May 28, 2005
I Loved Erica Jong's Books
. . . when I was a teenager. She's a good fiction writer. But she may not belong in the blogging world. You decide: here's a post she wrote in Huffington's blog regarding the preservation of embryos, and here's a response to that by Eugene Volokh, exposing the weaknesses in her argument.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Posted by: Attila at
03:28 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I second Mr. Volokh and seem to see some illustrations in Aristotle's Logical Fallacies of Irrelevant Conclusion.
Begging The Question: (Pre-supposes the conclusion)
"The political question here is obvious." Ie. BUSH said it - it's wrong.
(And I do think he's wrong on this.)
Non-sequitur: Blastocytes are dying because BUSH won't adopt them.
Fear: BUSH!
Ad Hominum: BUSH!
It is as if I were to argue the PETA plans an all-out campaign for the rights of bacteria and viruses.
Oh, wait...
Posted by: Mr.Kurtz at May 28, 2005 06:25 PM (kbXbz)
23kb generated in CPU 0.0204, elapsed 0.1552 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1454 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
209 queries taking 0.1454 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
