January 15, 2005
Speaking of Hugh Hewitt
Goldstein: “I AM A CITZEN JOURNALIST. I DEMAND PIE!”
As do we all. Make mine lemon meringue, please.*
* And I don't care what the mainstream media say; I'm eating it for breakfast!
Posted by: Attila at
11:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
Can We Get Over
. . . this
unfortunate habit of referring to the male genitals as "junk"? It's only slightly less offensive than the British "naughty bits."
On the other hand, at least there are terms for the male genitalia that encompass the entire area. Most term that refer to female genitals only refer to the canal . . . you know: the useful part.
Of course, sexual slang is generally really inadequate to describe the human equipment and experience. We should, really, be able to do better.
That said, I'm glad to finally know the origin of the term "going commando." Carry on.
Posted by: Attila at
10:55 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Most term that refer to female genitals only refer to the canal . . . you know: the useful part."
There's other parts?
Posted by: Don at January 16, 2005 12:50 AM (FsGoB)
2
It is easy to criticize, but do you have any suggestions?
Posted by: Pile On® at January 16, 2005 07:07 AM (KlBdH)
3
I'm still waiting for my ice cream.
Posted by: William Teach at January 16, 2005 08:03 AM (HxpPK)
4
Wiliam, I'll mail your ice cream to you. Or maybe send it UPS. There's a slight chance it'll melt, of course.
A friend of mine used to refer to female masturbation as "pounding the petunia." I liked that. (This is the same person who decided that the equivalent of "cocksucking" had to be "cunt-slurping.")
There is the male habit of naming their dicks, so as to establish that, at times, "they seem to have minds of their own." Sometimes it's a different name, and sometimes it's "Little [guy's name]."
Actually, I'll bet there is some slang out there that isn't offensive. I should look into it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 16, 2005 10:57 AM (RjyQ5)
5
Thanks. Chocolate.
Now, there was some language you don't see everyday. LOL
Posted by: William Teach at January 16, 2005 02:26 PM (HxpPK)
6
But Tilly — may I call you Tilly? — "junk" rhymes so conveniently with "trunk." Rhyming is an important part of playground slang.
If I can't have junk in my trunk, am I still allowed to have a rocket in my pocket?
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at January 16, 2005 11:40 PM (UAuME)
7
Tilly's fine, as is LMA, Attila Girl, and Joy.
But isn't the "trunk" a different part of the body? If schoolkids have THAT kind of junk in their trunks, we do have one heck of a disciplinary problem.
If I were younger, I'd totally encourage the rocket in your pocket. In a sense I still do, though I can't really help you, um, "launch" it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 17, 2005 01:02 AM (RjyQ5)
8
Junk is not a term that I used frequently, but the other word that came to mind when writing that post was 'hog'. As in "strapping 20 grit sandpaper to your hog". I thought better of that terminology so I went with junk.
Posted by: Froggy at January 17, 2005 02:15 PM (E1hup)
9
I certainly got the sandpaper issue, and I certainly wasn't criticizing. It just got me thinking, is all . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 17, 2005 07:05 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Islam in the Indian Ocean
Laurence has a plan that's absolutely
diabolical.
I don't condone it, of course. But I wouldn't be 100% surprised if this were attempted.
Posted by: Attila at
12:40 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The link is poigled
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 15, 2005 03:44 AM (+S1Ft)
2
Fixed!
I also left the heat on last night--very absent-minded of me.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 15, 2005 10:08 AM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 14, 2005
Clint Eastwood Lays Down the Law
Has everyone heard this story now? I got it from Larry Elder, and then grabbed
this account off the web.
Clint Eastwood was at the National Board of Review Awards dinner in New York on Tuesday, accepting an award for Million Dollar Baby. Michael Moore was also at the event, having received a "Freedom of Expression" award. So Clint pointed out that he and Moore actually had a lot in common. For instance, "we both value freedom of expression." Then he looked right at Moore and added, "but, Michael, if you ever show up on my doorstep with a camera, I'll kill you."
