July 27, 2005

Goldstein Throws Facts at Howard Dean

And good luck to him, too:

It was, in fact, the Court’s more liberal members, Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer—coupled with “conservative” Justice Anthony Kennedy—who evidently believe its okay to take and auction off some hardworking steel worker’s blue collar homestead to make way for a big corporate industrial park, the kickback being an increase in tax revenues the local nannystate municipality can put to use funding programs meant to provide that newly homeless steel worker with the “educational skills” he needs to one day own a home of his very own.

At least one liberal friend referred to this as "the Scalia court," demoting Rehnquist, but implying that it must have been those mean Constructionists who wiped out private property with this decision.

Nope. But thanks for your passing concern for individual liberties. Perhaps you'd like to join us the next time the Left starts shooting them down? There are a few words in the Bill of Rights, after all, that haven't yet got crossed out. We could start there.

Posted by: Attila at 01:13 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Doesn't he know the use of facts in a political discussion is unfair. If it wasn't so damn serious I'd laugh at all of this complaining about a conservative ruling where all the conservative justices dissented.

Posted by: tommy at July 27, 2005 08:39 AM (TWHR8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0293, elapsed 0.277 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.2123 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.