May 12, 2007
Chicken for Dinner Tonight.
It seemed like the logical choice: after all, we're dieting. However, I haven't yet cleaned off the grill for use this year. Next weekend, I think.
So: salad, rice with orzo, and breast pieces sauteed for a few minutes, and then braised. I started with "light" olive oil. (Not light in calories—light in taste. I use this for a lot of my sauteeing, since it's healthy and doesn't have a huge effect on the final outcome, as normal olive oil would. If the oil truly must be neutral, of course, I stick with Canola oil.)
Then I added some Moroccan-style sauce from Trader Joe's, cut heavily with broth to make the dish slightly less spicy.
And then I added some slices of Florida mango, for added flavor and some extra vitamin C.
Super-easy. And yummy. I was experimenting and tasting a lot, but this meal with be ready in 35 minutes or so next time I make it.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
The Spirit Is Willing, But the Flesh is Resentful.
What if I told you there were a handful of individuals in whom I have trouble seeing the face of God?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
08:50 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd assume you were being honest, and I might share
that I have a similar difficulty.
The answer, of course, is to pray -- ask God to bless them.
I recall we are commanded to do so.
-Bob
Posted by: Bob at May 13, 2007 02:12 PM (aTv/9)
2
Yes. And I do it. But I don't do it often enough, and I don't enjoy it much . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 13, 2007 03:14 PM (2WBcM)
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 08:31 PM (7cB5r)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thank You, K!
No vitamin C shortage around
here!
One down; eight to go. Yum.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:19 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nice job on staggering out the ripeness, too: we seem to consume about one a day&maybe two a day toward the end of the cycle.
I shall have to find a cheaper outlet for local mangoes. I think one of the Mexican markets might be a good choice: their produce tends to be much less costly (especially when one doesn't care as much about external characteristics—e.g., for cut fruit and cooking purposes).
Probably my favorite fruit, though of course I'd hate to have to choose. And in the summer white freestone peaches tend to capture my imagination, as well.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 12, 2007 09:14 PM (2WBcM)
2
Oh, good! I always try to hit that ripeness balance, but of course, the mangoes have minds of their own, and decide for themselves in the end.
Pretty Lady used to eat mangoes when she lived in Mexico, and says they were very high-quality fruits. If you go for the taste rather than appearance - why I like my *ugly* mangoes - I'd guess that Mexican produce might be great stuff.
Well. Outside of the e. coli concern, too.
Posted by: k at May 13, 2007 12:55 AM (zBbuE)
3
Of course, "sold in a Mexican market" and "Mesican in origin" may mean slightly different things, unless we are discussing those papayas that are the size of small cars . . .
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 13, 2007 01:59 AM (2WBcM)
4
For a moment I thought this post was about oral sex.
Posted by: John at May 14, 2007 04:12 PM (S3FTS)
5
Both very wet experiences.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 14, 2007 09:13 PM (+8+0X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
By the Way . . .
this isn't me. It's the other Joy McCann.
Though Joy McCann's refusal to bow to her son's wishes in how she runs this foundation is absolutely inspiring to me (a non-lawyer, IANOL). Once I pass the age my mother is now, I won't just wear purple—I'll drive a purple freaking convertible.
Because . . . why not?
I am positive that my 96-year-old grandmother (my only surviving grandparent, and dad's mom . . . thanks for asking) has never read this poem, or heard of this society..
And yet, her life is suffused with lavendar, a color she didn't pursue when my grandfather was alive (he had been very partial to red).
If anyone knows where I can find a lavendar flag that can be mounted on her scooter, that would be awesome. Bonus points for a cross or a fish on the flag (I have a vision of it being a purple pennant, but I could be wrong about that).
Just no rainbows, please--or woman-identified-woman symbolism. I do not want to have to explain that to her.
Thanks.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:53 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is 4" x 6" acceptable? How about a plain lavender flag and a separate Christian flag with a white background and a red Cross on a blue field in the upper left corner? Made in Ameica by a little company in Danville California. And we can't see your visions, btw, at least not yet. It would be nice to put them down on paper and scan them--or see what Photoshop can do until we can.
I would have to know some more details before I decide who is right in that legal battle. I would like to see a list of the old charites and the new ones, for example. Don't you think Hugh Culverhouse Sr.'s wishes matter? Or the court's decision 10 years ago? What about that Daugherty character?
Posted by: Darrell at May 12, 2007 03:08 PM (3lHEJ)
2
Somehow the ones I've seen have been triangular. I saw an elderly lady scooting along in my little town the other day, and almost accosted her to ask where she'd gotten her little flag.
I think my grandmother would totally dig the dual-flag idea. And blue goes really well with lavendar. How about a link?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 12, 2007 09:09 PM (2WBcM)
3
More scooters! More scooters!
One day I'll really go to town on Scooter Accessories. I think the flag will be easier to find than the mounting assembly.
And that, actually, probably isn't hard to find either.
I have a cool rear-view mirror and a wondrous variety of cupholders to install. Somehow, something tells me this will be done by Walter rather than myself.
Posted by: k at May 13, 2007 12:50 AM (zBbuE)
4
http://www.colorfastflags.com/index.php?method=Detail&ItemsId=10227
http://www.colorfastflags.com/index.php?method=Detail&ItemsId=9288
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 07:23 AM (2a74D)
5
In my grandma's case it's a safety issue--she truly does zoom along, and when cars are parked on her street it's hard for her to be seen.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 13, 2007 11:42 AM (2WBcM)
6
One easy mount would be to go to a Dollar store and find something with rubber/vinyl suction cups on it. They all have some suction mount hooks and such. Look around. Use Gorilla glue or a silicon-based glue/caulk to place those where you need to. Glue the flag in place in the suction cup as well. A bonus would be a certain amount of give in case of accidental contact. Vinyl and silicone based rubbers for the suction cups will hold up better to UV rays if she spends a lot of time outdoors.
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 08:04 PM (7cB5r)
7
It occurred to me last night that you are looking for a marker/safety/whip flag on a six-foot, 1/4" or 5/16" high-strength fiberglass pole, not a little flag. The kind you might see on riding mowers along the Interstate, or ATVs or farm equipment. Sorry.
Try these--
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/safetyflags.html
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/specialtyflags.html
http://www.wheelerwhip.com/specialtyflags.html
Holders are available here too. Their spring holder is a bit pricey. . .I would probably adapt a spring car antenna from a discount auto parts store using one of their holders for the flag(integrate both).
You might find something like these at WalMart, btw. I don't know for sure.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2007 08:18 AM (S+FtZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 11, 2007
Look. I Know Everyone Is Going to Get Mad at Me.
But how much time does
Chris Muir spend looking at women's bodies?
Chris, my man—I meant that in the good way.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:26 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Same as any man. All the time.
Posted by: Chris Muir at May 12, 2007 05:38 AM (+CRDT)
2
I'm not sure how much he looks at them, but he sure
draws them in a delicious way.
I mean,
look at that backside!
Posted by: John at May 12, 2007 02:45 PM (L/IjW)
3
I think what impresses me is the economy of line. It takes him very little virtual ink to convey the essentials of the human form.
Men, too, BTW: he really distills the human body in a lovely way.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 12, 2007 09:35 PM (2WBcM)
4
When I don't get Chris' jokes I still have something nice to look at.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at May 14, 2007 09:08 PM (8lL1c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Canned Black Olives Are Vile.
But if one substituted good green olives, spiked with a few Greek-style black ones, you'd definitely
have something, here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
May 09, 2007
Support H.R. 2060; Save Internet Radio.
