Posted by: Darrell at November 30, 2007 12:40 PM (pJhgI)
4
I take it that girl #2 and room #2 was for his co-worker . . . though of course I try to know as little about this as possible.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 30, 2007 04:04 PM (aywD+)
5
Attila Girl is correct.
Which is not to imply that I haven't had occasion to enjoy 2, 3 or 4 (these women are very lovely) sessions in one day. Of course, there is always a double session (2 girls at once) to be enjoyed.
Posted by: Hog Beatty at December 03, 2007 12:48 PM (Ar5f/)
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 03, 2007 01:18 PM (aywD+)
7
Oh, so you want to know how I enjoy two women simultaneously without alternately sending one or the other to the corner of the bed to read a magazine?
Posted by: Hog Beatty at December 03, 2007 07:49 PM (Ar5f/)
8
I'm busy! I'm blogging! I'm skipping! La la la la la!
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 03, 2007 08:57 PM (Pj4Qc)
9
Okay, since you insisted.
At first only JJ was in the room. She's 23 and is a sexual athlete. I've seen her come out of a session, consume a light/medium-sized lunch of rice, kimchi & over-easy egg and go directly into her next session. It's like a long distance bicyclist that eats while biking: no dining pleasure per se; just fuel to keep the engine running.
I proceeded to tenderly, and soon voraciously, dine on her perfectly smooth (lasered - no bumps, no discoloration), amply moist and incredibly soft......hmm, what does one call it in a proper politically-oriented blog such as this this?......ah, yes: pussy.
Then MDR came in and quickly disrobed. (For more about her go to http://www.stonedandnaked.com/?p=51
paragraph beginning with, "I was rather sweaty...".) Necessity IS the mother of invention: I mounted JJ and rotated my body
Posted by: Hog Beatty at December 03, 2007 09:37 PM (Ar5f/)
10
about 30 degrees to the right and proceeded to orally enjoy MDR (eliciting some lovely moans and the occasional "Oh my god") as I continued to......hmm, again, proper terminology......okay, okay I've got it!......as I continued to fuck JJ senseless.
This, this, this, uh, this was great fun, fulfillment and happiness.
Posted by: Hog Beatty at December 03, 2007 09:43 PM (Ar5f/)
I'm Not Saying that Men Are Irrational Creatures.
But if you did want to see a typical specimen behave in an irrational fashion, which topic would you bring up?—breasts, or lesbianism? I'm just askin'.
Total fan of men and all that . . . but, well. You know.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 29, 2007 03:38 PM (aywD+)
8
Clarification: "But if you did want to see a typical specimen behave in an irrational fashion, which topic would you bring up?—shoes or horses? I'm just askin'.
Posted by: Darrell at November 29, 2007 07:35 PM (Lqv3G)
9
Oh, right. I never really learned to ride a horse very well, I'm afraid. Not enough practice for a lower-middle-class chick in SoCal. They are pretty creatures, but so are dogs. And Mandy has the silkiest fur in the world.
And I don't really get the shoe thing. If one is into leather goods (oh, you know what I mean), why not a nice handbag? At least one would get enough use out of that to make it worth the dough.
Now guns, good books, and pit bulls--yippee! No rationality. No desire for same.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 29, 2007 10:11 PM (aywD+)
10
I was excluding you, of course, in normative patterns of behavior.
Posted by: Darrell at November 30, 2007 08:19 PM (jvY8M)
11
Ah . . . oh . . . I see.
So you've figured out that I'm really a 17-year-old male in a 45-year-old female's body? What gave it away?
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 30, 2007 08:44 PM (aywD+)
Naturally, I think Jesus was into the MoPar thing. His father's house has many mansions, presumably with a fair number of garages. And I suspect Chryslers are well-represented.
1
What would Jesus drive?
He would drive those people who invoke Him for their political goals out of the church.
Posted by: John at November 26, 2007 01:38 PM (j9QaS)
2
Well, he sure didn't like those moneychangers in the Temple . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 26, 2007 02:01 PM (aywD+)
3
The disciples, on the other hand, leaned toward Hondas. From Acts 2:1 (KJV): "And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one Accord in one place."
Posted by: CGHill at November 26, 2007 06:28 PM (7tYOI)
Just Thought I'd "Claim" This Blog on Technorati.
Though goodness knows why; my profile over there is doing just fine without any intervention whatsoever. But I'm just feeling a bit blog-whorish today, so there you go.
(The story sounds fishy, anyway: I'm sure the Fire Department coordinates with the cities so that trees are cut back within set guidelines, even for oak trees. And why would one hire a tree-trimming company out of Orange County to come all the way up here to the foothills, when they don't even know the local ordinances?)