The audience laughed, and Eastwood added, "I'm serious."
News accounts don't tell us if his eyes still twinkled, so I'm not positive what the yin/yang balance was in that moment.
But if he did mean it in a hostile way, and I were Michael Moore, I'm afraid I'd be tempted to call his bluff on this one.
Maybe not, though: there is The Power of Clint. One has to consider Eastwood Exceptionalism.
What, exactly, would happen if the sheriffs in Carmel were called out to Clint's place and encountered the enormous carcass of Moore in front of the former mayor's home? If there were a camera in Moore's hands, it might well be written off as a suicide.
Just sayin'.
Posted by: Attila at
10:01 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, as there was no showdown, I guess the "punk", just wasn't feeling so "lucky" that night! Thanks for the link BTW.
Posted by: Dan at January 14, 2005 11:17 AM (GI/5M)
2
Hello, LMA - I found this site thru (you guessed it) Lair's piece of crap. (And I say that with love!)
Question for you: the picture of the little Indonesian girl on the sidebar (the Tsunami Relief Effort ad) - do you know where the Tsunami Relief Effort people got that pic? It's a keeper...
Posted by: Steve at January 14, 2005 01:16 PM (2zW8B)
3
I REALLY hope that you're not Michael Jackson.
Posted by: Laurence Simon at January 14, 2005 02:07 PM (uBCxH)
4
"Forgiven"
Moore: I can't be like you Clint, I'd rather be ragged and blind and dead.
Clint: Okay
Posted by: HomericPundit at January 14, 2005 05:12 PM (AICCr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2005
Don't Be Fooled by My Hazel Eyes.
I'm full of crap, too. Why, just look at the crap on my blogad column. It's a harbinger of crap to come.
For the next two weeks, the protocol for accessing Laurence's site is:
1) visit Little Miss Attila;
2) skim over her brilliant postings and be really impressed;
3) click on the This Blog Is Full of Crap ad on the right to access Lair's blog;
4) repeat daily, to get the best from both a SoCal former English major and the world's cleverest Texan Jew (eat your heart out, Kinky Friedman).
Posted by: Attila at
12:21 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My my, what an effective graphic, someone is truly talented. Looks like something you might get on a cone at Dairy Queen, minus the steam and flies.
It looks like a site that Pile will have to check out.
Save it Cassandra.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 13, 2005 04:20 PM (n0vXU)
2
Ewwww. Someone alert cophrophilac Big Hominid
Posted by: jeff at January 14, 2005 12:59 PM (LYl+7)
3
I know. I don't even like potty humor, myself. But it's Lair, so it's funny. I think when I repeated some of the ad copy to my husband his mouth sort of dropped open, and I had to explain that Laurence occupies another dimension in which there's no such thing as sacrelige, and the only sacred cow is the spelling of his name.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 14, 2005 10:32 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Now THIS Is Art
Get your
velvet Jeff while they're hot.
Posted by: Attila at
10:28 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
January 12, 2005
January 11, 2005
Celebrity Journalism
A good friend of mine once told me I should read a particular magazine, because it has "great celeb photos." I considered saying,
I guess I still want to be your friend.
Celeb photos. This person, when he recognizes an actor or other performer on the street, actually stops to talk to them. I mean, he isn't obnoxious about it or anything, but unless I have a special feel for someone's work I can't imagine speaking to them. I usually just give a little half-smile as our eyes meet.
And, no—I can't imagine putting together a list of actors I've seen in person, even throwing out the events I've gone to on my husband's arm (which included a tribute to Steven Spielberg—as you might imagine, there were a lot of "names" in the room that night). We just see people in L.A., and most of us don't want to risk "bugging" them unless we have something significant to say.
