April 23, 2008

Playboy Contains Porn?

Are you sure?


If the target were Hustler, I wouldn't be too upset: after all, it's kind of a degrading magazine, and it makes sex/the human body look gross and ugly. But Playboy and Penthouse? Get real.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 10:04 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Oh good! I can put this where it belongs. Playboy=porn? Heavens no! A ban makes as much sense as them banning me from sending free cigarettes to people fighting in combat.(It happened, even though I got around it for a time.) I wish legislators could realize that people under fire have other concerns. I do wish that Playboy could see the beauty in women without D-cup breasts. Present beauty excepted, of course. Sure they have them--a few 'tokens' just a few times per year--but still. Doesn't Christie have any say? Or would she exclude herself from her own magazine? Time to open our eyes and take in all the beauty given to us in this world!

Posted by: Darrell at April 23, 2008 02:02 PM (itfSb)

2 Someone sometime recently posted a link to an archive of Playboy centerfolds dating back to the beginning of the magazine's publication. I tell you, there was more variety in the early issues, before they settled on the "Playboy Look". And heavens to betsy, women actually had *pubic hair* once upon a time. What a loss...

Posted by: Desert Cat at April 23, 2008 09:36 PM (DIr0W)

3 Hm. There has to be a way around this. (1) Have you tried the Victoria's Secret catalog? I know it might leave a bit to be desired, but it has a charm all its own. (2) Perhaps some of the mags devoted to very young ladies? I know they have gross titles--*Barely Legal* and the like--but I imagine they would be less geared toward the voluptuous. I haven't looked at a skin mag in a while (1999 or so?). I must say, I'm surprised that boobies are back. [It could be that I was once young/insecure, and in point of fact boobies never actually left.]

Posted by: Attila Girl at April 23, 2008 09:38 PM (Hgnbj)

4 One more suggestion for D: how about mags devoted to Asian women? That might help. D.C.--so they've totally nuked the hair? What a pity; a nice "treasure trail" looks great on either sex. Nothing wrong with a trim here and there, but the shaving thing has gone way too far.

Posted by: Attila Girl at April 23, 2008 09:40 PM (Hgnbj)

5 If it's trimmed enough so it doesn't look like she's got a wiry-haired midget squeezed between her thighs, that is good. But the "Hitler look", the "landing strip", and the completely bald look are just...wrong to me.

Posted by: Desert Cat at April 24, 2008 04:53 PM (B2X7i)

6 How about if the hair is shaved around/arranged into a tasteful heart shape?

Posted by: Attila Girl at April 24, 2008 10:43 PM (Hgnbj)

7 Hey, that's cute. You don't see that very often though.

Posted by: Desert Cat at April 25, 2008 11:49 AM (DIr0W)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
26kb generated in CPU 0.0494, elapsed 0.1733 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1514 seconds, 464 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.