From the Carol Burnett Show . . .
Courtesy of Cassandra, now on blog-hiatus (no true blogger ever really quits for good; you know it, and I know it):
The funniest thing about that show was the fact that the actors kept losing their shit: it didn't feel like a lack of professionalism so much as a sort of good-natured expression of camaraderie among them. Of course, that means that the outtakes from the show are the best part.
And, yes: after asking the other Cotillion women, and checking out Vicki's website, we have indeed confirmed that the Vicki Lawrence from "The Carol Burnett Show" is the same one who originally performed "The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia."
She, Carol Burnett, Harvey Korman and Tim Conway are just the best: Comedy without a body count. Love it.
1
All you had to do is ask someone old enough to remember firsthand. And since Vicki Lawrence was married to the songwriter, Bobby Russell, from 1972-74, don't you think that might have something to do with her winding up with the song? He also wrote "Little Green Apples" and "Honey's Song," if you were curious.
And, by the way, the Shelley Fabares that co-starred in "Coach" WAS the same Shelley Fabares that had the hit with "Johnny Angel" in 1962.
Posted by: Darrell at November 23, 2007 09:48 PM (p4bKK)
2
Heck--it was a surprise to my husband, when I told him.
Perhaps you're just more hip than you realize, D!
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2007 01:06 AM (aywD+)
3
I never thought I wasn't hip. Knowing the cultural references just never correlated with popularity in my case. But it probably kept me out of the big leagues when it comes to making a major contribution in science. My head is filled with lyrics from a bunch of '60s TV commercials and stuff, while the major players are basically one-trick ponies based on my personal experience.
A local radio host with a popular comedy show once had Marilyn vos Savant, billed as being the most intelligent human based on documented IQ results, on as a guest. Before her appearance, she agreed to take a short test that he would create. A few months later, a caller brought her up, and he told the story of how much time he spent putting together the test and how she really did. He started out as a researcher/fact checker for a major local news station, so he tapped some of his sources for the math/science questions. Most of his regular friends contributed pop culture questions. He told how he debated throwing those in, putting some in and taking them out, but finally deciding to include ten TV and pop music questions that someone her age couldn't help knowing--in his estimation and based on testing every person her age he came in contact with in the weeks prior to the show. She missed them all. Since she was a guest, he glossed over it at the time. I heard the segment at the time and thought it was strange that he didn't talk about the results of a test that he had been talking about for days. The caller weeks later must have touched a nerve, because he went on about how could she NOT know the answers.
I guess you have to watch TV and listen to the radio to know what's on. Or read about it.
Posted by: Darrell at November 24, 2007 09:48 AM (GdI34)
4
Well, that sort of thing happens to me because of my sort of binary relationship with television (on-again, off-again).
For instance, my friends had to tell me about Madonna as a cultural phenomenon (this was long before *Desperately Seeking Susan* came out, but still . . .).
And then there was that time they were talking about Max Headroom, and I didn't know what they were talking about. "It's like talking to an ALIEN!" one of them sputtered in frustration.
I probably also wasn't listening to the radio enough in those days, either, come to think of it.
So I'm a nerd, too--just a novelist nerd.
But I do know "hold the pickles, hold the lettuce," and that sort of thing. I watched eons of television with various grandparents and babysitters in the 1960s and 1970s, and we watched a fair amount in 70-74.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2007 01:59 PM (aywD+)
So, What Do We Call Those Muslims (Or "Perverters of Islam," If You Prefer)
. . . who are trying to kill us?
Timothy Ash of The Guardian makes the linguistic case against "Islamofascists," and argues that "Islamists" describes those who advocate through peaceful means for repressive systems such as Sharia law, whereas the term "Jihadis" should be reserved for those who murder in Allah's name.
I've been using "fuckin' assholes," but I've been cautioned that this lacks precision.
UPDATE: Dr. D. suggests in the comments that all "real Muslims" believe everything in the Koran—in a very literal way. Does that mean that all real Christians believe that every word in the Bible is literally true? Does it mean all real Jews believe everything in the Torah is literally true? Because I have a few challenging passages for you, if that's the case.
Furthermore, Dr. D. would like to see this country "Muslim-frei." Not only do I not particularly want that—I find the very proposal scarier than the Jihadis, or whatever we've decided to call them.
But Brian Micklethwait seems to agree that it's the religion itself we need to denounce. I still don't see it: I'd rather wage war on a few hundred people who want to kill me, or a few thousand people who want to convert me by force, rather than a few billion who don't care one way or another what I'm doing and are perfectly indifferent to whether I wear shorts, or whether my gay friends are living with their boyfriends, or whether I believe that Jesus was, in fact, the Christ.