For those of you who are new to the issue, there's a nice background piece by Michael Minn
here:
In 2005, the digital royalty was 0.07 cents per song streamed (per listener) and small webcasters were able to calculate royalties as a percentage of revenue rather than on a per-song basis. This made it possible for small, often niche, webcasters with limited revenue streams to be financially viable, although most webcasters did it for love rather than money and usually lost modest amounts of money on their webcasting ventures. A typical small Live365 webcaster paid around $600 per year in digital royalties.
On March 2, 2007 the Library of Congress' Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which oversees royalty rates, got rid of the revenue-based royalty provision, mandated a minimum royalty of $500 per channel per year, and established a higher royalty rate that will increase to 0.19 cents per song streamed per listener in 2010. For a webcaster that broadcasts 15 songs an hour to 500 listeners, that will increase the royalty to over $72,000 a year in 2010. For the six largest Internet-only broadcasters (who are financially marginal, at best), the royalty increase will represent over 50% of their total income. Pandora.com's founder, Tim Westergren, told Newsweek, "If this stays, we're done. Back to the stone age again." My favorite station, JazzPlayerRadio, has already left the web because the new rates will be applied retroactively to the first of the year.
Lest you think that some stations could survive by webcasting music from independent labels and producers, the RIAA has secured legal authority to administer a compulsory license that covers ALL recorded music. This means SoundExchange can force a royalty payment for ALL webcast music, with the provision that an independent label or artist can then join SoundExchange (for a significant fee) and get the money that was extracted on their behalf.
And for you NPR fans, this affects you. NPR is spearheading the effort against the new royalty because they have a significant number of listeners via the web. The new rules would be an accounting nightmare for them because only a portion of their programming is commercial music, but figuring out who is listening when a Justin Timberlake bumper plays on All Things Considered is really hard. For more details on NPR's role in this, see this article on NPR's initial appeal of the royalty increase.
From Mary McCann, Radio IO's The Bone Mama (as well as my sister-in-law, and felow PT Cruiser owner) come these ideas for nullifying the Copyright Royalty Board's decision:
An Easy "How-To Guide" for Making that Fateful Phone Call:
On March 2nd the Copyright Royalty Board set the rates that internet radio must pay for the years 2006-2010. My company and similar-sized operations will go from paying 11% of our revenues to 294% of our revenues, which means we will be upside-down unless HR 2060 passes. The first payment is due on July 17th, so immediate attention is desperately needed!
This is a death match for the beautiful medium of internet radio. The issue is access to the net and audiences for artists—not to mention my access to rice and beans. I'm asking you to make a phone call. It really makes a difference!
We have 51 sponsors today; there were only seven 10 days ago, before we went to Washington, D.C. One rep from Arizona is on board, and thatÂ’s all from that state. There are a handful from California, including the representative for Marin County, and we have a good early showing from Illinois. The bill is bipartisan: it was started by a guy in Washington state, Rep. Jay Inslee. You can look here to see whoÂ’s on board.
Call your Representative's office in Washington, D.C.—or call your local office in the case of your own representative. Ask to speak to the staffer who handles copyright or Internet issues. (If you enter your zip code at http://www.congress.org, theyÂ’ll give you your reps name and numbers.) They are used to people who don't call them for a living, and they're very easy to speak with. On the other hand, we have word that certain senators with ties to big record labels are blocking the IP of our coalition site. This is one of the reasons that e-mail is not a good option for working on this issue.
Here are some of the coalition's script ideas. Mix it up, but the main goal is to ask the reps for co-sponsorship. You really will be saving Internet radio—and my job in this baby industry.
1) "I am a constituent, and IÂ’m calling to ask Congressman/woman ________ to save Internet radio by co-sponsoring H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act."
2) "The Copyright Royalty Board's decison to increase royalty rates for webcasters is going to turn off my internet radio, and I do not want that to happen. Please ask Congressman/woman ________ to co-sponsor H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act."
3) "I believe artists should be compensated fairly for the music they make, but putting my webcasters out of business will only hurt artists more. They depend on Internet radio to get their music out to fans and build new audiences. When the webcasters go off the air, so do artists. Please co-sponsor H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act."
4) "Internet radio is one of the only bright spots of diversity for independent music. We need internet radio. DonÂ’t turn it off. Co-sponsor H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act."
5) [If you are an artist] "Internet radio enables artists like me to reach fans throughout the country and the world, and enjoy exposure and airplay that we might not receive otherwise. I'm asking you to co-sponsor H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act."
Or my least favorite: 6) "My friend Mary McCann will be out of a job unless H.R. 2060 passes, and then she won't be able turn me on to fabulous artists any more. I mean, where else can a person with the handle of The Bone Mama get a job? As a geisha?"
One of the artists who lobbied with us on the Hill, SONiA, had her manager run the numbers for promoting her next tour, should H.R. 2060 fail to pass. Without the support of Internet radio those costs would go up 600%.
Broadcast radio does not even pay this copyright fee. They are exempt; satellite radioÂ’s rate has been locked in at 7.5% of their revenue for this same time period. We arenÂ’t even asking for broadcast radioÂ’s rate, but simply parity with satellite radio—hence, the name: the Internet Radio Equality Act.
Thank you, from the bottom of my heart.
She is from Illinois, and our family members live mostly in the Upper Midwest and on the West Coast—that's why she focuses on Western States and Illinois in this guide. But the problem is national in scope—and, by implication, international, given the leadership role the U.S. has in internet development, and the fact that internet radio transcends national boundaries.
It is hard to see this as more than a naked power grab from those in broadcast radio who want to retain their monopoly. Please don't let them get away with it: support H.R. 2060. And hurry: this may come up for vote in the next few days.
More here.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
03:25 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1229 words, total size 8 kb.
1
This power grab thing is absolutely disgusting.
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 02:29 AM (zBbuE)
2
(1)How does this royalty scheme compare with the royalties paid for over-the-air transmission?
(2) "RIAA has secured legal authority to administer a compulsory license that covers ALL recorded music"...if this means what it sounds like it means, then it is absolutely unjustifiable and represents, in effect, a government-authorized antitrust violation.
Posted by: david foster at May 11, 2007 01:58 PM (T13v4)
3
Of course, Ayn Rand always maintained that all trusts were set up by the government (e.g., most railroads).
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2007 10:10 PM (2WBcM)
4
Actually it's not a power grab by broadcast radio at all. This is bad for broadcasters and webcasters alike, because many broadcasters are webcasters too. In reality the RIAA wants to kill streaming radio.
I work for a broadcast group in Seattle with 5 stations and we're hoping this bill passes. If it doesn't, we'll have to stop webcasting.
Posted by: Chris M at May 12, 2007 10:04 PM (kxtiO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bad Carpentry vs. Bad Masonry.
My mom needs a little deck or patio in her yard. Since her budget for this is pretty close to zero, I'm trying to figure out whether it would be easier/cheaper to build a little wooden platform there (something sturdy enough to last a few years), or simply level it out and use brick/sand to make a patio in between the "dog runs" and people paths.
Thoughts?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:57 PM
| Comments (26)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
easier? last longer? definitely brick and sand. Probably a tad more expensive, though.
You just level out the dirt, place the bricks (spaced, of course) and pour the sand on top. Then you spread the sand into the spaces with a broom. keep adding sand until the spaces are full of packed sand.
Pretty straightforward, and no measuring or cutting to goof up.