I'll tell you the first, though: It was Peter Falk. I was in an ice cream parlor in Westwood Village (part of the Swensen's chain, IIRC). I was maybe 12 years old, and Falk had clearly been filming an episode of Columbo (the ones in the 70s—remember, I'm old), because he had his trenchcoat on and makeup on his face to make his complexion just a bit deeper. I was eating my ice cream and looked up suddenly to see a face I knew intimately. I think the shock registered on my face, and Falk smiled at me. Then he ordered his own ice cream. I've always hoped that I regained my wits and smiled back at him, but I don't remember for sure.
Five years later I got to know some friends who were making a short super-8 film that was a Columbo parody. Fifteen years or so after that, one of those same friends found himself to be a new business owner due to a chain of events that involved Peter Falk.
My point is that in L.A. (and New York, to some degree) the cult of celebrity is like oxygen: just in the air. I've been thinking about this as I consider getting involved in one or more projects that involve reporting on celebrities. At first blush, my nerdly indifference to these matters other people are so concerned with might appear to be a liability. Once I thought it through, however, I realized the fact that I don't succomb to any kind of hero-worship could actually help me in covering some of the entertainment figures around town.
After Peter Falk smiled at me, it was all over. I saw behind the veil.
At my Publishing Group meeting tonight the one of the celeb magazines had some staffers on hand discussing how they handled the "Brad and Jennifer" issue, which had to be rushed into print in a matter of days. One of the discussions that went into that cover story was a brainstorming session in which staffers sat around considering what ordinary Americans might be curious about regarding the breakup.
"Like, what sorts of questions might your mother ask?" one of the editors enquired of the others in the group.
And when this was quoted in our meeting I thought, "my mother? She'd want to know, Brad and Jennifer who? And why should I care?"
So I'm a second-generation nerd. The difference being, I can snap out of it at will.
You all be good. Think twice about wishing for fame and fortune: fortune alone is handier and safer. It also leads to less social awkwardness: you aren't followed by hordes of people on photo safari, and no one approaches you on the street, apropos of nothing, and just starts talking.
Posted by: Attila at
11:56 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 627 words, total size 4 kb.
1
1. Being 12 during the 70s does NOT make a person old...I personally know this to be true.
2. Brad & Jen: My question is why does the "breakup" surprise anyone? From everything I heard they were never in it FOREVER, through thick and thin, in good times and bad, for better or for worse. I've heard multiple recounts of interviews (Oprah to name one) and vague memories of my own that they oddly (in my opinion) avoided the we're-together-forever concept and stated that they were together for as long as their love lasts type of thing. That's not marriage...that's dating! While Oprah and other interviewers would fawn all over them and tell them that their attitude was so wonderful and refreshing....*vomit*. And the whole kids thing...something about one wanted but the other didn't...hello?...what freaking about-to-get-married-moron doesn't work that out in excruciating detail before the wedding? Only a complete brain dead idiot or someone not serious about the marriage...and I don't know which or if both apply.
3. You reporting on celebrities: you're so much better than that. Hold out if you can.
Posted by: Don at January 12, 2005 01:09 AM (FsGoB)
2
"This person, when he recognizes an actor or other performer on the street, actually stops to talk to them. I mean, he isn't obnoxious about it or anything, but unless I have a special feel for someone's work I can't imagine speaking to them. I usually just give a little half-smile as our eyes meet."
My reflex if I see someone I recognize, is to give them more of a greeting than someone I don't. And on occasion this has resulted in my greeting someone I've never met, but seen on TV or other media, as if we know each other.
Fortunately, I'm not real big on stopping to chat with people I
do know, so it's not all that embarrassing.
Posted by: McGehee at January 12, 2005 11:20 AM (S504z)
3
3. Sure. OTOH, sometimes there's nothing better than paying the bills. Maybe taking that job can help folks hold out for the better one, since they're freed from financial pressure while they look and wait. I think any reasonably decent job is worth doing and worth doing well. Celeb stuff included.
Posted by: k at January 12, 2005 12:09 PM (ywZa8)
4
I met Buck Owens son at the county fair in Bakersfield, does that count?
David Edelstein, the NPR/Slate movie critic, wrote me a nasty email because I made fun of him. Does that count?
