October 21, 2007
Over at Ace's digs, Drew calls this a "nice little pickup for the GOP, heading into '08." Yup: I think the Democrats who are banking on Bush's low poll numbers haven't been looking at the Congressional polling data. They could be in for a bit of a surprise.
Notice I didn't use the word Reconstruction in this blog entry. Oops.
Are Indians really "nonwhite"? I mean, by people other than those who call Arabs, "Hispanics," and Jews "nonwhite"? Just curious. I mean, I was raised on the 1962 edition of the Encyclopedia Brittanica, which posited three actual races (in the larger sense, not the Yeatsian "the Irish are a race" sense). That always led me to believe that anyone without classical Asian or African features was some variation on the Caucasian theme.
Not that it matters to me: I'm the ultimate mongrol, and Asia is the only continent that I don't think is reflected in my racial makeup (unless one buys the land-bridge theory, and regards Native Americans as Asian: I do have a spot of Osage in me—and, I have always romantically hoped, a bit of Nez-Perce).
The whole race idea is soooo 18th/19th/20th Century.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
09:28 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 227 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: leanne at October 21, 2007 10:03 AM (Q+cRY)
Posted by: John at October 21, 2007 12:14 PM (PWu8+)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at October 21, 2007 02:51 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Darrell at October 21, 2007 07:46 PM (2E4R3)
209 queries taking 0.1489 seconds, 461 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.