Posted by: caltechgirl at May 09, 2007 03:27 PM (r0kgl)
2
Go to a few good home centers and look at the choices for pavers and concrete paving blocks. Look for something that stands up to abuse--'accidentally' drop one from a decent height on some others. With the range of choices available, you can create a masterpiece jigsaw puzzle that would amaze everyone (with your copy editing/graphic design superpowers). Caltechgirl's advice is right on the money, but remember you'll need a good bed of sand (at least 1-2 inches, compacted), so you may have to remove a little topsoil. Use a couple 8' PVC schedule 40 pipes, 1" or 11/2")and lay them on a layer of sand and use them to screed off a consistent thickness of sand with a long, straight board and two people. Slide the pipes back and gently fill in the void with sand from an empty coffee can and level off. Start placing brick/pavers and continue until you are done. Avoid cutting by dry fitting your design first. Make it as big as you like with no cuts. A pro would use a gas compactor with that sand afterward but you can just keep doing it and walking on it until the joints don't accept any more sand.
Posted by: Darrell at May 09, 2007 08:10 PM (fZnAt)
3
Okay--so the piping is there to compress/level the sand? Like a rolling pin would do to a pie crust? (Without the spreading effect that pie dough produces, presumably?)
One more question: If I have to start (and maybe even finish) this project without my male cousins or part-time brother around, can two strong women do what's necessary? (If necessary, I can recruit A the H, but his deadlines are NASTY these days.)
And do I need to dampen the ground before I level it off? I guess that would help.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 09:53 PM (2WBcM)
4
Oh, yes, and--what kind of sand do I need for this?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 10:02 PM (2WBcM)
5
Well, you KNOW which one I'd opt for.
And past experience shows that one woman all alone - even a crip - can do this just fine.
Slower, perhaps. But doable. I use some great one-person shortcuts.
Yes, sand. (More on sand below.) Your local building code folks may have opinions on this, about what kind of sand is required. Also, whether you are supposed to file a permit first is their call. Should they insist, then whether or not you decide to comply is
your call. In my little town folks swing both ways. The permit fee here is usually $50.
The sand
under the bricks should be compacted too. First you level it (scree), but that doesn't have to be elaborate. Me, I first just sort of spread it around by shovel, eyeballing it for level.
Then - and this is important - compact it. Rather than rent a power compactor, I use water, and, like Darrell said, simply walk on it. Works great.
Water compacting is a very old, recently scorned, but very effective means. I use it all the time. I like to run the hose on the sand, then walk around on it in a squarish spiral, back and forth, until it's really solid. You can feel when it's ready with your feet. (The cats used to greatly enjoy this exercise, BTW. Often more as spectators than participants, since they didn't like to get their little paws sandy, unlike their mama.)
Now: When done walking, I water it again. When the water pools in a level manner? Then I know it's level, and ready to lay the brick. No fussing around with a long mason's level, unless you love to for its own sake (moi?!?).
If there are lower spots in the sand, the water will gather there to tell me so. I add a little sand, walk on it, water it. This saves me costs in not using 2x4's or pipes to scree it first, and effort and manpower. It's a good way to work alone. Then, because it's tested for how level it is
after the sand is compacted, it's really a more sturdy sand bed in the end. Better product, easier, faster, cheaper. What's not to like?
D's thoughts on patterns are also great fun. He's absolutely correct about the variety you can create with today's pavers and such.
Patterns are an old, old art. With brick you can also make patterns, of course; and these patterns, *bonds,* are often traditional and have names (running bond, herringbone, basket weave). My paths are running bond and one slave path; my driveway is a staggered modified basket weave; my front patio is herringbone.
Now: A few years ago, in my interest in developing ever new brick bonds, I meandered my way into thoughts that came to always remind me of you. Dig this: Quilting.
Quilting patterns arise from the fact that most cloth scraps are linear-based, right? Squarish. Think *Log Cabin.* Someday I'll be making decorative mosaic brick or tile patterns based on quilting patterns.
So even though modern pavers come in more interesting shapes than just rectangles, that doesn't mean you can't make cool patterns with bricks.
Me, being something of a stick-in-the-mud on this, I like my St. Joe Brick, purchased straight from the brickyard in Slidell, Louisiana, hauled home in our own truck. Of course, this is not always an option for everyone.
But if you are enamored of real brick, the kind made of clay and fired - as opposed to the concrete pavers - you'll likely pay a little more up front, but increase the value of your home improvement job enormously. My brick driveway added at least $10,000 - $20,000 in value to the house, far more than concrete pavers would, and actually cost less than pavers to construct. If you shop around, watch ads and such, used Chicago or St. Louis etc. brick can still be had for less than concrete pavers. And they are beautiful. Just gorgeous. It's, it's Nordstrom's vs. Sears. Pavers are perfectly okay, but brick is elegant.
When you place the bricks, after you've laid them out and are satisfied with the placement, whack them into the sand with a hammer or mini sledgehammer (*maul*). It really makes a difference. Even though this is still *dry paving* - meaning, you're not using mortar - to set the bricks firmly into the sand will help them hold their place for years longer.
When you put the top sand on? I use the hose again. I carelessly toss a lot of top sand on, spread it sloppy with a broom or shovel, hose it into the cracks, add more sand, etc. till done. Much less work than using just a broom, and in the end? In my experience, it's a far better product. The water gets the sand tight in between the bricks like nobody's business. You will be amazed how much top sand those bricks will eat.
Many people discover this fact only after the first rain they get after they broomed the sand in. They'll sometimes tell me the top sand *washed away.* Wrong, It simply washed into the little air spaces between the bricks that they didn't completely fill the first time around because they didn't use water.
Really, any kind of construction sand works. Your local Home Depot type place sells different grades (meaning size, and sometimes type, of the sand grains) by the bag. Or, you can get a cheaper small truckload from a construction supply place; some will deliver for cheap, some not; most let you pick up a load in a rented or personal pickup truck. Bulk buying can save a lot of cost.
Again, your local building code folks may have some firm opinions on what kind of sand is *supposed* to go there. Me, I like to use our local *sugar sand,* which I just dig up in the yard and wash in the wheelbarrow until the loam is gone and there's nothing but pure white sand left.
The local building code folks tell me this is WRONG WRONG WRONG and sugar sand can never work well as the underlay OR the top sand because it's WAY TOO FINE GRAINED!!!
and of course, as I meander all over my paths and patios all built using sugar sand - and the driveway, done Their Way - I have comparative proof positive they're full of it. But hey. Facts never changed government's mind before. Why should today be any different?
Have fun!
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 02:19 AM (zBbuE)
6
Depends on who is doing the labor: if you have someone else to do this, definitely go with sand and masonry.
If YOU are doing it, keep in mind that all of that sand and masonry material weighs a TON (literally, or MORE), and involves a lot of digging and moving this heavy, heavy material around. "K's" info above is very useful, with the minor exception that there is absolutely NO shortcut in dealing with the weight of all of the material it will take to get a good solid finished project (other than getting someone esle to deal with it).
If it were ME doing it, treated lumber will last quite a while, and is much less involved, takes much less exertion, costs are similar or less than the masonry option, in addition to looking a bit more professional when finished (my opinion only). Some minor rough carpentry skills are required, along with a circular saw, a level, some deck screws and an electric hand drill. Do really do a bang up job, you might want to pour concrete footers at the base of the steps, but then again maybe you can get by with a few pavers as the base.
Have fun.
