1 Or maybe he was just lucky with "Roger and Me." I thought it was funny for a corporate-bashing screed.

2 Sure. We all knew a loser like Michael Moore in high school. Maybe he was even the class smart-ass, the one that would go on and on about Levi Strauss when the teacher called on him to explain gene theory. The one that signed the attendence list for the new-teachers'college-graduate substitute teacher as "Mike Hunt". We all laughed when she called out "Mike Hunt?(no response, laughter) Has anyone seen Mike Hunt?(more laughter and "No, but I'd like to!") Do you know Mike Hunt?" The one that never knew when to quit, accumulating a record number of 'minor' and 'major disciplines' along the way. Good times. So when we saw him in "Roger and Me," we said "good for him!" A lot of us knew the film didn't even try to follow the rules of a classic documentary, much less consider any rules regarding fairness or accuracy--if there were ever any. It was just "good for him!" A loser makes good. Little did we know there would be other films and other schlock-u-mentary makers.. And that all the media would swing so far Left that there wouldn't be any widely-heard voices to point out the inaccuracies--the lies, half-truths, and distortions--until the internet came along. Maybe Oprah would like to do a one-sided show about that? No Oprah, not one with all Lefties telling us that they see no problem with bias in the media:You've done those already.