Posted by: jeff at January 12, 2005 02:54 PM (J7J8H)
5
God bless you Atilla, I get so sick and tired of people coming up to me on the street.....Pile is that you Pile....it is you isn't it.....I love your work....you're my inspiration......that post you wrote on flatuphobia touched me deeply.....can I have your childr.....er......autograph?
Posted by: Pile On® at January 12, 2005 07:53 PM (pmW6d)
6
Being 12 during the 70s does NOT make a person old...I personally know this to be true.
Absolutely. Now, if you
weren't 12 sometime during the 70s, then you are either old or a child, but if you turned 12 in the 70s you're just right.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 15, 2005 04:16 AM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sun's Out
And I hope it stays that way. There's water flowing through our yard, like there has been for the past week and a half. All our footpaths are little streams, and there's an almost-mildewy scent in the air that suggests to me that the leach fields for our septic system are underwater. Even in between rains, the water just
will not stop coming.
When I went out last night in a not-too-heavy rain I saw roads closed all over, since the local hillsides have started giving way. There's one tree down in our neighborhood, and there's been hardly any wind: it's just that when the hills are saturated and losing soil due to fast erosion, there's not too much holding the trees in place.
If we get high winds in the next month this town will lose a lot of houses: there are a lot of very large trees around here, and some of them will fall down in the wrong directions.
It's a beautiful day, and the clouds over the nearby mountains are as lovely as they always are. But with the weather forecasts mixed, I find myself scrutinizing the clouds, and more ambivalent than usual about the "drama" of the view: snow-capped mountiains. Lots of clouds.
The drainage system at the house across the street (and considerably uphill) from us has jumped its confines, so there's a fair amount of sand, mud and gravel on the road.
There are little waterfalls everywhere.
But all will be well if the rain doesn't start again.
As I said before, it's almost never been intense. There have been very few cloudbursts, other than the one a week ago that included hail and caught me in the parking lot at Ralph's wearing jeans and a cashmere sweater. ("Well, who knew?—real weather. If I lived anywhere else I'd have the sense to be wearing a jacket.")
Mostly what we're getting is a steady drumbeat of water, water, water quietly overwhelming all the systems we have in place to dispose of it. More rain in two weeks than we usually get in the entire rainy season.
If it lets up, and if we don't get high winds while the hillsides are still saturated, there won't be too much more property damage, and—I hope—no more people will die.
And I can go back to loving the way the clouds look over the San Gabriels.
Posted by: Attila at
02:20 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 403 words, total size 2 kb.
Cassandra
is asking for
help in setting the President's agenda for the next four years. Please do your part.
Posted by: Attila at
09:00 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're so sweet - I had to do something to shut up all the yapping about his legacy - it was driving me apesh*t (can I say that here?)
Thanks for the link
Posted by: Cassandra at January 11, 2005 11:51 AM (289B8)
2
Believe me--you can say just about *anything* here, as long as it isn't a personal attack on another commenter.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 01:04 PM (RjyQ5)
3
Well, if I can't attack Cassandra personally, can I attack her snarkily?
Posted by: Pile On® at January 12, 2005 07:50 PM (pmW6d)
4
Don't make me turn into a CapitalOne ad, particularly when I hate that company!
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 13, 2005 10:10 AM (RjyQ5)
5
No need to go all El Salvador Plan on me, I was merely trying to discover the acceptable boundaries.
Posted by: Pile On® at January 13, 2005 10:28 AM (n0vXU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well, Now.
That was lovely: nothing like spending two hours with your husband on a Monday evening, trying to guide the water out of the basement, as it seeps in through the little "weeping holes" in the wall. I've never seen the basement so flooded, even during that much-hyped "El Nino" year.
Plastic sheeting is horrible, since there's always a seam between the pieces, and the water makes its way in between them. This frustrates us, and makes our tempers fray. (There were difference in tactical notions: is it better to cover a wide area with the plastic sheets, or a smaller area that acts more like a funnel for the water? Each was convinced his/her own ideas were correct, so as I recall we alternated in whose got implemented.)