Posted by: Dr. Steech at May 10, 2007 07:24 AM (+CTlT)
7
The PVC pipes insure a consistent depth of the sand...and when you run the straight board(your screed--I use a 2x6, if handy) over the two pipes(think rails, as in railroad)you have a level surface. If you are still unclear, think the pipes run north and south, and your straightedge moving east and west). Use builder's sand--available at any home center in bags, or have delivered from a landscape center by truck. You can check your local classifieds for used brick and pavers(pavers are thicker, fired longer, and carry heavier loads. I agree with k about using water to compact the sand in the joints. I would have mentioned it after you decided to go ahead with this project. I would add, use the retaining strips they sell at home centers around the perimeter of your finished patio, and stake them in with the aluminum stakes they sell there too. It keeps the outer pavers from moving...and once those move, the whole patio can start pulling apart. A patio made of pavers is a good job for the 4th of July weekend. Have everything ready to go, and invite friends and family over to provide the labor--cart and pass the brick. You can set the bricks, placing each one straight down-sliding it against the adjacent brick avoiding disturbing your sand base. You'll knock it out in one day---assuming you don't start serving the beer until after it's done. You can go modular with this project, if you like. Finish a small design that satisfies her needs, then expand it when you are in the mood. Lay out the whole design first, of course and anticipate problems with the grade for the future sections.
If you go with wood and a basic design that is in contact with the soil, use pressure-treated wood for the part that touches the ground.
Normal brick is not designed for horizontal use where water can remain in contact. Only a very thin layer of the outside of a brick is fired hard. If you scrape (damage) that outside skin, you'll find that the interior is quite soft. That's why ordinary brick can't be used in areas like Chicago that experience freeze-thaw cycles. SF/Cali??? That's another matter. Pavers are designed for horizontal applications. They are fired for a much longer time and the hard layer is very thick.
Posted by: Darrell at May 10, 2007 09:14 AM (Zv+eQ)
8
It turns out the mom has a pile of used bricks she forgot to mention, in the garage. I'll have to find out the origin of 'em, but it's tempting just to try them out on a cost basis.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 10, 2007 09:39 AM (2WBcM)
9
Finding a load of used brick in the garage of the house in question is a Sign!
IMHO.
I wouldn't worry too much about their origin, myself. It's not like you'll be driving cars on it, right?
I'm perhaps a bit more casual about the brick specs than some folks are. But I really do have good reason. Here's how my St. Joe Brick has performed in real life.
-First, this is *colonial wood mould face brick,* meaning currently it's not considered standard construction-grade brick - although it was, and very much so, in the past.
-It's not glazed; just ordinary uncoated clay brick. The whole brick is permeable to water, and when you dunk a dry brick in a tub, it'll bubble for 10 minutes soaking up water like a sponge. Rather than being a detriment, this is actually a big plus in a hot area: they are *air conditioner* bricks, that cool the whole house down by evaporation.
-St. Joe Brick is handmade by a bunch of semi-literate old black guys, filling a mix of sand and clay into wooden moulds, then drying and firing the brick. I've met most of them personally. They do use some big antique mixing machines and such, so it's not ALL done by hand. The kiln where they're fired is an ancient and beautiful *beehive* kiln made of *fire brick.*
-The resulting bricks are speckled with melted iron pyrite and other minerals, and have some cracks and things too. They're not hard to cut by hand, for me anyway; I cut them by hand faster than my neighbor does his with a machine.
-While they're not hardened the same way *pavers* are, they're at full thickness. Pavers are generally *split,* meaning they're only around half as thick as a brick. So while there are gains in strength with specifically made pavers, there's also some loss.
Now: All the above facts make modern paver people scorn the heck out of my brick. They'll allow that St. Joe might work on *decorative paths* - IOW where no one would actually walk, so it wouldn't have to bear any weight. But on a real sidewalk?
Or - heaven forbid! - a
driveway? Like, where cars drive and park?
After I finished the driveway, it was perfectly fine for a couple years holding car and light to medium truck traffic. Then came Hurricane Wilma. Not only were other people's asphalt and paver driveways disrupted by the actions of toppling trees and tree roots pulling up, just the flooding and windstorm damage messed up a lot of people's drives. Piles of upended and broken pavers were scattered everywhere.
We, of course, had the famous Two Trees on the House incident, and so forth.
Walter brought the big rig home. He used it to hoist the 25' queen palm back up. He left the rig on the drive for a couple weeks so we could use the engine batteries to power the house via a converter.
This all means, that very heavy truck not only parked on my dry-paved St. Joe Brick driveway, it drove all over it, manoeuvring around to pull up the queen palm.
Not one brick was dislodged. Not one brick was even cracked.
So, IMO? Whatever strength brick you use for that back patio, with the type of traffic the patio needs to hold, will probably be just fine.
Posted by: k at May 11, 2007 06:04 AM (zBbuE)
10
I guess you've never seen a spalling brick, k. When moisture enters a brick and freezes, the face splits off, and the brick eventually crumbles away over time. Those of us who live in areas where the temperatures dip well below freezing know it well. Even in warmer climes, there still is a problem with stratification fatigue caused by wetting/drying cycles. The mechanism for this is that moisture absorbs into the brick during a "damp" cycle, and the brick expands due to the moisture to a finite depth. The brick with no moisture or little moisture at greater depth, expands less. Then the brick dries out (dry cycle)and shrinks to some depth, while the "steady-state" (inner)portion of the brick stays the same. At this interface of wet-dry cycling, the brick fatigues and eventually spalls. The durability of brick results from incipient fusion and partial vitrification during firing. Since compressive strength and absorption are also related to the firing temperatures, these properties, together with saturation coefficients, are taken as predictors of durability. However, because of differences in raw materials, a single value of compressive strength or absorption will not reliably indicate the degree of firing.
And Chicago "penny" pavers are 11 1/2" x 4", btw, never split. Pick one up and you'll notice the density right away. It's definitely a "two-hander".
You are right that it probably won't matter much. Whatever brick is used, you'll get 10, probably even twenty years of service out of the project... I like to shoot for the ages myself. I take pleasure in knowing that I will someday annoy someone generations into the future when they dismantle my work.
Posted by: Darrell at May 11, 2007 09:29 AM (JDSeE)
11
Don't let me interrupt the argument, but I was just told that the bricks in question are from the patio off of my old bedroom--the one we moved into in the 1970s. They used fresh bricks when they rebuilt it a few years back. These are the old bricks; I'm sure they'd do just fine.
Though I must figure out how to cut 'em, and what to use as an edge.
i moved the doghouse off of the area in question yestarday, and it's nice. Though the paths could use some attention; I might just throw some pea gravel on 'em for now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2007 10:47 AM (2WBcM)
12
Try to lay out a pattern that doesn't require cutting, first. I would go to a discount tool store and get a 4 1/2" angle grinder and a masonry grinding wheel. You should pay under $30. Draw a line on the brick with pencil, lightly score(following the line), then repeat light passes until your cut is over an inch deep. Place cut line over an edge and tap with a mallet. Snap! You can score the line with a chisel and hammer, and repeat until you get to the critical depth. But that is a lot more work and a lot more problematic.
Posted by: Darrell at May 11, 2007 11:37 AM (C99Ct)
13
For some reason I keep fantasizing about a round patio, but I do know that would be cutting city. The alternative would be to transform the edges into little herb planters . . . impractical, right?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2007 12:10 PM (2WBcM)
14
Have you looked at those gazabo kits? they are all over places like Home Depot and such.
