October 17, 2004
Final Words on Mary Cheney
Ilyka gives us a nice dissenting opinion on the Kerry-Mary flap. Go here, and skip down five paragraphs to the discussion of electoral politics. She thinks it's no big deal, and tells us why. And:
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
I have just one question: Where would the Bush campaign be right now if the Democrats had actually nominated a guy who was any good at this game?
He might be fucked. I do know that if the Dems had nominated Lieberman I would have taken a good, hard look at him and I might have voted for him. And I don't think I'm alone.
Posted by: Attila at
10:46 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Lieberman lost any chance at my vote when he went all liberal during the Florida vote controversy.
I thought Howard Dean made a better candidate than Kerry. I still wouldn't have voted for him, but at least Dean was consistent.
Posted by: Michael at October 18, 2004 06:08 AM (ExF20)
2
Yeah, I thought Lieberman-Kucinich would have been their best ticket...well ok, maybe Kucinich wouldn't have appealed much beyond their left-libertarian base.
But I would have given that ticket serious consideration.
Posted by: Desert Cat at October 18, 2004 10:12 PM (c8BHE)
3
If they'd had the sense to nominate Lieberman, _I_ wouldn't care who won.
And do you know your comment's section doesn't like my blog name, because of "questionable content"
(little deceased critters)
Posted by: Kate at October 22, 2004 03:31 PM (NuS0d)
4
I'll check into that; as you probably know, I'm part of the mu.nu collective, so I'll see if I can get that fixed. I love your alternate blog name, Kate!
Posted by: Attila Girl at October 22, 2004 07:38 PM (SuJa4)
25kb generated in CPU 0.0197, elapsed 0.1288 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1204 seconds, 461 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
209 queries taking 0.1204 seconds, 461 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