All I can think of is to make a hollow in the basement floor and install a decorative little streambed right along the middle. It would be a conversation piece, and it would impart bitchin' feng shui to the place. And it would come handy on years like this, when all of SoCal turns into a large fish bowl.
Somewhere, in Florida, I hear people laughing.
Come on in; the water's fine. And you won't even need your shades.
Posted by: Attila at
12:04 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
1
oh, goodness! Where was the water coming from? The rain? I thought CA didn't have basements (my sil lives there and that was her account, though maybe I misunderstood.) Could you have a sump pump installed (or is that extremely costly and not efficient)
Posted by: Rachel Ann at January 11, 2005 02:20 AM (ZSjbT)
2
Yikes!
No, we don't laugh at Mr. Water. We may allow ourselves a quick grin when we think no one's looking - but even that's a grin of fellowship, laughing with ya not atcha. It's that shared fellowship of human misery. Sandbagging is definitely not fun.
I think I'd rather do hurricane preps any day. It's warmer. Plus it's more or less over at some point - once the cleanup's done, and all the plywood or shutters up, everything battened down, there's nothing much to do but sit and wait it out. And I like it being flat ground, slides are so unpredictable, scary.
The weather's so intensely beautiful before and after, too. Around a hurricane we always need our shades.
I like your streambed idea. Very much. We've been thinking about putting one in the back yard. You could put a little bridge over it. Some steppingstones. Koi. A little trellis with flowering vines. A nice gazebo or pagoda. It's a great place to lounge about with hot chocolate.
Uh, how big is your basement again? We don't have basements here. I'm trying to cram half my back yard into yours and I think I'm running out of room.
k
Posted by: k at January 11, 2005 06:20 AM (ywZa8)
3
Our house was built in 1963 by a woman whose husband was a bridge engineer. She was a small-time real estate developer, but they made this house to live in themselves. The construction is bizarre, but it stands by a steep hillside: we have a bridge for the driveway and one going up to the front door. And the house itself is bulit like a bridge that doesn't go anywhere: it's a platform that uses cables, concrete columns and I-beams.
There are two living levels, and below that, a workshop/basement that's two rooms, small ones (let's say a bathroom and a half for the workshop, plus another bathroom). And lots of cubby spaces and cabinets around.
It's nice to have the storage, but it's yet one more area Attila the Hub has to patrol for rats.
And there's a wonderful view. Living in this house is like driving a Masarati: wonderful most of the time, but the bills come due every now and again—usually during windstorms, but also in flooding weather.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 08:45 AM (RjyQ5)
4
Rachel Ann, our "basement" is above ground level (well, part of it's under the slope, but part is not). So we were just trying to guide the water to flow out the workshop door and onto some plastic sheeting we used to try to get the water away from the foundations of the house.
The husband's goal was not to have the ground around the foundational elements (in our case, concrete columns) become saturated and start to liquify.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 11, 2005 08:49 AM (RjyQ5)
5
I feel for ya. I know what that is like, with all the hurricanes NC has gotten over the past 10 years. Good luck, and be careful. Without being patronizing, don't drive through flooded areas. Seen too many bad things happen that way, too much tragedy.
Posted by: William Teach at January 11, 2005 01:37 PM (TFSHk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 10, 2005
MemoGate Report Is Out; So Are Four CBS Execs, Including Mary Mapes
Well, it's
here.
Editor and Publisher reports:
Four CBS executives were fired Monday following the release of an independent investigation that said a "myopic zeal" led to a "60 Minutes Wednesday" story about President Bush's military service that relied on allegedly forged documents.
The network fired Mary Mapes, producer of the report; Josh Howard, executive producer of "60 Minutes Wednesday" and his top deputy Mary Murphy; and senior vice president Betsy West.
<. . .>
Dan Rather, who narrated the report, announced in November that he was stepping down as anchor of the "CBS Evening News," but insisted the timing had nothing to do with the investigation.