Posted by: Bloggermouth at May 11, 2007 04:32 PM (QYSnd)
15
For a truly circular pattern, every block has to be cut (angled). They sell pre-fab kits in paver brick for these designs. The pavers themselves are angled t provide a uniform joint(gap). You can't have wide gaps filled with sand in a do-it-yourself design. It wouldn't hold up and just think what would happen if your stiletto heel got caught in one of those spaces. The angle grinder will give you good clean cuts, even if you aren't experienced with power tools. It's a lot safer than a circular saw with a diamond or masonry blade too. I would buy some thinner cutoff wheels they sell at Home Depot. They fit angle grinders...you'll find them near the pneumatic tools in cardboard bins. Pep Boys has inexpensive grinders. They're good enough to hold up for several jobs like this. They might sell the cut-of wheels as well.(??)
Take your X-acto knife and make a template out of thin cardboard to work out your design on paper.You'll see what cuts you'll need--and any gaps.
Making planters in the edge is a great idea! Better still because all you have to do is leave some bricks out! I did something like that once using the standard sizes for planters at the nursery. I could just pop a new plant in the space to change things out. Incorporate a drip irrigation system and you'll have a winner!
Posted by: Darrell at May 11, 2007 08:00 PM (IxV2v)
16
*sigh*
Darrell.
Of course I've seen what can happen to brick in freezing temps.
I'm from Chicago.
Part of my point was that LMA is not.
Neither is she building the Dan Ryan expressway.
I know that my own brick work in Louisiana, and here for a shorter period so far, has stood the test of time, and it looks like it will continue to do so.
When I say these things I mean no personal disrespect to you. I myself truly have no interest in arguing. While I know many people do enjoy it, it satisfies nothing in me. I'd far prefer to send you a box of mangoes instead.
In the time I have left here on earth, I like to enjoy my own work, and like to see others do the same. I don't look at building backyard foot-traffic patios in the same light as a driveway or a building. I like to see people do something they haven't done before, and I'm fond of brick, and I know LMA enjoyed the work she did a while back on construction.
So my point was that a person can do a good quality job on a first time attempt without being too intimidated by the engineering details. Especially in an area that doesn't experience freezes. That's all.
Posted by: k at May 11, 2007 09:43 PM (zBbuE)
17
Oooh. I knew that one was coming.
Come on, K--you know how guys are about over-engineering stuff.
My own goals are modest, however: I'm hoping she'll get some use out of this over the summer, because (being my mom) by next summer she will have staked out another sitting area in her yard that is EVEN MORE PERFECT!
Got the mangoes. Ate one. Yummy! See separate post.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2007 10:19 PM (2WBcM)
18
Ever read the words "you can't do it" in any of my comments? My philosophy is always "I do it, so can you!". You can add "I can help" for people I like, as well.
And didn't I posit a plausible mechanism for product failure in climates where freeze/thaw cycles are not a factor, like SoCal?
Is selecting a product designed and engineered for a specific application over-engineering? Especially considering that when this thread started there was no secret stash of bricks in the garage. I am never one to suggest that anything you have on hand go to waste. And I have not suggested buying anything since. Except the angle grinder for safe cutting, of course.
Engineers sweat the details so you don't have to. That's why we go to bed thinking about point loads on that patio surface. Why we think about 125-pound women wearing high heels and that 1/4" point of contact that will generate 2000 psi of force. How an even smaller edge on metal patio furniture when someone is leaning in the chair can generate loads exceeding 8000 psi--enough force to pulverize concrete! We think about our dreams of one day establishing our homes as sanctuaries for all those 0-size models persecuted and driven from their jobs in Europe...and imagine those point loads on our patios! And those legs! It's not easy!
Posted by: Darrell at May 12, 2007 02:28 PM (3lHEJ)
19
On the other hand, a little bit of spalling here and there, and the occasional cracked brick make for a bit of character in a wall or patio.
My back yard is full of brickwork done by the previous owner using salvaged brick. It doesn't look terribly professional. Some of the bricks are spalling. But I wouldn't trade any of it for professionally installed, "properly engineered" walls and planters. It has character. Same with the bathroom which was tiled with salvaged tile taken off the old courthouse building during a renovation a couple decades ago. "Naive art" is what I think some people call it.
If YOU are doing it, keep in mind that all of that sand and masonry material weighs a TON (literally, or MORE), and involves a lot of digging and moving this heavy, heavy material around.
Darrel, you are always going to get in hot water implying that all this brick and sand is too much for the little ladies to handle, especially when they've already proven otherwise.
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 12, 2007 07:59 PM (ogl5V)
20
I'm not really worried about that part: both the mom and I are reasonably strong, and we have access to handcarts. I have noticed that I like to buy stuff like gravel and sand in small bags, when feasible, but there is
always a way.
D, I don't suppose it will make any difference to point out that I it's unlikely I'll ever wear heels in my mom's backyard? Didn't think so.
Of course, to be fair, there are a lot of very big people in my family—we tend to run either short and squat (except me), or reasonably tall. Most of my relatives pack a lot of weight, one way or another.
I'm thinking 9 x 10, right now. That'll work for a first foray into masonry.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 12, 2007 09:44 PM (2WBcM)
21
Can't anyone read. I supported the brick patrio idea from the very beginning. First sentence:"Go to a few good home centers and look at the choices for pavers and concrete paving blocks."
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 07:06 AM (2a74D)
22
No, no--you're being great. But there's a school of thought out there that you're over-cautious WRT brick.
I, however, like to have as much information available as possible, so I welcome everyone's input.
This is going to be terribly exciting, if I pull it off!
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 13, 2007 11:49 AM (2WBcM)
23
I was thinking about this: "Darrel, you are always going to get in hot water implying that all this brick and sand is too much for the little ladies to handle, especially when they've already proven otherwise.--Desert Cat"
Never said it. Never will.
I just don't think spalling is beautiful. Or bricks are found in nature. Or that I must buy bricks from Gaia-worshippers with Pica who crap them out in sacred hand-carved wooden forms and dry them in solar ovens.
If I wanted spalling, I'd take my 12-gauge and do it myself with teflon-coated double-ought hand-loaded shells. . .
But none of that applies to you. I'd use what I have. If it wasn't enough, I'd buy something that would go with what I had, and work it into the design. I'd eliminate cuts unless I totally needed to add curves for the site/grade. If I had hundreds of cuts to make, I would rent a wet cut tile saw with a sliding bed/stationary diamond blade(with a big enough blade to do the cut). If I had only a few cuts to make, I would use the angle grinder and buy it. When done, I would use polymeric sand from the home center for joint locking(Home Depot , et al), weed control and to prevent insect mining.
Be it big or be it small,
do it right
or not at all.
Burke's Law
Posted by: Darrell at May 13, 2007 08:29 PM (7cB5r)
24
"Right" is a matter of what you're after.
Sandblasting would probably produce a nicer weathered appearance, although I've considered (but never tried yet) putting bricks together with a sand slurry in a cement mixer to soften the edges and give the appearance of weathering. There's nothing I hate worse than the angular, glazed appearance of brand new brick in a well-established garden.
I *have* seen instructions on how to get moss/algae started growing quickly on new brick to give an established appearance however. Moss+yogurt in a blender, thinned to a slurry and then sprayed on. Haven't tried that yet either.
Posted by: Desert Cat at May 13, 2007 09:52 PM (ogl5V)
25
There's a reason some people become engineers, and some become artists.
Conversation is an art too. Some folks can discuss things cordially even when their opinions or tastes differ. Others become outraged and stomp about implying the other folks can't do a worthwhile job, and are stupid new-agers to boot. It's often seemed to me that a reaction like that is what truly separates the men from the boys.
Darrell, the funny thing is, since you don't have a blog of your own, I really did come by to say *Hi* and see if you might like a box of mangoes. I'm sending a box around to everyone who helped out with the scooter fund, to say *Thanks for doing such a nice thing.*
But it looks like I must have dialed a wrong number. Sorry.
