August 20, 2005

Evan Coyne Maloney

. . . might become, for the New York Times, what Patterico is to the Los Angeles Times. (Though perhaps not as intensely: it would be difficult to match Patterico's frequency of slapdowns.)

And this could be lovely to watch. (Not to mention the fun I'll have forwarding these tidbits to my father, who maintains that I'm not "literate" because I don't read the NYT. I'm afraid his years on the East Coast warped his brain.)

At any rate, it's Maloney's takedown is sweet; check it out.


(Via Goldstein.)

Posted by: Attila at 12:08 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I get the sense that the NYT is every bit as bad as the LAT, if not worse. I just don't read it consistently every single day the way I do the LAT, otherwise I'd probably go nuts over the NYT in the same way. FWIW, Mickey Kaus says Krugman didn't get it wrong.

Posted by: Patterico at August 20, 2005 02:01 PM (qm0bN)

2 Interesting. I'll have to go back to the original and take a look.

Posted by: Attila Girl at August 20, 2005 02:55 PM (Ud5Hh)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.2745, elapsed 0.4014 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.3824 seconds, 459 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.