December 27, 2005
The Problem with Limousine Liberalism
. . . is that not everyone can afford a limousine.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Via Insty.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:07 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Excellent.
Posted by: beautifulatrocities at December 27, 2005 03:21 AM (Xep78)
2
How about some place without internet access?
Posted by: Darrell at December 27, 2005 08:19 AM (CFvGO)
3
Now THERE'S a thought.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 27, 2005 10:13 AM (zZMVu)
4
I'd rather live in Berkeley than in Houston, and Markos' problem is a sign of the fact that the market agrees.
Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf at December 28, 2005 04:47 AM (kmnNV)
5
I wish I knew enough about the housing market in the Bay Area to say for certain that the market is distorted drastically by (for example) rent control. I know that has happened in parts of the L.A. Basin.
Re: the issue of which area is better to live in, I'd have to give Berkeley higher marks for 1) boho cultural perks, and 2) the likelihood of finding media/entertainment work. However, I do better in hot, dry climes: the humidity in the Bay Area makes a lot of household molds thrive, and I get sick as a dog there in any house more than a few years old.
And we just get more sun here in the southwest. If you have any vulnerability to SAD, that also makes a difference.
Posted by: Attila Girl at December 28, 2005 06:02 PM (zZMVu)
6
He's more affected by MAD.
Oh..Moonlight...I hear he covers the windows with tin foil, but what does the NYTs know?
Posted by: Darrell at December 29, 2005 08:50 PM (KDw0C)
25kb generated in CPU 0.0211, elapsed 0.1851 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1754 seconds, 463 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
209 queries taking 0.1754 seconds, 463 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