Posted by: k at May 14, 2007 01:44 AM (zBbuE)
26
I agree that written conversation is an art. And a big part of that is not mispresenting what the other person is saying. Go back and re-read my comments and see if your words apply. Or if I was being mean. I was just giving tips I picked up over the years from doing many such projects. Like using pipes and a screed to insure a consistent bed sand level for the base--something I know you can never eyeball. Sample a few dozen points in an eyeball job with a steel rule, and you'll see what I mean. And you find different grades of sand specific to the individual uses--base, quick leveling, interlocking--at the home centers, too. Tips and tricks of the trades. Copy and paste where I say that anyone's ideas are worthless. You'll find that the comment box is blank. Ditto with mean remarks with your name attached, k. Just conversation. I guess not everyone can handle it. We agree/we disagree--conversation.
Your welcome, k! No other thanks necessary.
And you'll find a whole range of tumbled/distressed pavers and stones at the home center, btw. Edge-softening is something the manufacturers picked up on, too. Go figure.
Posted by: Darrell at May 14, 2007 08:49 AM (S+FtZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Increasing the "Yum" Factor
My former boss, Drew Hardin, wrote a nice little
roundup some years back on the ways people were tricking out their PT Cruisers. The lead for the piece is very cute:
Whether you love it or it leaves you cold, ChryslerÂ’s PT Cruiser is an unmitigated hit. People are still standing in line to buy this little car (van? mini-SUV? whatever...), even a year and a half after its introduction.
That delicate little dance leaves one unsure about Drew's true feelings regarding the Cruiser: either he disliked it intensely, or he secretly thought it was great, but didn't want to appear uncool to his automotive-jock friends.
I've always recognized that I'm not really like Iowahawk: I don't have the money or the time to put into collecting old cars or modifying/restoring them. But I love the fact that some people out there are doing it, and I love the fact that it filters down to my level, to the point that an ordinary chick like me can own and drive a piece of pop art.
And if my books do end up selling as much as my husband tells me they will, I'll probably get a few extra sets of wheels. Maybe even something nice enough to leave to Mr. P's Museum when I die.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
So, What Does This Mean?
It means an orange glow beyond the horizon as my constant companion, driving up through Chevy Chase canyon just after midnight.
It means devastation around the Hollywood sign, and the peak—Mt. Hollywood—from which one can see it best. It means farewell to countless movie sets, and the site of several early dates between my husband and me, back in the days when we assumed we'd grow out of this madness.
It means that there is soot in the air, and there are weird noises around the house—from hyperacive insects, and from the particles in the air as they begin to settle.
It means that the venue wherein I saw the Bangles in the 80s is now a staging area for LAFD.
How strange. I'm lookin' for the good in this, but it isn't visible yet.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:38 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 02:31 AM (zBbuE)
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 10, 2007 09:42 AM (2WBcM)
3
Whups!
YOUR fire is visible here from TV. Actually, the hundreds of square miles on fire in FL right now are also only visible from TV, for me. Thank heaven.
The fires are so huge and so bad, including an enormous one on the FL/GA border that's eating up my beloved Okeefenokee Swamp, that the air is full of haze and grit and the sunsets spectacular. The new TS off the east coast pushed huge patches of smoke all the way from the Panhandle to S. FL.
They ordered us inside for a few days - the very young very old infirm and COPD types.
Today the air is a little clearer and I feel a little better, breathing wise.
It's really terrible. We're watching yours and ours, both.
Posted by: k at May 10, 2007 04:19 PM (zBbuE)
4
Though we live in a crucible of fire, seeing our beloved Griffith Park in flames shakes many of us to the core.
We hope you'll join us in supporting the long-term restoration and rejuvenation of this municipal jewel.
Respectfully Yours in Safety and Service,
Brian Humphrey
Firefighter/Specialist
Public Service Officer
Los Angeles Fire Department
LAFD Home Page:
www.lafd.org
LAFD News Blog:
lafd.blogspot.com
Posted by: Brian Humphrey at May 17, 2007 10:35 AM (nR0mD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What If You Had To Choose Between Food and Sex?
Or between food, sex and work. Or between food, sex, work and clean clothes every morning.
Or this: food, sex, work, clean clothes, or potable water?
And there's always: food, sex, work, clean clothes, potable water, or my bitchin' faux surfwagon.
The advanced course: food, sex, work, clean clothes, potable water, my bitchin' faux surfwagon, or a meaningful relationship with a Higher Power. (This is, of course, a trick question: your Higher Power wants you to have lots of goodies. Though perhaps not all at once.)
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What? Nancy Pelosi making you feel like you have to choose again? Don't send your money to Washington and make your own choices. . .
Btw...Work? Clean clothes? I would give those as much consideration as I would a ringing telephone.
Posted by: Darrell at May 09, 2007 11:42 AM (C99Ct)
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 12:56 PM (2WBcM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'm Still Living that Roger Taylor Lifestyle.
And it's unlikely to stop anytime soon.
Just in love with that car. And with that 2.4.
Much better than the 1.9 in my Saturn SL2, which could at least climb hills at a steady, reasonable pace.
Fairly close, actually, to Attila the Hub's V6 in an engine that—stock—was 2.2, but became gosh-knows-what when they put the extra
cylinders in it. [Would a real car person step in, please, and spare me from further embarrassment?]
I like the fact that I ride high in this trucklet, and yet while I'm cruizin' along the car looks up at me with puppy-dog eyes and says, "faster, please." I pat it on the dashboard, and then look up to discover that I'm doing 80 without even thinking about it.
Naturally, at that point I say "heavens to Betsy," and slow down . . . if I'm in the mood, or if there are CHP cars malingering on that stretch of freeway.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:25 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The 2000-2005 Saturn L-Series offered a dohc, 24 valve V6 (3.0L)/183(cu.in.) engine that produced 182 hp and 190 pound-feet of torque(@5600 rpm). The curb weight of the sedan was 2910 lbs.
Posted by: Darrell at May 09, 2007 08:37 AM (p9fyC)
2
2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser--
Base:dohc I4 2.4L /148(cu.in), 150hp, 162ft.lb torque.
Turbocharged dohc I4 2.4L /148(cu.in.) 220hp, 245ft.lb torque.
Posted by: Darrell at May 09, 2007 08:51 AM (p9fyC)
3
But mine isn't the turbo. I mean, it would say it was if it were. And it would be on the bill of sale if it were a turbo. I think.
So why do I feel that it's every bit as powerful as the husband's LS? Does it have to do with that distinction of which engines are "peaky" and which are not?
Very mysterious. I swear, I'm almost willing to learn the physics of engines to explain it.
I wonder whether it's the fact that it's so high off the gound, which leads my mind to overcompensate for this vs. the low-riding Saturn.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 01:03 PM (2WBcM)
4
No "2.4 Turbo" on the tach faceplate? You'll find the turbo connected to the exhaust manifold(the place below the spark plugs where the exhaust gases leave the engine on the way to the catalytic converter and the muffler), which should be visible with the hood open. It'll look something like a half of a 2 pound coffee can. See it?
You are not imagining things. There is speed, and there is the perception of speed. Sometimes it's as simple as there being less noise insulation in a car. Weight is not a factor because the two cars are pretty close there. Whatever it is, enjoy it! You have it and that's all that matters. Be happy!
Posted by: Darrell at May 09, 2007 07:59 PM (fZnAt)
5
Nothing on the tachometer.I think I'm just a naive kid from a small town, who's impressed with all this "acceleration" business.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 10:35 PM (2WBcM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 08, 2007
Something About Fred.