As for those who love to ironically discuss "the religion of peace," you enjoy that. Me, I'd like to know whether, in point of fact, "they will know we are Christians by our love." Not always, boys and girls. And I'm not discussing the Middle Ages here, either.
I'd like to clean my own house before I see to other faiths' own Reformations. And by that, I mean The House of Joy McCann. There is plenty to be done in it—physically, metaphorically, spiritually, emotionally.
And so I shall leave the religious wars to others. Have at it, kids.
1
I would argue against "jihadi". As I recall, jihad means "to struggle against", so it's usage can range from "I am in jihad against my sinful nature" to "I'm going to kill those heathen Americans".
"Fuckin' assholes" is indeed imprecise. I have been accused of, and likely guilty of, assholery. But I've never desired to chop off LMA's head. Yah, I know, a character flaw, but I'm funny that way.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 23, 2007 08:02 AM (1hM1d)
2
I think it is quite adequte to simply describe them all as just muzlims. We need to remember that every last one of them is under an obligation to bring us under subjection to Izlam. Some will resort to violence while others may not, but they all have that same obligation just by virtue of being muzlims.
A second item to consider is that they essentially have no way out. Izlam does not allow people to leave. The penalty for leaving Izlam is death, and this penalty is enforced worldwide. There are a few who do leave, but they then live in fear for their lives. Those who want to live peacefully usually just keep a low profile, but then they are still muzlims. When the time comes, if it looks like their side is winning, they are apt to decide it is time to stand up and be counted for allah.
For this reason, we need to demand that every last muzlim be deported from the USA. We must not allow any muzlims to remain in the US. This is much more than a religion; it is a subversive political movement that is out to overthrow our way of life. It cannot be allowed to remain within our country. It is like a cancer eating away at us, and the only way to survive cancer is to get rid of it, all of it. You can't leave a little and expect to have the long term cure. All muzlims have to go, beginning NOW!!
Posted by: Dr.D at November 23, 2007 09:08 AM (KG5do)
3
Don't most religions contain an exhortation to the faithful to bring unbelievers into the fold? The New Testament is very clear that Christians have this obligation.
Even twelve-step programs, despite the Tradition of "attraction, rather than promotion," recommend reaching out to other people with the same compulsion (alcohol, food, sick relationships, dysfunctional relations with money). That is, in fact, the Twelth Step.
I'm just wondering whether we should be getting rid of anyone, of any faith, who's done any missionary work /oureach / proselytizing whatsoever.
After all, it's the only way to be sure.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 23, 2007 12:53 PM (aywD+)
4Don't most religions contain an exhortation to the faithful to bring unbelievers into the fold? The New Testament is very clear that Christians have this obligation.
Yes, true. But there's a vast difference between shaking the dust from one's sandals, and offering someone a convert or die, infidel. Yes?
As for Dr. D's idea at throwing the lot of 'em out, I would tend to disagree. However they should be aware that they will encounter people in the USofA who they will find offensive, either in manner of dress, speech, or behaviour. Just Deal With It.
And if they can't, they can go back from whence they came. Much like Californians, they seem to be really happy to escape from a certain environment, and then attempt to change their new environment to be just like what they left. Puzzling, but true.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at November 24, 2007 01:15 PM (1hM1d)
5
Are we talking about Jackson Hole, Wyoming, again?
Not all Muslims do this—just as not all Californians do it.
It isn't my impression that Muslims in the U.S. are really high on bringing Sharia law over here, or trying to get a separate legal system used for their crimes, vs. ours. I know that immigrants to Western European countries do that on a regular basis, but I just don't see much of it here (aside from a very tiny lunatic fringe). Most immigrants here are happy to live in a pluralistic society, and there really isn't an expectation that this country will "roll over" to silly demands, as some of the European countries have appeared on the cusp of doing.
Hence, "America Alone," (not that I agree with all of Steyn's premises, of course).
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 24, 2007 02:10 PM (aywD+)
Sorry, Kitty-Cat.
I've been AWOL on our Afghanistan discussion (under the Camille Paglia post). I have client-itis, and I'll be back later.
You're making some great points, and I'll catch up over the long weekend, once I get the family disposed of. (Um. I didn't mean in shallow graves in my backyard, though, come to think of it . . . . )
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
Can We Just All Make an Agreement
Not to talk about our exes on our blogs, unless we preserve their anonymity, as I used to do over at Dean's place? (Such as here, and here. And here.)
The fact is, I really like my exes. Even the quirky, annoying one, whom I can only take in small doses. I like 'em all, except the Westwood Village denizen who took my virginity by force. That was not too cool.
