February 27, 2008
More on Ayers and Dohrn
At Belmont Club.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Now as to why reputable academic institutions should employ the likes of Ayers and Dohrn the answer is equally simple: solidarity. It's a solidarity that exists not only in the present but goes back through history. To observe that Adolf Hitler is reviled while Josef Stalin is still held in high regard by [the] Left may be seen by Goldberg as a contradiction. It is no such thing. It's just a fact. The Left isn't stupid. It's just on the other side.
Posted by: Attila Girl at
12:54 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who is it that holds Stalin in "high regard"? Nobody comes to mind and I've met quite a few liberal academics in my day.
Some hold Karl Marx in high regard and even some of the ideals of Communism but who is it that approves of Stalinism?
Posted by: James Joyner at February 27, 2008 04:40 AM (njLzG)
2
The phrase "high regard" may represent overstatement—except, perhaps, as regards one of my ex-boyfriends who is an unrepentant Stalinist—but there certainly is a double standard WRT Stalin vs. Hitler among my lefty friends (many of whom are academicians): for Hitler, it is understood, no apologies can be made. Stalin, on the other hand, meant well, and accomplished so much. He just got carried away.
"No one is really evil," one friend earnestly remarks.
"How about Hitler and Stalin?" I ask.
"Stalin, no. Hitler, yes."
And the very fact that the ideals of Marxism are still held up as worthy goals says a lot: do people say similar things about the "good" aspects of National Socia-iism?
Posted by: Attila Girl at February 27, 2008 09:45 AM (ROU8v)
24kb generated in CPU 4.8078, elapsed 5.5512 seconds.
209 queries taking 5.5091 seconds, 459 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
209 queries taking 5.5091 seconds, 459 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.