The independent investigators -- former Republican Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and Louis Boccardi, retired president and chief executive officer of The Associated Press -- said they could find no evidence to conclude the report was fueled by a political agenda.
The network's drive to be the first to break a story about Bush's National Guard service was a key reason it produced a story that was neither fair nor accurate and did not meet CBS News' internal standards, the investigators said.
What do you want to bet some bloggers will see things differently?
According to RatherBiased, there is a “war” going on within CBS over how much of the report to release publicly—and how soon. How much is released (and when) will tell us just how serious the folks at CBS are about changing the corporate culture.
UPDATE: The report is now available as a PDF. Outside the Beltway has the link, extensive quotes, analysis, and a mini-roundup of blogger reactions.
The main controversy in the 'sphere seems to be whether this report is a "whitewash" of the situation (Hugh Hewitt), or "damning" (James Joyner). It is apparent to me that some of the language was softened a little bit before the report was released (the point is made, for instance, that there's no "absolute certainty" that the memos in question were forged; sure—if someone has a secret time travel machine, the documents might have been produced in the present day by an individual who hopped right back to the 70s, clutching the memos in his/her hot little hands).
But the litanies of egregious lapses of journalistic integrity in the report speak for themselves, and of all the recent media scandals (The New York Times, etc.) this one has by far the highest "body count."
Dan Rather may still have his job, and he may well be sitting in the anchor's chair for a few more months. But he's been publicly humiliated, as has CBS in its entirety.
Diplomatic language aside, the report is ultimately brutal in its assessment, and it brought CBS to its knees. All that remains to be seen is whether this is a one-time gesture or a permanent change in the way 60 Minutes does business.
Posted by: Attila at
09:42 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 498 words, total size 3 kb.
More from the Council!
The winning entries this week:
Council—
The Education Wonks give us StudentÂ’s Classroom Beating Caught on Videotape, which is a bit of a wake-up call regarding just how bad things have gotten in today's public schools.
And there's an honorable mention here: Resplendent Mango wrote a piece called Evacuation, in which she asks some provocative questions about crisis readiness in NYC.
Non-Council—
The ever-fascinating Diplomad has kept us up-to-date with the UN's ineptness when it comes to dealing with real problems like the tsunami disaster. In More UNReality . . . But the Dutch Get It he gives us more details regarding the actions of individual countries (India, the U.S. Australia, Holland) and the masturbatory antics of the United Nations.
There's another honorable mention here: Darn Floor uses the tsunami crisis to talk about what he calls "The Elephant in the Living Room" regarding the events in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania and Seychelles: where the hell is God? For part of the answer, he refers us to the Book of Job. For some of the rest, read his entry.
The complete list of winners/runners up is here.
Posted by: Attila at
09:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 202 words, total size 2 kb.
Happy Feet Around the 'Sphere
This is one of those moments when one can only think, "why didn't anyone think of this before?"
Jeff at Beautiful Atrocities has put together "A Foot Fetishist's Guide to the Blogosphere," featuring the tootsies of many eminent bloggers. This is the kind of public service that should win him an award.
At least, from people who dig feet.
Posted by: Attila at
07:33 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm ALWAYS in favor of more feet.
k
Posted by: k at January 10, 2005 10:08 AM (6krEN)
2
I'm amazed you can walk with such tiny tootsies! Or is that a giant mouse?
Posted by: Kingslasher at January 10, 2005 10:15 AM (SOfML)
3
I believe Jeff may have been exaggerating just a little with that "comparison." My feet are size 4 1/2 - 5. I was tempted to take the pic with one of my husband's shoes in between my own feet; I could
almost fit both feet into one of his shoes.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 10, 2005 11:12 AM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2005
So, I Need a Job.
Which means either a few more freelance clients or an actual staff positon. Send me a note at miss.attila AT gmail DOT com if you have any leads.
What I've been doing lately: fact-checking, copyediting, proofreading. (And some writing on the side.)