Via
Caltech Girl, there's a remarkable unedited
video of a Fred Thompson interview over at Breitbart's place; the man has presence.
I'm pretty sure he's going to go for it. It's very clear that he knows what the stakes are for the country right now.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:20 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Fred sounds substantive -- impressive even. Something
bothers me, though.
Look at his face. Those bags under his eyes and the shape
of the end of his nose.
I only know of one way to acquire features like those.
-B
Posted by: Bob at May 08, 2007 02:54 PM (aTv/9)
2
That's funny because I never trust a man from Tennessee whose face doesn't carry the evidence of a long, torrid, passionate love affair with that essential elixir of life--fine sipping whiskey. . .
Posted by: Darrell at May 08, 2007 07:55 PM (awYgw)
3
How funny that you should say that. I was thinking that he looked like he was getting older, but in the good way--the way that women still can't get by with.
I think as he spoke I had some sort of flashback to watching Barnaby Jones, and seeing Buddy Ebsen narrow those well-lined eyes. There's tremendous cleverness and an indominable will behind them.
Not to mention the folksiness of FRED! explaining, "this isn't my first time at the rodeo."
He has that fluentness that people utterly despised in Reagan--right up to the moment of voting for him.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 09, 2007 12:12 AM (2WBcM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 05, 2007
"If They Provided Sex, They Were Breaking the Rules."
Of course, if a lot of the most popular escorts were
ladies in their 50s, that certainly lends credence to Jeane Palfrey's claim. Naturally, I'll still be Arizona-hot in five years, but I'm the exception.
Will someone remind me why prostitution isn't legal in 49 of the 50 states? Isn't there a lot of effort being expended on this that could go to fighting terrorism, or fostering small businesses, or achieving energy independence, or . . . practically anything else?
Body count before the scandal: zero. Body count after the story broke: 1.
Perhaps D.C. law enforcement needs a hobby, like knitting.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
06:00 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
1
50-something escorts are entitled to a sex life too... Too bad they have to consort with sleazy politicians just because they live in the nation's Capitol. Btw, I have a feeling that these women were exceptions as well.
ABC's dilemma. . .How to increase that body count of Republicans while shielding all the Democrats on that list.
Why 49? Only one county in Nevada allows it now. And Las Vegas isn't in it.
Posted by: Darrell at May 05, 2007 08:18 PM (KUoQL)
2
"most popular escorts were ladies in their 50s"
I've read that part a half-dozen times, still doesn't make sense. Somehow those words just don't seem to go together.
As to why prostitution is legal, regulated and taxed, if our government's laws made sense, we'd have a border fence, a FairTax and a redoubling of the troop surge with all Senators and members of Congress declaring "Victory!" So, in a way, it's perfectly consistent that it's illegal. Oh, that and the whole morality thing.
Posted by: Don at May 05, 2007 08:18 PM (H3z07)
3
...and when I say "why prostitution is legal" I, of course, mean "why prostitution isn't legal."
Posted by: Don at May 05, 2007 08:20 PM (H3z07)
4
My hypothesis was that a man might want to be seen in public with a classy lady, a woman of substance, education and breeding. And that this might or might not be the sort of woman he'd want to hit.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 05, 2007 08:36 PM (2WBcM)
5
Like Sigourney Weaver as the PhD Economist/escort in London, Dr. Lauren Slaughter, in "Half Moon Street". And that's exactly the woman we'd like to hit.
I went out with an escort once where sex wasn't part of the equation. She spoke six languages and had just returned to Canada after modeling for fifteen years in Europe. Six-feet tall, haute couture, charm, intellegence and wit, The perfect guest for a professional society dinner dance. No one guessed she was an escort, as if that mattered.
Posted by: Darrell at May 06, 2007 07:27 AM (YNWsn)
6
If the function of a date is either: 1) to make good conversation and be funny/entertaining, or 2) to make you look good, then good-looking women who might be north of 50 could be awfully good candidates.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 06, 2007 08:33 PM (2WBcM)
7
The reason prostitution hasn't been legalized in most of the states is the same as the reason that marijuana is still illegal, the income tax is still with us, and the public schools haven't been burnt to the ground: The people who favor these goals are in a minority that cannot overcome the inertia of the status quo.
Posted by: John at May 08, 2007 03:58 PM (l7Glx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
O How I Love the Corn and Miniter Show.
Miniter is back from Iraq, and in his
accustomed seat at Johnnie on the Half Shell. Mixed news from Iraq, to be sure. ("The U.S. Army is the Post Office, with guns." Ouch.)
And Ana Marie Cox shows up as their first guest.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:27 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ugh! I'm glad I only watched the first 30 seconds. Cox is a parasite on the blogosphere. She just sucks, sucks, sucks never giving back.
Posted by: Sean Hackbarth at May 07, 2007 04:28 PM (8lL1c)
2
It's okay--she doesn't have many "lines" in that episode.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 07, 2007 09:25 PM (2WBcM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2007
Did the Republicans Have a Debate Thingie, or Something Like That?
Seriously: I've got some business correspondence to catch up on, and lunch with a friend/media contact.
Then I'll be working at Ye Olde Nonprofit into the evening.
So the Political Joy will be back on duty sometime over the weekend.
In the meantime, please check out this site and discuss among yourselves.
I'm all for respecting intellectual property rights, myself, but when royalties go up to the point that an entire industry will be decimated by it—and most of the artists themselves are on the other side of the issue—things appear to have gone sideways in a serious way.
Yes, this entire discussion comes under the heading of "does the mainstream music industry have a death wish?" Perhaps they don't, though: after all, once you've secured a government-enforced monopoly on the main avenue through which new music is desseminated, you've got a chance of survival—by killing the competition.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:38 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
May 03, 2007
It's a PT Cruiser.
A 2002 Limited Edition in beautiful shape, with a sunroof and those way-cool "faux woody" panels on the sides. The only downside: it's an automatic.
In the end, it came down to this car or a year-old white Scion with a trunk considerably smaller than the one on my friend's old non-hatchback Prius—or, approximately the size of my purse. We went with this car so that, should I need to carry people or objects from one place to another, I will be able to. (The seats fold down, the "trunk" is huge, and the vehicle sports a luggage rack.)
I still have to look up the engine specs, but the pickup on this thing is akin to what I get in my husband's V6, so whatever it is, it's good. (Nope. This info isn't in the owner's manual, which may have been written so that it covers base models as well as the souped-up versions of any particular Cruiser.) I'll hop online tonight, and/or call CarMax tomorrow.
Today our new couch is getting delivered, so I must go rearrange the living room furniture. And then it will be time to get together with a girlfriend for dinner.
Therefore: light blogging, as real-life demands continue to cut into my internet time. No rest for the wicked.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
11:30 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sweet! I'll have to "meet" your new baby soon!
Posted by: caltechgirl at May 03, 2007 12:27 PM (r0kgl)
2
I swear I saw a PT Cruiser today with "You can BUY me!" on the windshield and I thought of you. . .
Posted by: Darrell at May 03, 2007 02:02 PM (msb/m)
3
The base and Touring levels came standard with a 150-horsepower, 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine. The GT got a 2.4-liter turbocharged engine, good for 230 hp. There was also a 180-hp version of the turbo engine as an option for the Limited and Touring models. The legend "2.4 Turbo" is printed on the tachometer (there is no boost gauge) and is on the rear gate, in small chrome letters: No need to open the hood.
