September 16, 2005
After Reading
. . . this post over at Hubris, I considered proposing marriage. Then I remembered my husband's views on polyandry are not flexible at all.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
So scratch that. But read the freakin' post, okay?
Via the gossip in my Cotillion Ball in-box.
Posted by: Attila at
11:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ooohh, it really IS just the radical notion that women are people! All this time I thought it was a political ideology that advocated specific, leftist policies!! DOY!
Posted by: Dave Munger at September 21, 2005 03:55 PM (GfB1S)
2
Well, perhaps you're being a little bit semantic.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 22, 2005 09:07 AM (Kti1Q)
3
Dave, congratulations on successfully setting up a straw man to knock down.
As I wrote:
"Feminist" can simply mean that you are an advocate for equal rights for women. [emphasis added]
In fact, that's the number one generic definition of feminism: belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
Of course, there are many competing ideas and perspectives under the umbrella of "feminism," some of which could be described as "leftist policies."
What I find interesting is that because of this, many people have a knee-jerk reaction to the concept of feminism as a whole.
I also find it interesting how during this episode, so many people (not including you here) have posited that sexism essentially doesn't exist.
Is there a middle ground between "sexism is to blame for everything" and "sexism doesn't exist and all feminists are radical men-hating left-wingers"?
I'd like to think so.
Posted by: Hubris at September 22, 2005 12:29 PM (ghFND)
24kb generated in CPU 0.0304, elapsed 0.232 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.2091 seconds, 460 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
209 queries taking 0.2091 seconds, 460 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