What I can do: coordination, juggling, research, writing. I'm pretty good at dealing with people. I have the full range of office skills (minus Powerpoint, which I could pick up quite quickly with a little help) and can use Mac and Windows machines.
What I've done: everything from an assistant/coordinator to a managing editor. I used to make the "maps" that determined where advertising and stories were placed within magazines. Called "page dummies" or "maquettes," these were like huge puzzles, because each advertiser had its rules for where its ad needed to be placed, but the magazine would also have its own rules—and frequently these conflicted. The overall effect had to be just right, as well.
What I'd like to do: either research/coordination, or another job in publishing—in print or online. (My print background is very heavy: I've done most jobs involved in putting out magazines, with the exceptions of sales and art direction. My online experience is limited to blogging, but I obviously know html and the general principles involved. I'd say that my computer skills are okay for a plain old human being, but low for a blogger. For instance, I've never actually written a computer program.)
Location: Anywhere in and around Pasadena and L.A. for a staff job, and I do proofreading/editing of books from my home (through the miracle of FedEx). So I can definitely telecommute if necessary.
Posted by: Attila at
10:54 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 284 words, total size 2 kb.
Samuel Beckett
"I can't go on, I'll go on."
Posted by: Attila at
01:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
January 08, 2005
Time Out!
Remember how I've been reminding everyone that we—meaning Libertarians and Realio-Trulio Conservatives—were about to start squabbling in earnest, and implored everyone to be civil and respectful?
Well, it's started. And I'm having trouble finding civil or respectful on the menu.
I've got a Glock .40, and I don't want to sit the other right-wing bloggers down and make them sing "Kumbayah" like schoolchildren in "enlightened" classrooms.
But I will if I have to.
Posted by: Attila at
01:10 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think the debate remained very civil, for the most part.
Posted by: Jeff G at January 08, 2005 01:47 AM (EiRj3)
2
I wasn't clear enough:
your readers were polite. The comments you imported from Malkin's discussion gave me the impression that
her readers weren't equally respectful.
My bad.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2005 09:30 AM (8TapF)
3
Just so we have that straight. This rightwingblogger packs heat too you know...;-)
Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at January 08, 2005 02:35 PM (bsmsM)
4
Somehow I pictured you as an MP5-SD type of girl. Nothing like a 9mm assault rifle with an integrated silencer and a collaspsible stock. Could go for the 10mm version, but, it doesn't have the 3 shot selector. Maybe the .45 cal? Not quite as quite, but packs a wallop. Have to take it to SF with you
Posted by: William Teach at January 09, 2005 05:53 PM (HxpPK)
5
I think it helps to hash these things out. What doesn't destroy us only makes us stronger. We get so accustomed to using hyperbole and extreme rhetoric when dispatching the left, it doesn't hurt us to (re-)learn how to disagree civilly within our own camp.
Posted by: Desert Cat at January 09, 2005 08:31 PM (c8BHE)
6
Right. Again, the quotes from the discussion over at Malkin's place were a little disturbing—especially the implied notion that libertarianism is some sort of cancer that has to be cut out of the party. But, of course, that was two quotes (both of which appear in the Protein Wisdom entry I link above), and they represent only two people's thoughts.
William, I like a good rifle, but for close quarters nothing beats a nice handgun—and I have a 30-round mag for my Glock.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 09, 2005 10:15 PM (RjyQ5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hosting Matters Down
Which means that Power Line isn't available, and if you want Glenn, you need to go to the
Instapundit Backup Site (where he'll be posting tomorrow, Saturday, if the problem persists; right now, he's in bed).
It looks like it was a DDOS attack. (More on Denial of Service problems at WikiPed, including DDOS's.)
It's been alleged that the targets were right-wing sites; anyone know any left-leaning sites that use Hosting Matters?
Very odd.