In the PT Cruiser, accessing trouble codes is particularly easy. Just put the key into the ignition, then push in the odometer reset button while turning the key to RUN. You will first see the car's serial number (the last six digits of the VIN), then fault codes (which now start with the letter P) in the odometer. For a complete list of codes, you can visit ptcruizer.com.
Hidden features abound, and not just in the usual areas of flexible seats, clever storage compartments, and that sort of thing. You'll discover, through a quick read of the manual, that you could shut off the horn-honking that normally accompanies locking the door with the key fob; could shut off the automatic door locks that takes effect when you hit 15 mph; and alter other functions of the Cruiser without visiting a dealer. Another cool feature is the adjustable roof rack, which was a terribly overpriced option. However, it allows you to easily slide the roofrack supports so that, when not in use, it looks like a rear spoiler and not a roofrack. It also makes it more adjustable to carry different size loads.
Posted by: Darrell at May 03, 2007 02:20 PM (msb/m)
4
Yeah--I saw that thing about the "quiet locking" function in the manual last night.
And I discovered that it has a compass.
I still haven't figured out if I'm at 150 or 180--either way, it's well-engineered.
A benefit I hadn't thought of until we bought it: I'm driving from a higher position, and I can see more. Not quite "SUV high," but enough to help visibility for a short girl. Those Saturns ride low.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 03, 2007 10:17 PM (2WBcM)
5
The bill of sale will only confirm the 2.4 thing, but nowhere does the car or the paperwork mention "turbo," so I think it's just the 150 hp--presumably, the CarMax people had it tuned to the nines.
I'm dusting it off at least once a day. Sometimes I dust it, get in, start the engine, and run the windshield wipers front/back.
Occasionally I'll go out and rearrange the cargo area, maybe place some extra lint-free cloths in there--or add another CD to the box of 'em I have in the back seat.
I insisted on driving to church today. Because I could.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 06, 2007 08:40 PM (2WBcM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 02, 2007
We Bought a Car Today. Yes, Indeedy.
As Darrell predicted, it was "none of the above."
I'm really quite besotted; I may sleep in it tonight.
Anyone care to hazard a guess?
Posted by: Attila Girl at
10:45 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
1. Another Matrix.
2. Yaris. From Toyota.
3. Subaru Legacy. Turbocharged.
4. Infiniti G35.
5. Busta Rhymes' car.
Posted by: Darrell at May 03, 2007 06:50 AM (dYzdm)
2
abrams tank??? r
eally quite good for city driving-if theres an accident, you keep on rolling!
Posted by: jackie martling at May 03, 2007 07:59 AM (z2S93)
3
I'd like to see an Abrams roll up to your house!
Posted by: caltechgirl at May 03, 2007 08:17 AM (r0kgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
We Might Make a Deal Tomorrow.
We're definitely going used. The more I think about it, the more I want to do it that way. But not private party: I want more guarantees.
Bachelor #1 is a yellow Matrix, with which I'm secretly in love—because he has a sunroof, a tape deck + a CD player, a SIX-speed manual transmission, and a quirky maneuver for getting into reverse (one has to move a certain way, while reciting pagan incantations).
It's un-stealable: say there's a car thief who knows how to drive a stick—despite the fact that it's a dying art. He or she won't know how to get this bad boy onto the road. And it's got plenty of pickup, despite being a souped-up Corolla with a strange, practical Euro-style body.
Od: 35,326
Vintage: 2004
Extras: 4 years or 65,000 left on the extended warranty; tape deck
Even Attila the Hub, who was initially quite put off by the color (inspired, rumor has it, by French's mustard) is starting to warm to the quirky little car. I remind him that he only has to borrow it around three times, so he can get the feel of that funky reverse gear, and then he never has to set foot in it again unless there's an emergency.
Meanwhile, he's seeing more deep-yellow cars all over the highways, and is losing his reservations in that arena. "It's a cheerful color," I remind him. "Without being the kind of cop magnet that most shades of red are."
Bachelor #2 is respectable-looking Honda in a really beautiful light shade of metallic seafoam green. This one doesn't sport a sunroof: it's a grownup-looking car, but it cooks. It's got that Honda maneuverability, and the gears feel nice.
Od: 19K
Vintage: 2003
Extras: It just looks like a sober sort of sedan, in a non-aggressive/pretty color, and yet it maneuvers like a charm. Its another one of these small-but-clever cars, engineered so even tall guys like A the H can ride in comfort. Therefore, I could take him out to dinner without borrowing his car to do it. (Always a nice perk in the marital arena. When it's his birthday, I like to do the driving.)
Bachelor #3 is another Honda Civic, but of the hatchback variety they don't even make any more. He was a sweet ride. His bad habits: two doors (not counting the hatchback), and a rearview mirror that sucked, making daytime look like nighttime. But he might be available for less than his brother four-door Civic, and he like to rock and roll. For me the dealbreaker is that dim rear-view mirror—except that I know these are available on the aftermarket, and some of them are quite a bit better than the ordinary variety. This one is mounted into the windshield, but still: I'm sure there's a fix, and it probably isn't too expensive.
Besides, I carry a purse: think of all the time I'd save by throwing it into the back seat without having to open a back door! Two doors can be pretty practical, when you think it through.
There are a few aces up our sleeves, as Attila the Hub and I set out to negotiate with these people, and maybe even bring one of these sweethearts home:
1) My car works just fine. We aren't in a hurry.
2) When push comes to shove, I'm willing to drive an automatic, if it means a better deal. But they cannot sell their manual-transmission vehicles to people who don't know how to drive 'em.
3) A the H is using a special account for this purpose, and we put $4,500 less into it than we originally planned. This isn't an accident, or carelessness: it's because we knew that once I'd fallen for a couple of used cars, that would get us into a more appropriate price range for the models we were considering.
And I'm me: once my driveability buttons have been pushed, I'd prefer to spend the extra money fixing up our house. I want reliability, and a bit of a speed buzz. After that, who cares? I want to ditch the wallpaper, and paint this palace.
4) We are willing to walk. Not in a dramatic way, but if we aren't happy with a deal on offer, we will saunter off. After all, there are other sweet, sporty abandoned cars with stick shifts that are available for adoption all over the city. We are ready to deal—but not committed.
So if anyone's ready to buy a used car from an actual used-car lot, it's us. We are wearing our financial armor, and yet we carry the loudly beating heart of a passionate wife who has a deep need for speed.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
02:17 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 797 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The MoP and I have been really happy dealing with Enterprise Rental's car sales (http://www.enterprisecarsales(dot)com/carsales/home.do), and my daughter is quite happy with CarMax (http://carmax.com/).
You can preview cars on the web from both companies.
And, no, we have no interest in either company, except as occasional customers.
Posted by: leelu at May 02, 2007 10:53 AM (KFuCy)
2
Let's see. . .
All signs point to Bachelor No. 1.
Guess that means you will go with the unmentioned 5th choice. Women!!!!
Posted by: Darrell at May 02, 2007 07:48 PM (z6eVF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Possible Explanation
for why males seem so enamoured of
IM-ing their female friends. (Scroll down to the third entry on the page, David Linden's.)
Of course, there is a sort of corollary from high school. Those of us who were female and cute and brilliant and not computer jocks would often call our male friends for emotional support, understanding, and practical advice. As time wore on, it became more and more difficult to ignore the sound of the keyboard tapping that accompanied these conversations . . . fucking computer programmers. Fucking guys.
But, you know. We needed the eggs.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
01:23 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
123kb generated in CPU 0.3049, elapsed 0.4148 seconds.
222 queries taking 0.3645 seconds, 575 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.