to see Dean match his rhetoric to action. He acts anti war, now he is saing that Dems can be strong on Defense. As the saying goes, the best defense is a good offense.
Posted by: William Teach at February 19, 2005 04:31 PM (HxpPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 17, 2005
Noonan
. . .
discusses blogging with grace, insight, and that increasingly annoying sentence repetition that she should consider giving up on as a rhetorical device.
(Via Goldstein.)
Posted by: Attila at
12:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
Hot Rod Science Fiction
. . . from
Iowahawk. Some of the characters sound familiar, but I just can't be sure . . .
It's about a town full of hormone-infused teenagers who find their burg overcome by a very large blob, um, blog.
Sobering tale.
Posted by: Attila at
01:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
February 16, 2005
February 12, 2005
BoiFromTroy
. . . has a
new advertiser whose promos essentially amount to softcore porn. So I'll have to go back there after dinner and be scandalized all over again.
Wait: go through the Boi's site. That way he gets the credit when you click through. Upper right, not that you'll have trouble spotting it, and there are cute female models, too (there's a "just us girls" spinoff line). Something for everyone.
Posted by: Attila at
06:57 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, but trudging through the "boyz" part might be a bit much to ask to get to the cute female models.....
Posted by: Daniel at February 12, 2005 07:05 PM (XG5pe)
2
Hey. Have you
seen them?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 12, 2005 10:20 PM (RjyQ5)
3
The females? Are they that good? Maybe I should give it a shot then.
But how am I going to explain it to the guy who fixes my PC?
"No, you don't understand......but.......there's girls there, too.... uh.....why are you looking at me like that......."
Posted by: Daniel at February 13, 2005 08:39 AM (XG5pe)
4
The girlz don't show anywhere near as much skin as the boyz do. What's up with that?
Posted by: McGehee at February 13, 2005 11:57 AM (S504z)
5
You know, I didn't notice that. I'll have to go over there again to confirm what you're saying.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2005 12:53 PM (RjyQ5)
6
Okay, point taken. But they are very pretty, and you do seem some slender female tummy.
The boys, on the other hand, are being exploited. Yes. I fear exploitation of the boys. They should be counseled about this, preferably by an older woman who can, um, counsel them.
From Hell,
Attila
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2005 01:17 PM (RjyQ5)
7
So I'll have to go back there after dinner and be scandalized all over again.
Priceless, PRICELESS line, that.
Well, but I could use a break from the Eason Jordan scandal . . . hmm.
Posted by: ilyka at February 15, 2005 04:51 PM (SaegY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Replacing "Blogosphere."
Leopold Stotch thinks we should replace it with something a bit less lame, and is
taking suggestions. I agree that it doesn't get dorkier than
blogosphere, but no one at Outside the Beltway seems to be doing any better. Go have a shot at it, though: there's got to be something we can call this community/phenomenon that doesn't make us sound nerdier than we already are.
Posted by: Attila at
06:27 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Chimpyfascistsphere
Well, I guess that would only cover the evil right-wing blogs.
Back to the drawing board.....
Posted by: Daniel at February 12, 2005 06:40 PM (XG5pe)
2
The Matrix?
Grinning, ducking and running...
Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog at February 12, 2005 08:03 PM (UxMXb)
3
Nonsense.
Blogosphere is analogous is
noosphere, the realm of consciousness. If that was good enought for Teilhard de Chardin, blogosphere should be good enough for us.
Posted by: Dave Schuler at February 13, 2005 09:00 AM (u/h/J)
4
What? Now? When the word has finally begun to seep into the general public's lexicon, we want to change it?
I don't think it's so lame anyway.
Posted by: Desert Cat at February 13, 2005 10:23 PM (c8BHE)
5
Try saying it over dinner with an old friend who kind-of sort-of knows you do this online journal thingie, but would be scandalized to find out how much time you spend on it.
Out loud, it just sounds different. I feel like I'm talking about my friends and our secret clubhouse and our special handshake, and the flag we made out of an old handkerchief, and the secret codebook with all our special words in it.
Of course, I'm the sensitive type.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 13, 2005 10:49 PM (RjyQ5)
6
I like to think that our standards should be a little higher than those of a nansy-pansy like Teilhard de Chardin, don't you, Dave?
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at February 14, 2005 10:26 AM (UAuME)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Gerard Lays Down the Law.
In rhyme.
Guidelines for navigating this crazy old world of bloggy blogossitude.
Extra points if you can figure out exactly which poem he's parodying.
Posted by: Attila at
01:49 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Law of the Jungle
Alright, alright - I cheated. They talk about it in the comments. I've heard of Kipling but I can't say that I'm familiar with his work. I've read bits and pieces but never a complete poem.
Kipling is a favorite of The Derb®, writer for NRO's
The Corner and subject of abuse by
PW's Jeff G.
Posted by: Daniel at February 12, 2005 06:33 PM (XG5pe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2005
Re: North Korea's Shocking News
Goldstein
gives us "Nine OTHER Chest-Thumping Announcements North Korea is Set to Make This Week," including:
In 1975, a North Korean 4-year old named Jin-ho defeated both Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky in a best of seven chess match. Jin-ho then returned to her familyÂ’s farm, where she helped plant rice and weave baskets.
So get on over there; it's good stuff.
Posted by: Attila at
12:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
February 09, 2005
Would Someone Let Me Know
. . . when
Goldstein's site is back up again? I'm Jonesing.