Now, do I now question what on earth I was thinking, with one or two of these people? Sure. But that has to do with compatibility issues. I hope they are all doing well. Even Mr. Westwood Village, for that matter; he was a bit out of his depth with me, after all. I never want to speak with him again, but I do pray for him, every now and then.
1
Atila,
does anybody come to your blog anymore?
Or is this election getting you down no more Bush on the ballot
Posted by: azmat hussain at November 18, 2007 05:42 PM (mdszq)
2
Well, I'm despondent, of course. It's certainly no secret that I feel G.W. is perfect, and has handled his administration flawlessly.
I'm starting to come to terms with the possibility that I may never have his baby, but I still have crying jags here and there. Once in a while I sleep all day, wake up at 5:00 p.m., and stumble to my "W" corner to stare at all the pictures I have up of him, along with various White House curios and cheap souvenirs I got in Texas.
But I feel that I can probably cope. I may not take my life right away—that is, as long as I can hold out the hope that someday, somehow, his younger brother will run. And then, of course, his nephew (in a few more years).
I never thought you'd be the type to kick a girl when she's down, Azmat.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 18, 2007 06:49 PM (aywD+)
Overheard, 11
"I'm really annoyed by That Prominent Blogger," she complained.
"Hey. We like him. What did he ever do to you?"
"Well, he's a sexist, and kind of ageist, too. I had an exchange with him that went on for 400 comments or something, in which he argued that by definition, I couldn't be attractive because I'm in my forties. It wouldn't bother me if he'd ever seen me, because I may not be his type—and I suspect I'm not. But the sight-unseen thing bugged me."
"He wants you," says the blogger wearing the hoodie.
"Oh, yeah," chimes in the one in a T-shirt. "Have you ever seen a picture of him? No great shakes there."
"Listen," Mr. Hoodie says. "His arguments can go up to 200 comments easily. But 400? He wants you bad."
"He's never seen me, though."
"Oh—like he really cares about that."
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
Some of it is familiar, but removing people's chins and jaws can lead to confusion—especially for those of us with weird, angular jawlines (it looks good on my father—on me, not so much).
Posted by: Attila Girl at
05:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Insecure on Sartorial Matters?
Let the army of Davids help you pick an outfit for that special occasion.
In my particular case, I prepared for the Public Utility job by borrowing my husband's valet stand, and taking pictures of every business outfit I had (short of a suit, which would have been a bit much). I still have 'em all in a file, and I take 'em out for scrutiny whenever I get that "I don't have enough clothing!" feeling.
(This has led to some catfights in The Cotillion over "whose gay boyfriend" Jeff really is. I've suggested that we determine this like ladies: paper targets, 25 feet, sidearms-of-choice. I'll shoot off-hand, to make it more sporting for the others.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
07:00 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
Nepotism Rears Its Ugly Head.
I know it's childish of me, but I kind of dig all the interrelationships within the 'sphere—like, the fact that Glenn got both his wife and his mom into blogging (who wants to bet that the Instadaughter already has a blog, but hasn't "come out" to her dad, yet?).
And then there are the prominent bloggers I'm not supposed to talk about who were dating for a while, and now dislike each other intensely. And the cousins who blog. And the drinking buddies. And the real estate partners. And the venture capitalists and their favorite startups. Etc.
But my favorite blogging family is actually this one:
Posted by: Chuck at November 07, 2007 07:37 PM (H4W1a)
2
Thank you!
I like to pride myself on the fact that there is basically no manipulation too cheap, no suggestion too tawdry, and no teasing that's beyond the pale. Not when it comes to important things like traffic, money, and awards-that-the-offline-community-has-never-even-heard-of.
Posted by: Attila Girl at November 07, 2007 11:53 PM (aywD+)
No; I'm Not Going to the BlogWorld Expo in Las Vegas.
Though I might drive up to Santa Barbara for a day or two of the YAF conference.
BlogWorld Expo is, of course, concurrent with the YAF's West Coast Leadership Conference, and it occurs to me that a person could conceivably become a full-time blogging gadfly, jumping from event to event, talking about—and covering—the emergence of New Media.
Which, silly as it sounds, would beat workin'.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:33 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
Not all Muslims do this—just as not all Californians do it.
It isn't my impression that Muslims in the U.S. are really high on bringing Sharia law over here, or trying to get a separate legal system used for their crimes, vs. ours. I know that immigrants to Western European countries do that on a regular basis, but I just don't see much of it here (aside from a very tiny lunatic fringe). Most immigrants here are happy to live in a pluralistic society, and there really isn't an expectation that this country will "roll over" to silly demands, as some of the European countries have appeared on the cusp of doing.
Hence, "America Alone," (not that I agree with all of Steyn's premises, of course).