Posted by: Attila at
12:49 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wouldn't want to be Hosting Matters right now. They'd see the amount of nasty stuff I've had to deal with for MuNu multiplied by a hundred or so.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 08, 2005 01:15 AM (+S1Ft)
2
From my POV it looks like some kind of DoS has been aimed at Atilla. This site is generally pretty snappy for me (I use 3Mbps DSL at home). This morning it has taken upwards of five minutes to load this page
Posted by: Neal at January 08, 2005 01:37 AM (PRN2J)
3
I think there's some element on the page being loaded from somewhere else that's having trouble. The mu.nu server is running fine today (touch wood).
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 08, 2005 01:54 AM (+S1Ft)
4
Hosting Matters is back, and by strange coincidence this blog is now zoomy fast again.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 08, 2005 02:22 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2005 09:44 AM (8TapF)
6
Shhhh. I had to get the competition out of the way for awhile. Glenn can't have ALL the traffic. I'm sorry but he can't.
Posted by: jeff at January 08, 2005 06:04 PM (UVSIi)
7
I was wondering when the Robin Hood of the blogosphere would come along to set things right . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2005 07:06 PM (8TapF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2005
Instead of Money
If you're looking for a more tangible way to help the tsunami victims,
here's a wayyou can buy
new items (a list is provided), and have them sent to the troubled areas, via FedEx, for free.
If this is what you want to do, do it today. Let's get that plane filled with necessities for the survivors.
(Esmay.)
Posted by: Attila at
05:12 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is completely off topic, but as of about midnight January 8 a coordinated Denial of Service attack was apparently carried out against several popular conservative blogsites, such as PowerLine, Instapudit and LGF. This site seems to going down as I write this at 12:39 a.m.
Posted by: Neal at January 07, 2005 09:39 PM (PRN2J)
2
I'm okay now, though. You're in the Eastern Time Zone, obviously. I'll run and check on those sites you mentioned before I go to bed: curiouser and curiouser.
I don't think I'm too vulnerable: remember that I'm hosted in Australia, by someone who knows what he's doing and backs everything up. However, as part of a blog collective I might conceivably be brought down by an event such as you describe if sites like Ace of Spades or The Llama Butchers are discussing it and get totally swamped.
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2005 11:57 PM (8TapF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
My Fiction Group
. . . says "less dialogue, more exposition and description." Then they all try to lessen the sting by telling me how marvelous my dialogue
is: to hear them talk, you'd think the angels write dialogue like mine. It's so authentic. It crackles. It's the way people
talk. They practically have orgasms when they hear my dialogue.
"Actually," I want to point out, "all my characters sound like me, and if I ever have to write about people who aren't smart-ass psuedo-intellctuals, I'll be in deep shit."
I say nothing. I'll add some description to the chapter, and it won't hurt me a bit.
Onward.
Posted by: Attila at
10:18 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"psuedo-intellctuals"
This is great! By using simple typos you reinforce and amplify the jab towards the very group you're jabbing. Just brilliant.
That or your copy editor is out on another break...
Posted by: littlemrmahatma at January 07, 2005 02:59 PM (BZ0tI)
2
Oh, yes. Above and beyond that, I can spell "Attila."
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 07, 2005 04:24 PM (8TapF)
3
Pfui. If dialogue works for you, go with it.
As a side thought - I wonder how many Munuvians are writers? Maybe we could start a MuNu writers' group?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 08, 2005 02:20 AM (+S1Ft)
4
Hm.
1) That might be interesting: that way I could polish stuff that's been critiqued by my meat world WG, and see what you all think of it;
2) I've also been meaning to ask you about bulletin boards, and how hard it would be to set one up for my flesh-and-blood WG: one of our members is taking a class right now, so she can't be there with us on Thursdays. I thought you might know what would be required for my So CA writing teacher to set up at least one forum (for us) and maybe 2-3 (for her other group, and for the class she sometimes teaches).
Posted by: Attila Girl at January 08, 2005 09:52 AM (8TapF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
84kb generated in CPU 0.1075, elapsed 0.1578 seconds.
35 queries taking 0.1162 seconds, 126 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.