UPDATE: Back up, though I'm still have to endure several seconds of that "maintenance screen" before the real blog comes up on occasion. However, all's well that ends well.
Posted by: Attila at
12:26 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
February 06, 2005
Professor Purkinje
Describes the act of skimming my blog, trying to find updates on my life, or interesting observations. Or (one supposes) political essays that will make him mad. Or, whatever—something, anything!—that doesn't have to do with the blogging world.
"In joke, in joke, in joke [mimics the actions of fingers scrolling on a Mac laptop's touchpad]; fuck off, fuck off, fuck off."
Here's a thought: if you quit your job, sold your children, divorced your wife, burned your book manuscript, and just lived like a normal person, you could spend 8-12 hours a day online, and you'd get every single joke on the "blogosphere."
Some people just don't want to make any sacrifices. Always the easy options, ya know?
Start with Instapundit. He's a college prof too, and his entries are mercifully brief (unlike, say . . . mine).
"In jokes." Well, I never.
Posted by: Attila at
07:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
February 04, 2005
Speaking of Fascion
Jeff-in-Oakland has another photoshop over at
Beautiful Atrocities that suggests something about the homoerotic undertones in Islamist culture. But, you know—delicately.
(Oh, come on, boys and girls: we're talking about guys who shave each other's bodies. Anne Rice's vampires do a lot less.)
Posted by: Attila at
10:42 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ah, the buggery of boys is even more common over there than in a Brit Boy's School. And folks wonder why they turn out kinda twisted.
There's some seriously twisted societies over there.
Posted by: Peter at February 05, 2005 12:21 AM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 03, 2005
The Blogosphere is a Crazy Place.
Where children can be surprisingly mature, and supposed "adults" often act like kids.
"Stole an Instalanche"? WTF?
Should Austin ever start another blog in the future, I'll link to him right away, and put him on my blogroll.
And I don't expect to ever link Matt in my life. I most certainly won't ever link Jordan, whose behavior was egregious and unacceptable.
Remember the old saw about how you can judge a man's character by how he treats women? That comes from an earlier time, when women were bound by laws and conventions and less able to fend for themselves. It had to do with the notion that the way we treat those who are vulnerable shows who we are. It most certainly applies to the way any adult behaves toward the underaged.
I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS THROUGH PROTEIN WISDOM, RUN BY JEFF GOLDSTEIN. HIS WEB PAGE IS HERE. (Go. He's selling "Free Austin" T-shirts!)
Posted by: Attila at
03:12 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd go so far as to say you can still judge a man's character by how he treats women. or that could just be how I was raised.
Posted by: the Pirate at February 03, 2005 03:23 PM (SksyN)
2
Oh, I'm not so sure it never applies any more. I'm just extending the logic, here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 03, 2005 04:55 PM (RjyQ5)
3
As an absolute neophyte in this blog world, I'm not familiar with the specifics of crediting, etc. at issue here. But those specifics couldn't transcend the meanness behind that so-called grownup's reaction anyway.
Shame! What truly dishonorable behavior to an intelligent and compassionate child!
Shame!
Posted by: k at February 03, 2005 05:13 PM (6krEN)
4
Talk about taking yourself way to seriously. You stole my insta-lanche, sheesh.
Does anybody have Glen Reynolds IP address? I am going to ban him from my site, I just don't need the aggravation.
Posted by: Pile On® at February 04, 2005 07:52 AM (bKw38)
5
Well, of course it isn't Glenn's fault.
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 04, 2005 03:48 PM (RjyQ5)
6
Well, on one hand, Matt Margolis got dragged into it by Jordan, who has take a huge, and vastly desrved, amount of shat about this. He has appologized for his demeanor and attitude towards Austin, as well as has Matt. Hopefully, Austin's Mom will let him start blogging again.
Posted by: William Teach at February 05, 2005 03:01 PM (HxpPK)
7
Well of course not Attila Girl, but then being banned from my site isn't exactly the end of the world.
Posted by: Pile On® at February 05, 2005 09:46 PM (Aa66R)
8
What I like best about this incident's "damage control" is Jeff Goldstein's "Free Austin" t-shirts.
Now THAT's lemonade.
Posted by: k at February 06, 2005 06:32 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 02, 2005
The CITIZEN JOURNALIST
. . . has filed another
report.
No word yet on whether he's actually read Blog! yet.
Posted by: Attila at
03:03 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
60,000
Within a few days. Pretty good, for a small-time blog.
And my traffic is up again, which probably means that I need to keep you guys entertained.
"Honey, would you feed the blog?" (Nope. It don't work like that.)
Posted by: Attila at
09:24 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Within a few hours, more like.
I'm not going to bother congratulating you at the 10,000 marks any more. You're wearing my fingers out. At 100,000 for sure. Maybe 75,000 too.
you GO, girl! you GO!
oops. Couldn't help it.
L,
k
Posted by: k at February 02, 2005 06:24 PM (6krEN)
2
It's Feb. 3, 8:07 my time so 5:37 your time.
I said, within hours not days - and that old post was at 6:24 your time on Feb. 2.
So I was right.
As usual.
And I'm not at all ashamed of being insufferably smug about it, because it's just too totally fine to see that number turn over.
Posted by: k at February 03, 2005 05:08 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
66kb generated in CPU 0.0306, elapsed 0.1808 seconds.
216 queries taking 0.1612 seconds, 527 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.